Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi all! We have been experiencing an issue on site where threads have been missing the latest postings. The platform host Vanilla are working on this issue. A workaround that has been used by some is to navigate back from 1 to 10+ pages to re-sync the thread and this will then show the latest posts. Thanks, Mike.
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Stoke Vs Chelsea

2»

Comments

  • #52
    Quazzie
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,114 ✭✭✭✭Quazzie


    Barr wrote: »
    Hard to know how Chelsea lost that game.

    I wonder how
    Barr wrote: »
    Stoke defended well
    Well that's one reason. Another is that Chelsea for all their possession and passing created very little clear chances. Fabregas and Matic were the centre of your success last year and this year both are shadows of themselves.


  • #53
    Johner
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,625 ✭✭✭✭Johner


    Quazzie wrote: »
    I wonder how

    Well that's one reason. Another is that Chelsea for all their possession and passing created very little clear chances. Fabregas and Matic were the centre of your success last year and this year both are shadows of themselves.

    Hazard, Pedro, Costa and Remy all had decent chances. We didn't create an awful lot today and Stoke defended very well but Chelsea still created enough to have scored a couple and won that game.


  • #54
    Mr.Nice Guy
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 45,630 ✭✭✭✭Mr.Nice Guy


    Chelsea will be back to title-winning ways next season. They will do well in the Championship.


  • #55
    [Deleted User]
    Posts: 0 ✭ [Deleted User]


    Nice one Stoke.

    Chelsea are falling apart at the seams


  • #56
    Strumms
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25,850 ✭✭✭✭Strumms


    Stoke defended well without resorting to parking the bus West Brom style. Surprising that Shawcross hasn't been picked up by a Liverpool or Spurs or even a better side. Immense again tonight.


  • #57
    Ardent
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,334 ✭✭✭Ardent


    Surely the sack now for Mourinho. Majority of his players going through the motions.


  • #58
    Tomagotchye
    Registered Users Posts: 568 ✭✭✭Tomagotchye


    Ardent wrote: »
    Surely the sack now for Mourinho. Majority of his players going through the motions.

    New manager will see them boom up the table no doubt. Seems toxic now and enevitable


  • #59
    breffni bogballer
    Registered Users Posts: 618 ✭✭✭breffni bogballer


    One of chelseas better performances in a long time,and they still got beaten.Happy days


  • #60
    Quazzie
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,114 ✭✭✭✭Quazzie


    Diego Costa and Mourinho are both from the same mould no doubt. All front and no class.

    Sparky giving his interview now, I wonder will they go live to Heathrow to get one with Mourinho?


  • Advertisement
  • #61
    pmasterson95
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,074 ✭✭✭pmasterson95


    Norwich fans can be happy. They are above the "champions" lol


  • #62
    monkey9
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,337 ✭✭✭✭monkey9


    This must be the worst title defence up there with Man U in 2013/14 and Blackburn Rovers in 1995/96.


  • #63
    Quazzie
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,114 ✭✭✭✭Quazzie


    monkey9 wrote: »
    This must be the worst title defence up there with Man U in 2013/14 and Blackburn Rovers in 1995/96.
    Man City were relegated once in the season following winning the league.

    Football didn't begin in 1992.

    You should know you're opinion is wrong when Jamie Redknapp is making the same point.


  • #64
    MythicalMadMan
    Closed Accounts Posts: 1,579 ✭✭✭MythicalMadMan


    Thread needs a titlte change to, "How to catch a troll" about 80% of the suspects here


  • #65
    pmasterson95
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,074 ✭✭✭pmasterson95


    Quazzie wrote: »
    Man City were relegated once in the season following winning the league.

    Football didn't begin in 1992.

    You should know you're opinion is wrong when Jamie Redknapp is making the same point.

    Shock horror not remember 78 years ago


  • #66
    Johner
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,625 ✭✭✭✭Johner


    monkey9 wrote: »
    This must be the worst title defence up there with Man U in 2013/14 and Blackburn Rovers in 1995/96.

    It's worse than those two.


  • Advertisement
  • #67
    monkey9
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,337 ✭✭✭✭monkey9


    Quazzie wrote: »
    Man City were relegated once in the season following winning the league.

    Football didn't begin in 1992.

    You should know you're opinion is wrong when Jamie Redknapp is making the same point.

    Actually you're right. You've mugged me there in fairness.

    *in the Premier League*


  • #68
    Flint Fredstone
    Closed Accounts Posts: 3,519 ✭✭✭Flint Fredstone


    MythicalMadMan wrote: »
    Thread needs a titlte change to, "How to catch a troll" about 80% of the suspects here

    It's funny how the thread only appeared after Stoke scored.


  • #69
    jamesbere
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,022 ✭✭✭jamesbere


    Quazzie wrote: »
    Man City were relegated once in the season following winning the league.

    Football didn't begin in 1992.

    You should know you're opinion is wrong when Jamie Redknapp is making the same point.

    They scored 80 goals that season and still got relegated.


  • #70
    Nalz
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,831 ✭✭✭✭Nalz


    Did Mourinho give an interview?


  • #71
    Paully D
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 28,710 ✭✭✭✭Paully D


    Nalz wrote: »
    Did Mourinho give an interview?

    He has nothing to say.


  • Advertisement
  • #72
    monkey9
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,337 ✭✭✭✭monkey9


    Nalz wrote: »
    Did Mourinho give an interview?

    Sure how could he when he wasn't there. I think they were looking to interview Steve Holland or the other Portugese fella.


  • #73
    gimmick
    Closed Accounts Posts: 21,296 ✭✭✭✭gimmick


    If only we could start a thread wondering are they done! :pac:


  • #74
    monkey9
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,337 ✭✭✭✭monkey9


    gimmick wrote: »
    If only we could start a thread wondering are they done! :pac:

    I take it that's a straight yellow at this stage!


  • #75
    Nalz
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,831 ✭✭✭✭Nalz


    monkey9 wrote: »
    Sure how could he when he wasn't there. I think they were looking to interview Steve Holland or the other Portugese fella.

    Stadium ban or touchline?


  • #76
    Quazzie
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,114 ✭✭✭✭Quazzie


    Nalz wrote: »
    Stadium ban or touchline?
    Stadium ban.


  • #77
    Quazzie
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,114 ✭✭✭✭Quazzie


    Costa being accused of assault now.

    LOL


  • #78
    gimmick
    Closed Accounts Posts: 21,296 ✭✭✭✭gimmick


    monkey9 wrote: »
    I take it that's a straight yellow at this stage!

    2 week ban!!!!


  • #79
    monkey9
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,337 ✭✭✭✭monkey9


    Quazzie wrote: »
    Costa being accused of assault now.

    LOL

    Tell me that's a wind up!!


  • #80
    Quazzie
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,114 ✭✭✭✭Quazzie


    monkey9 wrote: »
    Tell me that's a wind up!!
    I've no doubt nothing will come of it as it's pretty obvious it's farcical, but it appears true he's been reported.


Advertisement