Arsenal Vs Liverpool (Sat 12.45)

niallo27

Raf32 wrote: »

Coutinho really proved he was better than Ozil today too.

Ozil 50 million. Coutinho 8 million.
Need I say more.

Drexel

niallo27 wrote: »

Ozil 50 million. Coutinho 8 million.
Need I say more.

and it shows

Osmosis Jones

Who cares?

ronjo

niallo27 wrote: »

Ozil 50 million. Coutinho 8 million.
Need I say more.

Ozils value gone up?

smileyj1987

RasTa wrote: »

But your team is Liverpool so this doesn't make any sense

The obsession is strong in this one want a lend of a Liverpool jersey ?

citytillidie

weldoninhio wrote: »

Thomson
Carragher
Souness
McManaman
Owen
Redknapp
Beglin
Houghton

Edit: Hansen
Lawrenson
That's off the top of my head

Yea a player who seen Liverpool fans turn there back on him

RasTa

smileyj1987 wrote: »

The obsession is strong in this one want a lend of a Liverpool jersey ?

So I'm not allowed talk about Liverpool in a match thread now, that's obsession?

smileyj1987

RasTa wrote: »

So I'm not allowed talk about Liverpool in a match thread now, that's obsession?

No just thinking you would have had a game to be watching.

keano_afc

Well isn't that just a lovely way to start a Saturday.

RasTa

smileyj1987 wrote: »

No just thinking you would have had a game to be watching.

Listening if you really must know

niallo27

keano_afc wrote: »

Well isn't that just a lovely way to start a Saturday.

No it's a shocking way to start it.

L'prof

Was hoping for a win, thought it would be tight though. Unfollowing this mess sharpish!

keano_afc

L'prof wrote: »

Was hoping for a win, thought it would be tight though. Unfollowing this mess sharpish!

Ah don't do that, this is where it gets fun. Every one knows Liverpool fans, above all, are the most magnanimous in defeat.

yohan the great

BorneTobyWilde wrote: »

Sterling was great today, he was one causing some trouble
Coutinho also amazing, the rest were average.

So if two of the players were amazing and the rest average how the **** did you get beat 4-1?

efb

4-1 happy days

Will I Amnt

smileyj1987 wrote: »

No just thinking you would have had a game to be watching.

What about all the Liverpool and Arsenal fans posting here today? You would think they would have had a game to be watching...

Always have to laugh at the ridiculousness of that argument.

Quazzie

murpho999 wrote: »

Isn't that easy to say after the event. I don't see much else that he could have picked when you look at his options.
It's his options is his main issue.

He started the game with no striker on the pitch, and then people are puzzled with ye couldn't get more shots on target and are comprehensively beaten.
It didn't take a genius to see before, during or after the match that Rodgers got his team selection wrong.

weldoninhio

citytillidie wrote: »

Yea a player who seen Liverpool fans turn there back on him

Ah I didn't realise that if a player had the fans turn their back on him it erased his history with the club.

Will I Amnt

@MD1990. Watching the game will tell you a lot more than stats, conveniently left out the shots on target though anyway... nice try...

smileyj1987

Will I Amnt wrote: »

What about all the Liverpool and Arsenal fans posting here today? You would think they would have had a game to be watching...

Always have to laugh at the ridiculousness of that argument.

That's called discussing the game that's taking place. Personally if my team where playing I wouldn't find the time to post in a thread for a different team but each to their own and all that.

Mickeroo

Will I Amnt wrote: »

What about all the Liverpool and Arsenal fans posting here today? You would think they would have had a game to be watching...

Always have to laugh at the ridiculousness of that argument.

Yeah, it's like the internet is harder to access depending what team are playing or something.

smileyj1987

smileyj1987 wrote: »

That's called discussing the game that's taking place. Personally if my team where playing I wouldn't find the time to post in a thread for a different team but each to their own and all that.

I'd have thought this was fairly obvious.

I thought wrong

citytillidie

Ahh found the Arsenal hate for BT lol it's only an advert

http://www.mirror.co.uk/sport/football/arsenal-fans-fume-bt-sport-3851635

Will I Amnt

smileyj1987 wrote: »

That's called discussing the game that's taking place. Personally if my team where playing I wouldn't find the time to post in a thread for a different team but each to their own and all that.

It takes the same amount of time to post in any thread. Ball goes dead for a bit... type away, easy.

I don't normally post in any thread when United are on but frankly, they are boring the arse off me at the minute.

Edit: Not anymore

yohan the great

mada999 wrote: »

so top 4 is out now... can we make sure we are not in the europa league either.. thanks...

Such a **** attitude. It's a great competition if people actually watched it.

Godge

niallo27 wrote: »

Ozil 50 million. Coutinho 8 million.
Need I say more.

That shows the difference in level between Arsenal and Liverpool.

Arsenal can buy 50 million players, Liverpool can't. Why? Mostly because Arsenal play Champions League and have revenues as a result. As of now, Arsenal are a level above Liverpool and likely to remain so.

Drexel

yohan the great wrote: »

Such a **** attitude. It's a great competition if people actually watched it.

and a champions league spot for the winner. Liverpool would be mad to not want to be in that competition

citytillidie

weldoninhio wrote: »

Ah I didn't realise that if a player had the fans turn their back on him it erased his history with the club.

It does when you join a rival team

RasTa

Godge wrote: »

That shows the difference in level between Arsenal and Liverpool.

Arsenal can buy 50 million players, Liverpool can't. Why? Mostly because Arsenal play Champions League and have revenues as a result. As of now, Arsenal are a level above Liverpool and likely to remain so.

Arsenal spent 30m on Sanchez. Liverpool spent £25 on Lallana, that's the difference. The reason for this Liverpool fans seem to ignore

Drexel

RasTa wrote: »

Arsenal spent 30m on Sanchez. Liverpool spent £25 on Lallana, that's the difference. The reason for this Liverpool fans seem to ignore

Speaking of Liverpool overspending on players why oh why was Kolo playing today with Lovern who cost close to 20million sat on the bench. Thats almost 50million wasted on two average players. Shocking stuff when you look at it

Mr Blobby

From Reddit.

Does Michael Owen live in some bizarre reality where he sees the exact opposite of what has actually happened?

Mickeroo

jonny666 wrote: »

Speaking of Liverpool overspending on players why oh why was Kolo playing today with Lovern who cost close to 20million sat on the bench. Thats almost 50million wasted on two average players. Shocking stuff when you look at it

Lovren has been very poor for them when he's played and Toure has had some good performances when he's been called on, most LFC fans didn't expect Lovren to start from what I saw.

In fairness, the Lovren signing seemed like a no brainer to me, don't think anyone would have predicted him being as bad as he has been.

Drexel

Mickeroo wrote: »

Lovren has been very poor for them when he's played and Toure has had some good performances when he's been called on, most LFC fans didn't expect Lovren to start from what I saw.

In fairness, the Lovren signing seemed like a no brainer to me, don't think anyone would have predicted him being as bad as he has been.

20 million though

Oranage2

2nd place - can't wait for the book about finishing second.

pmasterson95

I'm sure its Liverpools year next year. Its always the next year lol.

bad2dabone

Oranage2 wrote: »

2nd place - can't wait for the book about finishing second.

There were four books released about finished second.

citytillidie

Oranage2 wrote: »

2nd place - can't wait for the book about finishing second.

If you have fans dumb enough to buy them go for it, that was embarrassing to see

Its Only Ray Parlour

Could someone explain the book thing to me?

Also, I love the way Liverpool fans are bringing up the 5 - 1 defeat last season, while ignoring the fact that Arsenal beat Liverpool twice last season.

citytillidie

Its Only Ray Parlour wrote: »

Could someone explain the book thing to me?

Also, I love the way Liverpool fans are bringing up the 5 - 1 defeat last season, while ignoring the fact that Arsenal beat Liverpool twice last season.

Some want to be writers who are Liverpool fans released books on the run in last season would have been a gold mine for them if Liverpool had of won the league but looked really stupid and embarrassing when Liverpool finished 2nd and they still released them celebrating that.

yohan the great

Mickeroo wrote: »

Lovren has been very poor for them when he's played and Toure has had some good performances when he's been called on, most LFC fans didn't expect Lovren to start from what I saw.

In fairness, the Lovren signing seemed like a no brainer to me, don't think anyone would have predicted him being as bad as he has been.

Anyone that watched him at Lyon could

citytillidie

yohan the great wrote: »

Anyone that watched him at Lyon could

Anyone who watched the World Cup would have seen that

Cantona's Collars

pmasterson95 wrote: »

I'm sure its Liverpools year next year. Its always the next year lol.

https://twitter.com/thphnts/status/584350495231250432

brianregan09

Funny how i got flamed for having a go at the pro liverpool BT crap ....Michael Owen and even the other fella were rightly digging at us all game

keano_afc

Godge wrote: »

That shows the difference in level between Arsenal and Liverpool.

Arsenal can buy 50 million players, Liverpool can't. Why? Mostly because Arsenal play Champions League and have revenues as a result. As of now, Arsenal are a level above Liverpool and likely to remain so.

They've spent outrageous sums of money on dross. Big difference between not affording to spend big and spending big on crap.

wandatowell

A great 3 points in the bag, another win. Who next?

Liam O

Arsenal have never spent 50m on a player too. Is it only Ozil and Sanchez that are over 30m for them? Dare I say even 20?

KaiserGunner

Liam O wrote: »

Arsenal have never spent 50m on a player too. Is it only Ozil and Sanchez that are over 30m for them? Dare I say even 20?

As far as I know, Ozil cost 42m and Sanchez cost 32m, Welbeck at 16m is the third highest fee paid by Wenger I think.

smileyj1987

keano_afc wrote: »

They've spent outrageous sums of money on dross. Big difference between not affording to spend big and spending big on crap.

Some of that dross included a player you's tried to sign from lfc and got laughed at by LFC. LFC might not be the team they once where but at least LFC can say other then the torres deal they haven't been a feeder club to any other team in England

Alfred Borden

smileyj1987 wrote: »

Some of that dross included a player you's tried to sign from lfc and got laughed at by LFC. LFC might not be the team they once where but at least LFC can say other then the torres deal they haven't been a feeder club to any other team in England

Sorry cant hear you from all the way down there :pac:

wandatowell

smileyj1987 wrote: »

Some of that dross included a player you's tried to sign from lfc and got laughed at by LFC. LFC might not be the team they once where but at least LFC can say other then the torres deal they haven't been a feeder club to any other team in England

Pal relax, stop taking the beating so personally. It's just a game.