Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Brock Lesnar: Will he? Won't he?

1356

Comments

  • #62
    rovert
    Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 23,089 ✭✭✭✭rovert


    THE COACH:

    CA5clhhWsAArXkX.jpg


  • #63
    Virtanen
    Closed Accounts Posts: 1,288 ✭✭✭Virtanen


    There's hope for the main event at WM yet


  • #64
    rovert
    Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 23,089 ✭✭✭✭rovert


    Virtanen wrote: »
    There's hope for the main event at WM yet

    Yes this:


  • #65
    JP Liz V1
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 87,302 ✭✭✭✭JP Liz V1


    Must be getting some amount of money
    https://forumofgames.com/




  • #66
    rovert
    Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 23,089 ✭✭✭✭rovert


    JP Liz V1 wrote: »
    Must be getting some amount of money

    1257882_o.gif


  • Advertisement
  • #67
    martyos121
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,455 ✭✭✭✭martyos121


    Interestingly, the odds of 6/4 on him winning with Paddy Power haven't shortened at all. Either they haven't updated the price yet or don't think his re-signing will affect the result. I couldn't resist putting a large bet on for that price, I think this changes everything.


  • #68
    Tugboats
    Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 2,011 ✭✭✭Tugboats


    The Wild Bunch wrote: »
    Delighted

    Hopefully he smashes RR to smithereens

    Terrible idea. A Brock win goes nowhere. It's means he will be standing in the ring with the title with that disinterested look of his as Heyman waffles on every week.

    The best course of action now is Heyman to screw him and side with Reigns. Brock becomes a massive babyface and it also takes care of the Reigns situation. Heyman can claim that Brock left him out of the new contract negotiations or something to explain why he screwed him.

    They have obviously invested heavily in Brock now so they have to freshen him up. His role at the moment is boring


  • #69
    SlickRic
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 36,317 ✭✭✭✭SlickRic


    Why not keep it secret until after WM?

    Also, you can't beat him now can you?


  • #70
    J. Marston
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 23,213 ✭✭✭✭J. Marston


    Brock vs Rock next year, please.


  • #71
    Tugboats
    Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 2,011 ✭✭✭Tugboats


    J. Marston wrote: »
    Brock vs Rock next year, please.

    The biggest wrestlemania of all time and you want a movie star in the main event? How about they use this massive platform to showcase wrestlers who will be there the week after Mania?


  • Advertisement
  • #72
    WinnyThePoo
    Closed Accounts Posts: 3,417 ✭✭✭WinnyThePoo


    Tugboats wrote: »
    The biggest wrestlemania of all time and you want a movie star in the main event? How about they use this massive platform to showcase wrestlers who will be there the week after Mania?

    They won't though. The Rock is money.


  • #73
    rovert
    Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 23,089 ✭✭✭✭rovert


    SlickRic wrote: »
    Also, you can't beat him now can you?

    Seth_Rollins_Mr_Money_In_The_Bank_05July2014.png


  • #74
    martyos121
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,455 ✭✭✭✭martyos121


    Tugboats wrote: »
    The biggest wrestlemania of all time and you want a movie star in the main event? How about they use this massive platform to showcase wrestlers who will be there the week after Mania?

    WrestleMania isn't about the talent on the full-time roster, unless their name is John Cena. Brock vs. Rock sells, and I for one would love to see that in the main event next year. The biggest WrestleMania should have the biggest stars and the biggest matches.


  • #75
    [Deleted User]
    Posts: 0 ✭ [Deleted User]


    I am going to dance around this very carefully. My understanding of the WWE / UFC is that there is some sort of relationship there, despite what both sides say publicly, there is a cross over with fans of both sports and they know this. You will see more cross over between wrestlers and fighters.

    Lesnar was hurt towards the end of his UFC run and his move to WWE would keep him relevant among fight fans. The idea was for Lesnar to get back to his 100% and stay in the public eye, then return to UFC.
    I however think something has changed with this due to the fact that drug testing is becoming even more prevalent within the UFC.


  • #76
    Tugboats
    Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 2,011 ✭✭✭Tugboats


    martyos121 wrote: »
    WrestleMania isn't about the talent on the full-time roster, unless their name is John Cena. Brock vs. Rock sells, and I for one would love to see that in the main event next year. The biggest WrestleMania should have the biggest stars and the biggest matches.

    Nonsense. The main event at Wrestlemania should be between two WWE wrestlers.


  • #77
    ricero
    Closed Accounts Posts: 11,348 ✭✭✭✭ricero


    rovert wrote: »
    Yes this:

    Of course who wouldn't love to see big show win the wwe title at mania


  • #78
    Itssoeasy
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,302 ✭✭✭✭Itssoeasy


    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Fb0vkztzR2c


    I personally think Brock comes across very well just as himself.


  • #79
    Lord TSC
    Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 42,487 Mod ✭✭✭✭Lord TSC


    Tugboats wrote: »
    Nonsense. The main event at Wrestlemania should be between two WWE wrestlers.

    There's a long, long list of things WWE SHOULD be doing, but I wouldn't list "Don't do Brock/Rock" on it high. It would be a money match that fans want to see.


  • #80
    rovert
    Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 23,089 ✭✭✭✭rovert


    https://twitter.com/wrestlespective/status/580516586634809344


  • #81
    Tugboats
    Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 2,011 ✭✭✭Tugboats


    Lord TSC wrote: »
    There's a long, long list of things WWE SHOULD be doing, but I wouldn't list "Don't do Brock/Rock" on it high. It would be a money match that fans want to see.

    Stone cold as guest referee and Undertaker as guest time keeper to spice it up?


  • Advertisement
  • #82
    Moneymaker
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,846 ✭✭✭Moneymaker


    That's the most i've heard Brock talk.

    He comes across great.


  • #83
    rovert
    Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 23,089 ✭✭✭✭rovert


    If there was any doubt
    CA5qrtzWgAApgb3.png


  • #84
    MitchKoobski
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,101 ✭✭✭MitchKoobski


    So we're eventually gonna see...

    Rock vs Brock
    Bryan vs Brock

    Any others?


  • #85
    Mr.Nice Guy
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 45,594 ✭✭✭✭Mr.Nice Guy


    I'm delighted to hear this news but my cynical side is gnawing away at me.

    Didn't Chris Jericho one time announce ahead of a match about a decade ago, think it was against Cena, that he had signed a new deal, with the purpose being to throw off the scent all those who had figured out he was leaving after the match and who had therefore figured he was losing. It turned out then that he had only signed a short term deal and he was soon off on his way.

    Could something similar be at work here?


  • #86
    rovert
    Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 23,089 ✭✭✭✭rovert


    MitchKoobski wrote: »
    So we're eventually gonna see...

    Rock vs Brock
    Bryan vs Brock

    Any others?

    Owens
    Zayn
    Balor
    Samoa Joe

    *Hopefully*
    **People they haven't ruined**


  • #87
    Moneymaker
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,846 ✭✭✭Moneymaker


    Mr.Nice Guy wrote: »
    I'm delighted to hear this news but my cynical side is gnawing away at me.

    Didn't Chris Jericho one time announce ahead of a match about a decade ago, think it was against Cena, that he had signed a new deal, with the purpose being to throw off the scent all those who had figured out he was leaving after the match and who had therefore figured he was losing. It turned out then that he had only signed a short term deal and he was soon off on his way.

    Could something similar be at work here?

    Brock has always struck me as an honest guy. Yes he's in it mostly for the money but he's honest about it.

    Jericho has always had an agenda behind everything he does.

    Watch him show up at UFC in 6 months now :pac:


  • #88
    A Rogue Hobo
    Registered Users Posts: 838 ✭✭✭A Rogue Hobo


    Triple H announced it as a multi-year deal though. So I doubt it's something to throw people off the scent to be honest.


  • #89
    rovert
    Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 23,089 ✭✭✭✭rovert


    A Rogue Hobo wrote: »
    Triple H announced it as a multi-year deal though. So I doubt it's something to throw people off the scent to be honest.

    I think there's Wallstreet St. rules against something like that. This is outside of a storyline realm too.


  • #90
    A Primal Nut
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,949 ✭✭✭A Primal Nut


    Coach said that Lesnar would be performing four times a week. He obviously hasn't done his research.

    Lesnar said he got a lot more money. Hopefully Vince negotiated a couple of extra matches per year out of him.


  • Advertisement
  • #91
    DM_7
    Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 18,363 Mod ✭✭✭✭DM_7


    Brock V Owens and Brock v Balor are now possible ☺

    Brock v Orton and Brock v Rollins are feuds i want to see in the next year.


Advertisement