Bolton v Liverpool 7.45 4/02/2015 BBC1

OwaynOTT

what happened to Lazar?

101001

efb wrote: »

none

You should've said 'its a replay... Moron!'

Brain fart on my behalf.

efb

looking for contact isn't an offence

LuckyLloyd

I'm having a good condescending laugh at the 'it was a peno' people. Judging you all...negatively.

noodler

Dive for me as well.

Still skrtel could have avoided all this by not sticking the leg out.

Ref has been remarkably one-sided or well...just poor.

Osmosis Jones

Finally we get a call our way

5starpool

Against 10 men now surely we won't lose/

Surely.

klose

Good from allen there

Kirby

Silly foul to give away when you are on a yellow. Silly, silly boy.

Turtyturd

A decision from the ref....f*cking hell.

Lord TSC

Idiotic tackle to make when you've already been booked.

mayordenis

efb wrote: »

looking for contact isn't an offence

Spot on.

Diving when there's no contact though, that's a foul.

livinginkorea

Terrible tackle

googled eyes

Danns red card. Fooking delighted

efb

definite card. must have been showing off

Rayne Wooney

Dive there from Allen

Charlie19

OwaynOTT wrote: »

what happened to Lazar?

He's not able for cold night in Bolton.

murpho999

Red card means more space for Borini to run into. He's really good at that!

LuckyGent88

What a brain dead decision. Most footballers are just headless chickens.

LuckyLloyd

Sound. Relax...we've got this. Get passing, take our time, build the pressure, break them.

citytillidie

Osmosis Jones wrote: »

Finally we get a call our way

Well he could not really let them away with that

SlickRic

efb wrote: »

looking for contact isn't an offence

Falling over with none is.

Charlie19

googled eyes wrote: »

Danns red card. Fooking delighted

That's one scary grin.

Francie Barrett

naughtb4 wrote: »

Its an outrageous dive, I cannot believe Neville hasnt mentioned it more....

Why do you think? :pac:

efb

Kirby wrote: »

Doesn't matter whether he touched him. Doesn't even matter if he kicked him. Did he force him to lose his feet? The answer is nearly always no. Therefore, dive.

his tackle was late

Kirby

mayordenis wrote: »

Spot on.

Diving when there's no contact though, that's a foul.

Diving has nothing to do with contact or whether you have been fouled. You can be poleaxed out of it and still dive like Tom Daley. Going down when you can stay on your feet is simulation.

efb wrote: »

his tackle was late

And? Is you point that it could have been a penalty? It could have been, absolutely. But that isn't relevant to the silly little dive.

efb

late tackle = dangerous play

Turtyturd

OwaynOTT wrote: »

what happened to Lazar?

Flayed.

mada999

murpho999 wrote: »

Red card means more space for Borini to run into. He's really good at that!

not really if they get 9 men behind the ball now

Turtyturd

Borini coming back off?

Gerrard has been a passenger

5starpool

Here comes Sturridge.

On for Sterling perhaps? It'd be very unbalanced otherwise really although I don't want him off.

Junior D

Very soft penalty. I'm watching on a poxy stream here so can't tell if there was any contact (even if it was minimal). I'm not complaining though! Danns is an incredibly stupid at times

Happy Monday

Why is Sturridge not playing people? Why? :eek:

livinginkorea

Here he comes to save the day

efb

Kirby wrote: »

Diving has nothing to do with contact or whether you have been fouled. You can be poleaxed out of it and still dive like Tom Daley. Going down when you can stay on your feet is simulation.

can you prove they could have stayed on their feet?

martyos121

Huge gamble bringing Studge on. If we only score once, he's facing 50 minutes.

murpho999

mada999 wrote: »

not really if they get 9 men behind the ball now

No bother...Borini can command space better than any astronaut!

Osmosis Jones

It's a fcuking dive, if that's Sterling going down he's getting slated by everyone right now. "Magic of the fa cup" my arse

5starpool

Gerrard back to midfield then I guess?

Charlie19

Sterling could've done a hazard there and assaulted a ball boy.

murpho999

martyos121 wrote: »

Huge gamble bringing Studge on. If we only score once, he's facing 40 minutes.

Why is it a gamble?

If he' not fully fit then he wouldn't be on the bench. His only issue is match fitness.

Francie Barrett

Happy Monday wrote: »

Why is Sturridge not playing people? Why? :eek:

Are you not aware of his horrendous injury record?

kingshankly

martyos121 wrote: »

Huge gamble bringing Studge on. If we only score once, he's facing 50 minutes.

Maths isn't your strong point
You edited that you pup

Kirby

efb wrote: »

can you prove they could have stayed on their feet?

Yes. It's called physics.

But it's also called common sense. You can tell when a player has gone down when they didn't need to. Unless ofcourse you choose to be difficult and not see it but that's a choice.

Mr.Crinklewood

Next goal wins

niallo27

efb wrote: »

can you prove they could have stayed on their feet?

It's ok to admit your wrong. We won't judge you.

5starpool

efb wrote: »

can you prove they could have stayed on their feet?

Do we need to apply mathematical concepts to prove this or are you lloking for more Sherlock Holmes type proof?

There was zero contact, the player went down expecting there to be contact. It was not a foul or a penalty. If you are blind or being deliberately obtuse that is your issue.

monkey9

Don't be a pr!ck here Danny, score and celebrate by wiping your arse with a Bolton jersey

Mr Alan

niallo27 wrote: »

It's ok to admit your wrong. We won't judge you.

I already judge him