Eastenders [News, Spoilers and Discussion - from Feb 2015]

Galwayguy35

Pam seems to be taking it worse that Les wears a skirt than when she thought he was having an affair.

Although neither is a pleasant thought I suppose.

JP Liz V1

I don't think Ronnie wants baby Matthew at all

Summer wind

Well you see she does have the full time job of being Roxie's SISTER.

Riddle101

So are we ever going to find out what happened to Charlie Cotton? He just disappears and is forgotten about, and maybe presumed dead. I'm guessing he's still alive though, and he'll probably make a surprise return somewhere down the line. Maybe Vincent made a deal with him something without Ronnie's knowledge, and they're actually working together. But I only say that because someone said Vincent might be an undercover cop, and if the theory holds true maybe they are working together. Then again, even if he isn't a cop he still might be working with Charlie. But as we all know by now, whenever something happens off screen, there's never a certainty that we've gotten the full story, E.G Kathy Beale and Den Watt's deaths.

pmasterson95

Galwayguy35 wrote: »

Pam seems to be taking it worse that Les wears a skirt than when she thought he was having an affair.

Although neither is a pleasant thought I suppose.

An affair is at least normal tbh. Nice to see Eastenders had the balls to have Pam react realistically even though the storyline is pandering.

The Talking Bread

Riddle101 wrote: »

So are we ever going to find out what happened to Charlie Cotton? He just disappears and is forgotten about, and maybe presumed dead. I'm guessing he's still alive though, and he'll probably make a surprise return somewhere down the line. Maybe Vincent made a deal with him something without Ronnie's knowledge, and they're actually working together. But I only say that because someone said Vincent might be an undercover cop, and if the theory holds true maybe they are working together. Then again, even if he isn't a cop he still might be working with Charlie. But as we all know by now, whenever something happens off screen, there's never a certainty that we've gotten the full story, E.G Kathy Beale and Den Watt's deaths.

You were given the whole story re Den and Kathy. They were 100 % meant to be dead. Later Producers on the show just changed this. It wasn't a secret.

Stacy Key plot will be revisited

JP Liz V1

Deleted User wrote: »

Stacy Key plot will be revisited

I think Brian has other kids or family and the trans character is related to Stacey

Galwayguy35

JP Liz V1 wrote: »

I think Brian has other kids or family and the trans character is related to Stacey

Who is Brian?

whatismyname

Galwayguy35 wrote: »

Who is Brian?

Stacey's father

whatismyname

whatismyname wrote: »

Stacey's father

I've had the song 'Stacey's Mom' going round my head ever since I posted this

SouthernBelle

whatismyname wrote: »

I've had the song 'Stacey's Mom' going round my head ever since I posted this

Thanks - now I do! :-)

Riddle101

The Talking Bread wrote: »

You were given the whole story re Den and Kathy. They were 100 % meant to be dead. Later Producers on the show just changed this. It wasn't a secret.

Perhaps, but they were killed off screen which gave them a loophole to make out that they faked their deaths. I'm just saying that when things happen off screen, there is never a certainty. Especially with Charlie, who just disappeared and his wallet was found in the rubbish bin. As the saying goes i'll have to see it to believe it.

whatismyname

Why does Les call Pam Birdie?

fin12

whatismyname wrote: »

Why does Les call Pam Birdie?

I dont know, but I think its pretty cute, its probably a nickname he has for her.

The Talking Bread

fin12 wrote: »

I dont know, but I think its pretty cute, its probably a nickname he has for her.

of course its a nickname! what else could it be!

The Talking Bread

Riddle101 wrote: »

Perhaps, but they were killed off screen which gave them a loophole to make out that they faked their deaths. I'm just saying that when things happen off screen, there is never a certainty. Especially with Charlie, who just disappeared and his wallet was found in the rubbish bin. As the saying goes i'll have to see it to believe it.

He was a terrible character. They are well rid.

Riddle101

The Talking Bread wrote: »

He was a terrible character. They are well rid.

Yeah well, i'm just looking for closure. I don't like that it just ended without any mention of it since the wallet was found. I mean if they really wanted him gone, then why didn't they just make his exit with him leaving on the train. Why go to the length of having him return only for him to disappear. Somethings not right there.

The Talking Bread

Riddle101 wrote: »

Yeah well, i'm just looking for closure. I don't like that it just ended without any mention of it since the wallet was found. I mean if they really wanted him gone, then why didn't they just make his exit with him leaving on the train. Why go to the length of having him return only for him to disappear. Somethings not right there.

meh. Im gone beyond caring about a lot of the stories as the truth is most of them are running far too long with no closure. Things like the bloody key, Ryan reappearing, Kats son, Deans comeuppance, who is Vincent really, Denises alcohol problem, Billy and the Lucy photos etc. Im convinced the writers just plant seeds with no definite plan for them and then go back a few months \year later and make them up then. Like the Les story. It went on far too long and most people predicted that he was a crossdresser two months ago so there was no 'wtf' moment for most people.

so if you are looking for closure, your with the wrong programme.

The truth is the actor that played him was definitively axed so whether he is murdered or not we wont see him again.And chances are we will get references by Vincent and Ronnie to the night but no definitive answer.

Galwayguy35

I'm hoping the rumours that Grant is coming back are true.

whatismyname

The Talking Bread wrote: »

of course its a nickname! what else could it be!

I was only asking!

There could have been a reason for the nickname or a backstory given at some point that I missed!

whatismyname

Riddle101 wrote: »

Yeah well, i'm just looking for closure. I don't like that it just ended without any mention of it since the wallet was found. I mean if they really wanted him gone, then why didn't they just make his exit with him leaving on the train. Why go to the length of having him return only for him to disappear. Somethings not right there.

I know someone who knows

http://www.digitalspy.co.uk/soaps/s2/eastenders/news/a672584/eastenders-star-richard-blackwood-i-know-what-happened-to-charlie-cotton.html#~prPugJtFmddwTP

I think it's designed to keep viewers wondering, and will be probably tied up at some point, even if way down the line .

JP Liz V1

Please Kathy shop in Bobby

JP Liz V1

JP Liz V1 wrote: »

Please Kathy shop in Bobby

Bobby will try to kill Kathy I bet

The Talking Bread

She is obviously going in to admit her disappearance to the police. Why would she get her own son and grandson put away???

JP Liz V1

Kathy don't know yet that Max the innocent is Abi and Lauren's father

The Talking Bread

JP Liz V1 wrote: »

Kathy don't know yet that Max the innocent is Abi and Lauren's father

Why wouldnt she. It seems illogical she wouldnt have asked who did it. And it would be silly if they said who it was to her but neglected to mention his "connection" to her grandson and son....... That would just be silly.

JP Liz V1

If Kathy tells Gavin about Bobby he will blackmail Ian for money

fussyonion

The Talking Bread wrote: »

meh. Im gone beyond caring about a lot of the stories as the truth is most of them are running far too long with no closure. Things like the bloody key, Ryan reappearing, Kats son, Deans comeuppance, who is Vincent really, Denises alcohol problem, Billy and the Lucy photos etc. Im convinced the writers just plant seeds with no definite plan for them and then go back a few months \year later and make them up then. Like the Les story. It went on far too long and most people predicted that he was a crossdresser two months ago so there was no 'wtf' moment for most people.

so if you are looking for closure, your with the wrong programme.

The truth is the actor that played him was definitively axed so whether he is murdered or not we wont see him again.And chances are we will get references by Vincent and Ronnie to the night but no definitive answer.

Yes that has annoyed me too.
She was definitely heading down the road to a drink problem what with afternoon wine drinking and such, and now there's no mention of it.
I absolutely love Eastenders but I get frustrated when they don't come back to a story.

Galwayguy35

Deleted User wrote: »

Bobby will try to kill Kathy I bet

Hopefully.

I hope he kills Ian and Jane as well.