Captain America : Civil War *spoilers from post 480*

EoinMcLovin

Overheal wrote: »

what's flying in the background? It shows up in a couple promo images

It's falcons redwing drone which replaces the bird in the comics

crybaby

The Randy Riverbeast wrote: »

I think he had a thing on his wrist and it would fly to him in IM3 and AoU.

He did yeah, I think the briefcase was only used in IM2.

Can not wait for this, love Ant Man on Cap's shoulder in the poster, nice little touch.

flangemeistro

crybaby wrote: »

He did yeah, I think the briefcase was only used in IM2.

Can not wait for this, love Ant Man on Cap's shoulder in the poster, nice little touch.

And on Hawk eyes shoulder in the other poster. Gonna be epic.

Mickeroo

Hah, I didn't even spot him until ye mentioned it there. I re-watched Any man the other night on Netflix and I actually enjoyed it even more then when I first saw it.

sonic85

Hawkeye and black widow on opposite sides? Thought they were BFFs?

CramCycle

Mickeroo wrote: »

Hah, I didn't even spot him until ye mentioned it there. I re-watched Any man the other night on Netflix and I actually enjoyed it even more then when I first saw it.

I have a two year old who watched it with me, when Thomas the Tank engine had a guest appearance, he almost sh1t himself, more so than a 2 yo typically does.

jones

How do people not like IM3? I thought it was brilliant and up there with IM1 for me...the less said about IM2 the better it was shocking.

TWS and the first avengers are the best in the marvel staple in my opinion although I haven't seen Ant Man yet.

Civil War has the potential to be amazing say what you will about Marvel but they know how to make "mostly" good superhero movies

Lithium93_

New trailer being released tomorrow.

Lithium93_

http://www.comicbookresources.com/article/disney-confirms-captain-america-civil-wars-runtime

Disney confirmed to The Hollywood Reporter that "Civil War" will run for 2 hours and 27 minutes. This is just one minute longer than earlier rumors indicated.

Penn

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dKrVegVI0Us

Can. Not. Freak. Ing. Wait.

pixelburp

Wow, genuinely didn't expect that cameo, but I guess they couldn't keep it hidden forever. Looks decent, and hope whatever fallout from this 'war' sticks for a few movies anyway & that not everything goes back to normal by the roll of the credits.

Corholio

Spiderman

looked.......weird. It looked very dodgy CGI.

Trailer looked ok. Downey, as good as he has been playing Stark if a little overplayed, doesn't convince me of someone leading a 'war', from the trailers anyway. It is a very, very hard storyline to get right and translate to film I think though so it'll be interesting how they juggle all the characters.

Osmosis Jones

Well I wanted one thing from this movie, and I've gotten it.

Osmosis Jones

Corholio wrote: »

Spiderman

looked.......weird. It looked very dodgy CGI.

Looked straight out of a comic book, especially

the way his eyes move.

I think it looks great.

Lithium93_

Penn wrote: »

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dKrVegVI0Us

Can. Not. Freak. Ing. Wait.

Holy. ****. It looks brilliant.

Also the line where Tony says Stay down, final warning, freaking chills.

Frank Bullitt

Oh boy...

The Randy Riverbeast

Well I wasn't expecting that. Disappointed I know about it now, damn my curiosity.

Mickeroo

Osmosis Jones wrote: »

Looked straight out of a comic book, especially

the way his eyes move.

I think it looks great.

I always got the impression

his eyes didn't move

in the comics.

Boo Radley

Penn wrote: »

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dKrVegVI0Us

Can. Not. Freak. Ing. Wait.

Whaaaaat?! I wasn't expecting that at all. Looking forward to see how this all comes together.

TheKevin

Whatever the plot, it will still benefit from more RD Jr.

Turtyturd

Osmosis Jones wrote: »

Looked straight out of a comic book, especially

the way his eyes move.

I think it looks great.

Have only seen a still image so far (don't really want to watch the trailer) but

the design looks heavily influenced by Alex Ross and the early comics to me.

http://media.creativebloq.futurecdn.net/sites/creativebloq.com/files/images/2015/01/16/UNI117_legends_page33.jpg

Who funnily enough had these designs turned down by Raimi for the original movie.

http://static.comicvine.com/uploads/original/11/113734/3036302-1358479585-spide.jpg

Not to sure about the look, especially the breaks in the web pattern on the arms/legs, but at least it's different.

Lithium93_

The eyes are an homage to the 1966 cartoon.

Wasn't the first captain america a load of ****e?

Lithium93_

Deleted User wrote: »

Wasn't the first captain america a load of ****e?

That's your 2 cents..

Boo Radley

Corholio wrote: »

Spiderman

looked.......weird. It looked very dodgy CGI.

I'm guessing

the eyes are mechanical (I think there is even a whirring noise) that can allow for zoom or something akin to Iron Man. Maybe even Stark has a hand in Spidey's suit design?

Agent Coulson

I got a shiver down my spine watching that.

Effects

Spiderman looks awful. Badly rendered cg and sounds like a 12 year old kid.

Loughc

Effects wrote: »

Spiderman looks awful. Badly rendered cg and sounds like a 12 year old kid.

This Spider-Man in the marvel universe is meant to be 14.

Lithium93_

Loughc wrote: »

This Spider-Man in the marvel universe is meant to be 14.

I think, and i could be wrong, but in the MCU he's 15..

Thargor

Looks like more cheap and lazy mush, I was hoping it would be a big event with way more characters but the shot of the ten of them running at each other on the airport tarmac summed it up, so sick of this boring crap now. The whole setup is fcuking stupid, why would Tony Stark turn on Captain America because of the events of the last few films? What was the alternative? At least in the comic the setup to Civil War had some balls and both sides had their arguments to make after it...

Gbear

Thargor wrote: »

Looks like more cheap and lazy mush, I was hoping it would be a big event with way more characters but the shot of the ten of them running at each other on the airport tarmac summed it up, so sick of this boring crap now. The whole setup is fcuking stupid, why would Tony Stark turn on Captain America because of the events of the last few films? What was the alternative? At least in the comic the setup to Civil War had some balls and both sides had their arguments to make after it...

You're just assuming they'll start off hating each other with no context?

Why don't you wait and see what the film's like before inventing a load of bollocks about how there's nothing underpinning the conflict?

Corholio

Boo Radley wrote: »

Corholio wrote: »

Spiderman

looked.......weird. It looked very dodgy CGI.

I'm guessing

the eyes are mechanical (I think there is even a whirring noise) that can allow for zoom or something akin to Iron Man. Maybe even Stark has a hand in Spidey's suit design?

I actually don't mean

his eyes at all, just his appearance in general, looked too computer manipulated. An actor in a surprise shot like that would carry more weight imo

Lithium93_

Thargor wrote: »

Looks like more cheap and lazy mush, I was hoping it would be a big event with way more characters but the shot of the ten of them running at each other on the airport tarmac summed it up, so sick of this boring crap now. The whole setup is fcuking stupid, why would Tony Stark turn on Captain America because of the events of the last few films? What was the alternative? At least in the comic the setup to Civil War had some balls and both sides had their arguments to make after it...

Well if you were part of a team involved in said events and the destruction they caused, wouldn't you want to make sure there's some kind of accountability in place, plus the tension between Tony and Steve has been simmering since The Avengers in 2012

Links234

Deleted User wrote: »

Wasn't the first captain america a load of ****e?

It was a really good movie let down by the fact that most of the action in the latter half was basically a bunch of montages, it suffered in that it certainly wasn't long enough and what was one of the best origin stories of the Marvel movies had some of the worst action, bar the excellent sequence in the first half. They managed to get everything right for 2 though. And 3 is shaping up to be something else entirely.

Thargor

Gbear wrote: »

You're just assuming they'll start off hating each other with no context?

No, its shown in the trailer.

CramCycle

Mickeroo wrote: »

I always got the impression

his eyes didn't move

in the comics.

Some artist had them change shot to shot depending but no, only for artistic effect, don't recall it actually happening as a thing.

Boo Radley wrote: »

Corholio wrote: »

Spiderman

looked.......weird. It looked very dodgy CGI.

I'm guessing

the eyes are mechanical (I think there is even a whirring noise) that can allow for zoom or something akin to Iron Man. Maybe even Stark has a hand in Spidey's suit design?

I thought it looked dodgy first time around but rewatching it, its not that bad, I just think it was to shiny compared to recent movie incarnations which just threw me. The eyes are definetly mechanical, you can hear a camera zoom when they tighten.

FunLover18

I'm really interested to see how Ant-Man will fit into this, his movie was very much a comedy and from what we've seen this doesn't look very light hearted.

Mickeroo

FunLover18 wrote: »

I'm really interested to see how Ant-Man will fit into this, his movie was very much a comedy and from what we've seen this doesn't look very light hearted.

I still think the film will have the usual marvel doses of humour so it won't be much of an issue.

FunLover18

Mickeroo wrote:

I still think the film will have the usual marvel doses of humour so it won't be much of an issue.

I'm sure it will but I wonder how they'll play it. Ant Man's fight with Falcon was played for laughs. I'm not saying it won't work but I'm curious how he'll react when there are much bigger stakes.

Lithium93_

Cap saying to Tony "I can do this all day", clever little reference to the first Cap movie.. Well I thought so anyway.

constitutionus

Lithium93_ wrote: »

Cap saying to Tony "I can do this all day", clever little reference to the first Cap movie.. Well I thought so anyway.

that brought a smile to my face. its just one line but covers how far steves came. using it first against the bully kicking the crap out of him in the ally to the red skull.

VERY nice touch and shows the writers arent forgetting what came before . (i just realised as im typing this that he's always used it against "villains/bullys" which makes it a very sublte jab at tony too )

have to admit i forgot all about "yer man" at the end being in this and didnt expect them to have him in the trailer.

i can see that being a BIG "fuk YEAH" moment in the cinemas when it plays there. particularly for those avoiding spoilers online. the voice is spot on to me and the look is in line with the alex ross stuff from marvels from waaaaay back when. i can understand somes conscern on the costume, but remember this is a trailer so it could be still being tweaked too.

have to say i really really like that trailer. its buidling nicely to the scale of it and has some genuinely emotional weight. half this film will be the sense of hurt the characters feel at people choosing sides and it looks like downy jr and evens can pull this off.

from watching it i reckon were gonna see ALOT more characters too

unless im wrong that thing that came out of the ocean looks like the films equivilant to "42", the negative zone prison for superhumans. and there looked to be ALOT of cages. so ya gotta have at least a montage/breifing scene where you can merit that

.

cant wait.

Turtyturd

Surely it was

The Raft

coming up out of the water.

FunLover18

The thread isn't nearly angry enough.

C'mon guy, call yourselves fans.

pixelburp

In fairness, the Ghostbusters 3 thread has enough animated discussion and rage for the Film forum, no need for any extra.

Mr Freeze

Ah someone that does not really like the Marvel films (exceptions are Gaurdians and Antman, those were really good), but watches them anyways as I have an interest in most Superhero stuff.

I gotta say this film is looking good and I'm quite looking forward to seeing it.

And I thought "you know who" looked great, ya the CGI was a bit ropey but will be tidied up before release no doubt. I like the look of the costume, very much like the old comics\cartoons.

pixelburp

Given his face is plastered on every other forum, blog and website, do we really need to be circumspect about naming 'you know who'? His appearance is now out there in the main promotional push for this film; it's going to be impossible not to mention him by name.

MilesMorales1

I don't see how one can spoiler a trailer, specially in the social media age

Spiderman is awesome, he looks awesome in that trailer. That is all.

FunLover18

Some poor Potter fan is going to be very confused

Mr Freeze

pixelburp wrote: »

Given his face is plastered on every other forum, blog and website, do we really need to be circumspect about naming 'you know who'? His appearance is now out there in the main promotional push for this film; it's going to be impossible not to mention him by name.

I agree with ya. I just did, because everyone here was already using spoilers.

On youtube the thumbnail is a spoiler, never mind all the sites reporting it.

also, Can I just say: Spiderman.

Turtyturd

Spider-man.