Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi all! We have been experiencing an issue on site where threads have been missing the latest postings. The platform host Vanilla are working on this issue. A workaround that has been used by some is to navigate back from 1 to 10+ pages to re-sync the thread and this will then show the latest posts. Thanks, Mike.
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Shooting in California

1911131415

Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 761 ✭✭✭youreadthat


    Nekarsulm wrote: »
    I think they (USA) don't want to acknowledge that this is an example of domestic terrorism, as opposed to "foreign" attackers. As indeed Timothy McVeigh was.
    Much easier to control people's emotions if the feel they are being attacked by "outside" forces. Not so easy if the terrorist is a Municipal restaurant inspector from down the street.

    His wife's Pakistani..


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,221 ✭✭✭✭Nekarsulm


    His wife's Pakistani..

    Correct, but he is American.


  • Registered Users Posts: 414 ✭✭kettlehead


    ceadaoin. wrote: »
    How would border control have helped? The guy was US born and raised

    The wife came over on a K1 visa.
    The woman who helped kill 14 people at a holiday party in San Bernardino on Wednesday arrived in the United States last year on a special visa reserved for the fiancés of U.S. citizens.

    Tashfeen Malik, who was born in Pakistan, gained legal permanent resident status last year after she married Syed Rizwan Farook, her co-conspirator in Wednesday’s deadly shooting.

    The attack has brought new attention to the previously obscure K1 visa program, with some advocates for stricter immigration enforcement calling for investigations into the nation’s visa screening process and calling for the U.S. to halt its Syrian refugees program.


    “New information coming to light regarding Tashfeen Malik’s citizenship reaffirms the fact that proper screening and vetting those coming into our country, whether with a visa or as a refugee, is not always possible,” said Dan Stein, president of the Federation for American Immigration Reform, which advocates for stricter immigration laws.

    http://www.latimes.com/local/lanow/la-me-ln-san-bernardino-tashfeen-malik-20151203-story.html


  • Registered Users Posts: 3,161 ✭✭✭Amazingfun


    ceadaoin. wrote: »
    I had forgotten Trump said that. How anyone thinks this guy is serious candidate for president is beyond me. It's like he is just trolling everyone at this stage..


    No,Trump NEVER said "badges for muslims", lol....he spoke of a database, which in this case would have been very helpful.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,770 ✭✭✭The Randy Riverbeast


    Amazingfun wrote: »
    No,Trump NEVER said "badges for muslims", lol....he spoke of a database, which in this case would have been very helpful.

    Yeah, nobody will commit acts of terrorism if they are in a database.


  • Registered Users Posts: 3,161 ✭✭✭Amazingfun


    Yeah, nobody will commit acts of terrorism if they are in a database.

    Cute, except they may have been better able to coordinate law enforcement efforts had they been tracked.

    Anyways: these are the reasons Trump is dominating every poll and will , inshallah, be President :)


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,770 ✭✭✭The Randy Riverbeast


    Amazingfun wrote: »
    Cute, except they may have been better able to coordinate law enforcement efforts had they been tracked.

    Anyways: these are the reasons Trump is dominating every poll and will , inshallah, be President :)

    So you agree it wouldnt have stopped it.


  • Registered Users Posts: 3,161 ✭✭✭Amazingfun


    So you agree it wouldnt have stopped it.

    No, I didn't say anything of the sort, because no one knows the effect such action would have.......yet. And that includes you.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,365 ✭✭✭ceadaoin.


    Amazingfun wrote: »
    Cute, except they may have been better able to coordinate law enforcement efforts had they been tracked.

    Anyways: these are the reasons Trump is dominating every poll and will , inshallah, be President :)

    His name was mentioned very early on in the investigation. Practically as soon as the shooting occurred his name was heard multiple times on the police scanners and posted online. The police were able to trace him fairly quickly, he was caught going back too his house where the police were already waiting.

    Seems well co-ordinated to me. Obviously the database they already have works pretty well


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25,069 ✭✭✭✭My name is URL


    Amazingfun wrote: »
    Anyways: these are the reasons Trump is dominating every poll and will , inshallah, be President :)

    He's certainly popular amongst idiots. The US has no shortage of those

    Do you also agree with Trump's suggestion and plan to kill family members of suspected ISIS operatives?
    Cute, except they may have been better able to coordinate law enforcement efforts had they been tracked.

    You are just clueless. The guy openly supported ISIS on his social media pages, and despite the billions spent on intel every year by US agencies, they failed to identify him as a threat. How would a database of muslims change that?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 23,495 ✭✭✭✭Billy86


    Amazingfun wrote: »
    Anyways: these are the reasons Trump is dominating every poll
    Hate to break it to you, but he's really not - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nationwide_opinion_polling_for_the_United_States_presidential_election,_2016


  • Registered Users Posts: 3,161 ✭✭✭Amazingfun


    ceadaoin. wrote: »
    His name was mentioned very early on in the investigation. Practically as soon as the shooting occurred his name was heard multiple times on the police scanners and posted online. The police were able to trace him fairly quickly, he was caught going back too his house where the police were already waiting.

    Seems well co-ordinated to me. Obviously the database they already have works pretty well


    Care to retract your supposed "memory" of Trump and the "badges" for Muslims?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,770 ✭✭✭The Randy Riverbeast


    Amazingfun wrote: »
    No, I didn't say anything of the sort, because no one knows the effect such action would have.......yet. And that includes you.

    Waste money on a database that might not even help. Great idea.

    No explanation on how a database would even help.


  • Registered Users Posts: 3,161 ✭✭✭Amazingfun


    He's certainly popular amongst idiots. The US has no shortage of those

    Do you also agree with Trump's suggestion and plan to kill family members of suspected ISIS operatives?



    You are just clueless. The guy openly supported ISIS on his social media pages, and despite the billions spent on intel every year by US agencies, they failed to identify him as a threat. How would a database of muslims change that?

    Yes, and you're clearly a genius, lol.

    As for the results of such a database, I guess we'll find out when President Trump takes office ;)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25,069 ✭✭✭✭My name is URL


    Amazingfun wrote: »
    Yes, and you're clearly a genius, lol.

    As for the results of such a database, I guess we'll find out when President Trump takes office ;)

    Keep telling your deluded and paranoid self that

    You can't even answer a direct question. Pathetic

    How would a database help? You're the one extolling the virtues of the idea so explain how it'd help

    And do you agree with Trump's idea to kill family members of suspected ISIS operatives?


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,365 ✭✭✭ceadaoin.


    Amazingfun wrote: »
    Care to retract your supposed "memory" of Trump and the "badges" for Muslims?

    Seems to me a database would just be modern version of a yellow badge, but yes I retract it.

    Care to comment on the fact that these two were traced pretty quickly after the event. How would a separate database have helped? Unless they regularly inspect the premises of Muslims on it or insert tracking chips under their skin, which I think everyone would agree is not going to or should happen, then I don't see the point. Wouldn't put it past Trump to suggest those things though. Anything for headlines.

    Are you American or live in America? If not I really don't understand your fervent trump support considering it will have no impact on you whatsoever


  • Registered Users Posts: 3,161 ✭✭✭Amazingfun


    ceadaoin. wrote: »
    Seems to me a database would just be modern version of a yellow badge, but yes I retract it.

    Care to comment on the fact that these two were traced pretty quickly after the event. How would a separate database have helped? Unless they regularly inspect the premises of Muslims on it or insert tracking chips under their skin, which I think everyone would agree is not going to or should happen, then I don't see the point. Wouldn't put it past Trump to suggest those things though. Anything for headlines.

    Are you American or live in America? If not I really don't understand your fervent trump support considering it will have no impact on you whatsoever

    1. Good for you on the retraction.

    2. How do I know how a separate database would help? I am not law enforcement and I am sure there is more detail on this proposal to come, perhaps one the is more efficient and replaces existing structures.

    3. No and no, but I can ask you and the many anti-Trumpers on this thread the same thing as to why you are so against him? I love him, for a multitude of reasons.

    **It has been noted elsewhere that Trump's anti TPP stance is in fact very good for Ireland, btw ;)


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 23,495 ✭✭✭✭Billy86


    Amazingfun wrote: »
    Care to retract your supposed "memory" of Trump and the "badges" for Muslims?
    Care to retract your comment that Trump is dominating the presidential polls? :pac:


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25,069 ✭✭✭✭My name is URL


    Amazingfun wrote: »

    **It has been noted elsewhere that Trump's anti TPP stance is in fact very good for Ireland, btw ;)

    Why would his position on the Trans-Pacific Partnership have any bearing on Ireland?


  • Registered Users Posts: 3,161 ✭✭✭Amazingfun


    Billy86 wrote: »
    Care to retract your comment that Trump is dominating the presidential polls? :pac:

    No, because he is. He is the front-runner among the Republicans and in the Fox poll this week was 5 points ahead of Hillary :)

    How's your study of the crime stats coming along, you dropped it very quick ;)


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 3,161 ✭✭✭Amazingfun


    Why would his position on the Trans-Pacific Partnership have any bearing on Ireland?

    Go and find out. This is the "Shooting in California" thread.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,676 ✭✭✭✭Galwayguy35


    I don't think it's such a mad thing to say that Trump could win the republican nomination, Carson is nearest to him and he is pretty hopeless in comparison.

    Americans don't want to take in Syrians and him saying he will sent them all back is always going to win him votes.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25,069 ✭✭✭✭My name is URL


    Amazingfun wrote: »
    Go and find out. This is the "Shooting in California" thread.

    You're the one that brought it up.

    Funny how you get pissy whenever anyone questions something you yourself have said on the thread :)

    Ireland has nothing to do with the TPP, so how would his position on it affect us?

    Are you confusing it with TTIP? Confusion seems to be a theme in your posts


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,770 ✭✭✭The Randy Riverbeast


    Amazingfun wrote: »
    No, because he is. He is the front-runner among the Republicans and in the Fox poll this week was 5 points ahead of Hillary :)

    How's your study of the crime stats coming along, you dropped it very quick ;)

    http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2016/president/us/general_election_trump_vs_clinton-5491.html#polls

    Republican winning in Fox poll shocker.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 286 ✭✭Anachrony


    Billy86 wrote: »

    The only polls he's dominating are for the Republican primary, but a big part of that is that there are around 300 Republican candidates this year, so the slightly less crazy vote is pretty watered down. He has a solid plurality, but no majority. Once it narrows down to fewer candidates, the remaining candidates pick up supporters from former candidates. None of them will endorse Trump, so it will be everyone but Trump who makes gains at that point. The majority don't support Trump now, and they will continue supporting a non-Trump.


  • Registered Users Posts: 3,161 ✭✭✭Amazingfun


    You're the one that brought it up.

    Funny how you get pissy whenever anyone questions something you yourself have said on the thread :)

    Ireland has nothing to do with the TPP, so how would his position on it affect us?

    Are you confusing it with TTIP? Confusion seems to be a theme in your posts

    You have used "idiots" "clueless" and regularly post in the pissiest of ways possible so what are you on about? :pac:


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,259 ✭✭✭él statutorio


    Anachrony wrote: »
    The only polls he's dominating are for the Republican primary, but a big part of that is that there are around 300 Republican candidates this year, so the slightly less crazy vote is pretty watered down. He has a solid plurality, but no majority. Once it narrows down to fewer candidates, the remaining candidates pick up supporters from former candidates. None of them will endorse Trump, so it will be everyone but Trump who makes gains at that point. The majority don't support Trump now, and they will continue supporting a non-Trump.

    He's doing fantastically well to be fair to him. Plus, I find him tremendously entertaining! I'm surprised he actually lasted this long.

    Oh look, we're neighbours!


  • Registered Users Posts: 33,754 ✭✭✭✭RobertKK


    So the female terrorist had pledged her allegiance to ISIS online.


  • Registered Users Posts: 3,161 ✭✭✭Amazingfun


    Friday night smiles:

    CNN poll just in:
    Donald Trump is once again alone at the top of the Republican field, according to the latest CNN/ORC Poll, with 36% of registered Republicans and Republican-leaning independents behind him, while his nearest competitor trails by 20 points.

    http://edition.cnn.com/2015/12/04/politics/donald-trump-poll-cnn-orc-national/


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 23,495 ✭✭✭✭Billy86


    Amazingfun wrote: »
    No, because he is. He is the front-runner among the Republicans and in the Fox poll this week was 5 points ahead of Hillary :)
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nationwide_opinion_polling_for_the_United_States_presidential_election,_2016

    Verified polls: Clinton 16, Trump 1.
    Individuals polls from Oct 28 - present: Clinton 28, Sanders 10, Carson 8, Rubio 6, Trump 5.

    He's not even in the top two in his own party ffs, come back to reality would you! :pac:
    How's your study of the crime stats coming along, you dropped it very quick ;)
    Actually, I went to sleep. Until you can source all the data for every state, then you cannot talk about the US as whole. You clearly have no interest in doing that despite claiming that you would, and have no interest in talking about the reasons why minorities might be more likely to face crime and poverty. All you seem interested in there is proclaiming some weird concept of the inherent superiority of the white man over others. Frankly, I'm not remotely interested in that discussion but I can direct you to where you can find others who would be.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,807 ✭✭✭take everything


    Looks like a circus at the perpetrators' house.
    Media and ordinary joes walking through the house.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 716 ✭✭✭Red King


    How convenient for Obama


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 23,495 ✭✭✭✭Billy86


    Anachrony wrote: »
    The only polls he's dominating are for the Republican primary, but a big part of that is that there are around 300 Republican candidates this year, so the slightly less crazy vote is pretty watered down. He has a solid plurality, but no majority. Once it narrows down to fewer candidates, the remaining candidates pick up supporters from former candidates. None of them will endorse Trump, so it will be everyone but Trump who makes gains at that point. The majority don't support Trump now, and they will continue supporting a non-Trump.

    It's funny that they didn't seem to learn from the last two election cycles - the race for the Republican nomination is a race to see who can get the most right-wing extremist, and then after that they need to get back to the center to stand a chance of winning the election itself. Basically, by design they leave themselves with the worst possible chance of winning that they could.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 23,495 ✭✭✭✭Billy86


    Red King wrote: »
    How convenient for Obama
    How is this in any way convenient for him?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 716 ✭✭✭Red King


    Billy86 wrote: »
    How is this in any way convenient for him?

    Think about it


  • Registered Users Posts: 280 ✭✭Orangebrigade


    Billy86 wrote: »
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nationwide_opinion_polling_for_the_United_States_presidential_election,_2016

    Verified polls: Clinton 16, Trump 1.
    Individuals polls from Oct 28 - present: Clinton 28, Sanders 10, Carson 8, Rubio 6, Trump 5.

    He's not even in the top two in his own party ffs, come back to reality would you! :pac:


    Actually, I went to sleep. Until you can source all the data for every state, then you cannot talk about the US as whole. You clearly have no interest in doing that despite claiming that you would, and have no interest in talking about the reasons why minorities might be more likely to face crime and poverty. All you seem interested in there is proclaiming some weird concept of the inherent superiority of the white man over others. Frankly, I'm not remotely interested in that discussion but I can direct you to where you can find others who would be.
    Trump stands a great chance of becoming the candidate to be President. The Southerners will vote for him. The Yankees won't.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 23,495 ✭✭✭✭Billy86


    Red King wrote: »
    Think about it
    I have, now tell me why.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 23,495 ✭✭✭✭Billy86


    Trump stands a great chance of becoming the candidate to be President. The Southerners will vote for him. The Yankees won't.
    Possibly of winning the primaries, though I wouldn't count on it myself because if he did win the primaries he would be absolutely slaughtered in the election itself, and the higher ups in the GOP are surely well aware of that. I would imagine many voters do as well, and while the Republican voter is not the world's smartest person, I am guessing enough will see that too.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,177 ✭✭✭Wompa1


    One of my American friends over here just shared something on Facebook that stated "Guns are not responsible for the San Bernadino Shooting. Muslims are"

    And it's got a picture of the suspects brother...the decorated veteran. Oh, Arizona. It's a dry hate.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 33,754 ✭✭✭✭RobertKK


    ISIS have said that the attack was done by supporters of ISIS.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 1,162 ✭✭✭strelok


    msnbc and cnn reporters made their way into the suspects apartment and had a mosy around, live on air. there's 17 minutes of footage, that was apparently shown live, of them just wandering about the apartment rifling through photographs and looking at photo id's

    oh, and the police weren't done with their investigation yet so the crime scene is most likely insanely compromised


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,789 ✭✭✭✭BattleCorp


    strelok wrote: »
    msnbc and cnn reporters made their way into the suspects apartment and had a mosy around, live on air. there's 17 minutes of footage, that was apparently shown live, of them just wandering about the apartment rifling through photographs and looking at photo id's

    oh, and the police weren't done with their investigation yet so the crime scene is most likely insanely compromised

    I doubt it will affect the couple though, seeing as they are em ............ dead n stuff.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,365 ✭✭✭ceadaoin.


    strelok wrote: »
    msnbc and cnn reporters made their way into the suspects apartment and had a mosy around, live on air. there's 17 minutes of footage, that was apparently shown live, of them just wandering about the apartment rifling through photographs and looking at photo id's

    oh, and the police weren't done with their investigation yet so the crime scene is most likely insanely compromised


    WTF this is just bizarre. Would they not have had people guarding the place? How could this happen? Seems like there's a lot of potential evidence still there which has now been tampered with


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 23,495 ✭✭✭✭Billy86


    strelok wrote: »
    msnbc and cnn reporters made their way into the suspects apartment and had a mosy around, live on air. there's 17 minutes of footage, that was apparently shown live, of them just wandering about the apartment rifling through photographs and looking at photo id's

    oh, and the police weren't done with their investigation yet so the crime scene is most likely insanely compromised

    Not going to happen of course, but I would love to see some people face charges for this. Recklessly idiotic and irresponsible carry on.


  • Registered Users Posts: 33,754 ✭✭✭✭RobertKK


    FBI said they were finished investigating at the terrorists home, so they didn't care that the media was going through a boarded up house.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 5,191 ✭✭✭Eugene Norman


    RobertKK wrote: »
    So the female terrorist had pledged her allegiance to ISIS online.

    Anybody could do that of course.


  • Registered Users Posts: 33,754 ✭✭✭✭RobertKK


    Anybody could do that of course.

    Anyone can, it was on Facebook that she declared her allegiance. It was said on CNN that ISIS are happy to give membership posthumously if people carry out terrorism in their name.

    It was the landlord who let the media into the house.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,299 ✭✭✭✭MadsL


    RobertKK wrote: »
    It was the landlord who let the media into the house.

    Ker*ching!


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 1,869 ✭✭✭asherbassad


    Waste money on a database that might not even help. Great idea.

    No explanation on how a database would even help.

    But it's not a waste of money.
    The nephew of the wife of some Congressman has a company. He purchases a server for 5 grand and loads MS Excel onto it. He then charges the US Government $1 million for this piece of crap and an ongoing support and supply contract of $50,000 a month to have his friend's two teenage sons enter in bullcrap names that they cut and paste from an online phone book.

    The program is named some retarded acronym that sounds like a reptile or scary animal, e.g. Strategic Harnessing and Analysis of Reconnaisance Knowledge (S.H.A.R.K.)

    Then the taxpayer pays for this pile of shit.

    Profit for the company boy.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,797 ✭✭✭✭hatrickpatrick


    But it's not a waste of money.
    The nephew of the wife of some Congressman has a company. He purchases a server for 5 grand and loads MS Excel onto it. He then charges the US Government $1 million for this piece of crap and an ongoing support and supply contract of $50,000 a month to have his friend's two teenage sons enter in bullcrap names that they cut and paste from an online phone book.

    The program is named some retarded acronym that sounds like a reptile or scary animal, e.g. Strategic Harnessing and Analysis of Reconnaisance Knowledge (S.H.A.R.K.)

    Then the taxpayer pays for this pile of shit.

    Profit for the company boy.

    I think you're getting confused. This thread is about a mass shooting in America, not Irish Water. :pac:


  • Advertisement
Advertisement