Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi all! We have been experiencing an issue on site where threads have been missing the latest postings. The platform host Vanilla are working on this issue. A workaround that has been used by some is to navigate back from 1 to 10+ pages to re-sync the thread and this will then show the latest posts. Thanks, Mike.
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Aer Lingus Fleet/Routes Discussion

1166167169171172195

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,504 ✭✭✭Jack1985


    Locker10a wrote: »
    I thought headphones had to be removed during takeoff/landing but earbud types could be used for all stages other than the demo, I could be wrong here

    That is correct earbuds are fine, larger headphones are the ones not permitted.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,609 ✭✭✭IngazZagni


    It’s vague. AIC NR 19/15 suggests headphones are allowed during taxi, takeoff and landing subject to them not obstructing access to the aisles and exits. So that’s open for debate. Wired headphones connected to the ife could be a hazard. Wireless not so much.

    As for earbuds vs headphones. In 2020 earbuds can have as good noise cancellation as headphones so that point isn’t valid anymore.


  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 4,187 Mod ✭✭✭✭Locker10a


    IngazZagni wrote: »

    As for earbuds vs headphones. In 2020 earbuds can have as good noise cancellation as headphones so that point isn’t valid anymore.

    But earbuds be they noice cancelling or not are much less of a potential projectile


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,172 ✭✭✭✭kmart6


    Locker10a wrote: »
    But earbuds be they noice cancelling or not are much less of a potential projectile
    I think if there is a worry over the possible damage that over the ear headphones could cause if they became projectiles there are probably bigger problems occurring with the flight that would be more concerning.


  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 4,187 Mod ✭✭✭✭Locker10a


    kmart6 wrote: »
    I think if there is a worry over the possible damage that over the ear headphones could cause if they became projectiles there are probably bigger problems occurring with the flight that would be more concerning.

    Well generally speaking the cabin crew conduct a cabin secure for every take off and landing for this reason. Should something go wrong and the aircraft comes to a violent/sudden stop most heavy items are or should be stowed away/secured, so galley equipment latched, laptops away, bags pushed underneath seats etc it’s standard regulation that this is enforced for every takeoff and landing


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 1,252 ✭✭✭kevinandrew


    No sign of EI-LRC returning from Newark yet?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,504 ✭✭✭Jack1985


    On the move now, won’t be in DUB until 15:00 - I would imagine a delay therefor to the 131/130 if it is released back for revenue service by line maintenance.


  • Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators Posts: 9,940 Mod ✭✭✭✭Tenger


    IngazZagni wrote: »
    It’s vague. AIC NR 19/15 suggests headphones are allowed during taxi, takeoff and landing subject to them not obstructing access to the aisles and exits. So that’s open for debate. Wired headphones connected to the ife could be a hazard. Wireless not so much.

    As for earbuds vs headphones. In 2020 earbuds can have as good noise cancellation as headphones so that point isn’t valid anymore.

    I’m guessing EI had to make a call on this point 2-3 years ago and earbuds were allowed. Perhaps they may reassess it in the future, considering the increase in performance of noise cancelling earbuds and the proliferation of Bluetooth enabled wireless headphones.


  • Registered Users Posts: 85 ✭✭Karl8415


    Just wondering if anyone knows how severe is C checks on aircraft, I only ask out of curiosity considering that there was a few 330's sent away to have it done yesterday, are we talking engines and landing gears removed etc


  • Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators Posts: 9,940 Mod ✭✭✭✭Tenger


    Karl8415 wrote: »
    Just wondering if anyone knows how severe is C checks on aircraft, I only ask out of curiosity considering that there was a few 330's sent away to have it done yesterday, are we talking engines and landing gears removed etc

    Severe is a bad term.
    C Check is a yearly airframe check. It's essentially a full body check up of the aircraft. complete
    I don't think the gear is removed for this.
    Engines have their own maintainance cycle anyway.

    D Check is the most in depth check. It's close to stripping apart the aircraft.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,944 ✭✭✭✭LXFlyer


    The annual checks happen every year at this time on the transatlantic fleet, as this is when the schedule has the biggest amount of slack in it.

    Frequency is pared back during January and February.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,235 ✭✭✭✭JCX BXC


    Tenger wrote: »
    .
    D Check is the most in depth check. It's close to stripping as part the aircraft.

    So in depth that many airlines scrap older aircraft once they need another D check.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 940 ✭✭✭Bussywussy


    AFAIK EI don't carry out D Checks because they carry out maintenance at different levels, a C check could be c1 to c9,some C checks are very light and some are very heavy.


  • Registered Users Posts: 6,920 ✭✭✭billy few mates


    How long is a piece of string?
    There's actually no such thing as D checks or even C checks any more, there are just a number of maintenance tasks due at various intervals which you can bunch together and call whatever you like so long as they're done in accordance with the MPD (Maintenance Planning Document).
    If the authorities are happy you can do the tasks split over an extended period one job at a time you won't need to go into the hangar at all so long as everything is done properly.
    On most modern aircraft the engines are 'on condition' meaning you don't have to remove them until something goes wrong with them that can't be repaired 'on wing' but you might have to temporarily remove them for access for something like pylon inspections.
    The landing gear is 'life limited' so typically removed every ten years for overhaul but not normally removed unless you have particular inspections which require them to be temporarily removed for access but again it varies from type to type.
    I've seen C Checks under the old system done in anything from two or three days to two or three months but on average about three weeks to a month depending on type, age, findings etc.
    There's no 'one size fits all' when it comes to aircraft maintenance.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 940 ✭✭✭Bussywussy


    How long is a piece of string?
    There's actually no such thing as D checks or even C checks any more, there are just a number of maintenance tasks due at various intervals which you can bunch together and call whatever you like so long as they're done in accordance with the MPD (Maintenance Planning Document).
    If the authorities are happy you can do the tasks split over an extended period one job at a time you won't need to go into the hangar at all so long as everything is done properly.
    On most modern aircraft the engines are 'on condition' meaning you don't have to remove them until something goes wrong with them that can't be repaired 'on wing' but you might have to temporarily remove them for access for something like pylon inspections.
    The landing gear is 'life limited' so typically removed every ten years for overhaul but not normally removed unless you have particular inspections which require them to be temporarily removed for access but again it varies from type to type.
    I've seen C Checks under the old system done in anything from two or three days to two or three months but on average about three weeks to a month depending on type, age, findings etc.
    There's no 'one size fits all' when it comes to aircraft maintenance.

    EI use Out of phase checks too to capture items that fall out of time from when they extended the C check interval...I think it was BMI British Midland that were one of the first who started phasing their checks


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,611 ✭✭✭California Dreamer


    I think I will just hide out here. There are all sorts of strangers invading our forum talking about air crashes and stuff who I don't know!


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,252 ✭✭✭kevinandrew


    Anyone have an idea when the repaints start again? With quite a few aircraft out for maintenance this month it doesn’t leave much room so I’m guessing February and March?

    Noticed ‘EDY, ‘CVA and ‘RJI all have replacement engine cowlings in white.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,611 ✭✭✭California Dreamer


    Is that nearly 6 weeks for -GEY to be in BOD?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,935 ✭✭✭Van.Bosch


    Anyone have an idea when the repaints start again? With quite a few aircraft out for maintenance this month it doesn’t leave much room so I’m guessing February and March?

    Noticed ‘EDY, ‘CVA and ‘RJI all have replacement engine cowlings in white.

    Would any maintenance facilities also do painting or is that a separate service always? Would have expected GEY to be repainted this winter with the refit etc


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,609 ✭✭✭adam88


    DUB - PHL is cancelled today. PHL - DUB isn’t cancelled so presume LRC will position to PHL from EWR to operate that.

    Big interest in this. What’s the logistics involved in this ??? Get the ewr crew to top to phl and then onto dub??? What happens to the ewr pax ??


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,592 ✭✭✭john boye


    Van.Bosch wrote: »
    Would any maintenance facilities also do painting or is that a separate service always? Would have expected GEY to be repainted this winter with the refit etc

    I think it was said when the new livery was announced that all repaints would be done in Shannon and Dublin. In any case GEY only joined the fleet less than 2 years so is surely not due a repaint.


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,252 ✭✭✭kevinandrew


    Van.Bosch wrote: »
    Would any maintenance facilities also do painting or is that a separate service always? Would have expected GEY to be repainted this winter with the refit etc

    I think it's mostly a separate service.

    I believe Aer Lingus have a contract with IAC for the repaints which have locations in Dublin, Shannon, Rome and Ostrava. The Airbus repaints have so far
    all been done in Dublin or Shannon while the Avro's were done in Rome.

    Scheduling routine maintenance with a repaint probably isn't as easy as it sounds when both services are done by separate companies.


  • Registered Users Posts: 6,920 ✭✭✭billy few mates


    A lot of paint facilities also have their own maintenance facilities or access to a local maintenance organisation to certify the technical element of a re-paint.
    This can include bare metal inspections of the skin after the old paint is removed and just before the repainting begins.
    Also depending on the aircraft type you often have to remove and rebalance some of the flight controls if you repaint them, these can only be done by an engineer who's licensed on type with the proper approvals.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,504 ✭✭✭Jack1985


    GEY now expected back Monday returning as EIN2505 departing Bordeaux 16:00, arriving into Dublin at 16:45. No EIS planned as of yet as it’s subject to change.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 38 Aviation2K16


    Are the re paints expected to start soon? EI990 arrives in Shannon from Dublin in an hour? EI-DVK is on the move in DUB.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,504 ✭✭✭Jack1985


    Are the re paints expected to start soon? EI990 arrives in Shannon from Dublin in an hour? EI-DVK is on the move in DUB.

    Yes. DVK is off to SNN for a repaint.


  • Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators Posts: 9,940 Mod ✭✭✭✭Tenger


    Jack1985 wrote: »
    GEY now expected back Monday returning as EIN2505 departing Bordeaux 16:00, arriving into Dublin at 16:45. No EIS planned as of yet as it’s subject to change.

    Any idea if it got the cabin refitted? It will save another year of threads about the “wrong” interior


  • Registered Users Posts: 85 ✭✭Karl8415


    If it does turn out that GEY has had a refit it must have had a lot of maintenance done also because its gone since late November, either way it can't come back quick enough because EI are currently down 4 wide bodies, EDY-GEY-DAA are in south of France and FNG is out in Abu Dhabi


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,944 ✭✭✭✭LXFlyer


    Karl8415 wrote: »
    If it does turn out that GEY has had a refit it must have had a lot of maintenance done also because its gone since late November, either way it can't come back quick enough because EI are currently down 4 wide bodies, EDY-GEY-DAA are in south of France and FNG is out in Abu Dhabi

    You do realise that the long haul schedule is massively cut back during January and February until just before St Patrick’s Day.

    This time of year has lots of slack built into it.

    Four aircraft undergoing maintenance is nothing unusual.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,080 ✭✭✭EchoIndia


    Tenger wrote: »
    Any idea if it got the cabin refitted? It will save another year of threads about the “wrong” interior


    EI-GEY is receiving "an interior upgrade to Aer Lingus configuration".

    Source: Irish Air Letter magazine, January 2020


  • Registered Users Posts: 85 ✭✭Karl8415


    LXFlyer wrote: »
    You do realise that the long haul schedule is massively cut back during January and February until just before St Patrick’s Day.

    This time of year has lots of slack built into it.

    Four aircraft undergoing maintenance is nothing unusual.
    Thanks for that i did know that the schedule was curtailed January February March but I didn't realise it was back that much to afford 4 been sent out for maintenance, good to know


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,944 ✭✭✭✭LXFlyer


    Karl8415 wrote: »
    Thanks for that i did know that the schedule was curtailed January February March but I didn't realise it was back that much to afford 4 been sent out for maintenance, good to know

    Go and look at the timetable on the Aer Lingus website - you can see that the three routes (JFK, Boston and Chicago) that traditionally have a double daily service get pared back to one daily and one several days a week, while most of the other routes are pared back to three or four times a week with some using the B757/A321LR in place of the A330.

    Shannon-JFK is also suspended until mid-February.

    This allows the major exams to take place across the fleet.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,504 ✭✭✭Jack1985


    Tenger wrote: »
    Any idea if it got the cabin refitted? It will save another year of threads about the “wrong” interior

    Yes, finally. Of course was planned last year but scrapped last moment.


  • Registered Users Posts: 142 ✭✭Lapmo_Dancer


    LXFlyer wrote: »
    Go and look at the timetable on the Aer Lingus website - you can see that the three routes (JFK, Boston and Chicago) that traditionally have a double daily service get pared back to one daily and one several days a week, while most of the other routes are pared back to three or four times a week with some using the B757/A321LR in place of the A330.

    Shannon-JFK is also suspended until mid-February.

    This allows the major exams to take place across the fleet.

    Don’t think DUB-JFK is being curtailed this year. Staying at 2 330s daily.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,944 ✭✭✭✭LXFlyer


    Don’t think DUB-JFK is being curtailed this year. Staying at 2 330s daily.

    There’s some jiggery pokerey with the second JFK flight in February, but yes you’re right.

    The substantive point remains though that as a whole frequency drops substantially.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 409 ✭✭sherology




  • Registered Users Posts: 168 ✭✭EI321


    Exactly how many Avros are flying for Aer Lingus currently? In addition to the two in EI livery, there is at least one in cityjet livery flying DUB to LCY.

    Looks like there are either 4 or 5 still active with cityjet, with EI-RJD, EI-RJF and EI-RJI flying for Aer Lingus and EI-RJU flying for Brussels airlines. Not sure of the status of EI-RJO.

    The remaining few are stored.


  • Registered Users Posts: 377 ✭✭alancostello


    EI321 wrote: »
    Exactly how many Avros are flying for Aer Lingus currently? In addition to the two in EI livery, there is at least one in cityjet livery flying DUB to LCY.

    Looks like there are either 4 or 5 still active with cityjet, with EI-RJD, EI-RJF and EI-RJI flying for Aer Lingus and EI-RJU flying for Brussels airlines. Not sure of the status of EI-RJO.

    The remaining few are stored.

    Four currently in operation (the first four you mentioned) and all for Aer Lingus. EI-RJU is no longer flying for Brussels Airlines and that operation is now all CRJ900s.


  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 4,187 Mod ✭✭✭✭Locker10a


    EI321 wrote: »
    Exactly how many Avros are flying for Aer Lingus currently? In addition to the two in EI livery, there is at least one in cityjet livery flying DUB to LCY.

    Looks like there are either 4 or 5 still active with cityjet, with EI-RJD, EI-RJF and EI-RJI flying for Aer Lingus and EI-RJU flying for Brussels airlines. Not sure of the status of EI-RJO.

    The remaining few are stored.

    I think the schedule requires 2 for the EI LCY stuff


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,935 ✭✭✭Van.Bosch


    Locker10a wrote: »
    I think the schedule requires 2 for the EI LCY stuff

    RJD & RJI are the two in EI livery.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,563 ✭✭✭Noxegon


    EI321 wrote: »
    Looks like there are either 4 or 5 still active with cityjet, with EI-RJD, EI-RJF and EI-RJI flying for Aer Lingus and EI-RJU flying for Brussels airlines. Not sure of the status of EI-RJO.

    The remaining few are stored.

    Most but not all. EI-RJK crashed in Colombia in 2016.

    I develop Superior Solitaire when I'm not procrastinating on boards.ie.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,085 ✭✭✭✭BonnieSituation


    Noxegon wrote: »
    Most but not all. EI-RJK crashed in Colombia in 2016.

    That was the Chapecoense flight eh. Can't believe that was 3 years ago now.

    https://www.boards.ie/vbulletin/showthread.php?t=2057676281


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,611 ✭✭✭California Dreamer


    Saw on the Dublin spotters fb page that they reckoned -EWR was leaving the fleet or possibly -LAX, although if Alpha XRay is owned outright, why get rid of it.


  • Registered Users Posts: 352 ✭✭Shamrockj


    Saw on the Dublin spotters fb page that they reckoned -EWR was leaving the fleet or possibly -LAX, although if Alpha XRay is owned outright, why get rid of it.

    I dont see any 330 leaving the fleet in 2020. The 2 new ones coming allow 14 more round trip flights a week and this summer there is 10 extra frequencies per week


  • Registered Users Posts: 168 ✭✭EI321


    Shamrockj wrote: »
    I dont see any 330 leaving the fleet in 2020. The 2 new ones coming allow 14 more round trip flights a week and this summer there is 10 extra frequencies per week

    I also thought one was to be kept as a spare? Rule of thumb in most large airlines seems to be one spare long haul aircraft for every 15-16 that are active.

    The older ones in the fleet are probably worth around $20m per frame so might be worth keeping for a year or two as spares.


  • Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators Posts: 9,940 Mod ✭✭✭✭Tenger


    Shamrockj wrote: »
    I dont see any 330 leaving the fleet in 2020. The 2 new ones coming allow 14 more round trip flights a week and this summer there is 10 extra frequencies per week

    100% agree here. Rumours of the -200 being replaced dont hold water.
    2 new -300s entering service before Summer.
    With MSP upgraded to A330, MCO going 6 weekly, MIA 3 weekly and SEA going daily they need the current 13 airframes and the 2 new ones.


  • Registered Users Posts: 409 ✭✭sherology


    Tenger wrote: »
    100% agree here. Rumours of the -200 being replaced dont hold water.
    2 new -300s entering service before Summer.
    With MSP upgraded to A330, MCO going 6 weekly, MIA 3 weekly and SEA going daily they need the current 13 airframes and the 2 new ones.

    They would likely have harvested the business class seats and added them to GEY if a frame was leaving... They're not cheap!


  • Users Awaiting Email Confirmation Posts: 63 ✭✭flange888


    I suspect EWR is leaving in due course


  • Registered Users Posts: 404 ✭✭NH2013


    EI-ELA heading for painting shortly, once EI-GEY returns to service.


  • Registered Users Posts: 268 ✭✭cloudhopper19


    EI-EWR will indeed leave the fleet this year.


  • Advertisement
This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement