RTE Coverage of the Boston Bombing Trial

omnithanos

ohnonotgmail wrote: »

you are the one making extraordinary claims. the onus is on YOU to back them up.

Don't you think the US media feed us extraordinary lies?

If you want me to post any of the links to show the evidence behind my top 10 reasons why I believe the boston bombing was faked I'd be glad to.

Probabally the biggest reason is the lies we were fed regarding 9/11.
If you want my opinion of what actually happened on 9/11 and other events I believe were staged you can follow this link to my thread on the conspiracy theory boards.
http://www.boards.ie/vbulletin/showthread.php?t=2057395253

omnithanos

ohnonotgmail wrote: »

you are the one making extraordinary claims. the onus is on YOU to back them up.

Here are some links which support 10 reasons why I think the Boston Bombings were faked.

1. the photo with the girl standing and all the people in the background who look like they are ready to get into position. Photo is at 1min 50 secs.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tXpJWke2Zso

2. The man in red putting a fake leg on the little girl from 6mins 37secs.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IRfgugJxCOo

3. I still think Mr. Bauman is putting on a fake leg in the 16 second clip. He's in the top middle of the frame.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d-xhjAr_3kk

4. All the videos showing people passing out packets of fake blood
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nKpS...has_verified=1

5. The lady with no obvious injuries apart from a little scratch wheeled off covered in blood. Lady can be viewed at 10mins 16secs.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kOpMYz7bjuI

6. The demeanor of the injured people immediately after the bombing
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xx3U_z4c2Wg

7. The demeanor of the authorities in the press conferences, don't answer why people were warned to stay calm before the bomb etc.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hXg1uwFvfNg

8. The appearance of the three sandy hook first responders at the bomb site wearing the same backpacks as our two bombers from 7mins 7secs.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Bnaws7tHdz8

9. All the hand signals (see video at no. 5), girls kissing right before the bomb (this video).
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gLvbQJ25ygs

10.The two people running around with the same fake kid.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y8kjlJYYNy0

galljga1

omnithanos wrote: »

Here are some links which support 10 reasons why I think the Boston Bombings were faked.

1. the photo with the girl standing and all the people in the background who look like they are ready to get into position. Photo is at 1min 50 secs.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tXpJWke2Zso

2. The man in red putting a fake leg on the little girl from 6mins 37secs.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IRfgugJxCOo

3. I still think Mr. Bauman is putting on a fake leg in the 16 second clip. He's in the top middle of the frame.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d-xhjAr_3kk

4. All the videos showing people passing out packets of fake blood
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nKpS...has_verified=1

5. The lady with no obvious injuries apart from a little scratch wheeled off covered in blood. Lady can be viewed at 10mins 16secs.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kOpMYz7bjuI

6. The demeanor of the injured people immediately after the bombing
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xx3U_z4c2Wg

7. The demeanor of the authorities in the press conferences, don't answer why people were warned to stay calm before the bomb etc.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hXg1uwFvfNg

8. The appearance of the three sandy hook first responders at the bomb site wearing the same backpacks as our two bombers from 7mins 7secs.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Bnaws7tHdz8

9. All the hand signals (see video at no. 5), girls kissing right before the bomb (this video).
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gLvbQJ25ygs

10.The two people running around with the same fake kid.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y8kjlJYYNy0

This is quite simply a collection of videos put together by seriously deranged people. You put forward a theory and offer this as evidence. Absolute nonsense. As for the 'actors' appearing in different govt staged events, either you are looking at different videos to me or these are quite simply not the same people. The only theory I believe in is there maybe a link between flouride in drinking water and brain damage, hence all these nutbag videos on youtube. Typically conspiracy theorists reject evidence based reasoning in favour of focusing on one or a number of obscure elements to 'prove' their argument. You however appear to be trawling YOUTUBE for your 'evidence'. Why not Wikipedia?

Please close this and get this rubbish back to the forum to which it belongs

omnithanos

galljga1 wrote: »

This is quite simply a collection of videos put together by seriously deranged people. You put forward a theory and offer this as evidence. Absolute nonsense. As for the 'actors' appearing in different govt staged events, either you are looking at different videos to me or these are quite simply not the same people. The only theory I believe in is there maybe a link between flouride in drinking water and brain damage, hence all these nutbag videos on youtube. Typically conspiracy theorists reject evidence based reasoning in favour of focusing on one or a number of obscure elements to 'prove' their argument. You however appear to be trawling YOUTUBE for your 'evidence'. Why not Wikipedia?

Please close this and get this rubbish back to the forum to which it belongs

First off, the 9/11 wikipedia page is completely and obviously inaccurate and does not hold up to any scrutiny. For example, it claims that 19 hijackers died that day when it has since been proven that at least 7 of these are still alive.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/September_11_attacks

Where did RTE put any effort into establishing that this bombing was real? Where are the actual concrete facts? A video showing an explosion where nobody is seen getting injured? If RTE visit Sioux City will they then claim that people are being shot dead for entertainment? I'm saying this was definite substandard reporting as was last nights TV3 report into the hoax crash site in the Alps which claims that supposition is truth.

How do you explain, with reasoning, how the little girl, who was said to have had to have her leg amputated afterwards, could stand up independently immediately after the "bomb"?

How do you explain, with reasoning, how the same little girl is shown exposing the stump of her leg in the second video I posted when it was reported that she hadn't lost her leg yet?

This is not a case of the girl looking similar here, this is footage taken from the official reports of the Boston bombing.

Watch the following video carefully from 1 minute 50 seconds and answer me the following;

How do you explain why the lady runner in green tosses something to the man who is falling behind her immediately after the blast?

How do you explain why this man, who appears to be falling over because of the blast, actually dives to catch the object thrown by the lady in green?

Notice also how she throws the object behind her without turning around. Are you telling me you don't think there is anything suspicious about this?

Why were these two people interviewed afterwards by the corrupt hoax American media if they weren't all in on it together?

Notice also how the above video also links the illuminati card game published in 1995 with the Boston Marathon and how this woman in green, who appears to set off the fake bomb with a detonator, is dressed in a very similar fashion to the jogger in the game card. Note also that the same illuminati card game predicted both the pentagon attack and the twin tower attack.

I do not believe this is a theory I believe this to be fact and I would have to say that all the propaganda put out by the US media ever since they contrived the reports on 9/11 is the real collection of videos put together by seriously deranged people who are actually perpetrating these crimes.

The Irish Government appear to have been complicit in this ever since they allowed rendition flights to operate out of Shannon when we actually saw US tanks roll up and down the runways of Shannon on public access TV which was then taken off the air. Our president Michael D. Higgins was present to witness this happening and to protest against this. Now we appear to have either propaganda reporting by both the RTE and TV3 or else very shoddy work which is not researched correctly and makes no attempt to report fact. Remember how the story about that priest who was supposed to have fathered a child in Africa turned out to be complete baloney?

irelandrover

omnithanos wrote: »

First off, the 9/11 wikipedia page is completely and obviously inaccurate and does not hold up to any scrutiny. For example, it claims that 19 hijackers died that day when it has since been proven that at least 7 of these are still alive.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/September_11_attacks

Where did RTE put any effort into establishing that this bombing was real? Where are the actual concrete facts? A video showing an explosion where nobody is seen getting injured? If RTE visit Sioux City will they then claim that people are being shot dead for entertainment? I'm saying this was definite substandard reporting as was last nights TV3 report into the hoax crash site in the Alps which claims that supposition is truth.

How do you explain, with reasoning, how the little girl, who was said to have had to have her leg amputated afterwards, could stand up independently immediately after the "bomb"?

How do you explain, with reasoning, how the same little girl is shown exposing the stump of her leg in the second video I posted when it was reported that she hadn't lost her leg yet?

This is not a case of the girl looking similar here, this is footage taken from the official reports of the Boston bombing.

Watch the following video carefully from 1 minute 50 seconds and answer me the following;

How do you explain why the lady runner in green tosses something to the man who is falling behind her immediately after the blast?

How do you explain why this man, who appears to be falling over because of the blast, actually dives to catch the object thrown by the lady in green?

Notice also how she throws the object behind her without turning around. Are you telling me you don't think there is anything suspicious about this?

Why were these two people interviewed afterwards by the corrupt hoax American media if they weren't all in on it together?

Notice also how the above video also links the illuminati card game published in 1995 with the Boston Marathon and how this woman in green, who appears to set off the fake bomb with a detonator, is dressed in a very similar fashion to the jogger in the game card. Note also that the same illuminati card game predicted both the pentagon attack and the twin tower attack.

I do not believe this is a theory I believe this to be fact and I would have to say that all the propaganda put out by the US media ever since they contrived the reports on 9/11 is the real collection of videos put together by seriously deranged people who are actually perpetrating these crimes.

The Irish Government appear to have been complicit in this ever since they allowed rendition flights to operate out of Shannon when we actually saw US tanks roll up and down the runways of Shannon on public access TV which was then taken off the air. Our president Michael D. Higgins was present to witness this happening and to protest against this. Now we appear to have either propaganda reporting by both the RTE and TV3 or else very shoddy work which is not researched correctly and makes no attempt to report fact. Remember how the story about that priest who was supposed to have fathered a child in Africa turned out to be complete baloney?

Do you have something to back up that there are 7 still alive. Preferably something other than a youtube video.

Why would the jogger pass a detonator to the old man. A person that collapses beside a bomb is obviously going to get attention. Why would you give them the detonator. that makes no sense.I don't see him dive. I see him stumble and fall awkwardly.

AndyBoBandy

omnithanos wrote: »

as was last nights TV3 report into the hoax crash site in the Alps which claims that supposition is truth.

This was a conspiracy too?

your a gas man.

omnithanos

Andybobandy wrote: »

This was a conspiracy too?

your a gas man.

I'm on fire, I'm Electric!

You can visit my diary of fake and false flag events here
http://www.boards.ie/vbulletin/showthread.php?t=2057395253&page=3l
links can be found on posts #26 and #31.

omnithanos

irelandrover wrote: »

Do you have something to back up that there are 7 still alive. Preferably something other than a youtube video.

Why would the jogger pass a detonator to the old man. A person that collapses beside a bomb is obviously going to get attention. Why would you give them the detonator. that makes no sense.I don't see him dive. I see him stumble and fall awkwardly.

Don't you think the official story that a plane hit the tower and a hijakers passport fell out, landed on the ground and was found amongst all the dust and rubble by an FBI agent is a tiny bit suspect?

Here's a couple of links about the hijakers which exposes the official story.
http://www.rense.com/general20/alives.htm
http://whatreallyhappened.com/WRHARTICLES/hijackers.html

I don't know if this video shows it but the police dude then comes over and kicks the detonator to a bald guy in blue who passes it on to someone else.

With prior knowledge that 9/11 was a complete false flag and based on every piece of evidence I have seen relating to the Boston Bombing I can see no footage of anybody actually getting hurt and plenty of evidence suggesting fakery so my logical conclusion is fake bomb.

ohnonotgmail

omnithanos wrote: »

Don't you think the official story that a plane hit the tower and a hijakers passport fell out, landed on the ground and was found amongst all the dust and rubble by an FBI agent is a tiny bit suspect?

Here's a couple of links about the hijakers which exposes the official story.
http://www.rense.com/general20/alives.htm
http://whatreallyhappened.com/WRHARTICLES/hijackers.html

I don't know if this video shows it but the police dude then comes over and kicks the detonator to a bald guy in blue who passes it on to someone else.

With prior knowledge that 9/11 was a complete false flag and based on every piece of evidence I have seen relating to the Boston Bombing I can see no footage of anybody actually getting hurt and plenty of evidence suggesting fakery so my logical conclusion is fake bomb.

I'm not sure you and logic are on speaking terms.

AndyBoBandy

omnithanos wrote: »

the police dude

says it all really!

omnithanos

ohnonotgmail wrote: »

I'm not sure you and logic are on speaking terms.

Can you logically explain how you came to this conclusion?

omnithanos

Andybobandy wrote: »

says it all really!

Yes that the police dude was part of it, what other conclusion can you possibly come to when you see someone dressed in a police uniform passing incriminating evidence to an accomplice?

AndyBoBandy

omnithanos wrote: »

dude

indeed.

irelandrover

omnithanos wrote: »

Yes that the police dude was part of it, what other conclusion can you possibly come to when you see someone dressed in a police uniform passing incriminating evidence to an accomplice?

Why would the police officer not have the detonator all the time. Why the elaborate plan to pass it from a jogger to an old man to a policeman. What is the purpose of that?

omnithanos

Listen people if this were a real bombing then why was the runner in green not questioned when video evidence clearly shows her throwing something to old Bill immediately after the blast?

Answer, they had their patsies set up already and there was no need for an investigation.

What other plausible conclusion is there?

omnithanos

irelandrover wrote: »

Why would the police officer not have the detonator all the time. Why the elaborate plan to pass it from a jogger to an old man to a policeman. What is the purpose of that?

Because these Satanists were following the plan set out in the Illuminati cards.

irelandrover

omnithanos wrote: »

Because these Satanists were following the plan set out in the Illuminati cards.

But if no-one was to suspect a jogger why would she not just hold onto the detonator. Or why would she not just throw it straight to the police officer. It doesn't make any sense to throw it to an old man who then passes it to a police officer.

How many cards are there in the illuminati game?

omnithanos

irelandrover wrote: »

But if no-one was to suspect a jogger why would she not just hold onto the detonator. Or why would she not just throw it straight to the police officer. It doesn't make any sense to throw it to an old man who then passes it to a police officer.

How many cards are there in the illuminati game?

330 I believe

AndyBoBandy

irelandrover wrote: »

How many cards are there in the illuminati game?

most likely an infinite amount.

Their currently printing up the newest edition featuring suicidal pilots.

omnithanos

Andybobandy wrote: »

most likely an infinite amount.

Their currently printing up the newest edition featuring suicidal pilots.

There's 515 in total, you can see them all here
https://www.facebook.com/media/set/?set=a.479049158789282.117781.147849131909288&type=1

irelandrover

omnithanos wrote: »

There's 515 in total, you can see them all here
https://www.facebook.com/media/set/?set=a.479049158789282.117781.147849131909288&type=1

So pretty much any world event could be tied into a card?

omnithanos

irelandrover wrote: »

So pretty much any world event could be tied into a card?

I wouldn't conclude that and we are veering from the point that RTE's coverage sucked.
Nobody has shown any evidence, which does not look like a set up, to show that people were actually injured in the Boston (hoax) bombing. Therefore we can only conclude that RTE's coverage is not based on concrete fact which is the subject of my thread.

irelandrover

omnithanos wrote: »

I wouldn't conclude that and we are veering from the point that RTE's coverage sucked.
Nobody has shown any evidence, which does not look like a set up, to show that people were actually injured in the Boston (hoax) bombing. Therefore we can only conclude that RTE's coverage is not based on concrete fact which is the subject of my thread.

The last I will say on it is that the illuminati card for 9/11 is a nuclear attack. They picked a card that suited the most.

You have been shown videos of the street shaking, videos that show debris. You have ignored then or offered counter points. What evidence do you think would make you believe that the bombing was real. Any video that people show you, you will claim is fake.

The fact that you don't agree with it doesn't mean that the coverage sucked.

spacetweek

omnithanos wrote: »

Can you logically explain how you came to this conclusion?

Because you have seen absolutely no evidence that the Boston bombing was fake yet you think it was fake because illuminati/masons/CIA.

adrian522

spacetweek wrote: »

Because you have seen absolutely no evidence that the Boston bombing was fake yet you think it was fake because illuminati/masons/CIA.

And Family Guy FFS.

omnithanos

irelandrover wrote: »

The last I will say on it is that the illuminati card for 9/11 is a nuclear attack. They picked a card that suited the most.

You have been shown videos of the street shaking, videos that show debris. You have ignored then or offered counter points. What evidence do you think would make you believe that the bombing was real. Any video that people show you, you will claim is fake.

The fact that you don't agree with it doesn't mean that the coverage sucked.

Claiming something is true when you have no concrete evidence and when plenty of evidence exists which points to fakery conclusively shows RTE and TV3 up in a similar vein to their factually incorrect reporting of the priest who didn't father a child in Africa.

I mentioned in the Boston board that the bomb drill which took place in the library accross the road from the m&m shop where the hoax bomb happened explains how the street shook. It was reported that the authorities were telling people to remain calm immediately before the bombs went off so that confirms that the drill took place. I also pointed to the fact that both the library and the m&m's were both mentioned along with russian terriorists who had converted to Islam, blood and body parts on the streets of Boston and two bombs going off in quick sucession in the Boston marathon episode of Family Guy which was aired 29 day before the event and which was called Turban Cowboy alluding to the terriorists and the hero in the cowboy hat who was shown pushing Boston bomb poster boy Jeff Bauman, who had allegedly just lost both his legs, to safety in a wheelchair.
The videos showed hardly any debris and showed nobody being injured directly.
The explosion at the base of building 7 of the world trade centre caused a stream of molten steel which could not have resulted from a jet fuel fire and that building wasn't even hit by a plane so the illuminati card showing a serious bomb is relevant and remember those planes did not hit the towers, they were digitally inserted and one of those two planes didn't even take off that day according to the official flight records. We can also see the reflection of detonation charges going off in the south tower in the glass building behind it when the pretend plane hits.

adrian522

omnithanos wrote:

It was reported that the authorities were telling people to remain calm immediately before the bombs went off so that confirms that the drill took place.

Why do you believe this reporting so readily yet dismiss almost everything else from every media outlet worldwide?

omnithanos

adrian522 wrote: »

And Family Guy FFS.

Here's a video showing what was in the Family Guy episode that was aired 29 days before the Boston Bombing.

Note also that Seth McFarlane, creator of family guy, was one of the 350 passengers who were supposed to fly on one of the four planes which were allegedly hijacked on 9/11 but missed their flight. More people missed their flights then flew that day. Is this normal?

Seth claims he was drinking the night before and didn't arrive in time for the flight but it has been shown that he actually cancelled his flight at 6am that morning so why was there a discrepancy in his story?

adrian522

So Family Guy are in on the plot? Maybe they organized the whole thing as a publicity stunt?:rolleyes:

omnithanos

adrian522 wrote: »

Why do you believe this reporting so readily yet dismiss almost everything else from every media outlet worldwide?

Because I saw them ask the authorities about this in the press conference after the bombing and the authorities refused to answer these questions and there were other confirmed reports of this happening elsewhere.

You have to confirm reports before you can accept them.