Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi all! We have been experiencing an issue on site where threads have been missing the latest postings. The platform host Vanilla are working on this issue. A workaround that has been used by some is to navigate back from 1 to 10+ pages to re-sync the thread and this will then show the latest posts. Thanks, Mike.
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Heightism in Soccer

  • 17-02-2015 6:43pm
    #1
    Registered Users Posts: 1,849 ✭✭✭


    Niels Van Quaquebeke and Steffen R. Giessner
    7 September 2012
    Many fouls committed in football are ambiguous and there is no objective way to determine who the “true” perpetrator and who the “true” victim is. Consequently, when actual foul behaviour is not clearly observable, referees must rely on a variety of decision cues, i.e. other aspects that might be indicative of who truly committed the foul (cf. Gigerenzer & Goldstein, 1996; Kahneman, Slovic, & Tversky, 1982).

    In other words, when soccer passions are running high, supporters are likely to object to every foul decision against their team. But they might also have a point. We set out to investigate such decisions in football to see whether people consider the available information in such situations in an unbiased way. Based upon evolutionary and embodiment research (Barsalou, 2008; Niedenthal et al., 2005), which has revealed that people associate the size of others with concepts such as aggression and dominance (e.g., Giessner & Schubert, 2007; Schubert, 2005), we assumed that people are biased, in that they are likely to attribute an ambiguous foul to the taller of two players.

    To put our assumption to a test, we analysed all recorded fouls spanning the last seven seasons of UEFA Champions League (32,142 fouls), last seven seasons of German Bundesliga (85,262 fouls), the last three FIFA World Cups (6,440 fouls) as well as data from two additional perceptual experiments. For all seasons, leagues, and data collection methods, our analyses revealed the same picture: Taller people are more often held accountable for fouls than smaller ones – even if no actual foul was committed. However, just based upon this field data we were unable to ultimately determine whether there is a systematic foul attribution bias against taller players or whether taller players in fact commit more fouls. That is why we conducted two additional perception experiments (with soccer fans) in which we showed two players of different height running towards a ball in the middle of the picture. Here, no actual foul was committed.

    Thus taller players could not actually foul more. We framed these pictures with stories (so called scenarios) and then asked about participants’ foul perceptions. The results clearly show that participants are more inclined to anticipate the taller player to foul the smaller one. Also, if we told them that the taller player would be laying on the ground after the portrayed scene, they post-hoc attributed it to chance or a dive, however, when we told them that the smaller player would lie on the ground, participants post-hoc attributed it to a foul by the taller player. Hence given the field data and the experimental results, we can conclude that people, independent of the objective action that took place, have a tendency to attribute the foul to the taller of two players.

    However, it is not our call how our finding should impact football practice. Indeed, while our finding may bolster the case for using video replay to help soccer officials, we as soccer fans ourselves agree with FIFA president Sepp Blatter that such reviews would slow down the game and take away its human element. A better road to action thus might be to train referees accordingly so that they can consciously counter the height-bias (cf. Plessner et al., 2009). In the end though, screaming your heart out at the referee is maybe just one part of the fun when watching the game – making the football experience much less anaemic than watching other sports. - See more at: http://footballperspectives.org/size-matters-height-discrimination-football#sthash.ZuVN8v5i.dpuf

    Also:
    http://www.soccerbythenumbers.com/2012/07/height-discrimination-in-football-are.html


Comments

  • Closed Accounts Posts: 40,061 ✭✭✭✭Harry Palmr


    Peter Crouch knows such bias. Has often got blown up for a foul that clearly wasn't.


  • Registered Users Posts: 3,478 ✭✭✭ronjo


    Peter Crouch knows such bias. Has often got blown up for a foul that clearly wasn't.

    Jaysus Harry. You read all that?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 38,247 ✭✭✭✭Guy:Incognito


    ronjo wrote: »
    Jaysus Harry. You read all that?

    I didn't, I dropped out after the first couple of lines but I went straight to crouch too.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 53,262 ✭✭✭✭GavRedKing


    I've inserted a few paragraphs, was wrecking my head. :o


Advertisement