Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Is it time to get rid of the politics Mega Thread
Options
Comments
-
-
-
-
-
-
Advertisement
-
fuzzy dunlop wrote: »BTW the posting history is interesting here. It seems some of the people who hate discussing politics here have no problem over on the politics cafe when they have the numbers behind them which is the appropriate forum for that discussion. Goes to show its not the politics but being on the wrong side of the argument;)
FYP
Is that why you want to do all your political ranting "discussion" on here, rather than the appropriate designated forum, because you feel the numbers are on your side here in good old Union city...?!
While you were nosying, you may have noticed that probably 95% of my posts in the politics café are on two threads - the IW mega thread and the Paul Murphy being arrested thread. I also went on a kind of safari trip into the Sinn Fein mega thread for a few posts when all the sexual abuse stories were the big news story a few months back, and that was certainly interesting.
But the overall majority of my posts over the last 5 years are in the taxation and accountancy forums, yet I never post about either of those things in this forum. Applying your logic that must be because of lack of numbers to support my talk about numbers, whereas in reality (just like with my posts about IW and the Jobstown 27) it's just a case of posting in the appropriate forum. You should try it
0 -
-
-
-
No, leave things as they arebarneystinson wrote: »
Is that why you want to do all your political ranting "discussion" on here, rather than the appropriate designated forum, because you feel the numbers are on your side here in good old Union city...?!
Said like a true Fine Gaeler. Just because someone is not fawning over your corrupt little cult they have to be a a supporter of some other group you are paranoid about. Are you even from Waterford? You obviously have no interest in the place judging by the speed you have resorted to throwing mud at the City with your "Union" moniker.barneystinson wrote: »While you were nosying, you may have noticed that probably 95% of my posts in the politics café are on two threads - the IW mega thread and the Paul Murphy being arrested thread. I also went on a kind of safari trip into the Sinn Fein mega thread for a few posts when all the sexual abuse stories were the big news story a few months back, and that was certainly interesting.
It is interesting. Especially the IW one. There you will see the FG shills using the same tactics as you are now specifically trying to label those opposed to it as some sort of loony left group. When the reality is, it is the corrupt and incompetent way it was done is what has everybody fuming. Its why 90% of people haven't paid it. There is not that many lefties in Ireland.barneystinson wrote: »But the overall majority of my posts over the last 5 years are in the taxation and accountancy forums, yet I never post about either of those things in this forum. Applying your logic that must be because of lack of numbers to support my talk about numbers, whereas in reality (just like with my posts about IW and the Jobstown 27) it's just a case of posting in the appropriate forum. You should try it
Its no wonder this country went bust if you are the quality of accountant or auditor that is in existence.Because you are abysmal with numbers seemingly. Explains a lot. FYI it is your logic that is extrapolating the activities on one or two threads to the entire forum. It is your logic that would dictate that 5% of your posts determine you're activity. This has been my point all along...So now that the penny has finally dropped for you that only a handful of threads descend into local political commentary you surely understand that what you have been saying is bollix. I post in the appropriate forum. Show me where I haven't.....It should not take you long since you seemingly went through the entire posting history of about 50 people.
As for IW,Paul Murphy and Sinn Fein threads.Its no surprise you want to preserve the megathread if this is where you frequent. Like I said discussion of politics isn't your problem. You just can't do it unless the wind is at your back....0 -
Advertisement
-
Can you explain how you know I'm a Fine Gaeler? My job prohibits me from membership of a political party, even if I was that way inclined, which I'm not because I believe party politics is a complete farce.fuzzy dunlop wrote: »Said like a true Fine Gaeler. Just because someone is not fawning over your corrupt little cult they have to be a a supporter of some other group you are paranoid about.
I'm not from town, but if you continue to root through my posting history you'll figure out where in Waterford I'm from. And how/why do you assume me mentioning the fact that Waterford is traditionally perceived as being a stronghold of trade unionism is "throwing mud"? My point was that you seem to be left leaning (apologies if I'm wrong on that count), and it seems to me you feel more comfortable talking politics on a forum where you feel more people will be likely to agree with you, than on the forum designated for that type of discussion.fuzzy dunlop wrote: »Are you even from Waterford? You obviously have no interest in the place judging by the speed you have resorted to throwing mud at the City with your "Union" moniker.
Of course not everyone who is opposed to it are loony lefties. But to a man the you can be sure the loony left do oppose it (and remember you are the one who brought the loony left into this). I can fully accept that plenty of people have valid concerns about various aspects of IW and that's fine, but how's about you and I continue this discussion.... can you guess where I'm going to suggest... ON THE IRISH WATER MEGATHREAD!!fuzzy dunlop wrote: »It is interesting. Especially the IW one. There you will see the FG shills using the same tactics as you are now specifically trying to label those opposed to it as some sort of loony left group. When the reality is, it is the corrupt and incompetent way it was done is what has everybody fuming.
One of those statements is correct and the other is laughably incorrect. See if you can figure out which is which, if you need help come back to me.fuzzy dunlop wrote: »Its why 90% of people haven't paid it. There is not that many lefties in Ireland.
Is it? Show me where? I've simply stated I believe there's plenty of opportunity on Boards to talk about politics - when I want to do so I do it in the designated places. By all means if the mods on the Waterford forums choose to set up a politics subforum and move threads there that start or become political discussion, that might be a solution that could keep everyone happy (yourself excepted of course, because you come across as the type to always find fault or take offence).fuzzy dunlop wrote: »Its no wonder this country went bust if you are the quality of accountant or auditor that is in existence.Because you are abysmal with numbers seemingly. Explains a lot. FYI it is your logic that is extrapolating the activities on one or two threads to the entire forum.
Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence. It's not for me to determine how many threads descended into what or how - I'm starting from a point where there is a megathread, and responding to a poll about whether it should stay or not. Other posters have indicated their belief that people were put off by the type of nasty personalised posting that results when people get into arguing politics - case in point your very personal comments about my competence in my profession, but I'll take my response on that point to PM (not Paul Murphy, god knows he's enough on his plate) - I have simply accepted their opinions are valid. Unless you can definitively prove no-one was ever put off posting on this forum by the bilious exchanges when threads go political, then it is you has ventured into bollix territory.fuzzy dunlop wrote: »It is your logic that would dictate that 5% of your posts determine you're activity. This has been my point all along...So now that the penny has finally dropped for you that only a handful of threads descend into local political commentary you surely understand that what you have been saying is bollix.
When you assume....fuzzy dunlop wrote: »I post in the appropriate forum. Show me where I haven't.....It should not take you long since you seemingly went through the entire posting history of about 50 people. I didn't read a single post by any of those people; 2 mouse clicks on each voter shows their posting history by forum - I'd say I spent about one third of my child's mid-morning nap (circa ten minutes) clicking. It is interesting though, that while you're happy to throw the "are you even from Waterford" missile at me, you have no comment at all to make on the fact that a substantial chunk of your side of the poll have never had any interaction whatsoever with the forum before...
You'll have to explain this to me, maybe I just don't get Fuzzy logic (:pac:)fuzzy dunlop wrote: »As for IW,Paul Murphy and Sinn Fein threads.Its no surprise you want to preserve the megathread if this is where you frequent. Like I said discussion of politics isn't your problem. You just can't do it unless the wind is at your back....
If you're implying it's easy going posting in those threads from any particular persuasion, I suggest you go and read a few pages of posts - it is a warzone and a free-for-all in there, strewn with the carcases of the fallen from all sides. This last post of yours would be right at home in there, you're really wasted in here, you should go spread your wings and fulfil your potential in there... 0 -
No, leave things as they arebarneystinson wrote: »Can you explain how you know I'm a Fine Gaeler? My job prohibits me from membership of a political party, even if I was that way inclined, which I'm not because I believe party politics is a complete farce.
So 90% of the threads on the WC forum should be quite suitable for you as they don't discuss politics.barneystinson wrote: »I'm not from town, but if you continue to root through my posting history you'll figure out where in Waterford I'm from. And how/why do you assume me mentioning the fact that Waterford is traditionally perceived as being a stronghold of trade unionism is "throwing mud"? My point was that you seem to be left leaning (apologies if I'm wrong on that count), and it seems to me you feel more comfortable talking politics on a forum where you feel more people will be likely to agree with you, than on the forum designated for that type of discussion.
Again said like a true Fine Gaeler. I am, left leaning because I am critical of the government??? There is nothing I have posted that is can be construed to be supportive of Left Wing politics. How I know you're not from Waterford? Because you cling to the "trade union" dig like a drowning man to a life jacket. Farmers have the IFA. Industrial workers typically have a trade union.This is the way it is across the world. Make peace with it.....barneystinson wrote: »Of course not everyone who is opposed to it are loony lefties. But to a man the you can be sure the loony left do oppose it (and remember you are the one who brought the loony left into this). I can fully accept that plenty of people have valid concerns about various aspects of IW and that's fine, but how's about you and I continue this discussion.... can you guess where I'm going to suggest... ON THE IRISH WATER MEGATHREAD!!
But the fact is most of the people who oppose it are not loony left.barneystinson wrote: »One of those statements is correct and the other is laughably incorrect. See if you can figure out which is which, if you need help come back to me.
Maybe you can tell me on the IRISH WATER MEGATHREAD!!!!:D But incidentally this was from the horses mouth when I tried to pay a family members bill. But do tell you know what the government won't tell us:Dbarneystinson wrote: »Is it? Show me where? I've simply stated I believe there's plenty of opportunity on Boards to talk about politics - when I want to do so I do it in the designated places. By all means if the mods on the Waterford forums choose to set up a politics subforum and move threads there that start or become political discussion, that might be a solution that could keep everyone happy (yourself excepted of course, because you come across as the type to always find fault or take offence).
Again when the role of the government are intrinsically involved in the local issues discussed in the threads then that is where the opportunity is and that is the designated place. The only function of the Megathread is forcing it onto the politics forum is to bury it in enough noise so it cannot be discussed. You can easily apply your logic to any thread by moving it to the X forum that deals with something in a general way.barneystinson wrote: »Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence. It's not for me to determine how many threads descended into what or how - I'm starting from a point where there is a megathread, and responding to a poll about whether it should stay or not. Other posters have indicated their belief that people were put off by the type of nasty personalised posting that results when people get into arguing politics - case in point your very personal comments about my competence in my profession, but I'll take my response on that point to PM (not Paul Murphy, god knows he's enough on his plate) - I have simply accepted their opinions are valid. Unless you can definitively prove no-one was ever put off posting on this forum by the bilious exchanges when threads go political, then it is you has ventured into bollix territory.
There is nothing extraordinary about the claim. There is typically two or three hot topics. WIT, WRH or some flagrant strole of parochialism like the VEC merger. This is not hard to see. To suggest this is extraordinary is more of your grossly exaggerated BS. Tell us two or three others then!...You can pick from the "eight a side" or how about "dog found" or "where you went to school"barneystinson wrote: »When you assume.... I didn't read a single post by any of those people; 2 mouse clicks on each voter shows their posting history by forum - I'd say I spent about one third of my child's mid-morning nap (circa ten minutes) clicking. It is interesting though, that while you're happy to throw the "are you even from Waterford" missile at me, you have no comment at all to make on the fact that a substantial chunk of your side of the poll have never had any interaction whatsoever with the forum before...
Well this is pure bollox. From you alone there is 204 pages of results. You are saying you this with 50 other people in a few minutes and Yet twenty odd threads most of which are impossible to discuss politics are extraordinary for you.barneystinson wrote: »You'll have to explain this to me, maybe I just don't get Fuzzy logic (:pac:)
If you're implying it's easy going posting in those threads from any particular persuasion, I suggest you go and read a few pages of posts - it is a warzone and a free-for-all in there, strewn with the carcases of the fallen from all sides. This last post of yours would be right at home in there, you're really wasted in here, you should go spread your wings and fulfil your potential in there...
If this is the case then it will be easy for you to show me.....So do it......Post a link to a thread0 -
And do the other 10% discuss politics, or are they just the online equivalent of a load of people screaming abuse at each other...?!fuzzy dunlop wrote: »So 90% of the threads on the WC forum should be quite suitable for you as they don't discuss politics.
I'll direct you to your own posting history on the SF megathread...fuzzy dunlop wrote: »Again said like a true Fine Gaeler. I am, left leaning because I am critical of the government??? There is nothing I have posted that is can be construed to be supportive of Left Wing politics.
as a Fuzzy man once said, make peace with it
But I am from Waterfordfuzzy dunlop wrote: »How I know you're not from Waterford? Because you cling to the "trade union" dig like a drowning man to a life jacket. Farmers have the IFA. Industrial workers typically have a trade union.This is the way it is across the world. Make peace with it.....
Agreed. As I said, you brought that up á propos of nothing.fuzzy dunlop wrote: »But the fact is most of the people who oppose it are not loony left.
Not clear what you're saying here- are you telling me an IW employee told you that 90% of people aren't paying? I thought that the phones are outsourced to a call centre crowd, so I'd love to know how the lowly individual reading stuff from a script in a call centre is privy to the payment rate stats in real time... As for the final sentence above, not a clue whether that's a question or a statement, or what it means in any event.fuzzy dunlop wrote: »Maybe you can tell me on the IRISH WATER MEGATHREAD!!!!:D But incidentally this was from the horses mouth when I tried to pay a family members bill. But do tell you know what the government won't tell us:D
Won't disagree with you there, hence I'd favour a subforum where you aggressive politically active types can go to shout at each other and leave the rest of us to just natter away and get along together in the main forum, talking about where we went to school etc...fuzzy dunlop wrote: »Again when the role of the government are intrinsically involved in the local issues discussed in the threads then that is where the opportunity is and that is the designated place. The only function of the Megathread is forcing it onto the politics forum is to bury it in enough noise so it cannot be discussed. You can easily apply your logic to any thread by moving it to the X forum that deals with something in a general way.
Well we differ there because you'll have to explain how my logic implies what you're saying it does - we seem to be at cross purposes there. I'm not extrapolating anything - other posters on this thread have indicated a belief that the sniping and arguing on a number of threads was putting people off posting. I'm assuming their opinions are valid. It doesn't matter how many threads were involved. Unless you can definitively prove that view is wrong (and I don't see how you can BTW as it's very hard to prove a negative) then we're merely in the realm of opinion, and it's OK to differ on opinion without anyone having to accuse anyone else of talking bollix.fuzzy dunlop wrote: »There is nothing extraordinary about the claim.
If you want to keep arguing down this particular cul de sac (and I'm sure you do, since you can't seem to let anything go, ever... it's your most endearing quality), you'll definitely have to explain to me how anything I said suggests I believe "5% of your posts determine your activity".
Again I think you're reading too much into my threads - the bit I'm talking about being extraordinary is your assertion that no-one was ever put off posting in the forum generally, or some threads in particular, because of the political bickering. See my previous comment above about opinions, proving a negative etc...fuzzy dunlop wrote: »There is typically two or three hot topics. WIT, WRH or some flagrant strole of parochialism like the VEC merger. This is not hard to see. To suggest this is extraordinary is more of your grossly exaggerated BS. Tell us two or three others then!...You can pick from the "eight a side" or how about "dog found" or "where you went to school"
You throw your bollix around a lot, maybe you should change your name to Fuzzy Bollixfuzzy dunlop wrote: »Well this is pure bollox. From you alone there is 204 pages of results. You are saying you this with 50 other people in a few minutes and Yet twenty odd threads most of which are impossible to discuss politics are extraordinary for you.
I'll talk you through the process because I can see this must be melting your head.
1. Open this thread on a laptop/PC
2. Click on the hyperlink to the number 30 in the poll result at the top of the page, to see the list of voters
3. Right click on the first name and "open in new tab" (that way you just close the tab when you've finished and you're back to the list of names)
4. Click on "statistics" and then "find all posts by ..."
5. Down the left hand side of the page it shows what forums they posted in and how many posts in each. If Waterford isn't listed, they were never here...
15 seconds tops - times 53 is less than 15 minutes, while the baby was dozing. A level of competence and efficiency you probably wouldn't associate with a Fine Gaeler, oh but wait, that's right I'm not a Fine Gaeler, except in your head
I'm back to not knowing what you're asking - you want me to post a link to threads in the politics cafe?fuzzy dunlop wrote: »If this is the case then it will be easy for you to show me.....So do it......Post a link to a thread 0 -
-
-
No, leave things as they arebarneystinson wrote: »And do the other 10% discuss politics, or are they just the online equivalent of a load of people screaming abuse at each other...?!
No they discuss politics and their association with a local issue. There is no shortage of forum rules for dealing with abuse. Hence people like you needing the megathread to hide behind.barneystinson wrote: »I'll direct you to your own posting history on the SF megathread...
as a Fuzzy man once said, make peace with it
And what about it? You have a point to make?barneystinson wrote: »But I am from Waterford
No **** you're confused. So confused you still can't tell which threads have been descending into mayhem. By the way shame on you for having to knock your own to make a cheap dig.....barneystinson wrote: »Agreed. As I said, you brought that up á propos of nothing.
And you happily propogated it despite complaining it was off topic.barneystinson wrote: »Not clear what you're saying here- are you telling me an IW employee told you that 90% of people aren't paying? I thought that the phones are outsourced to a call centre crowd, so I'd love to know how the lowly individual reading stuff from a script in a call centre is privy to the payment rate stats in real time... As for the final sentence above, not a clue whether that's a question or a statement, or what it means in any event.
That's what was said. You implied you have info to the contrary. Let's have it...barneystinson wrote: »Won't disagree with you there, hence I'd favour a subforum where you aggressive politically active types can go to shout at each other and leave the rest of us to just natter away and get along together in the main forum, talking about where we went to school etc...
There is no-one being aggressive. If you are as "take it or leave it" as you say you are which you are obviously not then you could just meander along to the 95% of threads that have no political dsicussion. You know the ones? The ones you are unable to show where this aggressive behaviour is prevalent:D. You are claiming to be apolitical and every thread descends into political discussion. Neither one of these assertions are true. The first one is deniable.....just but they more you are arguing the more it looks ludicrous. The second one is easily provable. So easy in fact the only question is why you haven't gone and done it yet.barneystinson wrote: »Well we differ there because you'll have to explain how my logic implies what you're saying it does - we seem to be at cross purposes there. I'm not extrapolating anything - other posters on this thread have indicated a belief that the sniping and arguing on a number of threads was putting people off posting. I'm assuming their opinions are valid. It doesn't matter how many threads were involved. Unless you can definitively prove that view is wrong (and I don't see how you can BTW as it's very hard to prove a negative) then we're merely in the realm of opinion, and it's OK to differ on opinion without anyone having to accuse anyone else of talking bollix.
There is opinions and facts. If the sniping is is as prevalent as you are claiming then you can easily point it out. Yet you still are unable to do so. Facts are facts they are not open interpretation. Where are all these threads you are on about? Name them! Post a link to them!barneystinson wrote: »If you want to keep arguing down this particular cul de sac (and I'm sure you do, since you can't seem to let anything go, ever... it's your most endearing quality), you'll definitely have to explain to me how anything I said suggests I believe "5% of your posts determine your activity".
You are claiming the forum is over run with political sniping because of the activity on two or three threads. What is so hard for you to understand? For someone who claims to work with numbers you are having real difficulty with some primary level maths here....barneystinson wrote: »Again I think you're reading too much into my threads - the bit I'm talking about being extraordinary is your assertion that no-one was ever put off posting in the forum generally, or some threads in particular, because of the political bickering. See my previous comment above about opinions, proving a negative etc...
I am not saying anyone is not being put off. I am saying that they have no reason to be put off other then they don't like their own political leanings being challenged for their role in some of the events that have happened locally. This is not a valid reason for the megathread.barneystinson wrote: »You throw your bollix around a lot, maybe you should change your name to Fuzzy Bollix I'll talk you through the process because I can see this must be melting your head.
1. Open this thread on a laptop/PC
2. Click on the hyperlink to the number 30 in the poll result at the top of the page, to see the list of voters
3. Right click on the first name and "open in new tab" (that way you just close the tab when you've finished and you're back to the list of names)
4. Click on "statistics" and then "find all posts by ..."
5. Down the left hand side of the page it shows what forums they posted in and how many posts in each. If Waterford isn't listed, they were never here...
15 seconds tops - times 53 is less than 15 minutes, while the baby was dozing. A level of competence and efficiency you probably wouldn't associate with a Fine Gaeler, oh but wait, that's right I'm not a Fine Gaeler, except in your head
Great now put that skill to finding a couple of threads beyond the three out of fifty that I mentioned that are full of political bickering. This is all you need to do and you still haven't done it. Just more fabrication and inane comments. Throwing me bollix around indeed. You just have to do one thing and you can't do it. Instead you have to refer to all sorts of BS such as the SF and IW megathread.barneystinson wrote: »I'm back to not knowing what you're asking - you want me to post a link to threads in the politics cafe?
Let's keep it simple. Tell us the name of the threads or post the links from the first four pages (or as many as you like) of latest discussions on the Waterford City forum that are descending into politcal discussion? This is about a hundred threads in total. This will give you a nice round number to calculate a percentage. If the number is as high as you say it is you will have no trouble....0 -
-
-
-
-
Advertisement
-
-
-
-
-
fuzzy dunlop wrote: »Listen I made it idiot proof for you and you still couldn't do it. You have a myriad of problems the foremost seems to be that you can't understand your own posts as well as being constitutionally incapable of telling the truth. If you did understand your own posts you would realize that in the last sentence I have quoted here you have just confirmed what I am saying.
Here it is one more time. Just for you as you clearly have a problem seeing the bleeding obvious
EXACTLY!!!!! there is nothing to SUBSTANTIATE what you are saying.In other words BALLIX:D:D:D:D:D:D
Queue an abundance of denials that "I didn't say what I did say":D
Aaaaaand you're still not getting - there's nothing for me to post links to because your request for links from me isn't in reply to anything I actually said, but to what you've decided you'd like me to have said
So for the 4th time: I accept the opinions of others (such as that of Ziedth whom I quoted) as valid - if you want them to go and prove what specific threads they were talking about, you can take it up with them, it's their opinion you disagree with If you want to try and prove that people haven't been put off posting here because of aggressive/abusive political posting, knock yourself out. I'm pretty sure having read this thread people will be queueing up to have a nice polite discussion about things with you...
No matter how often or loudly you try to shout at me, won't make any difference, I still won't have said what you want me to have said. But by all means, keep spinning, like a true Fine Gaeler :cool:0 -
No, leave things as they arebarneystinson wrote: »Aaaaaand you're still not getting - there's nothing for me to post links to because your request for links from me isn't in reply to anything I actually said, but to what you've decided you'd like me to have said
That tacit understanding is that the justification for the Megathread was that almost every thread was descending into political argument. You have been arguing in support of that position and all the wriggling and backpeddling won't change that. Not one single thread have you been able to use to support your argument. I have given you the most open goal possible and you are unable to take it. Your position is just not credible.barneystinson wrote: »So for the 4th time: I accept the opinions of others (such as that of Ziedth whom I quoted) as valid - if you want them to go and prove what specific threads they were talking about, you can take it up with them, it's their opinion you disagree with If you want to try and prove that people haven't been put off posting here because of aggressive/abusive political posting, knock yourself out. I'm pretty sure having read this thread people will be queueing up to have a nice polite discussion about things with you...
The onus is on the person making the assertion that their is aggressive or abusive political posting that is how that works.Its the reason for the existence of the thing. Nobody has done that including you. All that has been shown so far is some people are not able to argue from a position of advantage anymore so they need a Megathread to give them some cover. Some people are put off by the megathtead. Why is their "opinion" less valid than those who only have to stay away from the two or three threads that are a problem for them? So the fact is you don't accept the opinion of others.......barneystinson wrote: »No matter how often or loudly you try to shout at me, won't make any difference, I still won't have said what you want me to have said. But by all means, keep spinning, like a true Fine Gaeler :cool:
And to think you made a thinly veiled threat of legal action against me for defamation:D But shouldn't you be making that statement on the Megathread:D Your defending it to the death after all....And you being apolitical:D0 -
fuzzy dunlop wrote: »And to think you made a thinly veiled threat of legal action against me for defamation:D
Did I?
Think we'll need to add humour to the list of things you struggle to comprehend.
The fact you chose not to reply by PM to mine but want to bring it up here is classy as ever...
Do you want to quote my PM or will I?
Your posts are spiralling into more and more childish stuff; it's great, keep it up, soon I won't even need to respond... 0 -
No, leave things as they arebarneystinson wrote: »Did I?
Yes you did.....barneystinson wrote: »Think we'll need to add humour to the list of things you struggle to comprehend.
So why say it in a PM? You've shown you are a master of the inane.Why need a PM?barneystinson wrote: »The fact you chose not to reply by PM to mine but want to bring it up here is classy as ever...
Because I am not a coward. Anyway says the guy desperate to recruit Ziedth into his arguement....They apolitical guy who is defending a political thread to the hilt.:Dbarneystinson wrote: »Do you want to quote my PM or will I?
Go for it! But quote all of it all of it. But maybe think about putting in the humour section first. Including why you said you voted for Ciara.Because that was the only other part of that particular wheeze I saw before I lost interest.barneystinson wrote: »Your posts are spiralling into more and more childish stuff; it's great, keep it up, soon I won't even need to respond...
Are you responding? Not one thing have you posted that confirms with any substance why the megathread is needed. Someone elses opinion that is all...With one tiny act you could have finished this but you weren't able yet you managed to check 50 peoples posting history. Like I said you're just not credible....What's most likely happened is you did check and couldn't find anything hence the sad act of seeing you trying to wriggle out of the arguement.0 -
-
Advertisement
Advertisement