Slanderous statement from Moderator

MakeEmLaugh

Hello,

I was slandered by a Moderator on Boards.ie in the last 24 hours.

I asked the moderator to respond, but he or she has not yet done so.

Could I ask why this moderator has the impunity to make slanderous statements and then scuttle off?

Shield

If you're referring to the comment from this thread, I put it to you that your understanding of the meaning of "slanderous statements" is deeply flawed.

-Shield.

MakeEmLaugh

Shield wrote: »

If you're referring to the comment from this thread, I put it to you that your understanding of the meaning of "slanderous statements" is deeply flawed.

-Shield.

whoopsadaisydoodles wrote: »

Mod

MakeEmLaugh - you have developed a trend of posting racial related threads and no other kind.

These are the last 50 threads I have started on boards.

• Some UK Muslims think “concentration camps” are close
• Ving Rhames gives Jack Lemmon his Golden Globe (1998)
• High Level Military Group – Report on 2014 Gaza Conflict
• Donald Trump - Darth Vader mashup
• US Politician - “We can't make African-Americans white”
• Boycotting Israel – a question.
• Republican Sinn Féin - Ard Fheis - Nov 2015
• Worst comedians?
• Favourite film/music/literary critics?
• Irish woman on BBC Question Time 03/12/2015
• Porno by Irvine Welsh
• Best of 2015 - on Netflix?
• Syrian opinions on UK intervention against ISIS?
• Whose Batman films are darker – Burton's or Nolan's?
• 'Intersectionaity' - gibberish or not?
• Native Americans on Thanksgiving [VIDEO]
• OpenOfficeWriter - Thesaurus not working
• Commemorating 9/11 victims is “offensive to Muslims” - The Daily Beast
• Zoolander 2 deemed “transphobic”
• Diarmaid Ferriter slams Tim Pat Coogan's new book
• Shunning an artist for personal reasons?
• Jimmy Deenihan - TD for Diaspora
• Ireland's Call - BBC/RTÉ Prime Time show
• Cancun, Mexico - Things to do?
• Belfast-based Easter Rising group exclude Unionists
• Woman lusts over "legal" Brooklyn Beckham
• What's more Irish - accent or birthplace?
• Petition to ban Germaine Greer from upcoming lecture
• Reebok UK apologises for 'Ireland' t-shirt
• Most satisfying revenge kills in films?
• Irish-American General retires – sings 'The Parting Glass'
• Israeli PM asks Palestinian President to negotiate on two-state solution
• Couple with six children killed in Palestine
• Using Region 1 DVDs on Toshiba Satellite Pro
• Tricolour burnings in Belfast - Should Irish government do more?
• Most ridiculous hangover cures you've heard?
• Any novels about the Scottish Independence referendum 2014?
• Anna Nolan on “gender fluid” people
• Pro-Palestinian woman at rally in London
• Most disappointing non-sequels
• US college course bans the words 'male' and 'female'
• Male rape is funny, according to New York Post
• Americans watch Father Ted [VIDEO]
• Websites doing exciting work today?
• Which news/entertainment websites dominate your Facebook news feed?
• Best Tarantino-scripted movie, and why?
• Polish workers strike in UK
• Calais 'migrants' - stop using that word
• Cecil the Lion/The Lion King mash-up

With the exception of the one I have highlighted in bold, not a single one was about race.

So the statement “you have developed a trend of posting racial related threads and no other kind” is a lie.

A slanderous lie.

If I were in a more heated mood, I would say it was a slanderous lie made a pathetic, dishonest individual who is too cowardly to respond when someone calls him up on it.

If I were in an even more heated mood, I would say it was being defended here by another pathetic, dishonest individual.

And if I were in an even more heated mood, I could respond by slandering the two individuals in question, maybe by making equally revolting statements and then scuttling off.

But then, I am not in a more heated mood.

Zaph

MakeEmLaugh wrote: »

With the exception of the one I have highlighted in bold, not a single one was about race.

So the statement “you have developed a trend of posting racial related threads and no other kind” is a lie.

A slanderous lie.

Knock it off with the hyperbole and ridiculously misplaced righteous indifnation. At worst it's an error on the part of the mod, possibly even due to mixing you up with someone else. However to call it a lie is overstating things somewhat. To call it a slanderous lie is demonstrating your complete lack of understanding as to what slander is.

MakeEmLaugh wrote: »

If I were in a more heated mood, I would say it was a slanderous lie made a pathetic, dishonest individual who is too cowardly to respond when someone calls him up on it.

If I were in an even more heated mood, I would say it was being defended here by another pathetic, dishonest individual.

And if I were in an even more heated mood, I could respond by slandering the two individuals in question, maybe by making equally revolting statements and then scuttling off.

But then, I am not in a more heated mood.

And if I were in a more heated mood I'd say that the mods don't need to put up with this sort of crap and sitebanning you would resolve the problem. But then, I am not in a more heated mood.