VOTE NO

Guy:Incognito

Guy:Incognito wrote: »

Still no answer to the issue. Just joking waffling around the issue. Many of the same arguments were brought up by racist groups to tell people how interracial relationships are wrong and ungodly etc and shouldn't be allowed. The world would end and other crap.

So not only are those voting no akin to racists, but the only argument they put forward is that the world will end.

You make the OP sound rational!

To everyone who thinks it is only the no side that get hysterical, please read this posters efforts. It's mad stuff!

222233

macker33

With all your b****** about voting no because of the church maybe you would like to revisit the time when the church would take "illegitimate" children from their biological mothers how can you say that these children were passed on to safe homes?

Seeing as you blame pedopheila on homosexuals.

The Moldy Gowl

Guy:Incognito wrote: »

Woman will try anal. From my experience, they even bring it up first.;)

Shock horror. I will always carry a cross to bed with me, but I stick it in a comdom so it's protected.
Don't even get me started on what I use rosary beads for. They are sterilised in holy water.

Father Ted Crilly

Gowlasauras Rex wrote: »

Men and women are the generally more or less the same with their sexual desires. Everyone loves sex. Even sneaky finger in the bum sex.

Guy:Incognito wrote: »

Woman will try anal. From my experience, they even bring it up first.;)

I'm sorry, I must be in the wrong thread. I was looking for the anti-gay marriage thread.

sunshine and showers

[Deleted User] wrote: »

So not only are those voting no akin to racists, but the only argument they put forward is that the world will end.

You make the OP sound rational!

To everyone who thinks it is only the no side that get hysterical, please read this posters efforts. It's mad stuff!

Why are you voting no?

cursai

222233 wrote: »

macker33

With all your b****** about voting no because of the church maybe you would like to revisit the time when the church would take "illegitimate" children from their biological mothers how can you say that these children were passed on to safe homes?

Seeing as you blame pedopheila on homosexuals.

Eh! He hasn't left that time.

Wang King

macker33 wrote: »

Show me where He ever contradicted the Father

So that's a no then, grand, glad we got that sorted at least!

Father Ted Crilly

I think we can all agree that everyone is a bit bisexual.

The Moldy Gowl

Father Ted Crilly wrote: »

I'm sorry, I must be in the wrong thread. I was looking for the anti-gay marriage thread.

Totes awks bbz. This isn't the anti gay marriage thread anyway.

We work hard, we play hard. Some one grab the pillow, I'm going in dry

Guy:Incognito

Deleted User wrote: »

So not only are those voting no akin to racists, but the only argument they put forward is that the world will end.

You make the OP sound rational!

To everyone who thinks it is only the no side that get hysterical, please read this posters efforts. It's mad stuff!

There hasnt been a decent argument put forward yet that doesnt boil down to much more than "because they're gay"

By all means though, on you go. The floor is yours...............

The Moldy Gowl

Father Ted Crilly wrote: »

I think we can all agree that everyone is a bit bisexual.

That's a very bold statement

macker33

cursai wrote: »

How are things back in the 1920's Macker.

suprisingly fink free

Wang King

macker33 wrote: »

Show me where He ever contradicted the Father

So that's a no then, at least you admit that much, glad we got that sorted!

The Moldy Gowl

macker33 wrote: »

suprisingly fink free

Interesting, so this country was built on the church, and the gays have only appeared this the church made this country.


Weird huh?

222233

macker33 wrote: »

suprisingly fink free

Why do you fear homosexuality so much ?

macker33

Windowsnut wrote: »

boards.ie/vbulletin/showthread.php?p=89695899

legalise prostitution macker33??

Isn't that a sin too? degenerate scum

Prostitutes serve a purpose, they make the world safer by reigning certain elements.

Stalkers and gays on the other hand serve no purpose

trackerman

This first post is an obvious False Flag, people should not be fooled by it.

cursai

222233 wrote: »

Why do you fear homosexuality so much ?

Isnt a fink a strikebreaker or something? Like in Strumpet City.

Guy:Incognito

macker33 wrote: »

Prostitutes serve a purpose, they make the world safer by reigning certain elements.

Stalkers and gays on the other hand serve no purpose

Ah, selective sinning.

So whats your plan to get rid of the gays, seeing as they have no purpose?

B_Wayne

In relation to Macker's nonsensical paedophilia points. The below goes into plenty of detail on subject. Granted, I think most that read him have the sense to know he's an idiot.

The empirical research does not show that gay or bisexual men are any more likely than heterosexual men to molest children. This is not to argue that homosexual and bisexual men never molest children. But there is no scientific basis for asserting that they are more likely than heterosexual men to do so. And, as explained above, many child molesters cannot be characterized as having an adult sexual orientation at all; they are fixated on children.
http://psychology.ucdavis.edu/faculty_sites/rainbow/HTML/facts_molestation.html

Lu Tze

macker33 wrote: »

Whats to elaborate on, old and new testament both tell us homosexuality is a sin and now the government wants to give gay a medal.

The government is telling us that homosexuality isnt a sin and that to consider it so is illegal,

Lu Tze wrote:

Have they really said that? Any chance you could provide a link to the press release? I would be very interest to see it, it would be the first time a thought has been criminalised as far as i am aware.

macker33 wrote: »

The government hasnt thought that far ahead, its called not considering the consequences.

So they haven't said anything of the sort?

constance tench

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/False_dilemma

cursai

Guy:Incognito wrote: »

Ah, selective sinning.

So whats your plan to get rid of the gays, seeing as they have no purpose?

I think the plan was to let them slowly breed/not breed themselves out of existence but this whole adoption thing throws that idea out the window. Sexual preferences are breed by the parents don't you know.

macker33

Gowlasauras Rex wrote: »

Ah I see your troll has become undone. The lols were had.

Definitely some people had a gay ol'time

sunshine and showers

VOTE NO...to feeding the shítty troll.

Guy:Incognito

cursai wrote: »

I think the plan was to let them slowly breed/not breed themselves out of existence but this whole adoption thing throws that idea out the window. Sexual preferences are breed by the parents don't you know.

If we stop straight people having kids then no gay people will be born. I predict complete gay eradication within 100 years.

cursai

sunshine and showers wrote: »

VOTE NO...to feeding the shítty troll.

He is a fine character actor though.

macker33

Guy:Incognito wrote: »

What can we blame them on thats the whole organisations fault so? Living in a big gold palace while purporting to be about helping the poor? Running a system of "workhouses" where women werent allowed to leave, had their children taken from them and sold.

Was that " a few gay priests " too? Were the nuns gay priests?

You do realise that the laundries replaced the workhouses or do you think workhouses were better.
Secondly priests didnt turn up at peoples doors and drag them off to the laundry, these people were institutionalised by their own parents.

macker33

Gandalph wrote: »

And to think it all started with the theft of an apple.

The apple wasnt the problem

freelancerTax

macker33 wrote: »

Ireland has been cursed because of how we carried on during the tiger years and now we risk being cursed again.

For the last 15 years all we have heard on the radio is progay nonsense from progay mouthpieces.
Anybody who says anything different to the progay friendly media push is immediately labelled a bigot by the homfacists, Its all completely one sided.

Are people so easily manipulated? Enda is an idiot who only cares about his legacy. A "first" for ireland.

Dont make christianity a criminal offence because progay and christianity cannot exist together.
Gay is a sin to christianity and christianity is a sin lo the libtards, You cant have both.
Gays have never done anything for ireland, We wouldnt even have an ireland if it wasnt for catholicism. The union jack would be flying over government buildings and not the tricolour.

Dont let your parish be a gay parish, vote no to "gay marriage"

Mod note: this OP is below the forum standards but given the large number of responses since 5.40 on a saturday morning and that the No side claim to be denied free speech, I'm simply going to warn the OP to increase the quality of his/her posts rather than simply talking about how much he/she hates the nasty liberal homosexuals. -js

isn't kiddy fiddling a sin also?? most likley illegal also?
what about moving know kiddy fiddlers around to different parishes instead of handing them over to authorities?

just because you label something as "catholic" does not make it right or good.

the church may have done good things in ireland they have also done some very very bad things...

dont blindly follow what anyone or any organisation say you should or should not do

cursai

Guy:Incognito wrote: »

If we stop straight people having kids then no gay people will be born. I predict complete gay eradication within 100 years.

No no no. The bible says it is a man and womans duty to procreate. We can still have 'normal' children just have to isolate them from lefty artsy influences. Tv convinces kids to be gay seemingly.

B_Wayne

Justifying the laundries now, I'm really not surprised unfortunately.

jacksie66

This post has been deleted.

macker33

cursai wrote: »

Seriously? Hows That?

Because ireland would have bent over the same as scotland and wales, it was the catholic faith that made us too different to accept english rule,
If not for catholicism we would have just rolled with it.
simple.

cursai

Guy:Incognito wrote: »

If we stop straight people having kids then no gay people will be born. I predict complete gay eradication within 100 years.

I predict a shorter timeframe as they'll just get bored of acting the eejit. Sure its only a fad.

macker33

Gowlasauras Rex wrote: »

This country was here before the Catholic Church?

Not sure what will be left if it ever leaves

macker33

Thepoet85 wrote: »

What makes you say that? I'm just curious.

We'd be just like scotland and wales

sunshine and showers

macker33 wrote: »

Not sure what will be left if it ever leaves

Liberals, homosexuality and leprechauns. :rolleyes:

cursai

macker33 wrote: »

Because ireland would have bent over the same as scotland and wales, it was the catholic faith that made us too different to accept english rule,
If not for catholicism we would have just rolled with it.
simple.

Yes. that is simple.

Guy:Incognito

macker33 wrote: »

Secondly priests didnt turn up at peoples doors and drag them off to the laundry, these people were institutionalised by their own parents.

Thats not answering any of the points. I believe thats called deflection. Is it ok to abuse people as long as their parents sent them to you?

Is it the womens parents fault Rome has so much wealth while people are poor too?

macker33

Jenny Thalia wrote: »

Macker, I presume you'll never have children?

looking for hostages?

macker33

Thepoet85 wrote: »

What the bible tells you and real life are two different things

what gays experience and real life are two different things

ElChe32

macker33 wrote: »

Right, blame the whole catholic church because of a few gay priests.

Things become my business as soon as they are forced across my line of sight,
You think i way gay values promoted into my front room by shows like emmerdale farm and coronation street?
Children are sitting in front of the telly and two guys start kissing and they are told by the show that its perfectly ok, Do parents get a say at all?

All this so called abuse gays supposidly get, how would somebody know if they were gay unless they were broadcasting it.
Gays look for it so they can feed off the sympathy.

You watch Coronation Street and Emmerdale? That's so gay.

Guy:Incognito

macker33 wrote: »

what gays experience and real life are two different things

Where are they having the experiences? In a book?

macker33

Gowlasauras Rex wrote: »

Females get abused as well.

The more somebody does something the easier it becomes to do.
I actually put the reason for it being mostly male on male down to the fact of convenience, Males would be in the care of males and most of the abusers were male.

222233

macker33 wrote: »

The more somebody does something the easier it becomes to do.
I actually put the reason for it being mostly male on male down to the fact of convenience, Males would be in the care of males and most of the abusers were male.

you literally blamed it on a few gay priests a while ago make up your mind

freelancerTax

macker33 wrote: »

The more somebody does something the easier it becomes to do.
I actually put the reason for it being mostly male on male down to the fact of convenience, Males would be in the care of males and most of the abusers were male.

priests from your beloved church were also some of these abusers
open your eyes

macker33

222233 wrote: »

macker33

maybe you would like to revisit the time when the church would take "illegitimate" children from their biological mothers how can you say that these children were passed on to safe homes?
.

The church didnt turn up, either the cruelty man turned up or the kids were handed in.

macker33

Wang King wrote: »

So that's a no then, grand, glad we got that sorted at least!

The Father called it an abomination, either saint peter or paul did likewise.
Copyleft isnt going to be much of a defence and it certainly isnt justification.

So i guess its no win for you.

jacksie66

This post has been deleted.