Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Mick Wallace

Options
13

Comments

  • Options
    #62
    Del.Monte
    Registered Users Posts: 12,363 ✭✭✭✭Del.Monte


    Howlin is a self important, pompous little ****e. Apart from that I'm sure he's a great fellow. With Mick Wallace, what you see is what you get.

    ****



  • Options
    #63
    esforum
    Closed Accounts Posts: 1,420 ✭✭✭esforum


    Del.Monte wrote: »
    Is he mad? He was right about the Garda penalty points and the Nama money 'resting' Father Ted style in an Isle of Man account to name but two things.

    no he wasnt, he didnt start the penalty points, that was ming and he was proved wrong about the nama money but as he just used Dail privelege to talk a load of ****e and continues to do so he is protected from those he bashes without proof. He hasnt actually accomplished anything, nor will he.

    he was wrong about the Gardai and the Clare Daly case

    he critisises a system he benefitted from

    he hasnt paid back any money yet from the pensions

    hasnt paid back revenue

    Did you really elect a TD to jump Shannons fence?

    Did you really elect a TD to go bail for a suspected terrorist?

    What exactly has he actually done for his contstituents?

    and as for his company, yeah he tried to keep the company afloat but it was for his pocket, not the good of his staff. get real will ya, he made millions building houses and selling them for huge profits not giving them away for charity! He wasnt critisising the housing bubble and banks then was he?


  • Options
    #64
    Bongalongherb
    Closed Accounts Posts: 3,766 ✭✭✭Bongalongherb


    He's getting my vote anyway. He's the only one that is putting pressure on this backward government.


  • Options
    #65
    Busted Flat.
    Registered Users Posts: 4,003 ✭✭✭Busted Flat.


    esforum wrote: »
    no he wasnt, he didnt start the penalty points, that was ming and he was proved wrong about the nama money but as he just used Dail privelege to talk a load of ****e and continues to do so he is protected from those he bashes without proof. He hasnt actually accomplished anything, nor will he.

    he was wrong about the Gardai and the Clare Daly case

    he critisises a system he benefitted from

    he hasnt paid back any money yet from the pensions

    hasnt paid back revenue

    Did you really elect a TD to jump Shannons fence?

    Did you really elect a TD to go bail for a suspected terrorist?

    What exactly has he actually done for his contstituents?

    and as for his company, yeah he tried to keep the company afloat but it was for his pocket, not the good of his staff. get real will ya, he made millions building houses and selling them for huge profits not giving them away for charity! He wasnt critisising the housing bubble and banks then was he?

    Very sad ignorant post, then you get posts from all parties when their candidates seats are in danger. Roll on the GE.


  • Options
    #66
    kawasaki1100
    Registered Users Posts: 138 ✭✭kawasaki1100


    Del.Monte wrote: »
    Where did Mick Wallace say that it was because the accused Donal O Coisdealbha came from a 'good' family? As far as I can see his family is known to Mick Wallace and that's all that's in the public domain. Interestingly, Donal O Coisdealbha is a stepson of one of the 'Columbia 3 Birdwatchers' http://www.irishnews.com/news/2015/05/18/news/men-charged-with-bomb-plot-ahead-of-charles-visit-123514/

    As for losing Mick Wallace votes - his constituency is Co.Wexford not Foxrock and SF have serious support down here.

    Don't know i have no idea. I asked the same question, just thought it weird Mick offering to post bail for some IRA lad. So - where does Foxrock come into it?? The plot thickens.......


  • Advertisement
  • Options
    #67
    esforum
    Closed Accounts Posts: 1,420 ✭✭✭esforum


    Busted Flat. wrote: »
    Very sad ignorant post, then you get posts from all parties when their candidates seats are in danger. Roll on the GE.

    where am I wrong?


  • Options
    #68
    tipptom
    Registered Users Posts: 4,219 ✭✭✭tipptom


    kawasaki1100 wrote: »
    Dosent really shed Mick in a good light this, thought he had a bit more cop on. Could the Shinners not have sorted a few bob for the IRA lad instead of Mick making a complete fool of himself all over the media?
    Don't think this reflects good on Mick either but why would SF post bail for a dissident republican whom they are opposed to and who have a long time death threat hanging over Gerry Adams and Martin McGuinness for bring about the peace process.


  • Options
    #69
    Finnbar01
    Registered Users Posts: 2,070 ✭✭✭Finnbar01


    I found it very surprising when he was very surprised that he would have to spend time in jail because he didn't pay a fine.

    What else did he think would happen?


  • Options
    #70
    joe swanson
    Registered Users Posts: 1,124 ✭✭✭joe swanson


    Really shocking stuff he has not faced justice in regards to his debt to the taxpayer and the treatment of his employees.

    Why is this? I think an inquiry should be set up to look into this .


  • Options
    #71
    flutered
    Registered Users Posts: 6,684 ✭✭✭flutered


    joe swanson wrote: »
    Really shocking stuff he has not faced justice in regards to his debt to the taxpayer and the treatment of his employees.

    Why is this? I think an inquiry should be set up to look into this .

    the same quote in two different threads, you already know the answer if you have been following them, he done a deal with the tax man, as far as i know


  • Advertisement
  • Options
    #72
    joe swanson
    Registered Users Posts: 1,124 ✭✭✭joe swanson


    flutered wrote: »
    the same quote in two different threads, you already know the answer if you have been following them, he done a deal with the tax man, as far as i know

    And why the special treatment?


  • Options
    #73
    tipptom
    Registered Users Posts: 4,219 ✭✭✭tipptom


    joe swanson wrote: »
    And why the special treatment?
    Go and read the papers and educate your self on the tax matters in this country.


  • Options
    #74
    joe swanson
    Registered Users Posts: 1,124 ✭✭✭joe swanson


    tipptom wrote: »
    Go and read the papers and educate your self on the tax matters in this country.

    That if your a politician in this country ie wallace. You should get special treatment and not be prosecuted?


  • Options
    #75
    tipptom
    Registered Users Posts: 4,219 ✭✭✭tipptom


    joe swanson wrote: »
    That if your a politician in this country ie wallace. You should get special treatment and not be prosecuted?
    I think you are the one with your faux outrage looking for special treatment and an inquiry for Mick Wallace after he has settled his affairs.


    Don't you think there has been enough money spent on inquiry's that have been frustrated by the real corrupt compromised politicians and their sugar Daddy corrupt businessmen in this country.


  • Options
    #76
    joe swanson
    Registered Users Posts: 1,124 ✭✭✭joe swanson


    tipptom wrote: »
    I think you are the one with your faux outrage looking for special treatment and an inquiry for Mick Wallace after he has settled his affairs.


    Don't you think there has been enough money spent on inquiry's that have been frustrated by the real corrupt compromised politicians and their sugar Daddy corrupt businessmen in this country.

    No faux outrage here , I just think the law should apply equally which it has not been in this case and the question need to be asked why?


  • Options
    #77
    tipptom
    Registered Users Posts: 4,219 ✭✭✭tipptom


    joe swanson wrote: »
    No faux outrage here , I just think the law should apply equally which it has not been in this case and the question need to be asked why?
    Where has he availed of a deal made with the taxman that has been unprecedented and never done before except for MW?


  • Options
    #78
    flutered
    Registered Users Posts: 6,684 ✭✭✭flutered


    joe swanson wrote: »
    And why the special treatment?[/QU
    i do believe that he is not alone being treated that way, but then you know that, but the sch1t needs to be kept stirred coming up to a ge, watch all the message boards and watch the attacks on the indys, others, ff and sf, there will be a few threads on all them running at the same time


  • Options
    #79
    joe swanson
    Registered Users Posts: 1,124 ✭✭✭joe swanson


    flutered wrote: »
    joe swanson wrote: »
    And why the special treatment?[/QU
    i do believe that he is not alone being treated that way, but then you know that, but the sch1t needs to be kept stirred coming up to a ge, watch all the message boards and watch the attacks on the indys, others, ff and sf, there will be a few threads on all them running at the same time

    I dont believe any person should b entitled to any special deals no matter if they are are ex property developers come left wing politician putting up bail for alleged terrorists or anybody else for that matter.


  • Options
    #80
    tipptom
    Registered Users Posts: 4,219 ✭✭✭tipptom


    joe swanson wrote: »
    flutered wrote: »

    I dont believe any person should b entitled to any special deals no matter if they are are ex property developers come left wing politician putting up bail for alleged terrorists or anybody else for that matter.
    That include your special sugar Daddy with his unlimited donations to your party,the bould Dinny?


  • Options
    #81
    kawasaki1100
    Registered Users Posts: 138 ✭✭kawasaki1100


    tipptom wrote: »
    Don't think this reflects good on Mick either but why would SF post bail for a dissident republican whom they are opposed to and who have a long time death threat hanging over Gerry Adams and Martin McGuinness for bring about the peace process.

    Strange though why SF TDs will never speak out against dissident murders of Gardai, really strange don't you think???


  • Advertisement
  • Options
    #82
    tipptom
    Registered Users Posts: 4,219 ✭✭✭tipptom


    kawasaki1100 wrote: »
    Strange though why SF TDs will never speak out against dissident murders of Gardai, really strange don't you think???
    Even stranger that you would like to make up something that is patently un true about SF in a thread about Mick Wallace.


  • Options
    #83
    kawasaki1100
    Registered Users Posts: 138 ✭✭kawasaki1100


    tipptom wrote: »
    Even stranger that you would like to make up something that is patently un true about SF in a thread about Mick Wallace.

    Oh Ouch! The truth hurts then eh?


  • Options
    #84
    tipptom
    Registered Users Posts: 4,219 ✭✭✭tipptom


    kawasaki1100 wrote: »
    Oh Ouch! The truth hurts then eh?
    If you want to make up lies to suit your agenda,knock youself out,I couldn't care less,but at least try to not get caught out in your ignorance.


  • Options
    #85
    kawasaki1100
    Registered Users Posts: 138 ✭✭kawasaki1100


    tipptom wrote: »
    If you want to make up lies to suit your agenda,knock youself out,I couldn't care less,but at least try to not get caught out in your ignorance.

    Ah just as i thought theres no answer.
    The question still remains - why did Mick Wallace try to post bail for some IRA lad?


  • Options
    #86
    Del.Monte
    Registered Users Posts: 12,363 ✭✭✭✭Del.Monte


    kawasaki1100 wrote: »
    Ah just as i thought theres no answer.
    The question still remains - why did Mick Wallace try to post bail for some IRA lad?

    Why don't you ask him yourself?

    http://mickwallace.net/index.php/contact

    ****



  • Options
    #87
    kawasaki1100
    Registered Users Posts: 138 ✭✭kawasaki1100


    Del.Monte wrote: »
    Why don't you ask him yourself?

    http://mickwallace.net/index.php/contact

    Ah cheers for that, I doubt i will get an answer there either but i will try. Happy Christmas to you all.


  • Options
    #88
    joe swanson
    Registered Users Posts: 1,124 ✭✭✭joe swanson


    tipptom wrote: »
    joe swanson wrote: »
    That include your special sugar Daddy with his unlimited donations to your party,the bould Dinny?

    What on earth are you on about? I have no party. I hold no political allegiance so enough absolute rubbish whataboutery.


  • Options
    #89
    tipptom
    Registered Users Posts: 4,219 ✭✭✭tipptom


    joe swanson wrote: »
    tipptom wrote: »

    What on earth are you on about? I have no party. I hold no political allegiance so enough absolute rubbish whataboutery.
    Phone the inland revenue and demand an enquiry in to the deal that they have done with MW and impress upon them your theory that this has not been done before and is special to MW, I'm sure if what you say is true it will be one of the big scoops of the new year and you will be at the centre of it.


    Ask them why the special deal and the IR might explain it if they are at a loose end.
    Let us know how you get on.


  • Options
    #90
    Del.Monte
    Registered Users Posts: 12,363 ✭✭✭✭Del.Monte


    The Inland Revenue https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inland_Revenue was a British Government Dept., why would they have been making deals with Mick Wallace?

    ****



  • Advertisement
  • Options
    #91
    fryup
    Registered Users Posts: 18,067 ✭✭✭✭fryup


    the kelt wrote: »

    Meanwhile he was willing to put up 5,000 in bail money for a fella who has been charged with membership of the IRA and was caught with a component part of an explosive device.

    he also wants omagh bomber michael mckevitt released on "compassionate" grounds :confused:

    and what compassion did mckevitt show to omagh?


Advertisement