Padraig Nally is attacked again!

jimgoose

end of the road wrote: »

its nally's fault for murdering him in cold blood rather then leaving it after the first shot

He was a frightened old man who had the wherewithal to destroy a mad dog that was attacking him. He was lucky. Plenty like him are not.

SEPT 23 1989

end of the road wrote: »

because it would cost to much and would take up to much time. its not worth the bother. CAB will get what they can get to but that isn't much.

plenty of time for revenue and CAB(if its warranted) to hound the rest of the country if they step out of line

what makes these people so special?

end of the road

cerastes wrote: »

If there was more of that, then there might be less threat of the crimes happening

wrong. it doesn't work. murdering people doesn't deterr crime

catallus

Maybe we should bring in the death penalty

Yiikes

end of the road wrote: »

its nally's fault for murdering him in cold blood rather then leaving it after the first shot

Murder? That's slander of Nally's charachter. The court ruled what he did as justifiable, legal and not murder.

Nally is a great man. He should be given his gun license back.

Sociopath2

end of the road wrote: »

wrong. it doesn't work. murdering people doesn't deterr crime

Not murder. Care to provide a link to where he was convicted of murder like I asked?

Justifiable homicide is more like it:

justifiable homicide

n. a killing without evil or criminal intent, for which there can be no blame, such as self-defense to protect oneself or to protect another, or the shooting by a law enforcement officer in fulfilling his/her duties.

end of the road

Sonderkommando wrote: »

He shot a piece of filth who terrorised him, brought his son to help him and had close to 100 convictions for violence and robbery.

doesn't matter what the man was or wasn't. he was murdered in cold blood, nally "finished the job" out of revenge

jmayo

whupdedo wrote: »

When End of the road posts in any thread its the equivalent of giving a semi literate chimpanzee, whos parents were brother and sister, a lap top

I do think you are rather unfair on chimpanzees.

The thing I have noticed with end of road is the rinse and repeat metholodgy of their posting.

I keeping thinking of a y-front clad duracel bunny in a dimly lit bedrom typing away furously oblivious to the world.

mikom

SEPT 23 1989 wrote: »

plenty of time for revenue and CAB(if its warranted) to hound the rest of the country if they step out of line

what makes these people so special?

You'll never see a TV licence inspector in a halting site.

end of the road

cerastes wrote: »

not for the first time has someone been put away by the state for being on the receiving end of crime, when they pursued the criminal.

because they broke the law. and behaved like a wild animal themselves

Aidric

mikom wrote: »

You'll never see a TV licence inspector in a halting site.

Or a revenue inspector.

end of the road

SeanW wrote: »

Ward was a scumbag who clearly demonstrated that he had no place in civilised society. No loss.

Nally had been living in terror, sleeping in his shed for (perfectly justified) fear of scumbags like Ward. He also feared (legitimately I think) that Ward would come back for him, in any case, Nally would have been on an adrenaline rush during the incident, that due to its nature could not have been avoided.

By allowing a piece of scum with 80 convictions out to rob and terrorise potentially vulnerable people at will, the law failed Paraic Nally, as it does all of us on a routine basis by allowing incorrigible vermin to go through the justice system on a revolving door basis.

P.N. should never have been put in the position he was. A civilised society demands better.

nally would be no loss either. he is just as much vermin as ward

Sociopath2

end of the road wrote: »

because they broke the law. and behaved like a wild animal themselves

You're just going to have to accept that in certain circumstances homeowners and police officers have the right to kill dangerous criminals like Ward.

mikom

end of the road wrote: »

nally would be no loss either. he is just as much vermin as ward

He's a terror alright.........
I heard he got two penalty points on his licence since killing Ward.
Course he was speeding through gilmartin road in Tuam at the time.......

Sociopath2

mikom wrote: »

He's a terror alright.........
I heard he got two penalty points on his licence since killing Ward.
Course he was speeding through gilmartin road in Tuam at the time.......

I heard he doesn't have a TV licence.

mikom

Sociopath2 wrote: »

I heard he doesn't have a TV licence.

Charlie bird lent him his.

DoYouEvenLift

When will it be mine turn for one of these people to enter my property!

end of the road

SeanW wrote: »

Yes, he did.

he didn't. only violent criminals or other dangerous violent individuals would think otherwise.

SeanW wrote: »

There was good reason to fear that Ward would come back.

only in your head. the evidence shows otherwise.

SeanW wrote: »

He is a frightened old man who had been living in his shed because he had been terrorised by roving gangs of scum.

he is a dangerous clearly violent individual. him being old doesn't change that.

SeanW wrote: »

Ward was the feral animal who should have been locked up.

yeah, just like nally. both ferrel animals

SeanW wrote: »

He was cleared because a judge/jury found (with the force of the law of the State) that he'd acted in self-defence.

no, he just got sympathy, and there probably wasn't enough evidence to convict him.

SeanW wrote: »

"thankfully?"
It's because he "hasn't been allowed a gun since" that he's been robbed again, every scumbag in the land knows this man is defenceless now, so he's fair game.

yes thankfully. it is right he isn't allowed a gun. the law is right on this one. its about protecting the public

threeball

end of the road wrote: »

nally would be no loss either. he is just as much vermin as ward

I'd wager most would rate him higher than they do you.

DoYouEvenLift

end of the road wrote: »

he didn't. only violent criminals or other dangerous violent individuals would think otherwise.



only in your head. the evidence shows otherwise.



he is a dangerous clearly violent individual. him being old doesn't change that.



yeah, just like nally. both ferrel animals



no, he just got sympathy, and there probably wasn't enough evidence to convict him.



yes thankfully. it is right he isn't allowed a gun. the law is right on this one. its about protecting the public

Lol

Bruthal

floggg wrote: »

Yes, it must have been very hard for him standing over a wounded and man and shooting him dead.

If all the rest of the scum of the country were stood over and shot, it would be a far better place.

end of the road

Sociopath2 wrote: »

They did have legitimacy, the courts have affirmed that. So his justifiable homicide actions were perfectly entitled to be taken.

Nally is a man without a criminal record that has the support of the vast majority of the country.

A career criminal with 80+ convictions is dead, justifiably according to the state and won't be missed.

You can stamp your feet and throw your toys out of the pram but that won't change.

You've become amusing at this stage, please continue.

he's murdering actions were not justified. you have no evidence to say he has the support of the vast or any majority of the country. we do know anti-traveler types or other questionable types support him, but thats all. the state has not said a criminal is justifiably dead as the state does not have capital punishment

humanji

MOD: end of the road, don't post in the thread again. You don't get to decide who is a criminal and who isn't, so don't claim people are guilty of crimes that the law says they're innocent of.

end of the road

jimgoose wrote: »

I expect so. They didn't come for it, after observing and no doubt taking copious notes.

or, maybe they didn't take it because they expected he would go to jail, and the fact that the gards were watching nally and if anything happened they would be the first to be suspected.

Bruthal

end of the road wrote: »

he's murdering actions were not justified. you have no evidence to say he has the support of the vast or any majority of the country. we do know anti-traveler types or other questionable types support him, but thats all. the state has not said a criminal is justifiably dead as the state does not have capital punishment

Well if your type of opinion is anything to go by, that would suggest that indeed he does have widespread support.

end of the road

jimgoose wrote: »

Correct. Justice as dispensed reflects society's view of the matter, as it is supposed to.

so the short sentences for rapes and murders are reflecting societies view on the matters then. sometimes reflecting the view of society isn't the best thing

Omackeral

end of the road answer the question, who is Padraig Nally a danger to?

h2005

end of the road wrote: »

he didn't. only violent criminals or other dangerous violent individuals would think otherwise.



only in your head. the evidence shows otherwise.



he is a dangerous clearly violent individual. him being old doesn't change that.



yeah, just like nally. both ferrel animals



no, he just got sympathy, and there probably wasn't enough evidence to convict him.



yes thankfully. it is right he isn't allowed a gun. the law is right on this one. its about protecting the public

The evidence shows otherwise????
You have no clue about the case really have you? Pretty much like every thread you post in you're spamming this thread with uninformed nonsense.

Bruthal

Omackeral wrote: »

end of the road answer the question, who is Padraig Nally a danger to?

Scum bags hopefully.

DeadHand

end of the road wrote: »

nally would be no loss either. he is just as much vermin as ward

Let's compare Nally to Ward!

No trouble with the Gardai prior to this incident versus 80 criminal convictions, including many for violent crime.

A hard working farmer versus a parasite who lived off the taxpayer, this income supplemented by robbery of the taxpayer.

A gentle, quiet man held in high regard by his community versus a "man" who deliberately, cynically preyed on the weak and elderly.

A man who was terrorised regularly by Traveller gangs versus a man who regularly terrorised the most vulnerable people he could find.

A week after the Nally incident an elderly farmer was found dead in his driveway after a criminal raid on his property. Would you feel better had Nally submitted to this fate inside of rightfully defending himself and his property?

Everyone in Nally's community, like the vast majority of people in this country, supported him, admired him and sympathised with him. Everyone in the country besides some in the Travelling community and some of our more smug, insulated leftists saw Ward for exactly what he was- a scumbag.

The only vermin I'm seeing here is the one that invaded an honest man's property that day with the intention of doing him harm.

mikom

Omackeral wrote: »

who is Padraig Nally a danger to?

A plate of boiled spuds, bacon and cabbage.

end of the road

Terrlock wrote: »

I do Not Judge McNally for the way he killed ward. Yes he reloaded his gun and shot him in the back...this might sound extreme, but I'm sure if anyone else is in that situation, where you have been terrorized and your are full of fear, you know that his guy will be coming back to kill you. considering what his emotional state was what else could he have done?

left it after the first shot which nutralized the threat. you should be judging nally. the way which he murdered ward was just that, murder, violent and dangerous.

Terrlock wrote: »

Unfortunately we live in a state where the Law is on the side of the criminals

no . stop reading the rags

Terrlock wrote: »

wit's no wonder that some people have to take the law into the own hands.

no, they do it because they want fame and respect from certain sections of society

Omackeral

end of the road answer the question, who is Padraig Nally a danger to?

evo2000

He should be given a license to **** this ***** up, if they get killed robbing its there own fault

DeadHand

end of the road wrote: »

no, they do it because they want fame and respect from certain sections of society

Nally subjecting himself to living in a shed in constant, terrified alert as part of some scheme to... Win fame and respect?

tomwaterford

Omackeral wrote: »

end of the road answer the question, who is Padraig Nally a danger to?

Trespassers??

evo2000

Omackeral wrote: »

end of the road answer the question, who is Padraig Nally a danger to?

His a danger to theifs and scumbags! they should have given him M4 and a pat on the back instead of bringing him to court!

DoYouEvenLift

end of the road wrote: »

left it after the first shot which nutralized the threat. you should be judging nally. the way which he murdered ward was just that, murder, violent and dangerous.



no . stop reading the rags



no, they do it because they want fame and respect from certain sections of society

Ha! Guess I'm part of that section of society then because not only would I buy him a pint, I would pay for his tab and laugh as he describes how he shot that degenerate.

Bruthal

end of the road wrote: »

left it after the first shot which nutralized the threat. you should be judging nally. the way which he murdered ward was just that, murder, violent and dangerous.

The only thing that neutralized that fella was his demise.

no . stop reading the rags

How else would a fella be on the streets with 80+ convictions??

no, they do it because they want fame and respect from certain sections of society

So if a fella broke into your house, robbed your possessions, and left you and family traumatised, the first thing on your mind would be fame? Quite clueless, aren`t you?

Sociopath2

end of the road wrote: »

he's murdering actions were not justified. you have no evidence to say he has the support of the vast or any majority of the country. we do know anti-traveler types or other questionable types support him, but thats all. the state has not said a criminal is justifiably dead as the state does not have capital punishment

The state has decided a justifiable homicide took place, so he is justifiably dead, the state being the the final arbiter of such matters.

nagel

just to let "end of the road " know that I think Nally was right
also look at what he saved the state a good deed

I do wonder sometimes if some boardsies are actually posting from secure facilities.

Mal-Adjusted

Lads, how many convictions did Frog have? I don't think it's been brought up yet?

Bruthal

Mal-Adjusted wrote: »

Lads, how many convictions did Frog have? I don't think it's been brought up yet?

I think it was usually stated that it was a string of 80 convictions at the time of his end.

Jamsiek

end of the road wrote: »

the murdering actions of nally who is a danger to society and who should be in a secure facility where he can't be a danger did not serve the "greater good" but the satisfaction of those who have a hatred of travelers and other minority groups

Has Mr Nally harmed one other person besides that scumbag Ward? No!
So he is not a danger to the public. Nobody here agrees with you

Rezident

I am glad that somebody did something against the epidemic of burglaries and robberies. We finally just bought a house in December and someone tried to break in two weeks ago. Someone tried to break into our next door neighbour's at 6am on Sunday and according to the guards a gang has carried out a spate of robberies in the area recently. Only a matter of time before they come back, maybe I will have forgotten to turn the alarm on next time. Maybe I'll be here next time. What am I supposed to do? Just let them away with it? Not a chance.

By removing one of these animals Nally made the world a better place. A lot done, more to do.

Roquentin

Mal-Adjusted wrote: »

Lads, how many convictions did Frog have? I don't think it's been brought up yet?

he had 80 convictions and its been stated about 80 times:pac:

Roger Hassenforder

Nally's a hero.

ygolometsipe

Buzz Meeks wrote: »

... if his gun license was taken off him it could be seen to imply he did something wrong....

That's pretty much the conclusion I can see.
It is unimaginable unfair (should be illegal) to get a non-guilty verdict and then be treated as guilty in any way at all.

You are correct in that it is almost entirely at the whim of the Gardai.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gun_politics_in_Ireland

I thought this was interesting

"Self-defence and the defence of property do not constitute a good reason when applying for a firearms certificate. Applications made for firearms certificates for such reasons will be refused.[5]"

I am not sure if I agree with this at all. He should have the right to defend himself.

The entire firearms law = FUBAR

I love this part, you must be of "temperate habits"

The Ayatolla

Anyone else hoping he finishes off a few more?

Legend.