Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

EDGE 100 greatest videogames list.

Options
13»

Comments

  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Computer Games Moderators Posts: 51,414 CMod ✭✭✭✭Retr0gamer


    da gamer wrote: »
    The list is the top 100 games ever, not the top 100 games that have aged the best. Goldeneye is one of the best games ever, regardless of how it plays today. Anyone that thinks otherwise shouldn't be playing videogames

    If you look at it through Rose tinted glasses with lashing of nostalgia jam. Look at it critically and it just doesn't hold up unlike something timeless like Tetris.


  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Computer Games Moderators Posts: 51,414 CMod ✭✭✭✭Retr0gamer


    I thought Dark Souls was absolute crap.

    I'm sure it was really, really good at doing whatever it was supposed to do. But I don't like whatever it was supposed to do, at all.

    And that's why other people's lists of Top X Best Things Ever are nothing to get wound up about - they're meaningless. Each of us would make a different one. The only time they can really be of use is if you find a list that you broadly agree with, notice some things on it you've never tried, and thus have a pretty good idea that you have some new things to try that you might like.

    The problem is that Edge is a bunch of critics that are seen as many as highly regarded in their field (and a bunch of spoofers by others). Having a group like that means absolute fever dream delusions like your opinion of Dark Souls get diluted :P on the other hand even if it's edge I'm dumbfounded by how poor the list is and how it's filled to the brim with flash in the pan new games , no surprises and a complete disregard for anything but the most populist classic games. It's baffling.

    There's even some games in there that are just plain bad. R type final's inclusion is kind of indicative that none of the writers have any knowledge of shmups so just stuck one in. It's just a bad game with boring levels and one stage is played at sub 5 fps (I'm not exaggerating, stage 3 is excruciating) and is on the list at the expense of greats like radiant Silvergun, battle garegga or even R Type 1, 2, 3, Leo and Delta.


  • Registered Users Posts: 906 ✭✭✭Randall Floyd


    I notice skyward sword isn't there despite them awarding it one of their coveted 10/10s.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 10,087 ✭✭✭✭Dan_Solo


    Retr0gamer wrote: »
    If you look at it through Rose tinted glasses with lashing of nostalgia jam. Look at it critically and it just doesn't hold up unlike something timeless like Tetris.
    But that isn't the problem. Nobody is arguing that Tetris and Pacman are among the best games ever. But this whole list seems to assume that arcades never existed and home computing started about 1995. If Pacman is a best game ever, where's Asteroids? Bubble Bobble? Gauntlet? Where's the entire interactive fiction genre? Manic Miner or Boulderdash?
    Yes, lists are made to be argued about, so this one has done its job. I don't know how anybody can defend it though. It's not even the wrong games, it just isn't a list of best games ever at all.


  • Registered Users Posts: 10,870 ✭✭✭✭Generic Dreadhead


    I notice skyward sword isn't there despite them awarding it one of their coveted 10/10s.

    Probably cause it was s**t


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 6,618 ✭✭✭Mr Freeze


    Retr0gamer wrote: »
    no one lives forever

    What a blast from the past there, that was an amazing game.


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,911 ✭✭✭tailgunner


    Mr Freeze wrote: »
    What a blast from the past there, that was an amazing game.

    Couldn't remember it at all till I Googled it, fantastic game alright.


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,443 ✭✭✭WeleaseWoderick


    Not that I'm a big fan of these lists or particularly agree with their choices but this was the criteria that was used:

    "In compiling the list, we worked to simple criteria: all formats – console, PC, portable, coin-op, touchscreen – were eligible; we could include only a single entry from any series that features straight-up sequels; and each game had to stand up today rather than making the cut for reasons of nostalgia or historic significance. The result is a collection of modern classics that must not be missed."

    So RetrOgamer's point on Goldeneye does have some merit


  • Registered Users Posts: 33,754 ✭✭✭✭Penn


    we could include only a single entry from any series that features straight-up sequels;

    Well that's a bunch o'bullsh*t. You can only feature one GTA or one MGS, but because of the way Nintendo name their games you can have 4 Marios (as in platformers, not counting Maker or Mario Kart) and 4 Zeldas in the top 50?


  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Computer Games Moderators Posts: 51,414 CMod ✭✭✭✭Retr0gamer


    I think it's fair enough in some cases. GTA and MGS are all very similar while Mario games are wildly different from each other and some of the earlier Zelda games are totally different from what the series has become. All those mario games are very different experiences from each other and I'd say the same about the Zelda games as well other than Wind Waker which is way too similar to Ocarina of Time and the other later zelda games that use the same Ocarina formula. It's a bit of a silly rule that they should have played loosely with, basically it's like ruling out Resi 2 because Resi 4 is on the list but both are very different games. But thems the rules.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 2,388 ✭✭✭Cina


    I don't even know why people are rambling on about FF7 and randomly bashing it. It's not even in the list...


  • Registered Users Posts: 4,394 ✭✭✭Pac1Man


    Good list. I would also agree that Driveclub is better than Chrono Trigger. :D


  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Computer Games Moderators Posts: 51,414 CMod ✭✭✭✭Retr0gamer


    Pac1Man wrote: »
    Good list. I would also agree that Driveclub is better than Chrono Trigger. :D

    This guy are sick.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 10,375 ✭✭✭✭kunst nugget


    Retr0gamer wrote: »
    This guy are sick.

    All are bases are belong to us?


  • Registered Users Posts: 4,394 ✭✭✭Pac1Man


    Tongue firmly in cheek by the way!!!


  • Registered Users Posts: 3,590 ✭✭✭Mal-Adjusted


    All are bases are belong to us?

    Are you a bad enough dude to save the president?


  • Registered Users Posts: 8,249 ✭✭✭Sonics2k


    I don't exactly agree with the list at all, but I'm baffled by Dark Souls being at number 1.

    It was a good game, but frustrating as hell with clunky controls and a plot right out of a tumblr account. Sure it gave people some laughs watching others try to beat it, Drunk Souls is a good one for a giggle, but best game ever? Not a chance.


  • Registered Users Posts: 902 ✭✭✭da gamer


    Retr0gamer wrote: »
    If you look at it through Rose tinted glasses with lashing of nostalgia jam. Look at it critically and it just doesn't hold up unlike something timeless like Tetris.

    I agree that it hasnt aged well, that can't be denied. However I can't agree with the notion that if a game was a classic 20 years ago and one of the best games of a generation, that it can't be considered one of the best games ever because it doesn't stand up to today's games, that's complete nonsense.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 10,375 ✭✭✭✭kunst nugget


    da gamer wrote: »
    I agree that it hasnt aged well, that can't be denied. However I can't agree with the notion that if a game was a classic 20 years ago and one of the best games of a generation, that it can't be considered one of the best games ever because it doesn't stand up to today's games, that's complete nonsense.

    Why? Lots of cutting edge stuff can have a habit of aging very badly. My first iPod was fantastic but let's be honest, now it's a hunk of poo. My brother had Goldeneye when it came out and I played a fair few hours of it and thought it was great at the time but would I have any interest in playing it now? Not a bit of it…

    Lawnmower Man was considered state of the art when it came out but I'm sure not many are going to be saddened by it's non-inclusion on a list of 100 best special effects movies.


  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Computer Games Moderators Posts: 51,414 CMod ✭✭✭✭Retr0gamer


    Sonics2k wrote: »
    I don't exactly agree with the list at all, but I'm baffled by Dark Souls being at number 1.

    It was a good game, but frustrating as hell with clunky controls and a plot right out of a tumblr account. Sure it gave people some laughs watching others try to beat it, Drunk Souls is a good one for a giggle, but best game ever? Not a chance.

    I'd be of the opinion that it's a good shout for best game of all time, if some told me they thought it was it's a decision I'd respect. I didn't find the controls clunky at all either. Sure they had a lot of weigth behind each action but that was the point and you could eleviate it with equipment choice. I'd go so far as to say it's the best combat system of any action RPG I've played until Bloodborne came along.


  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Arts Moderators, Computer Games Moderators, Entertainment Moderators Posts: 29,460 CMod ✭✭✭✭johnny_ultimate


    Sonics2k wrote: »
    I don't exactly agree with the list at all, but I'm baffled by Dark Souls being at number 1.

    It was a good game, but frustrating as hell with clunky controls and a plot right out of a tumblr account. Sure it gave people some laughs watching others try to beat it, Drunk Souls is a good one for a giggle, but best game ever? Not a chance.

    What's always worth stressing is that it isn't the plot that necessarily makes Dark Souls' (along with its From brethren) storytelling so memorable - it's the very telling. Yes, the actual literal events are convoluted fantasy-hokum in quite a few ways, but the hokum becomes interesting due to the brave minimalism with which it is presented. Hands down, From are the best environmental storytellers about, especially with Miyazaki at the helm. Locations are loaded with mysteries, secrets and quiet little revelations (and the occasional big ones). Enemies, NPCs and bosses especially are deeply embedded in the lore, giving your actions meaning and substance. Ditto even your inventory, where the mere item descriptions further serve to help unravel and deepen the cryptic narrative. The gameplay mechanics, too, exist in impressive harmony with the world and story. That the game only has a handful of cutscenes, and fewer still with much in the way of substantive dialogue or exposition, is a very impressive feat, and rewards players willing to figure it out on their own (and, admittedly, some assistance from that wonderful online Souls community).

    There are games with more 'meaning' behind their stories, that say something more challenging and intriguing. And yes, there are game plots out there that, in terms of offering an A->B story, are arguably more interesting than Dark Souls have. What few if any other games have is the articulate, experimental storytelling Dark Souls has, and when you hear the games' storytelling praised it's reliably for that instead of the actual relationships between Gwyn, the Lordvessel and the Kiln of the First Flame :)


  • Registered Users Posts: 902 ✭✭✭da gamer


    Why? Lots of cutting edge stuff can have a habit of aging very badly. My first iPod was fantastic but let's be honest, now it's a hunk of poo. My brother had Goldeneye when it came out and I played a fair few hours of it and thought it was great at the time but would I have any interest in playing it now? Not a bit of it…

    Lawnmower Man was considered state of the art when it came out but I'm sure not many are going to be saddened by it's non-inclusion on a list of 100 best special effects movies.

    Ok so we are saying that for a game to be considered in a list of best titles ever it has go stand the test of time? If that's the criteria needed then I can't argue with that. But it's a pity that we have to forget most of the 32/64 bit era then, which seems odd to say the least considering some of the revolutionary titles that were realeased in that era.


  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Computer Games Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 34,605 CMod ✭✭✭✭CiDeRmAn


    Dark Souls is easily one of the best examples of games making, certainly the best using 3D space at least.
    The sense of place, the way the levels you move through feel more like a coherent world consisting of layers and levels, with gloom and shafts of light bringing contrast and a desolate beauty to the backdrop of some of the best gameplay I've seen or played.
    When you fail in the game it's always your fault, your fault for being too impetuous, your fault for not levelling up or buying that armour or sword, your fault for not taking the time to learn to parry, or backstab, or roll.
    You explore through the ruined landscape, creeping across the unburied remains of, at times, better men and women than you who died in their own attempts to tame the world, and then you go through their pockets, or negotiate with their ghosts.
    The use of co-op is certainly brilliant, and makes you recognise there are other ways to meet people online in a videogame, and you are not always promised assistance and success.
    The story is told as you play, an experiential thing, in the inscribed stones, weapons and items, and of course within the online community, it's probably impossible for a single player to keep track of it all, and it is almost demanded that you use online forums to seek guidance and lore details as you make your own journey through the game.
    Personally, I preferred the cut, thrust and BOOM of Bloodborne, and it's more attacking gameplay, but Dark Souls is magnificent and rewrote the book on what we can expect from a videogame, on consoles at least.
    Speaking of consoles, at this point I'd guess that the best place to play Dark Souls is on PC?
    Pity they didn't remaster the original along with the sequel.


Advertisement