Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

XB1 Season 1 Off Season Schedule

13»

Comments

  • #102
    Nelbert
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,341 ✭✭✭Nelbert


    adrian522 wrote: »
    surely you can't sing a FA and trade him straight a away?

    Are we doing a 1 FA pickup per gameweek after the draft?

    I'm not saying I will. It would have to be the right offer to do it! His contract is so favourable for me!
    My bigger need is in another area, if the offer was right why wouldn't I take it?
    Highly unusual but if mods consider him untradeable that's ok.

    It's a pure want vs need thing. Do I want another top drawer WR? Hell yes! Do I need one? No. Do I need a top drawer DT? Hell yes, do I have one no.

    Still can't believe he accepted the offer!


  • #103
    Rock Lesnar
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,882 ✭✭✭✭Rock Lesnar


    PADRAIC.M wrote: »
    Just curious what Eagles pay for Murray ?

    We didnt


  • #104
    PADRAIC.M
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,189 ✭✭✭PADRAIC.M


    Just assumed you got him! Ha must be gone to raiders


  • #105
    Rock Lesnar
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,882 ✭✭✭✭Rock Lesnar


    PADRAIC.M wrote: »
    Just assumed you got him! Ha must be gone to raiders

    Lions got him 4 years 42m


  • #106
    PerrinV2
    Moderators, Computer Games Moderators Posts: 6,335 Mod ✭✭✭✭PerrinV2


    Nelbert wrote: »
    Just to clarify what the first post says. Up to 6 years and bonus can be at most equal to salary on the offer screen (to make the deal 50/50 if you want, although I don't like giving up cap irrecovable (via cutting) cap space!)???
    Wasn't sure if this was a question or statement so just left it lol
    Nelbert wrote: »
    I'm not saying I will. It would have to be the right offer to do it! His contract is so favourable for me!
    My bigger need is in another area, if the offer was right why wouldn't I take it?
    Highly unusual but if mods consider him untradeable that's ok.

    It's a pure want vs need thing. Do I want another top drawer WR? Hell yes! Do I need one? No. Do I need a top drawer DT? Hell yes, do I have one no.

    Still can't believe he accepted the offer!
    Whilst there's no specific rule about trading a player just after you signed him in FA,by allowing it,it does open it up potiential to take advantage of the FA system especially this season with extension to 6 year contracts imo.
    Like for example someone with a high cap space could sign up a player on a high salary,offer little to signing bonus(so no penalty for the trade) on a 6 year deal to use purely as a bargaining/trade tool.
    Even if no human trade partner could be found, with cpu trading on they would most likely be able to get a pick for them.

    It's kinda been an unwritten rule,I know cause something similiar happened to be with a player in the post season FA pool,although that was down to me changing scheme and deciding I didn't want him,did have the option to release,kept him in the end for the season though.


  • #107
    Nelbert
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,341 ✭✭✭Nelbert


    PerrinV2 wrote: »
    Wasn't sure if this was a question or statement so just left it lol


    Whilst there's no specific rule about trading a player just after you signed him in FA,by allowing it,it does open it up potiential to take advantage of the FA system especially this season with extension to 6 year contracts imo.
    Like for example someone with a high cap space could sign up a player on a high salary,offer little to signing bonus(so no penalty for the trade) on a 6 year deal to use purely as a bargaining/trade tool.
    Even if no human trade partner could be found, with cpu trading on they would most likely be able to get a pick for them.

    It's kinda been an unwritten rule,I know cause something similiar happened to be with a player in the post season FA pool,although that was down to me changing scheme and deciding I didn't want him,did have the option to release,kept him in the end for the season though.

    No problem. Honestly his salary makes me look at my other WRs as trade bait or cuttable but the salary I got him on would also be attractive to someone who wanted to trade me for him.
    I'll likely keep him just to annoy the lions likely completely rebuilt secondary.....


  • #108
    PerrinV2
    Moderators, Computer Games Moderators Posts: 6,335 Mod ✭✭✭✭PerrinV2


    Added some more information on draft and Free Agency Post Draft
    Nelbert wrote: »
    No problem. Honestly his salary makes me look at my other WRs as trade bait or cuttable but the salary I got him on would also be attractive to someone who wanted to trade me for him.
    I'll likely keep him just to annoy the lions likely completely rebuilt secondary.....
    Ya if there was higher numbers in the league then its something that could be looked at,as with more numbers most likely there would have been better competition which would probably involve signing bonus's so cap penalties would come into play but with the cpu involved there likely not to bid on a player in FA and then give up a pick for him after,abit unpredictable like :pac:

    Anyway its usually the norm to keep a guy signed from FA on your roster for 1 season before trading him unless released of course.


Advertisement