Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi all! We have been experiencing an issue on site where threads have been missing the latest postings. The platform host Vanilla are working on this issue. A workaround that has been used by some is to navigate back from 1 to 10+ pages to re-sync the thread and this will then show the latest posts. Thanks, Mike.
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Stretched earlobes ....horrible

124

Comments

  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 6,351 ✭✭✭katydid


    lanos wrote: »
    lets try a different approach

    2 people equally qualified
    one is clean cut and conventional
    the other is pierced and alternative

    who gets the job ?

    It would depend on the job


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 6,351 ✭✭✭katydid


    Mozzeltoff wrote: »
    Which ever has the most hands on experience and is capable of doing the tasks that are required of them.

    The Chef De Partie was above me. He had them in. Obviously he got a job because of his skills as a chef. Not his ear lobes.

    I'm just watching Masterchef the Professionals (recorded) and one of the guys has a closed up tunnel in his left ear.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 6,351 ✭✭✭katydid


    AmyPL wrote: »
    Retail can be snootier about appearance than the IT industry, it turns out.

    It's nothing to do with snootiness. Its business. They know their customer profile and they know that many customers would be put off by certain kinds of body modification.


  • Registered Users Posts: 919 ✭✭✭Joe prim


    Turtyturd wrote: »
    While we're playing make believe. If I owned a restaurant and you had that attitude towards my staff I'd tell you to leave and not bother coming back.

    What's the food like?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 600 ✭✭✭lanos


    Kovu wrote: »
    Lol.
    You actually went back through the thread to get all the negative comments. What about all the positive ones?

    well I was expecting this

    the very fact that so many people have such a negative view of them will influence managers, because it can affect the bottom line - i.e Reduced Revenue.

    the fact that so many other people are indifferent about them will not sway the manager because an employee with tunnels will not increase revenue - all other things being equal.

    to summarise:
    employee with tunnels will repulse some customers
    employee with tunnels will not attract new customers
    net result - lost customers = reduced revenue = sack the hiring manager

    people with skills are plentiful
    clean cut people are plentiful
    so the hiring manager will not take the risk.

    q.e.d


  • Advertisement
  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 6,351 ✭✭✭katydid


    P_1 wrote: »
    Sad to see such snobbery is still alive and well

    It's not snobbery. In my case, it would put me off my food, and I would worry about the standards of an establishment that would send someone out to interact with the public in that state.

    I teach catering students work experience. I have had this discussion with them on several occasions, as it's part of their course to think and write about factors that influence employment. The vast majority of the students accept that they should cover up body modification where possible, and that employers are reasonable in expecting them to be covered up. We've had heated class discussions in which a few students would disagree, but they would be in the minority.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 6,351 ✭✭✭katydid


    Turtyturd wrote: »
    While we're playing make believe. If I owned a restaurant and you had that attitude towards my staff I'd tell you to leave and not bother coming back.
    Your business. Your loss. Especially when I'd tell all my friends about how I was treated.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 24,211 ✭✭✭✭One eyed Jack


    lanos wrote: »
    a few viewpoints


    I'm already aware of some people's personal distaste for piercings and tattoos.

    Is that the extent of your evidence that employers do not hire people with tunnels?

    Is that the extent of your evidence that people with tunnels are unemployable?

    If that's all you've got, I think we're done here, because effectively - you've got nothing. You just don't like them. That's fine, but your opinion bears no reflection on reality. It's a perception in your own mind, based upon your own personal distaste for tunnels.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 600 ✭✭✭lanos


    lanos wrote: »
    lets try a different approach

    2 people equally qualified
    one is clean cut and conventional
    the other is pierced and alternative

    who gets the job ?
    katydid wrote: »
    It would depend on the job

    any of these jobs I mentined earlier
    lanos wrote: »
    Fields of employment that wouldn't accept you if you had tunnels
    All the professions: including Solicitor, Chartered Accountant, Chartered Engineer, Doctor,
    Teacher
    Nurse
    An Garda Síochána
    Armed Forces
    The Prison Service
    Sales Reps
    Financial Services
    Airlines
    Catering
    Retail, except maybe places that sell tunnels
    Senior IT - high stakes positions dealing with valuable clients


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 6,351 ✭✭✭katydid


    lanos wrote: »
    any of these jobs I mentined earlier

    Exactly.

    It's a decision a person has to make, knowing they are excluding themselves from certain professions.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 14,241 ✭✭✭✭Kovu


    lanos wrote: »
    well I was expecting this

    the very fact that so many people have such a negative view of them will influence managers, because it can affect the bottom line - i.e Reduced Revenue.

    the fact that so many other people are indifferent about them will not sway the manager because an employee with tunnels will not increase revenue - all other things being equal.

    to summarise:
    employee with tunnels will repulse some customers
    employee with tunnels will notattract new customers
    net result - lost customers = reduced revenue = sack the hiring manager



    people with skills are plentiful
    clean cut people are plentiful
    so the hiring manager will not take the risk.

    q.e.d

    How do you know? Have you gone out there and surveyed some people in different establishments? Had a few vox-pops on the street? Nah, nah, you made a thread on a forum and continuously pushed your pov. Well done you!

    Your Q.E.D. is false as it is not proven. It is, as you quoted ''off the top of your head''
    So what happens if the hiring manager has tunnels? Do they have to employ people who look 'normal' when they themselves have an alternative look which appeared to work for them when they got the position.
    They are becoming more commonplace and 'meh' in many areas and for someone who has established themselves in a *shock, horror, can they ever get there* salaried sector of business, it should be a matter of choice which can be backed up by a good work ethos and experience.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 600 ✭✭✭lanos


    If that's all you've got, I think we're done here

    at last :D
    I can go to bed now
    and go to work tomorrow to a tunnel free zone


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 55 ✭✭Haznat


    lanos wrote: »
    I provide lists and examples and what do you respond with ?

    waffle waffle
    spoof spoof
    blah blah blah

    you're an expert in typing tons of drivel but nothing of any substance
    and nobody is fooled I can assure you

    you probably want me to provide proof of that though don't you :D

    Your list is nonsense. I've worked in three roles with stretched ears on your list.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 600 ✭✭✭lanos


    katydid wrote: »
    Exactly.

    It's a decision a person has to make, knowing they are excluding themselves from certain professions.

    you mean most professions


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 600 ✭✭✭lanos


    Haznat wrote: »
    Your list is nonsense. I've worked in three roles with stretched ears on your list.

    name them please


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 24,211 ✭✭✭✭One eyed Jack


    lanos wrote: »
    well I was expecting this

    the very fact that so many people have such a negative view of them will influence managers, because it can affect the bottom line - i.e Reduced Revenue.

    the fact that so many other people are indifferent about them will not sway the manager because an employee with tunnels will not increase revenue - all other things being equal.

    to summarise:
    employee with tunnels will repulse some customers
    employee with tunnels will not attract new customers
    net result - lost customers = reduced revenue = sack the hiring manager


    This depends entirely upon the nature of the business.

    lanos wrote: »
    people with skills are plentiful
    clean cut people are plentiful
    so the hiring manager will not take the risk.

    q.e.d


    This depends entirely upon context! I'd sooner hire someone with tunnels who had the skills required to fulfill a particular role, than someone who was clean cut, who didn't.

    I wouldn't hire a chef if I needed a software developer, and vice versa, because even though both are skilled professions, they require different skills.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 55 ✭✭Haznat


    lanos wrote: »
    name them please

    Financial services (AIB)
    Retail
    Sales rep.

    All over the last 15 years.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 600 ✭✭✭lanos


    Haznat wrote: »
    Financial services (AIB)
    Retail
    Sales rep.

    All over the last 15 years.

    well I'm a bit sceptical but thanks for your input.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 55 ✭✭Haznat


    I have no reason to lie so there you go. I'll be heading to work in the morning in one of them roles as well.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 600 ✭✭✭lanos


    I'd sooner hire someone with tunnels who had the skills required to fulfill a particular role, than someone who was clean cut, who didn't.
    I wouldn't hire a chef if I needed a software developer, and vice versa

    yeah I do believe we have covered this already

    if I was looking for a software developer I would
    A. Choose a person with knowledge of various platforms and languages
    B. Choose a person with experience and a proven track record of completing projects on time.
    C. Choose a person with excellent teamwork skills
    D. Choose a person with neat conventional appearance so that I would not need to worry about them meeting potential or existing clients.

    I believe I could easily find a candidate with all those attributes and more and I would not need to sacrifice D to achieve A, B & C


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 24,211 ✭✭✭✭One eyed Jack


    lanos wrote: »
    yeah I do believe we have covered this already

    if I was looking for a software developer I would
    A. Choose a person with knowledge of various platforms and languages
    B. Choose a person with experience and a proven track record of completing projects on time.
    C. Choose a person with excellent teamwork skills
    D. Choose a person with neat conventional appearance so that I would not need to worry about them meeting potential or existing clients.

    I believe I could easily find a candidate with all those attributes and more and I would not need to sacrifice D to achieve A, B & C


    I actually agree with what you've just said above. But do you see on your very own list then, that a person's physical appearance was last on the list?

    My question to you is -

    If "Candidate X", met criteria A, B and C, and "Candidate Y", only met criteria D, which one then would you hire?

    Candidate X has tunnels.
    Candidate Y has none.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 600 ✭✭✭lanos


    I actually agree with what you've just said above. But do you see on your very own list then, that a person's physical appearance was last on the list?

    My question to you is -

    If "Candidate X", met criteria A, B and C, and "Candidate Y", only met criteria D, which one then would you hire?

    Candidate X has tunnels.
    Candidate Y has none.

    I would hire neither candidate
    I would not sacrifice D because I realise how important appearance can be to some clients
    I would re-advertise the job and offer more money

    money talks


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,681 ✭✭✭bodice ripper


    lanos wrote: »
    I would hire neither candidate
    I would not sacrifice D because I realise how important appearance can be to some clients
    I would re-advertise the job and offer more money

    money talks

    So more should get their lobes stretched. Everyone wins.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 24,211 ✭✭✭✭One eyed Jack


    lanos wrote: »
    I would hire neither candidate
    I would not sacrifice D because I realise how important appearance can be to some clients
    I would re-advertise the job and offer more money

    money talks


    Your clients don't give a fiddlers fcuk what your employees look like as long as they can fulfil criteria A, B and C, so not only would you lose out on potential revenue, you'd waste even more money going through the same rigmarole again and again because you'd still be forced to choose at some point between candidates X and Y, and eventually you would have to make that call.

    Money doesn't talk, people talk, and if your hiring decisions are anything indicative of the way you do business - indecisive money waster, people tend to notice that sort of thing, and potential investors avoid your sort like the plague as the only thing consistent about you is that you are unreliable.

    If you project an image of yourself as unreliable, how do you think that's going to reflect on your business? Your business too will be seen as unreliable, and your products will be seen as unreliable, to be avoided.

    Clearly you don't have a clue about how business development works, and I for one would never hire someone who didn't have a clue, no matter how clean cut or how clever they think they are. I'd want to have more money than sense to be so utterly clueless.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 600 ✭✭✭lanos


    katydid wrote: »
    Absolutely stomach churning. I've no problem with piercings in general, but those make me want to puke. I teach young people, and several of them have those things. I've had to tell them straight out I can't look them in the face because I find them (the ears, not the students) revolting.
    Your clients don't give a fiddlers fcuk what your employees look like as long as they can fulfil criteria A, B and C

    That is just your opinion, its not a fact although you would like us to think it is.
    Anecdotally, the opposite seems to be the case.

    Clients are people and so is the poster Katydid
    she is a teacher and she is forced to teach these kids if she wants to continue working in that particular job.
    but she still tells them straight that she has issues with them, fair play to her.

    A valuable business client has a lot more clout
    if he has a problem he will definitely say it.
    and he will use it to his advantage too.
    if a project hits a speedbump and a deliverable might be late, the client can use it to kick some ass.
    a correspondence might go like this:

    why is this deliverable late, it is very important that this rollout happens on time. what are you guys doing over there. the left hand doesn't seem to know what the right hand is doing. oh and now that i think of it. that scruffy bloke Jack with the weird jewelery on his ears. my staff don't like his appearance. send somebody else next time.
    and what will the manager say in response ?
    yes sir

    and why will the manager not defend his employee ?
    he could say something like:
    but hes our best developer
    and the response would go something like
    why am i not surprised by that statement
    listen, i don't want excuses, i want results, shape up.


    thats why the manager wont defend his scruffy employee.
    thats the reason he wont employee a scruffy employee.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 24,211 ✭✭✭✭One eyed Jack


    lanos wrote: »
    That is just your opinion, its not a fact although you would like us to think it is.
    Anecdotally, the opposite seems to be the case.

    Clients are people and so is the poster Katydid
    she is a teacher and she is forced to teach these kids if she wants to continue working in that particular job.
    but she still tells them straight that she has issues with them, fair play to her.

    A valuable business client has a lot more clout
    if he has a problem he will definitely say it.
    and he will use it to his advantage too.
    if a project hits a speedbump and a deliverable might be late, the client can use it to kick some ass.
    a correspondence might go like this:

    why is this deliverable late, it is very important that this rollout happens on time. what are you guys doing over there. the left hand doesn't seem to know what the right hand is doing. oh and now that i think of it. that scruffy bloke Jack with the weird jewelery on his ears. my staff don't like his appearance. send somebody else next time.
    and what will the manager say in response ?
    yes sir

    and why will the manager not defend his employee ?
    he could say something like:
    but hes our best developer
    and the response would go something like
    why am i not surprised by that statement
    listen, i don't want excuses, i want results, shape up.


    thats why the manager wont defend his scruffy employee.
    thats the reason he wont employee a scruffy employee.


    All of the above, you said it best yourself -

    lanos wrote: »
    That is just your opinion, its not a fact although you would like us to think it is.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,382 ✭✭✭petes


    lanos wrote: »
    well I'm a bit sceptical but thanks for your input.

    It doesn't matter what anyone says to the contrary you aren't going to listen.


  • Registered Users Posts: 468 ✭✭aine92


    I think that you've just got to have a bit of cop on. I personally don't have a problem with piercings or whatever but you don't know the person who will interview you so you should err on the side of caution, especially if you've been having trouble.

    It's just common place really; I wear jeans to work everyday but I wore a skirt suit to my interview. It's just the done thing whether you like it or not and these are the kind of things you have to do to get a job. :confused::o


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,400 ✭✭✭Medusa22


    aine92 wrote: »
    I think that you've just got to have a bit of cop on. I personally don't have a problem with piercings or whatever but you don't know the person who will interview you so you should err on the side of caution, especially if you've been having trouble.

    It's just common place really; I wear jeans to work everyday but I wore a skirt suit to my interview. It's just the done thing whether you like it or not and these are the kind of things you have to do to get a job. :confused::o

    I'm in agreement with you, I have facial piercings but I take them out for interviews. Just like you, I usually wear jeans and I wear converse shoes most of the time but I'm not going to wear either of those to an interview either.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 600 ✭✭✭lanos


    All of the above, you said it best yourself -

    finally


    The message below if not for anybody who has posted on this thread

    Its a message to the kids out there who may be thinking about their future lives.
    if you want to look mad
    get a mohican----hair grows back
    walk around naked....and get dressed later
    get a henna tattoo on your forehead....they are not permanent.

    and if you aspire to living in a nice house, drive a cool car, travel frequently for work or leisure, get a good job that requires a proper third level education.

    do not mess with your face

    do not get your ears stretched

    There may be misguided people who tell you
    its ok, employers couldn't give a fiddlers how you look.
    i challenge you to go to a busy place and find a person with stretched lobes and observe him. follow him if you wish, discreetly. no harm its just an experiment.
    you will NOT see him climbing into a shiny new BMW
    99 times out of 100 he will be a bum.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,382 ✭✭✭petes


    lanos wrote: »
    finally


    The message below if not for anybody who has posted on this thread

    Its a message to the kids out there who may be thinking about their future lives.
    if you want to look mad
    get a mohican----hair grows back
    walk around naked....and get dressed later
    get a henna tattoo on your forehead....they are not permanent.

    and if you aspire to living in a nice house, drive a cool car, travel frequently for work or leisure, get a good job that requires a proper third level education.

    do not mess with your face

    do not get your ears stretched

    There may be misguided people who tell you
    its ok, employers couldn't give a fiddlers how you look.
    i challenge you to go to a busy place and find a person with stretched lobes and observe him. follow him if you wish, discreetly. no harm its just an experiment.
    you will NOT see him climbing into a shiny new BMW
    99 times out of 100 he will be a bum.

    You really are coming across as a bit of a asshole to be fair. Do you leave the house much?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 24,211 ✭✭✭✭One eyed Jack


    aine92 wrote: »
    I think that you've just got to have a bit of cop on. I personally don't have a problem with piercings or whatever but you don't know the person who will interview you so you should err on the side of caution, especially if you've been having trouble.

    It's just common place really; I wear jeans to work everyday but I wore a skirt suit to my interview. It's just the done thing whether you like it or not and these are the kind of things you have to do to get a job. :confused::o


    It all depends upon the type of job you're going for though aine, that's the crucial point that Ianos seems to be missing.

    In some jobs, physical appearance is the determining factor.
    In some jobs, qualifications is the determining factor.
    In some jobs, experience is the determining factor.
    In some jobs, personality is the determining factor.

    All these things are just some of the criteria that employers base their decisions on, and if a candidate is suitable for a position, an employer who knows what they're doing, will hire the most suitable candidate for the position based upon their criteria, which are not necessarily the criteria that Ianos uses.

    I've worked in management positions in IT MNC's, and currently I work in management in social care (while also being self-employed and working in the IT industry and being involved in education). I've conducted hundreds of interviews personally, and I've been involved in many more. I've helped people to gain employment in a vast array of career fields, from accountancy to... well, ok, I've never had to mentor anyone looking for a career in zoology, but you get the idea :D

    I've also mentored entrepreneurs who have set up their own businesses, in a number of different areas and occupations.

    Their physical appearance has always been the least of my concerns, but unfortunately, because of Ianos' ideas, these people think their appearance is the most critical factor in employers hiring decisions. They completely overlook the fact that employers are more interested in their skills, their competency, and them as a person, than they are in whether or not the person is pleasing to the eye.

    Many times, interview candidates have made judgements about me based upon my physical appearance, and I can see it written all over their faces. They have no idea of my opinion on piercings or tattoos, but because of Ianos' opinion (who does not speak for me), they've nearly talked themselves out of a job, and I've had to try and get them back on track, focus on what they can bring to the role, because I want to hire them. I wouldn't have been involved in inviting them for interview otherwise, as it would be a waste of my time.

    Tunnels, tattoos and piercings do not make someone unemployable, and they do not in any way hinder a person's prospects in life. It's very difficult to impart that to people, but I think this Commencement speech by Steve Jobs at Stanford University sums it up nicely -





    And if you don't like that, there's always Ashton Kutcher's speech at the Teen Choice Awards where he addresses a group of young people -





    In short - employers are people too, and just because Ianos or a handful of people here would not employ a person based upon their physical appearance, the fact is that there are many employers for whom a person's physical appearance is not a critical factor in their hiring decisions, if in fact it is indeed a factor at all.


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,328 ✭✭✭Magico Gonzalez


    Long and short of it, will having stretched earlobes restrict you from certain career options? Possibly. More corporate careers, yes. "Client facing" IT careers, i.e on site consultancy, yes, I can't speak for medicine and law but I probably wouldnt hire a lawyer or see a consultant who had holes in their ears. You mightn't like that, but it's true.

    If that's not an issue, go ahead, get those lobes stretched. It's a personal decision which I assume reflects a lifestyle choice and speaks to what you dont want to be as much as what you do want to be?


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,328 ✭✭✭Magico Gonzalez


    It all depends upon the type of job you're going for though aine, that's the crucial point that Ianos seems to be missing.

    In some jobs, physical appearance is the determining factor.
    In some jobs, qualifications is the determining factor.
    In some jobs, experience is the determining factor.
    In some jobs, personality is the determining factor.

    All these things are just some of the criteria that employers base their decisions on, and if a candidate is suitable for a position, an employer who knows what they're doing, will hire the most suitable candidate for the position based upon their criteria, which are not necessarily the criteria that Ianos uses.

    I've worked in management positions in IT MNC's, and currently I work in management in social care (while also being self-employed and working in the IT industry and being involved in education). I've conducted hundreds of interviews personally, and I've been involved in many more. I've helped people to gain employment in a vast array of career fields, from accountancy to... well, ok, I've never had to mentor anyone looking for a career in zoology, but you get the idea :D

    I've also mentored entrepreneurs who have set up their own businesses, in a number of different areas and occupations.

    Their physical appearance has always been the least of my concerns, but unfortunately, because of Ianos' ideas, these people think their appearance is the most critical factor in employers hiring decisions. They completely overlook the fact that employers are more interested in their skills, their competency, and them as a person, than they are in whether or not the person is pleasing to the eye.

    Many times, interview candidates have made judgements about me based upon my physical appearance, and I can see it written all over their faces. They have no idea of my opinion on piercings or tattoos, but because of Ianos' opinion (who does not speak for me), they've nearly talked themselves out of a job, and I've had to try and get them back on track, focus on what they can bring to the role, because I want to hire them. I wouldn't have been involved in inviting them for interview otherwise, as it would be a waste of my time.

    Tunnels, tattoos and piercings do not make someone unemployable, and they do not in any way hinder a person's prospects in life. It's very difficult to impart that to people, but I think this Commencement speech by Steve Jobs at Stanford University sums it up nicely -




    And if you don't like that, there's always Ashton Kutcher's speech at the Teen Choice Awards where he addresses a group of young people -




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,681 ✭✭✭bodice ripper


    lanos wrote: »
    finally


    The message below if not for anybody who has posted on this thread

    Its a message to the kids out there who may be thinking about their future lives.
    if you want to look mad
    get a mohican----hair grows back
    walk around naked....and get dressed later
    get a henna tattoo on your forehead....they are not permanent.

    and if you aspire to living in a nice house, drive a cool car, travel frequently for work or leisure, get a good job that requires a proper third level education.

    do not mess with your face

    do not get your ears stretched

    There may be misguided people who tell you
    its ok, employers couldn't give a fiddlers how you look.
    i challenge you to go to a busy place and find a person with stretched lobes and observe him. follow him if you wish, discreetly. no harm its just an experiment.
    you will NOT see him climbing into a shiny new BMW
    99 times out of 100 he will be a bum.



    You know, I believe personality and ability to communicate well with others are also much sought after traits by employers...


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 600 ✭✭✭lanos


    petes wrote: »
    You really are coming across as a bit of a asshole to be fair. Do you leave the house much?

    namecalling now....thanks :)
    Long and short of it, will having stretched earlobes restrict you from certain career options? Possibly. More corporate careers, yes. "Client facing" IT careers, i.e on site consultancy, yes, I can't speak for medicine and law but I probably wouldnt hire a lawyer or see a consultant who had holes in their ears. You mightn't like that, but it's true.

    this is exactly what i have been saying but some people cant seem to grasp it.
    if you get body modifications on your face you may be risking your future career prospects.

    leaving your face intact will not harm your prospects
    modifying your face probably will harm your prospects

    so why would you take the risk ?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 28,397 ✭✭✭✭Turtyturd


    katydid wrote: »
    Your business. Your loss. Especially when I'd tell all my friends about how I was treated.

    That's a real problem for my imaginary restaurant. You act the dickhead to my imaginary staff, I throw you out, and you tell your friends half the story.


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,328 ✭✭✭Magico Gonzalez


    lanos wrote: »
    namecalling now....thanks :)



    this is exactly what i have been saying but some people cant seem to grasp it.
    if you get body modifications on your face you may be risking your future career prospects.

    leaving your face intact will not harm your prospects
    modifying your face probably will harm your prospects

    so why would you take the risk ?

    I assume people who are getting their earlobes stretched are not looking to enter a corporate "client site" environment. Plenty of options open to them, I dont see it as a big deal once you take the facts into consideration.

    Piercings are a different thing, once you can take them in and out it wont affect your options too much.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 24,211 ✭✭✭✭One eyed Jack


    You are lying if you think it would be acceptable for an IT consultant to go on site to a bank or more traditional corporate environment with stretched lobes. I can tell you with more than 20 years exp in that environment I have never saw it. I have been presented with all manner of requirements for physical appearance for those institutions including black shoes only, clean shaved, short hair, suit and tie etc.


    Well it's a good thing for me I never said that then. I've never met anyone applying for a career in the financial sector who had tunnels, I've met many who have had tattoos and piercings though, both men and women.

    I wouldn't want anyone to be given the impression that I meet people with tunnels and tattoos all the time either. Tattoos are common enough though, even giving blood last night I noticed the sleeve tattoo on the nurse's arm and asked him about it. This guy was at least in his 50's. It didn't impede him from conducting himself in a professional manner. My barber who cuts my hair is inked up to, well, her neck, and it doesn't impede her from giving me exactly the haircut I want. Mate of mine owns an outdoor sports shop, looks like he was dragged through a ditch backwards, has the "rings" (tunnels, large ones!), a broken front tooth, surrounded by a beard and dreads. You couldn't meet a nicer guy, I've known him 15 years, and when I met him he'd green and pink spiky hair! :D

    Is it acceptable in the newer wave of software houses, yes, absolutely. Google, airbnb etc, I imagine that you'd still get in the door, but that is not on site work. I have not worked in a single Financial Services company for example where it would fly.

    Again, it's a personal choice. Maybe if you want to have hoops for earlobes you're more comfortable working behind the scenes or in a more modern employment environment, with less travel and on site work.

    I'm not saying its right, but that's the world as is right now.


    Exactly - it's all about context, and what the person themselves wants to do with their lives, they'll work for a lot longer, and be more productive, in a career that they're happy in, than a career where they're unhappy, and many employers are now beginning to recognise this.

    I imagine you never went on-site with a face on you that says you hate your job?


  • Registered Users Posts: 8,614 ✭✭✭Mozzeltoff


    lanos wrote: »



    this is exactly what i have been saying but some people cant seem to grasp it.
    if you get body modifications on your face you may be risking your future career prospects.

    leaving your face intact will not harm your prospects
    modifying your face probably will harm your prospects

    so why would you take the risk ?

    Because it's their body and they can do what they want? You're way too overly concerned about what other people are doing. Fair enough it's a discussion and you've made your opinion loud and clear. But nearly a week on and you're still bitching about how people choose to live their lives. If someone gets a job with body mods, more power to them!! As long as they're earning something and not sitting around doing nothing on the dole, isn't that the main thing? Not everyone wants to be an exec. Not everyone wants to work in a bank or in finance. Seriously, if a person has a job, that should be the end of it. What they do or don't do is none of your business.

    Why care so much?


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,382 ✭✭✭petes


    lanos wrote: »
    namecalling now....thanks :)


    I wouldn't hire you on the basis that you can't read and understand sentences.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 600 ✭✭✭lanos


    I assume people who are getting their earlobes stretched are not looking to enter a corporate "client site" environment.

    probably not a safe assumption
    many students in 3rd level have no idea what whey want to do after graduation.

    Then opportunity comes knocking and they get a call from the careers office informing them that [certain bluechip multinational] is expanding and has 20 places on its new graduate program offering a starting salary of 30K. exam results are good but theres the little problem of the dangling flapping earlobes hanging from his head.

    never mind, theres always vodafone tele support offering 18K, your own cubicle and burnout within a year if you're lucky enough to outshine the 100's of other applicants with no degree but normal ears.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 600 ✭✭✭lanos


    Mozzeltoff wrote: »
    Because it's their body and they can do what they want? You're way too overly concerned about what other people are doing. Fair enough it's a discussion and you've made your opinion loud and clear. But nearly a week on and you're still bitching about how people choose to live their lives. If someone gets a job with body mods, more power to them!! As long as they're earning something and not sitting around doing nothing on the dole, isn't that the main thing? Not everyone wants to be an exec. Not everyone wants to work in a bank or in finance. Seriously, if a person has a job, that should be the end of it. What they do or don't do is none of your business.

    Why care so much?

    its because i care so much that i am trying to educate those who are, as yet, undecided about whether or not to get tunnels.

    some posters here had not even heard of tunnels before this thread.
    so i see myself as a educator.

    why do you care so much that i care so much :)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 24,211 ✭✭✭✭One eyed Jack


    lanos wrote: »
    probably not a safe assumption
    many students in 3rd level have no idea what whey want to do after graduation.


    How is their lack of tunnels going to give them any better idea what they want to do after graduation? You're ignoring again the vast majority of people who know exactly what they want to do which is why they enter third level education in the first place. That has absolutely nothing to do with tattoos or piercings or any of the rest of your nonsense.

    Then opportunity comes knocking and they get a call from the careers office informing them that [certain bluechip multinational] is expanding and has 20 places on its new graduate program offering a starting salary of 30K. exam results are good but theres the little problem of the dangling flapping earlobes hanging from his head.


    You really think that's how it works? Well, I suppose only in your own mind, that's exactly how it works. You're completely wrong though.

    never mind, theres always vodafone tele support offering 18K, your own cubicle and burnout within a year if you're lucky enough to outshine the 100's of other applicants with no degree but normal ears.


    This misguided shyte isn't even worth entertaining.


  • Registered Users Posts: 8,614 ✭✭✭Mozzeltoff


    lanos wrote: »
    its because i care so much that i am trying to educate those who are, as yet, undecided about whether or not to get tunnels.

    some posters here had not even heard of tunnels before this thread.
    so i see myself as a educator.

    why do you care so much that i care so much :)

    But you're not really an educator, you're just preaching your opinion. Like everyone else does on this website. You're not changing minds or changing lives. You're some arrogant, person, sitting at a computer, ranting at people who disagree with you and bemoaning the horrors of someone getting a body modification and getting other people to agree with you.


    It's your opinion, it's great you have it but please, nobody is going to have a change of heart because some guy on the internet told them not to do it.


    Why do I care so much?

    Because I think you have this inflated sense of entitlement to tell people what they can and can't do even though it has no direct effect on your life whatsoever and I think it's about time I gave you this advice: Cop on and just let it be.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 600 ✭✭✭lanos


    interesting read:

    from a professional ear stretcher

    http://www.startribune.com/the-case-against-stretching-earlobes/137908688/


    mind you, its just his personal opinion so not to be taken as fact
    (disclaimer to satisfy half-blind-jack)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,681 ✭✭✭bodice ripper


    lanos wrote: »
    interesting read:

    from a professional ear stretcher

    http://www.startribune.com/the-case-against-stretching-earlobes/137908688/


    mind you, its just his personal opinion so not to be taken as fact
    (disclaimer to satisfy half-blind-jack)


    And in the interest of balance, here is an article by a woman who regrets doing all the **** you outlined.

    http://www.forbes.com/sites/jennagoudreau/2011/09/28/youth-in-the-office-confessions-of-a-fed-up-employee/


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 600 ✭✭✭lanos


    Mozzeltoff wrote: »
    It's your opinion, it's great you have it but please, nobody is going to have a change of heart because some guy on the internet told them not to do it.

    i disagree, i do see myself as an educator and if i can persuade just 1 person to avoid this misguided course then my time on boards.ie today has been very worthwhile.

    i have not told anybody to do or not to do anything.
    i have asked people to consider the long term consequenses of their actions.
    i can't persuade somebody not to be a bell-end, i'm not that persuasive.
    i can only advise...and educate.


  • Registered Users Posts: 8,614 ✭✭✭Mozzeltoff


    lanos wrote: »
    i disagree, i do see myself as an educator and if i can persuade just 1 person to avoid this misguided course then my time on boards.ie today has been very worthwhile.

    i have not told anybody to do or not to do anything.
    i have asked people to consider the long term consequenses of their actions.
    i can't persuade somebody not to be a bell-end, i'm not that persuasive.
    i can only advise...and educate.

    I might see myself as Batwoman but that doesn't make it so. You might see yourself as an educator but again, that doesn't make it so. You, are a guy, on the internet, having arguments on the internet with people about other peoples earlobes.

    What times we live in.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,681 ✭✭✭bodice ripper


    lanos wrote: »
    i disagree, i do see myself as an educator and if i can persuade just 1 person to avoid this misguided course then my time on boards.ie today has been very worthwhile.

    i have not told anybody to do or not to do anything.
    i have asked people to consider the long term consequenses of their actions.
    i can't persuade somebody not to be a bell-end, i'm not that persuasive.
    i can only advise...and educate.
    lanos wrote: »

    Its a message to the kids out there who may be thinking about their future lives.
    if you want to look mad
    get a mohican----hair grows back
    walk around naked....and get dressed later
    get a henna tattoo on your forehead....they are not permanent.

    and if you aspire to living in a nice house, drive a cool car, travel frequently for work or leisure, get a good job that requires a proper third level education.

    do not mess with your face

    do not get your ears stretched

    lanos wrote: »

    ...so i see myself as a educator.

    :)


  • Advertisement
Advertisement