Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Will 1916 commemorations open up old wounds between Ireland and the brits?

Options
168101112

Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 10,117 ✭✭✭✭Junkyard Tom


    Sinn Fein get paid by the likes of me to run the British state which is part of the United Kingdom.

    Indeed, the British forced Unionists into power sharing with people they NEVER, NEVER, NEVER wanted to. Do you remember when the British did this too? The British army bringing Unionists and Loyalists to heel.



    And we won the Battle of the Boyne, a victory.

    I understand your type have awful difficulty moving on from the past but have you realised that The Boyne is now here in the Republic of Ireland in 2015?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 12,452 ✭✭✭✭The_Valeyard


    Iwasfrozen wrote: »
    None of it to be honest. Irish independence was granted by Parliament. Even then the currency was tied to the pound for decades.

    Granted?

    This is why it's called a 'treaty'

    If the British establishment had its way, we would all be waving Union Jacks today. The British government was forced to the negotiating table by a band of young rebels. Who dared to be different and not part of her empire. Sure it would be a stepping stone process, but we would achieve our own democracy, economy, and right to make our own destiny.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 6,995 ✭✭✭Schadenfreudia


    Do other countries engage in this kind of hair shirt wearing when celebrating their own foundation narratives?

    No.

    We are perhaps the only post-colonial nation on Earth who fret about such matters....


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 6,363 ✭✭✭KingBrian2


    Iwasfrozen wrote: »
    None of it to be honest. Irish independence was granted by Parliament. Even then the currency was tied to the pound for decades.

    Yes an Irish Parliament. :rolleyes:


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 12,078 ✭✭✭✭LordSutch


    If the British establishment had its way, we would all be waving Union Jacks today. The British government was forced to the negotiating table by a band of young rebels. Who dared to be different and not part of her empire. Sure it would be a stepping stone process, but we would achieve our own democracy, economy, and right to make our own destiny.

    But for a quirk of fate we would have been granted Home Rule, which would I guess have turned into full independence from Britain after several decades of negotiated & peaceful seperation, (while retaining our rightful place within the Commonwealth), but the HR side lost, and the rest is history. And now almost one hunderd years later we are still feeling the ramifications of those fine "young rebels" as you describe them, and their wreckless & feckless blood lust.

    In relation to another poster, our link to sterling ended in the late 1970s.

    I guess the Rising commemorations will be broadcast on all British TV channels, and the whole thing will pass off without incident. Obviously there will be some Loyalist groups up North and in Scotland who will be jumping up & down for a few days, but I fully expect the British population at large to be TV spectators of something that may well confound them :)

    Cue, bar stool conversation South London.

    ...you what mate, you lost the battle? you what? you mean the rising was a failure? Yep, it was a total wipe out and the leaders were executed! So how come you paddys got beat then? well, the rising was only carried out by a minority within a minority. You what mate? so if the rising was carried out by such a small group then why are they considered as heroes today? presuming the rest of you lot didn't agree with the rebels at the time? Well, although the rising wasn't a popular rising, it became retrospectively popular after the ring leaders were executed. Ah, I see mate, martyredom and all that jazz . . . . exactly mate. These rebel jonnies didn't by any chance have any dealings with ze jerries did they? Well, actually they did, indeed they wanted the Germans to invade and attack Britain from behind, using Ireland as a back door!! Oh, now hang on a minute mister, you telling me these rebel fellas wanted to stab us in the back? fraid so. Humm, maybe then they deserved to be executed? well some may say yes, many others say execution was too harsh.

    And this hypothetical discussion^ may well go on with many people in Britain next Easter, who have no incling whatsoever of Irish history, let alone the 1916 Rising.


  • Advertisement
  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 6,995 ✭✭✭Schadenfreudia


    LordSutch wrote: »
    But for a quirk of fate we would have been granted Home Rule, which would I guess have turned into full independence from Britain after several decades of negotiated & peaceful seperation, (while retaining our rightful place within the Commonwealth), but the HR side lost, and the rest is history. And now almost one hunderd years later we are still feeling the ramifications of those fine "young rebels" as you describe them, and their wreckless & feckless blood lust.

    Bizarre.

    We are also "commemorating" an Imperial War that took 50,000 Irish lives; led to WW2 and the death of perhaps a hundred million people in Europe alone and you are fretting about "blood lust" on the part of brave people who opposed that Imperialism :rolleyes:

    Beyond ridicule....


  • Registered Users Posts: 669 ✭✭✭josephryan1989


    LordSutch wrote: »
    But for a quirk of fate we would have been granted Home Rule, which would I guess have turned into full independence from Britain after several decades of negotiated & peaceful seperation, (while retaining our rightful place within the Commonwealth), but the HR side lost, and the rest is history. And now almost one hunderd years later we are still feeling the ramifications of those fine "young rebels" as you describe them, and their wreckless & feckless blood lust.

    In relation to another poster, our link to sterling ended in the late 1970s.

    I guess the Rising commemorations will be broadcast on all British TV channels, and the whole thing will pass off without incident. Obviously there will be some Loyalist groups up North and in Scotland who will be jumping up & down for a few days, but I fully expect the British population at large to be TV spectators of something that may well confound them :)

    Cue, bar stool conversation South London.

    ...you what mate, you lost the battle? you what? you mean the rising was a failure? Yep, it was a total wipe out and the leaders were executed! So how come you paddys got beat then? well, the rising was only carried out by a minority within a minority. You what mate? so if the rising was carried out by such a small group then why are they considered as heroes today? presuming the rest of you lot didn't agree with the rebels at the time? Well, although the rising wasn't a popular rising, it became retrospectively popular after the ring leaders were executed. Ah, I see mate, martyredom and all that jazz . . . . exactly mate. These rebel jonnies didn't by any chance have any dealings with ze jerries did they? Well, actually they did, indeed they wanted the Germans to invade and attack Britain from behind, using Ireland as a back door!! Oh, now hang on a minute mister, you telling me these rebel fellas wanted to stab us in the back? fraid so. Humm, maybe then they deserved to be executed? well some may say yes, many others say execution was too harsh.

    And this hypothetical discussion^ may well go on with many people in Britain next Easter, who have no incling whatsoever of Irish history, let alone the 1916 Rising.

    Let me explain why the 1916 Rising was utterly justified?:

    After the split in the Irish Parliamentary Party over the Kitty O'Shea scandal which destroyed the political career and led to the early death of Charles Stuart Parnell, for a decade Irish Nationalism was split between the anti-Parnell and the Parnellite factions. This division meant that no Home Rule legislation had any hope of passing through the House of Commons until the division was mended.

    Opposition to the Boer War by the majority of Irish Nationalist opinion led to the reunification of the IPP under the leadership of John Redmond. The surge in support for the IPP in the next decade up until their electoral triumph in the 1910 election when they held the balance of power in the Commons led to the reluctant introduction of the Home Rule Bill in 1912 by the Liberals.

    The Conservatives allied with the Unionists were in open conspiracy against the government and committed treason when they imported German arms to threaten rebellion if Home Rule was implemented.

    The Irish Volunteers were founded to defend the democratic rights of the overwhelming majority of the island of Ireland from the UVF who had superior arms and training and were supported by a mutiny of British Army officers who threatened to disobey orders from the civilian government to move against the UVF in order to implement Home Rule. To add insult to injury Irish Nationalists imported modest quantities of arms they were fired on by British troops.

    Redmond who had opposed imperialism in 1900 cynically betrayed Irish nationalist and republican principles by allying the Irish Volunteers renamed the National Volunteers with the British war effort in 1914. Irish Home Rule was suspended and if the Conservatives and Unionists had their way would be permanently buried. Tens of thousands of Irishmen trusted Redmond and believed in his bogus claim that Irish blood sacrifice in the trenches of World War I would be gratefully rewarded with Home Rule following the war. Their honorable bravery and sacrifice counted for nothing in the eyes of Conservatives and Unionists.

    The UVF were allowed to remain intact when they formed the Ulster Division while Irish Volunteers saw their units dispersed and commanded by upper class Anglo Irish Protestant officers when they joined the Irish regiments and divisions. The IPP TD Willie Redmond brother of John Redmond realized too late that the cream of Irish manhood were being slaughtered and his pleas for Irish Home Rule in the Commons fell on deaf ears before he chose a noble death when he went over the top with his own men.

    By 1916 the Irish Parliamentary Party was moribund and discredited and the National Volunteers had been decimated. Nationalism was at a low ebb except for the rump Irish Volunteers and the socialist Irish Citizen Army who refused to fight for Britain and continued to defiantly drill openly. Dublin Castle was plotting to crack down on the Irish Volunteers and round up its leadership when the rebel leaders moved first and launched the rising.

    Pearse, Clarke, Connolly et al knew that if they were lifted and the movement crushed and disbanded that it was the end of the road. The Unionists would be ascendant and Ireland would remain a province of the British Empire like Wales and Scotland.

    Outside of the small conspiratorial movement the majority of constitutional nationalists had practically given up on peaceful change. They had marched to the summit but had been marched back down again after a generation of fruitless effort. The Fenians of the 1860s who had once used dynamite and later became MPs in the IPP were now frustrated white bearded old men.

    This is why the 1916 Rising was the only chance left for Irish Republicans and for Nationalist Ireland. A military stand by Irish republicans would keep the dream alive. The orders of the wrongheaded Professor O'Neill which led to a much smaller force turning out in Dublin and nationally prevented a much longer pitched fight. Thousands more could have turned out to fight but did not and these men were subsequently rounded up in the aftermath.

    The alternative was that Ireland would have been cowed for generations and perhaps never have become an independent state.

    The rebellion was a failure and has elements of farce but the sheer heroism of the leaders who went to their deaths cannot be refuted. A generation of young Irishmen and Irishwomen were angered, ashamed, embarrassed but most importantly inspired and in 1918 when this generation went to the polls they swept away the tired old IPP and returned a youthful idealistic Sinn Féin with an overwhelming majority.

    The British government responded by jailing Irish leaders and TDs leaving no other recourse but armed guerrilla war by the IRA. The subsequent indiscriminate terrorisation of the Irish people by the Black and Tans revealed to even the most die-hard West Briton that Irish democratic opinion meant nothing to the British establishment.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 12,078 ✭✭✭✭LordSutch


    Bizarre.

    We are also "commemorating" an Imperial War that took 50,000 Irish lives; led to WW2 and the death of perhaps a hundred million people in Europe alone and you are fretting about "blood lust" on the part of brave people who opposed that Imperialism :rolleyes:

    Beyond ridicule....

    The scale of death during the Great War is off the scale, and nobody is denying that, and as you say anything up to 50.000 Irish men also died in that futile and horrific world war. However, at the very same time as that war was taking place, and while this country was so heavily involved in that massive war effort against Germany, a small band of local rebels thought that they would wrecklessly take it upon themselves to declare a Republic and hold the country to ransom for a whole week, while about four hundred people needlessly died ...

    Are the Rebels beyond ridicule?


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 10,087 ✭✭✭✭Dan_Solo


    LordSutch wrote: »
    (while retaining our rightful place within the Commonwealth)
    "rightful" for who?


  • Registered Users Posts: 3,254 ✭✭✭MPFGLB


    Thanks josephryan1989 ...you have restored my faith in Irish Education :D


  • Advertisement
  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 10,087 ✭✭✭✭Dan_Solo


    LordSutch wrote: »
    a small band of local rebels thought that they would wrecklessly take it upon themselves to declare a Republic and hold the country to ransom for a whole week, while about four hundred people needlessly died ...
    What was "needless" about it? If Germany tries to invade England is it "needless" to resist occupation?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 12,078 ✭✭✭✭LordSutch


    Rightful for us, and for (what would have been) our natural trading connections with all the commonwealth countries of the globe, many of which had/have deep family connections with Ireland.

    Then in 1949 it was announced that we had left the commonwealth, and that all commonwealth connections would end ... just like that!

    Marvelous, not :(


  • Registered Users Posts: 3,254 ✭✭✭MPFGLB


    LordSutch wrote: »
    The scale of death during the Great War is off the scale, and nobody is denying that, and as you say anything up to 50.000 Irish men also died in that futile and horrific world war. However, at the very same time as that war was taking place, and while this country was so heavily involved in that massive war effort against Germany, a small band of local rebels thought that they would wrecklessly take it upon themselves to declare a Republic and hold the country to ransom for a whole week, while about four hundred people needlessly died ...

    Are the Rebels beyond ridicule?

    Yes the Irish rebels went in the face of WW1, a 'futile and horrific war' that was not Ireland's doing and remains for me one of the most ludicrous and murderous acts of treachery by the ruling classes at any time in history

    But low and behold the rebels act of heroism to separate us from these rulers is the issue at fault ???

    What a ridiculous and unintelligent comment


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 10,087 ✭✭✭✭Dan_Solo


    LordSutch wrote: »
    Rightful for us, and for (what would have been) our natural trading connections with all the commonwealth countries of the globe, many of which had/have deep family connections with Ireland.

    Then in 1949 it was announced that we had left the commonwealth, and that all commonwealth connections would end ... just like that!

    Marvelous, not :(
    Boo f**king hoo.


  • Registered Users Posts: 6,872 ✭✭✭ebbsy


    i like chicken.


  • Registered Users Posts: 3,254 ✭✭✭MPFGLB


    LordSutch and the Queen of England must be the only people on earth who give a rats arse about the commonwealth


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 16,768 ✭✭✭✭tomwaterford


    LordSutch wrote: »
    Rightful for us, and for (what would have been) our natural trading connections with all the commonwealth countries of the globe, many of which had/have deep family connections with Ireland.

    Then in 1949 it was announced that we had left the commonwealth, and that all commonwealth connections would end ... just like that!

    Marvelous, not :(

    Ya...great connections a rake of bankrupt African countries :rolleyes: :pac:


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 12,078 ✭✭✭✭LordSutch


    MPFGLB wrote: »
    Yes they went in the face of a 'futile and horrific war' that was not Ireland's doing and remains for me one of the most ludicrous and murderous acts of treachery by the ruling classes at any time in history

    But low and behold the rebels act of heroism to separate us from these rulers is the issue at fault ???

    What a ridiculous and unintelligent comment

    ...but I say that in the knowledge that the Rebels and their Rebellion were very unpopular, hence what you would call the Rebels 'herosism' was universally attributed to wreckless murder and needless destruction (by the population of the time). The heroism you speak of was only attached retrospectively.

    At the time of the rising the rebels were spat at and cursed at by Dubliners, as they were led away to meet their fate.


  • Registered Users Posts: 23,246 ✭✭✭✭Dyr


    Ya...great connections a rake of bankrupt African countries :rolleyes: :pac:

    Guess who bankrupted them? :D


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 6,995 ✭✭✭Schadenfreudia


    LordSutch wrote: »
    However, at the very same time as that war was taking place, and while this country was so heavily involved in that massive war effort against Germany

    Correction; this country was not "involved in that massive war effort against Germany".

    A minority and/or Unionists resident here were either devoted to Empire or were misled mercenaries.

    The "country" was no more involved than the "country" was involved in the American Civil War.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 16,768 ✭✭✭✭tomwaterford


    LordSutch wrote: »
    ...but I say that in the knowledge that the Rebels and their Rebellion were very unpopular, hence what you would call the Rebels 'herosism' was universally attributed to wreckless murder and needless destruction (by the population of the time). The heroism you speak of was only attached retrospectively.

    At the time of the rising the rebels were spat at and cursed at by Dubliners, as they were led away to meet their fate.

    They weren't spat at in 1966 passing the pile of rubble that once was nelsons pillar :pac:


  • Registered Users Posts: 3,254 ✭✭✭MPFGLB


    LordSutch wrote: »
    ...but I say that in the knowledge that the Rebels and their Rebellion were very unpopular, hence what you would call the Rebels 'herosism' was universally attributed to wreckless murder and needless destruction (by the population of the time). The heroism you speak of was only attached retrospectively.

    At the time of the rising the rebels were spat at and cursed at by Dubliners, as they were led away to meet their fate.

    Just becasue they were cursed on the street by some sections of the population does not mean what they set out to do was not heroic

    What is right is not always popular ( at the time or anytime)

    Must be history 101 you are quoting from ....


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 6,995 ✭✭✭Schadenfreudia


    They weren't spat at in 1966 passing the pile of rubble that once was nelsons pillar :pac:

    I think the election of 1918 illustrates the reality of the spitters of 1916 in the Imperial capital! :cool:

    And remember, 1918 was the first democratic election ever held in this Imperial Provence.

    All talk of "democracy" prior to that election is bullsh1t.

    (And, I might add, all elections between that and the GFA Referendum were illegitimate from a "country" perspective)


  • Registered Users Posts: 23,246 ✭✭✭✭Dyr


    LordSutch wrote: »
    .
    At the time of the rising the rebels were spat at and cursed at by Dubliners, as they were led away to meet their fate.

    I do enjoy how this auld chestnut gets wheeled out like its some sort of gospel

    There was no shortage of support for the rebels across the country, try reading some contemporary accounts of the rising beyond the Irish Times

    That's why a popular rebeliion took place a few later and your lot were run out. Of course the remaining imperialists were just glad that they were allowed to keep their stolen lands and softened their cough accordingly. Apparently that's worn off over the years :)


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 6,995 ✭✭✭Schadenfreudia


    Bambi wrote: »

    There was no shortage of support for the rebels across the country, try reading some contemporary accounts of the rising beyond the Irish Times

    Indeed.

    And both the Irish Times and the Indo called for the murder of the leaders of the rebellion; and their demand was granted.

    Surely the greatest tribute to the extraordinary tolerance of the Irish people is that those two organs still survive to this very day - still spewing out their poison.....:cool:

    It would not have happened in any other post-colonial country.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 12,078 ✭✭✭✭LordSutch


    Correction; this country was not "involved in that massive war effort against Germany".

    A minority and/or Unionists resident here were either devoted to Empire or were misled mercenaries.

    The "country" was no more involved than the "country" was involved in the American Civil War.

    Ireland, (the island of), was an integral part of the United Kingdom in 1916, and as such was at war with Germany, of that there can be no doubt.

    Between two hundred & fifty thousand, and three hundred thousand Irish men left this island and fought with Britain and her allies against Germany in the Great War (1914-1918.

    Up to fifty thousand Irish men died in that war. Interestingly conscription was never introduced here, ergo all those men who went to join the war effort, did so of their own free will.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 16,768 ✭✭✭✭tomwaterford


    LordSutch wrote: »
    Up to fifty thousand Irish men died in that war. Interestingly conscription was never introduced here, ergo all those men who went to join the war effort, did so of their own free will.

    Here's another interesting fact that emigration was banned from ireland at the time except for to join the British army

    Given the lack of an economy in ireland this amounted to effective conscription
    Join or starve


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,873 ✭✭✭melissak


    No. I think enough time has passed
    Edit to add
    Just read through thread. It seems not.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 12,078 ✭✭✭✭LordSutch


    Indeed.

    And both the Irish Times and the Indo called for the murder of the leaders of the rebellion; and their demand was granted.

    Surely the greatest tribute to the extraordinary tolerance of the Irish people is that those two organs still survive to this very day - still spewing out their poison.....:cool:.

    You mention the word murder, but surely that's what the Rebels had been involved in prior to their surrender/capture. Take the old umarmed policeman standing outside Dublin castle, who had his brains blown out at point blank range < The 1st act of the Rising.

    PS; Question, do we know which rebel did this?


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 16,768 ✭✭✭✭tomwaterford


    LordSutch wrote: »
    You mention the word murder, but surely that's what the Rebels had been involved in prior to their surrender/capture. Take the old umarmed policeman standing outside Dublin castle, who had his brains blown out at point blank range < The 1st act of the Rising.

    But we'll keep stump on Briton bringing a boat up the Liffey firing shells into the most heavily populated slums in Europe at the time??


Advertisement