Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Humans - Channel 4

Options
2456711

Comments

  • Closed Accounts Posts: 26,658 ✭✭✭✭OldMrBrennan83


    This post has been deleted.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 643 ✭✭✭Geniass


    wil wrote: »
    First noticed Gemma Chan in IT Crowd, female Spock I think:D
    Spocktacular

    I prefer her with the green luminous eyes. Can we make that a thing.


  • Registered Users Posts: 15,902 ✭✭✭✭AMKC
    Ms


    I think it has potential. Was surprised that it is based in the present but I suppose that is down to the tight budget they have. Would have been cool if it could have been maybe 20 or 30 years in the future.

    Live long and Prosper

    Peace and long life.



  • Registered Users Posts: 8,693 ✭✭✭Lisha


    AMKC wrote: »
    I think it has potential. Was surprised that it is based in the present but I suppose that is down to the tight budget they have. Would have been cool if it could have been maybe 20 or 30 years in the future.

    I like the fact that its based now. It makes it weirder and more troubling to think about.


  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    It kind of reminds me of Ex Machina. There was a fantastic discussion there about the sexualization of robots.
    AMKC wrote: »
    I think it has potential. Was surprised that it is based in the present but I suppose that is down to the tight budget they have. Would have been cool if it could have been maybe 20 or 30 years in the future.

    TBH, I doubt we're even 20-30 years away from having them. If anything, it's much closer than that. It's quite scary how far ahead we are with AI and robotics in general.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 643 ✭✭✭Geniass


    There was a fantastic discussion there about the sexualization of robots.

    Don't call them robots, that's too cold and impersonal:)


  • Registered Users Posts: 4,080 ✭✭✭EoghanIRL


    Promising start.


  • Registered Users Posts: 45,573 ✭✭✭✭Mr.Nice Guy


    I thought it was pretty good. I thought Anita was the most interesting part of the show. Interested to see where it goes from here.
    TBH, I doubt we're even 20-30 years away from having them. If anything, it's much closer than that. It's quite scary how far ahead we are with AI and robotics in general.

    I'd like to think so, but I'd be sceptical. Isn't it absurdly difficult to get them to move in a human-like manner? All of the current ones I've seen have the mobility of Hans Moleman.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,353 ✭✭✭Cold War Kid


    Really enjoyed it. Likely Blade Runner influenced (the soundtrack is quite Vangelis-esque in parts too).
    Eerie, dystopian... mixed up with just mundane stuff like going to the supermarket and doing the laundry.

    There are so many of those dystopian thingies over the past five or so years, but this one, to me, is that bit more compelling.


  • Registered Users Posts: 28,789 ✭✭✭✭ScumLord


    TBH, I doubt we're even 20-30 years away from having them. If anything, it's much closer than that. It's quite scary how far ahead we are with AI and robotics in general.
    They're already hitting the factory floor in the form of a robot that can be just shown how to do a task. By the person it's replacing probably.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 2,389 ✭✭✭PhiloCypher


    Really enjoyed it. Likely Blade Runner influenced (the soundtrack is quite Vangelis-esque in parts too).
    Eerie, dystopian... mixed up with just mundane stuff like going to the supermarket and doing the laundry.

    There are so many of those dystopian thingies over the past five or so years, but this one, to me, is that bit more compelling.

    I actually found the futuristic tinkling soundtrack a bit too on the nose and at odds with the mundane present day backdrop.

    Other then that I quite liked it(the show)


  • Registered Users Posts: 6,133 ✭✭✭FloatingVoter


    ScumLord wrote: »
    They're already hitting the factory floor in the form of a robot that can be just shown how to do a task. By the person it's replacing probably.

    Right, so next week I'm losing my job to this heap of metal. Now will I teach it to do my job as well as me or will I show it ways to murder my scumbag boss. It's a dilemma, Ted.


  • Registered Users Posts: 12,248 ✭✭✭✭BoJack Horseman


    Its a bleak future Channel 4 portrays.....

    Humanoid robots everywhere & 2008 Astra's & Yaris's still rolling around.

    Curious direction for technological development.


  • Registered Users Posts: 21,444 ✭✭✭✭Skid X


    Its a bleak future Channel 4 portrays.....

    Humanoid robots everywhere & 2008 Astra's & Yaris's still rolling around.

    Curious direction for technological development.

    I think that's the point of it, though.

    Apart from the androids everything else is kept the same as it is today, to illustrate that smart robots might be here sooner that people expect.

    I think it's a decent show, looking forward to how develops.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,353 ✭✭✭Cold War Kid


    I actually found the futuristic tinkling soundtrack a bit too on the nose and at odds with the mundane present day backdrop.
    I actually liked that juxtaposition. :)


  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    I'd say we're under a decade away (if not much less) from these kind of robots and AI being commercially available. If you watch it developing right now, it's utterly terrifying. Just pray that the Singularity never comes.


  • Registered Users Posts: 4,080 ✭✭✭EoghanIRL


    hqdefault.jpg
    Singularity reminds me of this.

    I reckon reaching this level with robots is like accelerating something to the speed of light, the closer you get the more difficult it becomes.


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,328 ✭✭✭Mezcita


    I'd say we're under a decade away (if not much less) from these kind of robots and AI being commercially available. If you watch it developing right now, it's utterly terrifying. Just pray that the Singularity never comes.

    Think ten years is pretty optimistic to be honest. This looks a long way from saucy maid robots who can dodge bullets and make lasagne for dinner.



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    On the side of AI though, that's where it is getting kinda scary.


  • Registered Users Posts: 28,789 ✭✭✭✭ScumLord


    Right, so next week I'm losing my job to this heap of metal. Now will I teach it to do my job as well as me or will I show it ways to murder my scumbag boss. It's a dilemma, Ted.
    I'm sure it will murder you boss eventually either way so I wouldn't worry about it. All robots are homicidal.
    I'd say we're under a decade away (if not much less) from these kind of robots and AI being commercially available. If you watch it developing right now, it's utterly terrifying. Just pray that the Singularity never comes.
    Google and Facebook are battling it out behind the scenes trying to make the most advanced AI. They've both been buying up AI companies. They will be using the AI for searching though, it won't be the malevolent sentient creature we're used to in movies it will just be a more aware search system. That takes up a few warehouses.

    The problem with a sentient robot is probably the brain won't fit into a body that's smaller than an airplane and with all our mechanical prowess muscles still have some major advantages over the mechanicals in robots. They can carry out pre planned operations with stunning accuracy but throw them into a changing environment and their laughably slow.

    I think AI's (Artifical Intelligence: I'm sure will become a politically incorrect term for them at some stage) will always be big and at best they'll control robots remotely. The problem I see with AI is that we might make them sentient so they have the processing power to do certain jobs, but once they become sentient we can't really force them to do those jobs anymore.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 6,133 ✭✭✭FloatingVoter


    Humans invented chopsticks and wheels millennia ago. Those tools have yet to take over humanity. The fact that a few nerds have invented some new tools does not make said nerds creators of anything more useful than a chopstick.
    A species so idiotic it can't operate a washing machine therefore needs a more complicated machine to operate the washing machine is on the way out all by itself.
    And chopsticks and wheels don't endlessly crash or need upgrades. My money is on the cockroaches (they're behind the washing machine, dummy).


  • Registered Users Posts: 33,470 ✭✭✭✭NIMAN


    AI my ass.

    Computers are thick. What is happening in that TV show is hundreds of years away.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 6,038 ✭✭✭Go Harvey Go


    ScumLord wrote: »
    I'm sure it will murder you boss eventually either way so I wouldn't worry about it. All robots are homicidal.

    "Command link severed. Default setting. Crush. Kill. Destroy."

    "Children, help! He's... killing... me!"

    "YAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAY!!!!!!"

    children-hes-killing-me.png?w=630&h=472

    yaaay.png?w=630&h=472

    :o:o:D:D;);)


  • Registered Users Posts: 28,789 ✭✭✭✭ScumLord


    NIMAN wrote: »
    AI my ass.

    Computers are thick. What is happening in that TV show is hundreds of years away.
    Probably not hundred of years away. The advances being made today will allow for rapid development in the future. They reckon within 50 years you'll have a direct link between the internet and your brain, nanotechnology will be boosting your immune system, AI will be smarter than a human and rapidly becoming smarter than every human combined.

    There are many technologies in labs around the world that are just going through the process of making them manufacturable at an affordable price. It's not so much the technology doesn't exist it's just that it can't be made cheap enough for the general public yet.


  • Registered Users Posts: 6,133 ✭✭✭FloatingVoter


    The show has got one thing right. Watch the porn industry. They will not market robots as tools to raise your kids, they will be marketed as tools to raise your tool.
    The great "invention" of the last 25 years - the internet itself - has two main functions.....free stuff and porn. The rest is window dressing. Before you reply in the negative, check your browser history...if you're not at it, your kids are.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 997 ✭✭✭MrJones1973


    Nowadays Smut is de rigueur but I think the scene was to illustrate the abuse of the syths.


  • Registered Users Posts: 6,133 ✭✭✭FloatingVoter


    Nowadays Smut is de rigueur but I think the scene was to illustrate the syths debasement. rigueur

    Agreed about the placement of the scene (and her leaving her pain chip or whatever on)- but it would have been a lesser show without it. And the lady getting carried off for her eh...massage by the manbot while hubby looked on in another scene showed that Sisters can exploit it for themselves.
    It's not terribly deep - just a show about how all us posh liberals could bring back slavery tomorrow if the TV told us it was all cool and for our own good.


  • Registered Users Posts: 4,572 ✭✭✭enfant terrible


    TBH, I doubt we're even 20-30 years away from having them. If anything, it's much closer than that. It's quite scary how far ahead we are with AI and robotics in general.

    This is currently the pinnacle of AI

    http://imgur.com/gallery/K4mWF2n


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 98 ✭✭Polly Sonic


    ScumLord wrote: »
    Probably not hundred of years away. The advances being made today will allow for rapid development in the future. They reckon within 50 years you'll have a direct link between the internet and your brain, nanotechnology will be boosting your immune system, AI will be smarter than a human and rapidly becoming smarter than every human combined.

    There are many technologies in labs around the world that are just going through the process of making them manufacturable at an affordable price. It's not so much the technology doesn't exist it's just that it can't be made cheap enough for the general public yet.

    Google is technically smarter than any single human being on the planet and has been for many years. Self awareness and cognitive behaviour is a million miles away from that kind of "smart". It's centuries away if even possible.

    Following commands is all we will ever see in our lifetime.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 3,541 ✭✭✭duridian


    Reminded me of this from CES 2015


    The show's analogies, slavery/where does humanity (and life) begin and end etc. also remind me greatly of something that was done on Star Trek TNG with a Data focussed storyline. Picard's defence of Data was one of Picard's most epic courtroom speeches.
    http://en.memory-alpha.wikia.com/wiki/The_Measure_Of_A_Man_(episode)



Advertisement