Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Are topics like Multiverses outside of Science?

Options
  • 28-01-2015 3:06pm
    #1
    Registered Users Posts: 18,446 ✭✭✭✭


    As far as I understand , science requires evidence and or experiments before you move on. If one comes across topics like a multiverse which have no evidence or scientific way of looking at the subject is there enough distinction made between such topic and maybe something like black holes which may have various theories but at least there are hung on something with some data and maybe more data will come in as technology improves?

    are there any other topic that fall into this category? Wormholes (just guessing here) for instance? Time travel into ones past etc. any others?

    A belief in gender identity involves a level of faith as there is nothing tangible to prove its existence which, as something divorced from the physical body, is similar to the idea of a soul. - Colette Colfer



Comments

  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,948 ✭✭✭gizmo555


    Short but interesting article on this exact topic here:

    http://www.npr.org/blogs/13.7/2015/01/27/381809832/the-most-dangerous-ideas-in-science

    Cosmology is the study of the universe as a whole: its structure, its origins and its fate. Fundamental physics is the study of reality's bedrock entities and their interactions. With these job descriptions it's no surprise that cosmology and fundamental physics share a lot of territory. You can't understand how the universe evolves after the Big Bang (a cosmology question) without understanding how matter, energy, space and time interact (a fundamental physics question). Recently, however, something remarkable has been happening in both these fields that's raising hackles with some scientists. As physicists George Ellis and Joseph Silk recently put it in "Nature":

    "This year, debates in physics circles took a worrying turn. Faced with difficulties in applying fundamental theories to the observed Universe, some researchers called for a change in how theoretical physics is done. They began to argue — explicitly — that if a theory is sufficiently elegant and explanatory, it need not be tested experimentally, breaking with centuries of philosophical tradition of defining scientific knowledge as empirical."


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 150 ✭✭_Jumper_




  • Registered Users Posts: 18,446 ✭✭✭✭silverharp


    gizmo555 wrote: »
    Short but interesting article on this exact topic here:.....

    thanks that was the kind of article I was looking for

    A belief in gender identity involves a level of faith as there is nothing tangible to prove its existence which, as something divorced from the physical body, is similar to the idea of a soul. - Colette Colfer



Advertisement