Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Air Accident / Incident thread

18911131431

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,116 ✭✭✭Mech1


    1123heavy wrote: »
    don't think avherald do ground incidents

    they do http://avherald.com/h?article=4aa0eae6&opt=0


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,058 ✭✭✭EchoIndia


    Pictures also on Pprune of a ground incident at JFK involving a China Southern B773 and a Kuwait B773 (9K-AOE). Both will need repairs before they go anywhere. https://www.pprune.org/rumours-news/603896-another-ground-incident-pearson-airport.html


  • Registered Users Posts: 911 ✭✭✭Mebuntu


    LiamaDelta wrote: »
    Pretty serious one in Toronto. Surprised there wasn't a quicker order to evacuate. Not on Avherald yet.
    Reportedly, the FA's were shouting "remain seated" at pax. Good luck with that when the pax could see flames outside. As usual, some pax were grabbing their onboard baggage when eventually told to evacuate.

    http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/toronto/planes-collide-pearson-1.4475958


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 824 ✭✭✭LiamaDelta


    Mebuntu wrote: »
    Reportedly, the FA's were shouting "remain seated" at pax. Good luck with that when the pax could see flames outside. As usual, some pax were grabbing their onboard baggage when eventually told to evacuate.

    http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/toronto/planes-collide-pearson-1.4475958

    In the video on the Guardian website they are telling people to remain seated. However in that video you posted you can hear the evacuate instruction. Still seems slow though given that on the cbc video it's 20 seconds in before the announcement is made and there are flames visible from the beginning. The video on the Guardian is 40 seconds long and flames are visible throughout so possibly this is after the instruction.


  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 4,183 Mod ✭✭✭✭Locker10a


    LiamaDelta wrote: »
    Mebuntu wrote: »
    Reportedly, the FA's were shouting "remain seated" at pax. Good luck with that when the pax could see flames outside. As usual, some pax were grabbing their onboard baggage when eventually told to evacuate.

    http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/toronto/planes-collide-pearson-1.4475958

    In the video on the Guardian website they are telling people to remain seated. However in that video you posted you can hear the evacuate instruction. Still seems slow though given that on the cbc video it's 20 seconds in before the announcement is made and there are flames visible from the beginning. The video on the Guardian is 40 seconds long and flames are visible throughout so possibly this is after the instruction.
    Pilots must complete evacuation checklists, these often take 30/40/50 seconds or more to complete before an evacuation order is given


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 1,020 ✭✭✭1123heavy


    Mech1 wrote: »

    OK, I just remember when a BA A320 skidded off the paved service in Billund early 2017 and that it was not reported by the Avherald and it was brought up in the comments of another article on there and someone said ground incidents aren't necessarily published.

    This incident too seems to have been ignored.


  • Registered Users Posts: 6,920 ✭✭✭billy few mates


    Locker10a wrote: »
    Pilots must complete evacuation checklists, these often take 30/40/50 seconds or more to complete before an evacuation order is given
    An evacuation checklist that takes 50 seconds to complete with a wing full of fuel on fire...??? :confused: Even the most complicated checklist doesn’t take 50 seconds to read.
    You’re not honestly suggesting people are going to wait calmly in their seats waiting for an instruction to evacuate a burning aircraft? Normal rules of engagement don’t apply in a fire situation, you have to act fast and take control of the situation before panic sets in and passengers take matters into their own hands.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,153 ✭✭✭bkehoe


    An evacuation checklist that takes 50 seconds to complete with a wing full of fuel on fire...??? :confused: Even the most complicated checklist doesn’t take 50 seconds to read.
    .

    The flight deck crew need to gather information, assess the risk and whether that of an evacuation is greater or lower than keeping everyone onboard (an evacuation is going to lead to injuries and dumping people on an active taxiway with aircraft moving around is a huge threat to safety when people start running around randomly). Assessing the situation in the cabin and from the viewpoint of the cabin crew is of course part of this and you can hear a call from the flight deck to the cabin in one of the videos.

    Once the decision to evacuate is made then the checklist is actioned, and while I haven't ever timed it, it takes an age for the flaps to go to 40 (the fully extended configuration) which is a part of the evacuation checklist on a 737 as the flaps are required to enable safe use of the overwing exits as they effectively create a slide rather than a 10ft drop. Only after the aircraft is configured for an evacuation will the crew then initiate it.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,338 ✭✭✭markpb


    An evacuation checklist that takes 50 seconds to complete with a wing full of fuel on fire...??? :confused: Even the most complicated checklist doesn’t take 50 seconds to read.
    You’re not honestly suggesting people are going to wait calmly in their seats waiting for an instruction to evacuate a burning aircraft? Normal rules of engagement don’t apply in a fire situation, you have to act fast and take control of the situation before panic sets in and passengers take matters into their own hands.

    Your instinct, while perfectly normal, is dangerous and could result in more injury and death than the fire itself. There's a reason why flight crew are trained on evacuations and why passengers are expected to follow their instructions instead of panicking and doing whatever comes into their head.

    Left to their own devices, people would evacuate into the fire (people do the damnedest things when they panic), in front of a running engine, into the path of approaching fire engines, climb all over each other, freak out because the person opening the door is taking too long, freak out because someone is collecting their overhead luggage, freak out because they can't find their own overhead luggage, slide down the side on top of someone else, slide down with high heels and a plethora of other dangerous things. In an emergency, the last thing you want is people panicking and thinking for themselves.


  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 4,183 Mod ✭✭✭✭Locker10a


    Locker10a wrote: »
    Pilots must complete evacuation checklists, these often take 30/40/50 seconds or more to complete before an evacuation order is given
    An evacuation checklist that takes 50 seconds to complete with a wing full of fuel on fire...??? :confused: Even the most complicated checklist doesn’t take 50 seconds to read.
    You’re not honestly suggesting people are going to wait calmly in their seats waiting for an instruction to evacuate a burning aircraft? Normal rules of engagement don’t apply in a fire situation, you have to act fast and take control of the situation before panic sets in and passengers take matters into their own hands.

    No im not suggesting people will wait calmly in their seats while the plane is on fire, they won't!And I know that!  But that doesn't change the fact checklist for excavations can take up to a minute to complete.  As has been explained above


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 911 ✭✭✭Mebuntu


    The AAIU has issued its final report on a serious incident affecting an Aer Lingus Regional flight ex-DUB in July 2015. Makes for very interesting reading.

    http://www.aaiu.ie/sites/default/files/report-attachments/REPORT%202018-002_0.pdf

    Quote: "Following this event, the Operator reported 16 occurrences up to September 2017 where baggage was placed in the wrong hold during loading. These events occurred at a variety of bases/destinations on the Operators network; in five cases the error occurred more than once and at one destination it occurred on four occasions."


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 36,169 ✭✭✭✭ED E


    Locker10a wrote: »
    No im not suggesting people will wait calmly in their seats while the plane is on fire, they won't!And I know that!  But that doesn't change the fact checklist for excavations can take up to a minute to complete.  As has been explained above

    As many aviation regs have their basis in a notable incident, has there ever been an evacuation that went spectacularly wrong?


  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 4,183 Mod ✭✭✭✭Locker10a


    ED E wrote: »
    Locker10a wrote: »
    No im not suggesting people will wait calmly in their seats while the plane is on fire, they won't!And I know that!  But that doesn't change the fact checklist for excavations can take up to a minute to complete.  As has been explained above

    As many aviation regs have their basis in a notable incident, has there ever been an evacuation that went spectacularly wrong?

    Several, one that springs to mind is the British airtours 737 at Manchester, I believe various regulations came about from that regarding cabin aisle width, cabin crew training and emergency floor path lighting. Similarly an Air Canada flight I think AC797 resulted in regulating overwing exit escape routes and briefing the passengers who sit there.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,612 ✭✭✭Dardania


    Mebuntu wrote: »
    The AAIU has issued its final report on a serious incident affecting an Aer Lingus Regional flight ex-DUB in July 2015. Makes for very interesting reading.

    http://www.aaiu.ie/sites/default/files/report-attachments/REPORT%202018-002_0.pdf

    Quote: "Following this event, the Operator reported 16 occurrences up to September 2017 where baggage was placed in the wrong hold during loading. These events occurred at a variety of bases/destinations on the Operators network; in five cases the error occurred more than once and at one destination it occurred on four occasions."


    Interesting indeed, and very forgiving airframe judging by appendix 1


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,123 ✭✭✭DellyBelly


    Saw this today regarding the tail of the plane clipping the runway on takeoff. Is this extremely rare occurrence. No aviation experience but always wondered if this happens. https://www.breakingnews.ie/ireland/delayed-ryanair-flight-lands-in-dublin-after-reportedly-clipping-tail-off-runway-827453.html


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,058 ✭✭✭EchoIndia


    DellyBelly wrote: »
    Saw this today regarding the tail of the plane clipping the runway on takeoff. Is this extremely rare occurrence. No aviation experience but always wondered if this happens. https://www.breakingnews.ie/ireland/delayed-ryanair-flight-lands-in-dublin-after-reportedly-clipping-tail-off-runway-827453.html

    It depends what you mean by "extremely rare". The 737 is the most widely-used modern jet airliner in any case. Here is some detail.

    http://www.b737.org.uk/tailstrikes.htm


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,123 ✭✭✭DellyBelly


    EchoIndia wrote: »
    It depends what you mean by "extremely rare". The 737 is the most widely-used modern jet airliner in any case. Here is some detail.

    http://www.b737.org.uk/tailstrikes.htm

    Thanks for that. Interesting reading. Probably just me but I always have a fear that back of the plane will scrape along the runway on takeoff


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 645 ✭✭✭faoiarvok


    DellyBelly wrote: »
    Thanks for that. Interesting reading. Probably just me but I always have a fear that back of the plane will scrape along the runway on takeoff

    More common on 737-800/900s as operated by Ryanair and Norwegian (among many other airlines) as they're stretched versions of existing designs, meaning the tail is further from the fulcrum as the aircraft rotates on take off.

    New aircraft models are purposely subjected to this during Vmu tests



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,246 ✭✭✭✭smurfjed


    Not just new aircraft, this has happened for years...





  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 645 ✭✭✭faoiarvok


    smurfjed wrote: »
    Not just new aircraft, this has happened for years...

    I reckon those models/variants were new at the time of the tests. That’s what I meant, rather than recent models :)


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 6,920 ✭✭✭billy few mates


    DellyBelly wrote: »
    Thanks for that. Interesting reading. Probably just me but I always have a fear that back of the plane will scrape along the runway on takeoff

    Many aircraft, particularly those prone to tail strikes have a tail skid device like a crushable cartridge to ‘absorb’ the damage caused by over rotation and have done for years. The Tristar had a retractable hydraulic ram (affectionately called the Donkey’s Dick) which was extended during take off and landing to protect the aft fuselage from tail scrape, the Concorde had an additional set of wheels at the back for the same purpose. The aircraft in question would have one of these...

    https://goo.gl/images/ZePqi8

    https://goo.gl/images/sFM5FQ


    https://goo.gl/images/BH8k3n


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,691 ✭✭✭✭AndyBoBandy




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,984 ✭✭✭Stovepipe


    EchoIndia wrote: »
    It depends what you mean by "extremely rare". The 737 is the most widely-used modern jet airliner in any case. Here is some detail.

    http://www.b737.org.uk/tailstrikes.htm

    It's not extremely rare, that's the point. If it was, long airframes wouldn't have the tail damper fitted as standard. When the 737 stretched to the -400, it started to reoccur and the same applies to the long, skinny turboprops like the dash-8-400 and long Embraers. It is, as has been pointed out, a certification requirement for a tailstrike take-off test, so the manufacturers and authorities take it very seriously.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,811 ✭✭✭Comhrá


    Transavia flight diverted to Vienna due to farting passenger



    http://www.airlive.net/transavia-flight-diverted-to-vienna-due-to-farting-passenger/


    The passenger apparently kept breaking wind on board a Transavia Airlines flight from Dubai to Amsterdam Schiphol last week.

    Two Dutchmen sitting next to the flatulent passenger reportedly asked the man to stop, but he refused and continued to break wind aboard the Transavia Airlines flight from Dubai to Amsterdam Schiphol.

    Despite a warning from the pilot, a fight between the men then broke out, causing the flight to be diverted to Vienna Airport.

    Police boarded the plane with dogs and removed two sisters and the two men after the pilot made a report about ‘passengers on the rampage’.

    The women, who are sisters, that were removed from the flight are now taking the airline to court claiming they were not involved in the alternation


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,058 ✭✭✭EchoIndia




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 36,169 ✭✭✭✭ED E


    Somebody's in big trouble. Would such an error, if not a technical failure, result in a licence revocation?

    https://yle.fi/uutiset/osasto/news/extremely_serious_close_call_at_kokkola_airport_as_plane_lands_without_permission/10129275


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 36,169 ✭✭✭✭ED E


    Light aircraft has crashed on approach to Belfast at Nutts Corner.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,608 ✭✭✭California Dreamer


    Passenger jet makes emergency landing in Dublin due to crack in windscreen
    http://jrnl.ie/3973305

    Nice picture of the new A320!!!! 😡😡😡


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,833 ✭✭✭knucklehead6




  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 113 ✭✭LeakRate


    NTSB released video of the Air Canada G/A at SFO last year, scarily close.


Advertisement