Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

New Star Trek TV show - Star Trek Discovery

12346

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,363 ✭✭✭✭CastorTroy


    DS9 hit its stride when it had an enemy in the Dominion. I liked Voyager but when they were able to defeat the Borg on a weekly basis it got annoying. Enterprise really picked up once they got the ongoing story with the Xindi. I thought it was a decent series until the bad finale.

    Think I've said before but the main problem with setting before the other series is that you're limiting what aliens can be used. Remember fitting the Ferengi into Enterprise?


  • Registered Users Posts: 544 ✭✭✭Greyjoy


    I think the mid-season split is to give them even more time to finish off production on the later episodes. Those new Klingon make-up designs take forever to apply!

    We're in an era where companies like Netflix are able to drop entire series (eg the Expanse) in one block. I would suspect the split has more to do with CBS trying to hold viewers' interest in this streaming service they're launching. If CBS released Discovery in a single run I'd imagine there would be an exodus of viewers from the streaming service once the show has finished the season.


  • Moderators, Entertainment Moderators Posts: 17,994 Mod ✭✭✭✭ixoy


    Greyjoy wrote: »
    We're in an era where companies like Netflix are able to drop entire series (eg the Expanse) in one block
    The Expanse aired weekly on SyFy in the US. It only dropped in one block here after it finished airing.

    Apparently the Netflix international deal covers production costs. Americans seem very unhappy that they have to subscribe to another service to see it (boo hoo..).


  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Entertainment Moderators Posts: 36,711 CMod ✭✭✭✭pixelburp


    Greyjoy wrote: »
    We're in an era where companies like Netflix are able to drop entire series (eg the Expanse) in one block. I would suspect the split has more to do with CBS trying to hold viewers' interest in this streaming service they're launching. If CBS released Discovery in a single run I'd imagine there would be an exodus of viewers from the streaming service once the show has finished the season.

    Not to be pedantic, but The Expanse is a ScyFy Channel production, and both seasons to date aired weekly on the channel; no sign yet of Season 2 appearing on Netflix (though way back when there was a vague promise that it'd air weekly on Netflix too, so dunno what happened there).

    Supposedly the reason for the season split with Star Trek is that the back half will still be in post-production during the break. I'm a bit confused because I was sure I read the Season Order was bumped up to 18 episodes, whereas reports yesterday still spoke of the original 13.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,488 ✭✭✭Goodshape


    pixelburp wrote: »
    I read the Season Order was bumped up to 18 episodes, whereas reports yesterday still spoke of the original 13.

    Wikipedia states 15.

    "Star Trek: Discovery is set to debut on CBS with a two-part premiere in "fall" 2017, before moving to All Access. The first season will consist of 15 episodes."

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Star_Trek:_Discovery

    Alex Kurtzman's involvement is by far my biggest concern. Otherwise totally looking forward to it.


  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Arts Moderators, Entertainment Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 22,682 CMod ✭✭✭✭Sad Professor


    I'm not sure whole season drops are really good for a show anyway. Imagine if whole seasons of Lost had dropped all at once. There would have been less complaining and hate-watching, but there also wouldn't have been much to talk about. I think it works with Netflix shows to an extent because many of these shows aren't designed to last that long. I mean, they might last a few seasons, but they aren't going to be the next Sopranos or Mad Men, the success of which had a lot to do with the water cooler factor.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,394 ✭✭✭✭AMKC
    Ms


    So what are peoples thoughts on the look off the Discovery now?

    I have heard it has negative space in between the inside and outside sections of the saucer. It will be interesting to see why this is? It looks better than the first version of it we have seen but I have also seen some fan versions that I thought looked better and would have been even nicer.

    Live long and Prosper

    Peace and long life.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,394 ✭✭✭✭AMKC
    Ms


    pixelburp wrote: »
    Not to be pedantic, but The Expanse is a ScyFy Channel production, and both seasons to date aired weekly on the channel; no sign yet of Season 2 appearing on Netflix (though way back when there was a vague promise that it'd air weekly on Netflix too, so dunno what happened there).

    Supposedly the reason for the season split with Star Trek is that the back half will still be in post-production during the break. I'm a bit confused because I was sure I read the Season Order was bumped up to 18 episodes, whereas reports yesterday still spoke of the original 13.

    I have never seen The Expanse on Syfy. Are you sure they had it on here? Dark Matter and Killjoys do be on it but not The Expanse.

    Live long and Prosper

    Peace and long life.



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Entertainment Moderators Posts: 36,711 CMod ✭✭✭✭pixelburp


    AMKC wrote: »
    I have never seen The Expanse on Syfy. Are you sure they had it on here? Dark Matter and Killjoys do be on it but not The Expanse.

    Absolutely 100%. It's a ScyFy production, and arguably their biggest critical hit since Battlestar Galactica:
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Expanse_(TV_series)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,371 ✭✭✭✭Zillah


    AMKC wrote: »
    So what are peoples thoughts on the look off the Discovery now?

    The early images were the ugliest fupping thing I've seen this side of Andromeda. We barely catch a glimpse of it in the trailer so nothing has really changed. They appear to have kept that awful triangular wedge shape though.

    I really think Michelle Yeoh as a Starfleet Captain is fantastic casting.


  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Arts Moderators, Entertainment Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 22,682 CMod ✭✭✭✭Sad Professor


    Zillah wrote: »
    The early images were the ugliest fupping thing I've seen this side of Andromeda. We barely catch a glimpse of it in the trailer so nothing has really changed. They appear to have kept that awful triangular wedge shape though.

    I really think Michelle Yeoh as a Starfleet Captain is fantastic casting.

    The ship in the trailer isn't the Discovery, it's the Shenzhou.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,371 ✭✭✭✭Zillah


    The ship in the trailer isn't the Discovery, it's the Shenzhou.

    Wait, what? This?
    sYuG2pr.jpg

    I am so confused. Is the show set on the USS Discovery or the USS Shenzhou?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,394 ✭✭✭✭AMKC
    Ms


    Zillah wrote: »
    Wait, what? This?
    sYuG2pr.jpg

    I am so confused. Is the show set on the USS Discovery or the USS Shenzhou?

    We think it might be set on two ship either that or the Shenzhou gets destroyed early on sometime.

    Live long and Prosper

    Peace and long life.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,888 ✭✭✭AtomicHorror


    Zillah wrote: »
    Wait, what? This?
    sYuG2pr.jpg

    I am so confused. Is the show set on the USS Discovery or the USS Shenzhou?

    This is Discovery:

    StarTrek_Digital_Teaser_fnl_ship.jpg


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,371 ✭✭✭✭Zillah


    It's so ugly. All the flashy effects in the world won't fix horrible geometry.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 28,996 ✭✭✭✭_Kaiser_


    More info on First Officer Michael Burnham
    We can tell you that Burnham is fully human (not half-Vulcan as some have speculated) and is the first human to attend the Vulcan Learning Center as a child and then the Vulcan Science Academy as a young woman. She has a close relationship with Sarek (James Frain), the father of Spock. For the past seven years, she’s been serving on the U.S.S. Shenzhou.

    “I’m the first officer on the U.S.S. Shenzhou that is captained by Captain Philippa Georgiou, who is played by the amazing Michelle Yeoh,” she says. “I have an inner war and it’s a journey of self discovery and finding out what it means to be alive, to be human, to be a Starfleet officer, what it means to be a hero.”

    It's the Worf story then mixed with elements of TOS Spock.


  • Moderators, Computer Games Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators Posts: 10,416 Mod ✭✭✭✭CatInABox




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 60,972 ✭✭✭✭Agent Coulson


    Ye looks very by the numbers to me.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,844 ✭✭✭py2006


    Very meh...

    I'm more excited for this:



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,591 ✭✭✭Tristram


    Looking forward to both tbh!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 28,996 ✭✭✭✭_Kaiser_


    CatInABox wrote: »
    Looks fairly generic to me.

    Yep, as I said over in the other thread, it's more JJ Trek rather than Star Trek. Complete with soft rock track in the trailer FFS.

    I'm not saying it had to be 60s production styles but this looks like yet another bland, hyper/chaotic action-filled mess with almost nothing tying it to Star Trek, never mind the era or timeline it's supposedly set in. Reading comments online and some are comparing it more to BSG and that's probably a fair comparison.. but BSG isn't Trek either.

    Maybe it's just a bad trailer intended for the millennial generation or those who like the JJ films. Maybe the actual show will be better than wall-to-wall explosions and "edgy" characters - I'm thinking this:



    In short, there's nothing in that trailer that gets me hyped for this show. The Orville looks far better at the moment, and if true, that's going to be somewhat embarrassing!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,365 ✭✭✭✭rossie1977


    Trailer looks very Battlestar Galactica inspired to me. If that's your bar it's going to be extremely hard to reach .


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 60,972 ✭✭✭✭Agent Coulson


    Bryan Fuller Originally Wanted ‘Star Trek: Discovery’ to Be an Anthology Series
    Fuller sat with CBS executives to deliver his pitch. It wasn’t just for a ‘Trek’ series but for multiple serialized anthology shows that would begin with the ‘Discovery’ prequel, journey through the eras of Captain James T. Kirk and Captain Jean-Luc Picard, and then go beyond to a time in ‘Trek’ that’s never been seen before.

    “The original pitch was to do for science fiction what ‘American Horror Story’ had done for horror,” Fuller says. “It would platform a universe of ‘Trek’ shows.”

    CBS countered with the plan of creating a single serialized show and then seeing how it performed. It was a fair compromise, yet demonstrated the first conflict of vision between a powerful company and an inventive writer that would eventually lead to a dramatic falling-out.

    http://collider.com/star-trek-discovery-original-vision-bryan-fuller/


  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Entertainment Moderators Posts: 36,711 CMod ✭✭✭✭pixelburp


    I'd read this before, wayyyy back when Discovery was still an unknown quantity; I wasn't on-board if I'm honest, anthology series just aren't my thing & it'd have been a little annoying to be constantly bouncing around without ever getting to know the characters or locales. Aside from that, it'd have been more expensive too, in a genre already renowned for being on the pricier side. New sets, costumes, FX, make-up ever season ....


  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Arts Moderators, Entertainment Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 22,682 CMod ✭✭✭✭Sad Professor


    I remain optimistic about this show. It looks different and different is what Trek needs to be. I don't want anymore TNG lite, or DS9 lite for that matter either. I stopped being a fan of Trek on TV around the time Farscape started. It made me realise how tired and boring Trek had become.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 60,972 ✭✭✭✭Agent Coulson


    Yes around that time mid to late 90's Babylon 5, Farscape and even Stargate all showed how space could be done differently and better than the way Star Trek was doing it.


    Hopefully they will take a risk with it but it seems to be a bit of a mess behind the scenes and may take a while to find it's legs then you have to ask will it be given that time in this era of tv.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,394 ✭✭✭✭AMKC
    Ms


    I remain optimistic about this show. It looks different and different is what Trek needs to be. I don't want anymore TNG lite, or DS9 lite for that matter either. I stopped being a fan of Trek on TV around the time Farscape started. It made me realise how tired and boring Trek had become.

    Star Trek tired and boring never noticed. I would have easily watched another 2 season's of TNG and DS9. Never got into Farscape. Seen a few episodes but not a show that I think "must watch all of that"

    Yes around that time mid to late 90's Babylon 5, Farscape and even Stargate all showed how space could be done differently and better than the way Star Trek was doing it.



    Hopefully they will take a risk with it but it seems to be a bit of a mess behind the scenes and may take a while to find it's legs then you have to ask will it be given that time in this era of tv.

    I like Babylon 5 and it has a great story but its not as optimistic or as futuristic as Star Trek is. I don,t regard Stargate as better than Star Trek but it was an entertaining show especially Jack o Neill who was always very funny in it.

    Live long and Prosper

    Peace and long life.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,815 ✭✭✭✭silverharp


    some behind the scenes gossip

    A belief in gender identity involves a level of faith as there is nothing tangible to prove its existence which, as something divorced from the physical body, is similar to the idea of a soul. - Colette Colfer



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 28,996 ✭✭✭✭_Kaiser_


    Star Trek Continues released it's latest episode yesterday - if you haven't seen this series yet, I really recommend checking it out.. it's basically season 4 of TOS.

    Just watched the latest episode this morning (guest starring John DeLancie (Q) and Anne Lockhart (Sheba from the original Battlestar Galactica)) and really enjoyed it.

    As I said in the dedicated thread, it also shows that "classic" Trek storytelling and even design can still be effective in 2017 - also demonstrated with Axanar

    I think there's some credence to the idea floated in the Midnight Edge video above that the new Meyer project may be a backup plan should Discovery tank.. we knew about the "anthology" idea when Discovery was first being talked about, but this has resurfaced again in the last few days. Could be nothing, or could indeed be laying the groundwork to accept the Meyer show as a Season 2 instead.


  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Entertainment Moderators Posts: 36,711 CMod ✭✭✭✭pixelburp


    Finally, some clips have surfaced; nothing major & nothing spoiler'y, but good to finally get some tangible sense of the show in action:





  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,815 ✭✭✭✭silverharp


    off twitter

    DJvSerHUIAE5V3W.jpg

    A belief in gender identity involves a level of faith as there is nothing tangible to prove its existence which, as something divorced from the physical body, is similar to the idea of a soul. - Colette Colfer



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 60,972 ✭✭✭✭Agent Coulson


    Never a good sign.


  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Entertainment Moderators Posts: 36,711 CMod ✭✭✭✭pixelburp


    Never a good sign.

    As mentioned in the Star Trek forum, it's not necessarily a bad sign: no press screenings might often be a red flag with films, usually pointing towards a movie the studio knows is garbage, but not every TV series gets screeners sent to critics in the first place - plus there are suggestions & rumours CBS are trying to spoiler-proof the show, and protect the supposed twists & turns in the plot. I could well believe that, given the nature of today's TV landscape.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,815 ✭✭✭✭silverharp


    pixelburp wrote: »
    As mentioned in the Star Trek forum, it's not necessarily a bad sign: no press screenings might often be a red flag with films, usually pointing towards a movie the studio knows is garbage, but not every TV series gets screeners sent to critics in the first place - plus there are suggestions & rumours CBS are trying to spoiler-proof the show, and protect the supposed twists & turns in the plot. I could well believe that, given the nature of today's TV landscape.

    makes sense, its just that given there is a bit of a smell over this show its an easy assertion to make.

    A belief in gender identity involves a level of faith as there is nothing tangible to prove its existence which, as something divorced from the physical body, is similar to the idea of a soul. - Colette Colfer



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,394 ✭✭✭✭AMKC
    Ms


    I think its only right and great that no critics will get to see it before anyone else. Gives them something to loo forward to us well now that they don,t have to review it and that must be a rare think being a movie/TV critic these days.

    Live long and Prosper

    Peace and long life.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,501 ✭✭✭✭Slydice




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 60,972 ✭✭✭✭Agent Coulson


    CBS had a screening and are letting those who saw tweet about it and it's all positive the first two episodes were shown at the screening.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,815 ✭✭✭✭silverharp


    I like the Tweet
    Good Ideas Vs Bad‏ @BadIdeasVs · 2m2 minutes ago


     More

    Virtue signaling fail
    For ****'s sake, Sisko was the goddamned messiah who punched god in the face!


    DKO-Av1UQAEo9A4.jpg:large

    A belief in gender identity involves a level of faith as there is nothing tangible to prove its existence which, as something divorced from the physical body, is similar to the idea of a soul. - Colette Colfer



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Entertainment Moderators Posts: 36,711 CMod ✭✭✭✭pixelburp


    It feels a bit redundant there are two threads on Boards for this; IMO we should merge them so the conversation can be a bit more unified; aside from myself I have noticed other users posting the same comments on both threads :rolleyes: :D


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,815 ✭✭✭✭silverharp


    pixelburp wrote: »
    It feels a bit redundant there are two threads on Boards for this; IMO we should merge them so the conversation can be a bit more unified; aside from myself I have noticed other users posting the same comments on both threads :rolleyes: :D

    can 1 thread be seen in 2 forums? , I just wouldn't be as arsed trying to find threads in the sifi section

    A belief in gender identity involves a level of faith as there is nothing tangible to prove its existence which, as something divorced from the physical body, is similar to the idea of a soul. - Colette Colfer



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 55,548 ✭✭✭✭Mr E


    It's a difficult one - maybe move this thread to Star Trek with a permanent redirect? Anyone searching here will be able to find the thread there. What do you think?


  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Entertainment Moderators Posts: 36,711 CMod ✭✭✭✭pixelburp


    Mr E wrote: »
    It's a difficult one - maybe move this thread to Star Trek with a permanent redirect? Anyone searching here will be able to find the thread there. What do you think?

    The specialist forums can be too out of the way, but seems like the Star Trek forum has greater 'ownership' over the discussion thread :) Like you said, a permanent redirect would at least keep the footprint here too.

    But that's just me, dunno what others think. Just feels a bit daft having two of the same conversations going on at the same time - especially once the show starts airing; it's bound to cause debate :)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 55,548 ✭✭✭✭Mr E


    Yeah cool. I'll do nothing for now and see if anybody else has any feedback.
    If there are no major objections during the day today, I'll move it tonight.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 28,996 ✭✭✭✭_Kaiser_


    Mr E wrote: »
    Yeah cool. I'll do nothing for now and see if anybody else has any feedback.
    If there are no major objections during the day today, I'll move it tonight.

    Permanent redirect sounds good (does that update when the actual thread is updated though?)

    On the latest tweets, I'm taking them with a grain of salt. First, it was an invited event, second the feedback is 100% positive from what I've seen.

    Maybe it really is THAT good, but for me the jury is out until I see it on Monday morning.


  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Arts Moderators, Entertainment Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 22,682 CMod ✭✭✭✭Sad Professor


    Merging might be messy. Maybe just lock the TV thread with a link to the Star Trek forum and Discovery thread.

    Once the first episode airs we’ll be using separate episode threads in the ST forum anyway, so even the Discovery thread in ST may need to be locked eventually to avoid overlap.

    We could also consider moving the Star Trek forum to the Television sub-category or just adding a link to it.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 60,972 ✭✭✭✭Agent Coulson


    Sure since it's on Netflix now as well maybe the online forum ;)


  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Arts Moderators, Entertainment Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 22,682 CMod ✭✭✭✭Sad Professor


    Sure since it's on Netflix now as well maybe the online forum ;)

    Oh god yeah, I'm surprised there isn't a thread going there already.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,815 ✭✭✭✭silverharp


    once you can follow the link that's fine, I only have a middling interest so I don't want to specifically follow the thread

    A belief in gender identity involves a level of faith as there is nothing tangible to prove its existence which, as something divorced from the physical body, is similar to the idea of a soul. - Colette Colfer



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 28,996 ✭✭✭✭_Kaiser_


    Merging might be messy. Maybe just lock the TV thread with a link to the Star Trek forum and Discovery thread.

    Once the first episode airs we’ll be using separate episode threads in the ST forum anyway, so even the Discovery thread in ST may need to be locked eventually to avoid overlap.

    We could also consider moving the Star Trek forum to the Television sub-category or just adding a link to it.

    Wasn't it previously under TV before the Big (to be completed) Menu Reshuffle? Not a bad idea though to add at least a link.
    Sure since it's on Netflix now as well maybe the online forum ;)

    I still don't know why that was done. TV is TV regardless of the medium these days.


  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Entertainment Moderators Posts: 17,994 Mod ✭✭✭✭ixoy


    Sure since it's on Netflix now as well maybe the online forum ;)
    It also has appeal across many facets of sci-fi, so Sci-Fi & Fantasy forum as well :)

    Hopefully the early reviews aren't just uber-fans, the likes of who praised films such as "Batman vs Superman" before a wider audience got to see it.


This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement