Boston Bomber Found Guilty

Timberrrrrrrr

Hans Bricks wrote: »

"No, no, rabel rabel, it is, no, no your the *Throw back exact same insult which was received* "

Another thread ruined by EOTR.

Amazes me how one poster is allowed CONSISTENTLY ruin threads in this fashion, I honestly wonder would any other poster be allowed post like this and get away with it for so long.

ohnonotgmail

Timberrrrrrrr wrote: »

Amazes me how one poster is allowed CONSISTENTLY ruin threads in this fashion, I honestly wonder would any other poster be allowed post like this and get away with it for so long.

just stick him on ignore and let him wither on the vine.

Timberrrrrrrr

ohnonotgmail wrote: »

just stick him on ignore and let him wither on the vine.

Not easy to miss when people still quote his relentless waffle though.

ohnonotgmail

Timberrrrrrrr wrote: »

Not easy to miss when people still quote his relentless waffle though.

be strong, grasshopper

Timberrrrrrrr

ohnonotgmail wrote: »

be strong, grasshopper

Yeah

It just pisses me off that one poster ruins so many decent threads with no action ever taken but know that any other person posting like that would be slammed with the ban hammer within minutes.

ohnonotgmail

Timberrrrrrrr wrote: »

Yeah

It just pisses me off that one poster ruins so many decent threads with no action ever taken but know that any other person posting like that would be slammed with the ban hammer within minutes.

spot on. we should form a support group.

end of the road

Timberrrrrrrr wrote: »

Yeah

It just pisses me off that one poster ruins so many decent threads with no action ever taken but know that any other person posting like that would be slammed with the ban hammer within minutes.

because i'm just posting an opinion. apparently that is allowed on here

Joshua J

For people who are so worried about the rules ye forgot the one about attack the post not the poster. Acting like a gang of kids in the playground.

Timberrrrrrrr

Joshua J wrote: »

For people who are so worried about the rules ye forgot the one about attack the post not the poster. Acting like a gang of kids in the playground.

There's also one about backseat modding as well

Hans Bricks

Joshua J wrote: »

For people who are so worried about the rules ye forgot the one about attack the post not the poster. Acting like a gang of kids in the playground.

Theres only so many times you can attack the post before attacking the poster becomes the only way of pointing out it's sheer stupidity. Engage with a poster like that for a few days and get back to us.

Joshua J

If you have to resort to playground bullying and name calling you've already lost.

creolebelle

I'm glad he's been sentenced to life.
I have always felt that the death penalty was barbaric and antiquated.

bodice ripper

end of the road wrote: »

caused of course by certain countries pentiants for running around the world overthrowing governments and replacing with puppet governments, and bombing the **** out of places.



well , rightists don't wish to hear that the more certain countries antagonise the islamic world, the more radicals we will get. and americas and britains policies have a major part to play and are mostly responsible.

At first I thought, "hey, if they are penitent, that's a start, right?"




And then "panti-ants". No one wants them.

















**** me, that's supposed to be penchant.

end of the road

bodice ripper wrote: »

At first I thought, "hey, if they are penitent, that's a start, right?"




And then "panti-ants". No one wants them.

















**** me, that's supposed to be penchant.

i'm still right though. the more the islamic world is interfeared with, the more potential for radicals. but i suppose you have nothing to say about that. much easier to come out with pointless nonsense rather then at least form an argument counteracting what i said

ohnonotgmail

end of the road wrote: »

i'm still right though. the more the islamic world is interfeared with, the more potential for radicals. but i suppose you have nothing to say about that. much easier to come out with pointless nonsense rather then at least form an argument counteracting what i said

so we leave them alone to do whatever the hell they want? a capital idea, simply capital.

end of the road

ohnonotgmail wrote: »

so we leave them alone to do whatever the hell they want? a capital idea, simply capital.

well, its better then overthrowing governments of countries and having the likes of isis fill the power vacuum isn't it

Timberrrrrrrr

end of the road wrote: »

i'm still right though. the more the islamic world is interfeared with, the more potential for radicals. but i suppose you have nothing to say about that. much easier to come out with pointless nonsense rather then at least form an argument counteracting what i said

Your arguments get counteracted all day everyday, your arguments get disassembled, ripped apart and refuted all the time, you just resort to pages of "No i'm not wrong you are" replies.

ohnonotgmail

end of the road wrote: »

well, its better then overthrowing governments of countries and having the likes of isis fill the power vacuum isn't it

All this started a long time before ISIS came on the scene. It started before 9/11. A long time. It doesnt matter. Islamic nutters will always find some spurious justification for acting like islamic nutters.

Billy86

ohnonotgmail wrote: »

All this started a long time before ISIS came on the scene. It started before 9/11. A long time. It doesnt matter. Islamic nutters will always find some spurious justification for acting like islamic nutters.

And the constant interference in the middle east from other nations started during, possibly even before, the Cold War.

Lt J.R. Bell

Billy86 wrote: »

And the constant interference in the middle east from other nations started during, possibly even before, the Cold War.

As far back as The Crusaders

ohnonotgmail

Billy86 wrote: »

And the constant interference in the middle east from other nations started during, possibly even before, the Cold War.

it started a long time before that.

Hitchens

CONVICTED BOSTON MARATHON bomber Dzhokhar Tsarnaev has been sentenced to death.

http://www.thejournal.ie/boston-bomber-tsarnaev-death-penalty-2106600-May2015/

........and rightly so!

darkpagandeath

Wrong decision, should have let him rot for life. Do we need more martyrs ?

boombang

Young man, doubt it helps to kill him

The_Valeyard

Bad call. Life in prison, no prole, no freedom, just decades to think over what you did and have the ghosts of all your victims visit you each night in your dreams.


RIP to all those who died. Regardless of the verdict I hope you find closure in this.

Arsemageddon

....am I the only person in the world who thinks the Boston bombing was a pretty minor event in the greater scheme of things?

bjork

Meh, hard to give a fluck


That's what you get when you blow people up

Titzon Toast

Those lads love a martyr or two.
They're about to get another one now.
Bad move I think.

Nodin

Hitchens wrote: »

CONVICTED BOSTON MARATHON bomber Dzhokhar Tsarnaev has been sentenced to death.

http://www.thejournal.ie/boston-bomber-tsarnaev-death-penalty-2106600-May2015/

........and rightly so!

Yep, nothing puts off people wanting to become martyrs like somebody being made a martyr.

Old Perry

He will have decades to rot, theyll spend the next 10 to 20 year arguing and appealing and god knows how much money in between. To whom ever it concrns he's already a martyr.