Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

What would you do if you found out God existed?

2

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,875 ✭✭✭ShoulderChip


    I wouldnt do anything until we got an apology

    would you accept one under any circumstance from such a c*nt?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,305 ✭✭✭✭branie2


    If I were an atheist, I'd say the "prayer" from Monty Python's The Meaning of Life, when I'd see Him


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,433 ✭✭✭NomadicGray


    would you accept one under any circumstance from such a c*nt?

    It would certainly need to be an exceptional apology


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,453 ✭✭✭Shenshen


    kneemos wrote: »
    I postulated that if he interfered he would have to interfere with all mans mishaps.
    Children do die of cancer,they die in droves everyday across the developing world of even simple diseases,all kinds of unimaginable stuff happens.
    No idea why it is this way.If you create life it's going to have good and bad I suppose.

    Why would any interference be required?
    The question that was asked was why, assuming god created the world, he created it containing cancer, parasites and all manners of contagious and congenital diseases in the first place?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,837 ✭✭✭TheLastMohican


    I'd get through to His manager and book Him for the full day at the Dingle Regatta and Pattern Day in Knocknagoshel ........ both on the 15th of August.

    Bi-location should be no problem for Him.

    I wonder if He charges double?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 901 ✭✭✭xLisaBx


    Shenshen wrote: »
    Why would any interference be required?
    The question that was asked was why, assuming god created the world, he created it containing cancer, parasites and all manners of contagious and congenital diseases in the first place?

    Not necessarily. If a God created life, if it created humans and animals and bacteria etc., it would have created them to live. Cancer is developed by our cells mutilating, and these mutilated cells multiplying out of control. It's not really something created, per say. It's just a fault of our bodies. God would not really have had to create cancer for it to exist.

    It is preached that the reason it doesn't interfere is because free will is the ultimate goal. Cancer wasn't really an issue up until the last 100/200 years. This means that it has most likely been caused by our environment and ways of life. Cancer treatments are progressing rapidly, and eventually it is highly possible that all forms of cancer will be cured. This demonstrates a circle, the will to live in a way that causes illness and the will to cure it. This is what many religions preach.

    Another commonly asked question is why a God would permit poverty and disease amongst those in the 3rd world. The answer is the same really, we DO have the power to change it, but the greed of the wealthy overpowers the need of the poor. Sad reality of life, but demonstrates free will.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 243 ✭✭316


    I would bring him for a pint or a dozen.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 6,995 ✭✭✭Schadenfreudia


    Tell him he's a total sadistic bollix...


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,396 ✭✭✭DivingDuck


    I'd mostly be asking why some of the rules he wanted people to follow (heterosexual behaviour only, no sex before marriage, etc.) were so narrow-minded and unfair.

    If I could get a decent answer* to this, I'd be prepared to consider changing my ways.




    *Except there is no decent answer, only bad ones. So sadly, I don't think it would have any impact on me at all. I'd go on trying to be good to people as much as I could, and if that wasn't good enough, then I'd have to make do in whatever afterlife with comes all the other fundamentally decent people whose actions and preferences sometimes strayed outside the lines of Catholicism.

    I would be disappointed by a deity who truly had such uncharitable and unkind views, so it's no surprise he'd be disappointed with me in turn.


  • Advertisement
  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 6,995 ✭✭✭Schadenfreudia


    DivingDuck wrote: »
    I'd mostly be asking why some of the rules he wanted people to follow (heterosexual behaviour only, no sex before marriage, etc.) were so narrow-minded and unfair.

    If he is so anti-gay why the phuk did he make so many of them? More of His sadistic "pulling-wings-off-flies" carry on.

    He's a very hard Guy to warm to....shows classic psychopath tendencies....


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 37,311 ✭✭✭✭the_syco


    Ask for super powers.

    Or if not, then they aren't god...


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,396 ✭✭✭DivingDuck


    If he is so anti-gay why the phuk did he make so many of them? More of His sadistic "pulling-wings-off-flies" carry on.

    He's a very hard Guy to warm to....shows classic psychopath tendencies....

    That's more or less my point.

    I can, at a broad stretch, understand the concept of allowing people suffer at the hands of others. They will be rewarded in the afterlife, and (in theory) it allows humankind the chance the chance to develop its own intelligence and compassion instead of just reacting to "God will punish you if you are cruel". The development of compassion out of free will rather than fear is important.

    However, why make people with inherent urges that go against the rules for having a good afterlife? Homosexuality and the general urge for pre-marital sex are the only ones that spring readily to mind, but there have to be others. Unlike with the suffering notion, this is different. It's not about developing compassion for others or free will, it's purely "Don't do this because God says you shouldn't". I can't think of any logic behind that, even a cruel logic, so that's why I take the most issue with it.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 24,523 ✭✭✭✭Cookie_Monster


    Just pretend you wake up tomorrow morning to find out that God has sent a messenger to the word preching his message. His message is basically telling you to be a good Catholic(not perfect) in order to get into heaven. Your proof that this person is telling you the truth is they can tell you exactly what your loved ones who are in heaven are like and he can preform miracles.
    Would you change to being a better Catholic? Or would you carry on in your sinful ways?

    I'd ask him why he has been such a **** allowing so much of the world to go to ****.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25,243 ✭✭✭✭Jesus Wept


    I'd kick him in the face. And not just because it is a populous answer.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 1,104 ✭✭✭Niemoj


    Do an absolute shît load of apologising.


  • Advertisement
  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    The only thing a sane, rational person can do. Kill him!

    Very good! Been reading a certain Russian novelist, per chance?

    For those of you who haven't read one of the truly great pieces of world literature (and existential philosophy), here's a summary.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,389 ✭✭✭NachoBusiness


    Blasphemers, the lot of ye.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 23,495 ✭✭✭✭Billy86


    I'd be straight down the George into a machete and a shotgun to begin making amends. :pac:


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,389 ✭✭✭NachoBusiness


    Funny, I was just going to say that it sounds like a bit of a con that God should get the blame for things that go wrong, but deserves no gratitude for things that go right.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 23,495 ✭✭✭✭Billy86


    It would certainly need to be an exceptional apology

    Immaculate, even.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,957 ✭✭✭✭gormdubhgorm


    Would got just send a text these days instead of a messenger?
    If that is the case I would just block the number.

    Guff about stuff, and stuff about guff.



  • Closed Accounts Posts: 12,452 ✭✭✭✭The_Valeyard


    Would got just send a text these days instead of a messenger?
    If that is the case I would just block the number.


    Its God, you cant really block his number, he just unblock it and shìt. In fact if you did block his number, he would probably spam you.


  • Registered Users Posts: 3,750 ✭✭✭iDave


    Nuke him just to be safe.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,468 ✭✭✭CruelCoin


    Would you change to being a better Catholic? Or would you carry on in your sinful ways?

    You're assuming i'm catholic to begin with.

    Screw your messenger, my god offers beers volcanoes and stripper factories. Top that.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,065 ✭✭✭crazygeryy


    id hire him to build me a new shed.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,893 ✭✭✭Hannibal Smith


    I'd try better to be good. But then again, if s/he is a God they'll know me full well and my chances of sticking to it are slim to none :pac:


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,453 ✭✭✭Shenshen


    xLisaBx wrote: »
    Not necessarily. If a God created life, if it created humans and animals and bacteria etc., it would have created them to live. Cancer is developed by our cells mutilating, and these mutilated cells multiplying out of control. It's not really something created, per say. It's just a fault of our bodies. God would not really have had to create cancer for it to exist.

    It is preached that the reason it doesn't interfere is because free will is the ultimate goal. Cancer wasn't really an issue up until the last 100/200 years. This means that it has most likely been caused by our environment and ways of life. Cancer treatments are progressing rapidly, and eventually it is highly possible that all forms of cancer will be cured. This demonstrates a circle, the will to live in a way that causes illness and the will to cure it. This is what many religions preach.

    Another commonly asked question is why a God would permit poverty and disease amongst those in the 3rd world. The answer is the same really, we DO have the power to change it, but the greed of the wealthy overpowers the need of the poor. Sad reality of life, but demonstrates free will.

    I assume you mean "mutated" when you say "mutilated"?

    Cancer has been documented as far back as Roman times, it's by no means a new phenomenon.

    Again, assuming this omnipotent, omniscient god created the world, he indisputably created it knowing that it would contain cancer. He created it with parasites that will kill their hosts painfully and slowly. He created it with contagious and congenital diseases.
    You seem to claim that really he wasn't aware and didn't know what he was doing, which is not a claim many religions would support.


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,342 ✭✭✭fatknacker


    If god created man on his own image, why do we all look different and some or most of us are uggos. Why are we not all men with beards? Why are we women with moustaches?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 24,280 ✭✭✭✭Sleepy


    I'd ask him when planned to wreak great vengeance and furious anger down upon the Catholic Church for the crimes of hoarding vast wealth while millions starve.
    I'd ask him how much of what his "messagers on earth" spout was his, and how much of it was their own narrow mindedness.
    I'd make him answer Steven Fry's question about why he created a world full of evil that can happen to the innocent.

    Then I'd crucify the ****er.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,471 ✭✭✭✭kneemos


    I'm not being defensive,trust me I don't care,but it's genuinely difficult to believe that a lot of these comments were written by grown ups.

    I mean seriously.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 12,452 ✭✭✭✭The_Valeyard


    kneemos wrote: »
    I'm not being defensive,trust me I don't care,but it's genuinely difficult to believe that a lot of these comments were written by grown ups.

    I mean seriously.

    It's After Hours.......


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,160 ✭✭✭Huntergonzo


    Haha messengers, why does God not have the balls do his own proselytising?

    Anyway God does have a soft spot for red light districts (as seen by the fact that the one in New Orleans was left relatively intact after Hurricane katrina) so who knows, me and old whore monger God might actually get along :-)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25,725 ✭✭✭✭Timberrrrrrrr


    Shenshen wrote: »
    I assume you mean "mutated" when you say "mutilated"?

    Cancer has been documented as far back as Roman times, it's by no means a new phenomenon.

    Again, assuming this omnipotent, omniscient god created the world, he indisputably created it knowing that it would contain cancer. He created it with parasites that will kill their hosts painfully and slowly. He created it with contagious and congenital diseases.
    You seem to claim that really he wasn't aware and didn't know what he was doing, which is not a claim many religions would support.

    Because free will man free will, When you don't have the answer you just claim "god" gave us free will and therefore it's all our own fault.


  • Moderators, Music Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 25,734 Mod ✭✭✭✭Boom_Bap


    "Howya God. You have the power and wisdom (infinite) and insight to be the only person or celestial being to answer the following question. Which is the best mobile operator really? Really like?"


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,368 ✭✭✭Smart Bug


    kneemos wrote: »
    I'm not being defensive,trust me I don't care,but it's genuinely difficult to believe that a lot of these comments were written by grown ups.

    I mean seriously.


    I find it hard to credit the circular, childish thinking of some of the Godbotherers on this thread.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,096 ✭✭✭Daith


    If God arrived on Earth could do everything as described in the Bible but appeared in the form of a woman the Pope wouldn't believe her.


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,499 ✭✭✭Yester


    I would be terrified into confroming.


  • Registered Users Posts: 782 ✭✭✭Reiver


    I'd be very afraid.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 901 ✭✭✭xLisaBx


    Shenshen wrote: »
    I assume you mean "mutated" when you say "mutilated"?

    Cancer has been documented as far back as Roman times, it's by no means a new phenomenon.

    Again, assuming this omnipotent, omniscient god created the world, he indisputably created it knowing that it would contain cancer. He created it with parasites that will kill their hosts painfully and slowly. He created it with contagious and congenital diseases.
    You seem to claim that really he wasn't aware and didn't know what he was doing, which is not a claim many religions would support.

    Yeah, mutate, damn autocorrect :D

    It has indeed been documented that far back, but it certainly didn't affect one in three like today. He created it knowing cells would mutate, yes, but if he didn't then he would have made us immortal. That wasn't really a goal, either.

    Our world can't really sustain itself without diseases such as cancer and aids. We're overpopulated as it is, and they are an excellent way of culling our population. I know that sounds incredibly heartless, but it's the truth. And if some diseases weren't congenital and contagious, they wouldn't spread as easily and therefore we wouldn't cull the population as efficiently as we do now.

    A God may be doing a great thing for the common good by having a world with disease and decay. Without them, we would run out of resources and all probably die. Some dying is better than all.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25,725 ✭✭✭✭Timberrrrrrrr


    xLisaBx wrote: »
    Yeah, mutate, damn autocorrect :D

    It has indeed been documented that far back, but it certainly didn't affect one in three like today. He created it knowing cells would mutate, yes, but if he didn't then he would have made us immortal. That wasn't really a goal, either.

    Our world can't really sustain itself without diseases such as cancer and aids. We're overpopulated as it is, and they are an excellent way of culling our population. I know that sounds incredibly heartless, but it's the truth. And if some diseases weren't congenital and contagious, they wouldn't spread as easily and therefore we wouldn't cull the population as efficiently as we do now.

    A God may be doing a great thing for the common good by having a world with disease and decay. Without them, we would run out of resources and all probably die. Some dying is better than all.

    So why not just kill off all the non believers and leave the planet less populated for the people who worship him? Why kill off a child or a devout follower with a sickening disease but let a mass murderer live a life of luxury?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 901 ✭✭✭xLisaBx


    So why not just kill off all the non believers and leave the planet less populated for the people who worship him? Why kill off a child or a devout follower with a sickening disease but let a mass murderer live a life of luxury?

    That resurrects the whole free will argument again. Also, the concept of eternity in heaven or hell explains it too. The child may die young but has an eternity of happiness afterwards. The murderer may enjoy 80 years or so of murder but will not enjoy the rest of time.


  • Registered Users Posts: 190 ✭✭defrule


    Don't think I would buy it, not gonna bow down in fear. If I'm going to hell im going honest.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25,725 ✭✭✭✭Timberrrrrrrr


    xLisaBx wrote: »
    That resurrects the whole free will argument again. Also, the concept of eternity in heaven or hell explains it too. The child may die young but has an eternity of happiness afterwards. The murderer may enjoy 80 years or so of murder but will not enjoy the rest of time.

    It's not an argument it's a get out clause for not being able to explain how a "loving god" can let an innocent child live and die in agony for it's short life.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 901 ✭✭✭xLisaBx


    It's not an argument it's a get out clause for not being able to explain how a "loving god" can let an innocent child live and die in agony for it's short life.

    Read the rest of the reply. Explains the rest of the viewpoint without a "get out" clause.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 843 ✭✭✭HandsomeDan


    Can this messenger transpire to be Bono?


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 782 ✭✭✭Reiver


    defrule wrote: »
    Don't think I would buy it, not gonna bow down in fear. If I'm going to hell im going honest.

    Do you want to live forever?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,283 ✭✭✭✭MadYaker


    I'm too far gone at this stage. Even it all turned out to be real I don't think I could be saved.


  • Registered Users Posts: 266 ✭✭Irelandcool


    Yeah this thread pretty much went down how I thought it go down on the internet.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 280 ✭✭sm213


    Not really a concern if its not going to happen.
    My 'sinful' ways gave me 2 beautiful babies. No way would I change my mind


  • Posts: 13,712 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    I would repent, of course, but I don't fancy my chances.


  • Advertisement
Advertisement