Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi all! We have been experiencing an issue on site where threads have been missing the latest postings. The platform host Vanilla are working on this issue. A workaround that has been used by some is to navigate back from 1 to 10+ pages to re-sync the thread and this will then show the latest posts. Thanks, Mike.
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest
Manchester United Team Talk/Gossip/Rumours Thread 2015 Mod Note Post #2331
Comments
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Advertisement
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Advertisement
-
-
-
-
-
-
Advertisement
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Advertisement
-
The friction always appears to arise when someone portraying a negativity, does so in a fashion that is so clearly to others, not a reason for the initial painpoint.
As an example(I just pulled this from my head, this second): The club have signed no players in January to bolster the squad. The club have announced three new commercial sponsors.
A poster has constructed a post that is negative in tone, and as the basis for the issue, insinuated that the club prioritized commercial deals, and if by intention, completely ignored player re-enforcement. And with their thinking, believing that the club can only do one or the other,and not both.
So you see, and when you look back, at when there is glorious debate and argument, we are rarely if never disagreeing over relatively straight forward statements or topics, it's the constructed theory of an individual or poster that others feel is incorrect, misguided or just a total myth being portrayed as fact.
The fact it's a written format, also means there is going to some things that will be taken up incorrectly, or worded incorrectly.
As another example:
There is little controversy, or potential mud slinging for anyone who makes a statement
Where you will get the mud slinging is when someone says
They are both coming from the same place, a supporter disappointed with a new signing who came with a good reputation. But it's how it's conveyed, that will get on the tits of plenty of people, and myself included to be honest.
That example above will then move into how the Erdevise is rubbish and no real test, where it's the exact same reason as to why you would cut him slack, moving to a different league and a higher lever.
Look at the tag Bangkok has got himself over Fellaini. We all know where he is coming from. We all most likely share the same rooted opinion and feelings toward Fellaini. But because Bangkok is so visceral and aggressive in his Fellaini criticsm, which includes many myths and twisting of a scenario to slate Fellaini, plenty of others will throw back at him over his opinion or stance.
That statement, I'd argue no one would actually disagree with. It's the stuff built around it, to form the negative posts, that cause the issue and the vitrol.
And the same can be said for the positive posts, that people will pick apart also.
It's a part of the written medium, but it's also part of a forum. That we all at the core as here for the exact same reason, and desire the exact same outcome, but season through season hurdle over each other about HOW we go about it, is the draw and attraction of any community on the web.
Sweet love of God - you have way too much time on your hands.
0 -
-
The friction always appears to arise when someone portraying a negativity, does so in a fashion that is so clearly to others, not a reason for the initial painpoint.
As an example(I just pulled this from my head, this second): The club have signed no players in January to bolster the squad. The club have announced three new commercial sponsors.
A poster has constructed a post that is negative in tone, and as the basis for the issue, insinuated that the club prioritized commercial deals, and if by intention, completely ignored player re-enforcement. And with their thinking, believing that the club can only do one or the other,and not both.
So you see, and when you look back, at when there is glorious debate and argument, we are rarely if never disagreeing over relatively straight forward statements or topics, it's the constructed theory of an individual or poster that others feel is incorrect, misguided or just a total myth being portrayed as fact.
The fact it's a written format, also means there is going to some things that will be taken up incorrectly, or worded incorrectly.
As another example:
There is little controversy, or potential mud slinging for anyone who makes a statement
Where you will get the mud slinging is when someone says
They are both coming from the same place, a supporter disappointed with a new signing who came with a good reputation. But it's how it's conveyed, that will get on the tits of plenty of people, and myself included to be honest.
That example above will then move into how the Erdevise is rubbish and no real test, where it's the exact same reason as to why you would cut him slack, moving to a different league and a higher lever.
Look at the tag Bangkok has got himself over Fellaini. We all know where he is coming from. We all most likely share the same rooted opinion and feelings toward Fellaini. But because Bangkok is so visceral and aggressive in his Fellaini criticsm, which includes many myths and twisting of a scenario to slate Fellaini, plenty of others will throw back at him over his opinion or stance.
That statement, I'd argue no one would actually disagree with. It's the stuff built around it, to form the negative posts, that cause the issue and the vitrol.
And the same can be said for the positive posts, that people will pick apart also.
It's a part of the written medium, but it's also part of a forum. That we all at the core as here for the exact same reason, and desire the exact same outcome, but season through season hurdle over each other about HOW we go about it, is the draw and attraction of any community on the web.
by the way, my self imposed 2 week break of not talking about Fellaini is up
0 -
-
-
-
-
-
-
Advertisement
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Advertisement
-
-
-
-
-
-
Advertisement
This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement