Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Star Wars Episode VIII - The Last Jedi *spoilers from Post 2857*

1132133135137138221

Comments

  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 7,611 ✭✭✭david75


    conorhal wrote: »
    Denial, that's what keeps 'em coming back... :(

    It’s an odd one for sure. It’s not the abomination some are trying to frame it to be. Hope it comes around for you.


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,435 ✭✭✭pumpkin4life


    Classy. Can we please be adults and stop making crass comments of this ilk?

    I didn't say anything about her appearance. :o You're the one making crass comments johnny!

    Obesity is a falsifiable (in the Popperian sense) quantifiable fact (BMI + 30) as is to a lesser extent, race. She is Asian-American after all.

    I never said she was ugly or unattractive, did I?

    Maybe I like wans with big arses?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 415 ✭✭falinn merking


    david75 wrote: »
    It’s an odd one for sure. It’s not the abomination some are trying to frame it to be. Hope it comes around for you.

    Ah come on it is in years to come 2017 won't be remembered for wars roads deaths or the homeless crisis.:D


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 543 ✭✭✭tony stark


    conorhal wrote: »
    Ugh.. I can't really make any sense of that post.

    The point of being angry about something you like that gets ruined it pretty subjective, but there you go, that's all. I like something, Ryan Johnson and Disney took a steaming dump on it. In the scheme of things it doesn't mean that much, but welcome to the internet!

    As for the rest. It's a challenging film? No, it really isn't. Irreversible is a challenging film, Come and See is a challenging film, TLJ is just a poor film that rehashes plot points from ESB and ROTJ and is a lame Starwars film. personally I love Starwars and that pisses me off, because it didn't have to be a lame Starwars film.
    Amen


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 543 ✭✭✭tony stark


    david75 wrote: »
    You love Star Wars and don’t like it though therefore you’ve been challenged. It’s challenged your understanding of and demands of Star Wars. And I’m with you. I’m not happy about some of it either. Are we gonna whit and never watch them again? No. Are we gonna boycott 9? No. So..

    How is bad comedy "challenging"?


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 7,000 ✭✭✭conorhal


    david75 wrote: »
    It’s an odd one for sure. It’s not the abomination some are trying to frame it to be. Hope it comes around for you.

    I never called it an abomination, that would be silly. I called it a really, really bad movie. It won't come around for me though, a bad movie can't change because it's a fixed thing that can't change, I can however, but the only real change I can make is not supporting a movie series that is (IMO) awful.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,698 ✭✭✭✭BlitzKrieg


    I ended up seeing it a second time with family because they insisted.

    I thought it was fine the first time through, had issues with parts of the plot, felt it was in need of a serious script trim and some of the plot details needed to be reworked so they popped more.

    Second time though I enjoyed it a lot more, it moved up from being fine to being good.

    A lot of the scenes felt more settled, even space monte carlo felt a bit better, mostly because it felt shorter. But everything clicked more. Outright the only bit that I felt needed to be drastically changed was the escape sequence on alien horseback. All the other sequences there might be a tweak here and there but mostly the events play out right, especially the characterisation.

    Now its not a great thing that a film needs a second viewing to be fully appreciated, thats a serious flaw and I doubt anyone who loathed the film will have their opinion changed on a 2nd viewing, but if you were someone who had a middle of the road opinion of the film, when you get the opportunity to watch it again (on tv, on demand, or you have a cineworld card) I'd say give it a second chance.


  • Registered Users Posts: 626 ✭✭✭Wedwood


    I'm convincing myself I liked it, my brother says I had the same reaction after The Phantom Menace !!

    Given the divisive nature of TLJ, it's probably a good thing JJ Abrams has been called back to conclude the trilogy.


  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    david75 wrote: »
    You love Star Wars and don’t like it though therefore you’ve been challenged. It’s challenged your understanding of and demands of Star Wars. And I’m with you. I’m not happy about some of it either. Are we gonna whit and never watch them again? No. Are we gonna boycott 9? No. So..

    Is the barometer if I don't like it I have to boycott 9???

    I'm definitely going to watch 9 but my expectations are so, so low for it at this stage.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 3,246 ✭✭✭judeboy101


    Any t-shirt companies doing a good anti TLJ t-shirt yet?


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 2,431 ✭✭✭kerplun k


    Nice piece from ign,

    http://m.ie.ign.com/articles/2017/12/22/the-star-wars-effect-how-nostalgia-can-distort-objectivity

    It’s not saying anything that hasn’t already been said on here, and said better at that. pixelburp made some similar points yesterday.

    But it has some interesting points and is worth a read.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,306 ✭✭✭✭Drumpot


    Classy. Can we please be adults

    Ask and you shall receive.

    97514479cab7d255c0aab29d7252d110.jpg


  • Administrators, Computer Games Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 32,335 Admin ✭✭✭✭✭Mickeroo


    I saw it last night and liked it quite a bit. I'm a bit baffled by the negative reaction tbh.

    Whatever about its flaws as a film can someone sum up what was the big issue with it as a "star wars" film folks had? I'm a lifelong fan myself and I thought the direction they went in was great, I was delighted Reys's parents were nobodies, I'm pretty sure I said after Tfa that that was what I wanted them to do and to avoid falling into the trap of another nostalgia filled rehash, which I felt they succeeded in.

    The things that dragged it down for me were the whole Finn/Rose sections, Phasma showing up again was completely pointless, it genuinely felt they had no idea what to do with Finn so they brought back his nemesis for no logical reason. Rose I thought was a likeable character but felt pretty superfluous if I'm honest. Along with that I'm not sure how I feel about Snoke being a red herring of sorts, his demise was a very good scene though and it left Kyko/Reys's story in a good place. Lastly.... er...that milking bit wtf.

    I thought everything else was really good though, Rey/Kylo relationship, Luke's cynicism and Poe's arch, though heavy handed and a bit clunky it worked for me.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 7,611 ✭✭✭david75


    There’s a theory out there that Snoke was projecting himself into that throne room as Luke was and isn’t actually dead. Anyone up for that ?

    I really love the way he was taken out. Total blind arrogance and certainty that his apprentice is under his heel. And the. That happens.
    Hope it’s just a bs theory.


  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    david75 wrote: »
    There’s a theory out there that Snoke was projecting himself into that throne room as Luke was and isn’t actually dead. Anyone up for that ?

    I really love the way he was taken out. Total blind arrogance and certainty that his apprentice is under his heel. And the. That happens.
    Hope it’s just a bs theory.

    I love if that was true but I don't think series is smart enough for something like that. He's gone.


  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Entertainment Moderators Posts: 36,711 CMod ✭✭✭✭pixelburp


    Snoke being alive would be cheap as hell and totally undermine EVERYTHING about Kylo''s arc; that moment of killing your master, only to then be rejected first by your equal, then your other former master. It was glorious and elevated Kylo Ren into a truly complex, fascinating villain through his own choices. Snoke rising from the dead would throw a grenade at all that great storytelling, all for the sake of a cheap shock that even the old fashioned stories Star Wars originally aped wouldn't touch. Blergh.

    Let the past die. Kill it if you have to.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,432 ✭✭✭✭Tony EH


    david75 wrote: »
    Oh. Reylo is the term used by those obsessed with shipping the two of them and making them a love interest.

    I have zero interest in that kind of nonsense. That shite is for girls. :D


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 7,611 ✭✭✭david75


    pixelburp wrote: »
    Snoke being alive would be cheap as hell and totally undermine EVERYTHING about Kylo''s arc; that moment of killing your master, only to then be rejected first by your equal, then your former master. It was glorious and elevated Kylo Ren into a truly complex, fascinating villain through his own choices. Snoke rising from the dead would throw a grenade at all that great storytelling, all for the sake of a cheap shock that even the old fashioned stories Star Wars originally aped wouldn't touch. Blergh.

    Let the past die. Kill it if you have to.


    Completely agree. The other thing about Snoke having a second apprentice and this is who kylo will have to deal with in 9 is far more intriguing than Snoke being still alive. Presumably the other apprentice is going to be pissed kylo killed Snoke and there’ll be a power struggle for domination.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 7,611 ✭✭✭david75


    Tony EH wrote: »
    I have zero interest in that kind of nonsense. That shite is for girls. :D


    It’s mostly girls pushing that agenda funnily enough. Which is warped. They want the heroine to get with the manipulative abusive guy who mind raped the heroine in the last movie?

    Sickos. Girls are weird.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,775 ✭✭✭✭Osmosis Jones


    This is a series where the main character kisses his sister, it was weird long before now :p


  • Advertisement
  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 7,611 ✭✭✭david75


    This is a series where the main character kisses his sister, it was weird long before now :p

    She kisses him! Girls! Sickos! Haha


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,390 ✭✭✭PhiloCypher


    david75 wrote: »
    Completely agree. The other thing about Snoke having a second apprentice and this is who kylo will have to deal with in 9 is far more intriguing than Snoke being still alive. Presumably the other apprentice is going to be pissed kylo killed Snoke and there’ll be a power struggle for domination.

    Why would he be pissed. If he is alive, it's probably because he and snoke had a falling out and he scarpered before he killed him . If he returns it will be to reclaim his birthright from Kylo not to avenge Snoke .


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 7,611 ✭✭✭david75


    Why would he be pissed. If he is alive, it's probably because he and snoke had a falling out and he scarpered before he killed him . If he returns it will be to reclaim his birthright from Kylo not to avenge Snoke .

    Well it seems Snoke was doing that thing to all his underlings. Warping them with constant abuse and occsssionaly rewarding them. This leaving them desperate for his approval. But it is more likely that he wants to grab power rather than avenge Snoke I guess.

    If it’s even a thing. The other apprentice was mentioned in the official Star Wars magazine in an article about Snoke. Weird place to drop info like that.


  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 60,163 Mod ✭✭✭✭Wibbs


    pixelburp wrote: »
    It was glorious and elevated Kylo Ren into a truly complex, fascinating villain through his own choices.
    I'm quite fascinated by how easily people seem to think this is any sort of good example of character, never mind complexity. Maybe for soap operas and kids comics of the past. For a start he is daftly inconsistent from scene to scene. Secondly the character has no choice over his path. He's just "evil" out of the box. The script and the actor heavy-handedly pushes this point with every gurn and grimace and tantrum. Going for the obvious cursed by destiny but may be redeemed because of his internal conflict angle(QV he ran his da through, but can't pull the trigger on his ma). Rey is similarly born not made, blessed by destiny but may waver before resolution, though at least Ridley doesn't chew the scenery.
    old fashioned stories Star Wars originally aped
    AKA storytelling that has been around and honed since the days of Babylon. The Epic of Gilgamesh has it and it's over 4000 years old.
    Let the past die. Kill it if you have to.
    Indeed. If one can make a better hash of the present and future in the telling. I'm seeing little evidence of that in this film, more a case of kill the past(for good marketing reasons) and for the sake of it. It even killed what we got from TFA.

    I caught it again so Disney got my beer tokens :D and to see if it resonated more second time around. Like I said before it pushes some buttons and I have buttons that can be pushed and that's cool. Some scenes worked better the second time around. The throne room for a start. As a standalone scene anyway. Though I thought Kylo's fighting choreography was a bit leaden in spots. Ridley felt more "real". That these two greatest force users alive both nearly get done in by non force users still jarred. Del Toro was watchable as ever even with the script he had. Though the casino scene was jarring and could be snipped. I'd think similar of the whole side story TBH. Felt like we have to get the Finn dude screen time and spark up a love story angle and deal with the (sadly)loose end that was Phasma(such a bloody waste of a character IMHO and not just in TLJ).

    The starship chase seemed even dafter a plot idea second time around(ditto for the opening bombing run). The hyperspace suicide run was fantastic though. Standout image sequence for me. Great cinema. Mind you Dern's character I could easily have done without. Though she is the only woman character that wasn't shown as "perfect" and "invincible", so there's that. Though they weren't to know of poor Carrie's end, it would have been the ideal scene for her to go out on. Princess Leia says fcuk you empire! :)

    Luke on the Skelligs? Hamill and Ridley played it well, but again as a standalone scene not quite in the SW universe but wearing all the familiar clothes of it. Which would be my overarching feeling on this and TFA, especially this. Yoda was inexplicable in his performance and actions. Playing the fool for laughs. Which he only did once before in his very first appearance and for good reasons. He was serious business after that. More of the "burn the past" while pushing nostalgia for the sake of it. Luke with the breastfeeding and fishing wasn't as bad for me as some seem to feel. Initially I thought, hang on, maybe he's doing a first appearance Yoda to Rey's Luke. Playing the cranky old fool to gauge her reaction and worthiness as an apprentice. That would have made more sense and the story could have still had him gone by the end, but nope. Luke had to be the non hero with feet of clay to make way for the new. Burn the past Luke Skywalker.

    The Leia superwoman bit was beyond embarrassing.

    The removal of Snoke was daft from a story basis. Oh sure it pushed the easily pushed buttons when he got offed, but another utterly wasted pointless character like Phasma. No backstory, no reasons given for who he is, what he came from, how he ended up creating a new empire, or how he's about the most powerful force user we've seen so far, or how he influenced Kylo. Nope, let's throwaway all of that for a button pushing exercise for the popcorn rows. It's really bloody awful storytelling. More like a level in a video game to be won and onto the next.

    TL;DR? For me it was a badly written, simplistic, button pushing retcon of the SW universe going forward.

    It looked bloody brilliant though. Hats off to the FX and cinematographer guys and gals on that score. The soundtrack was better too.

    Rejoice in the awareness of feeling stupid, for that’s how you end up learning new things. If you’re not aware you’re stupid, you probably are.



  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 7,611 ✭✭✭david75


    Wibbs wrote: »
    I'm quite fascinated by how easily people seem to think this is any sort of good example of character, never mind complexity. Maybe for soap operas and kids comics of the past. For a start he is daftly inconsistent from scene to scene. Secondly the character has no choice over his path. He's just "evil" out of the box. The script and the actor heavy-handedly pushes this point with every gurn and grimace and tantrum. Going for the obvious cursed by destiny but may be redeemed because of his internal conflict angle(QV he ran his da through, but can't pull the trigger on his ma). Rey is similarly born not made, blessed by destiny but may waver before resolution, though at least Ridley doesn't chew the scenery.

    AKA storytelling that has been around and honed since the days of Babylon. The Epic of Gilgamesh has it and it's over 4000 years old.

    Indeed. If one can make a better hash of the present and future in the telling. I'm seeing little evidence of that in this film, more a case of kill the past(for good marketing reasons) and for the sake of it. It even killed what we got from TFA.

    I caught it again so Disney got my beer tokens :D and to see if it resonated more second time around. Like I said before it pushes some buttons and I have buttons that can be pushed and that's cool. Some scenes worked better the second time around. The throne room for a start. As a standalone scene anyway. Though I thought Kylo's fighting choreography was a bit leaden in spots. Ridley felt more "real". That these two greatest force users alive both nearly get done in by non force users still jarred. Del Toro was watchable as ever even with the script he had. Though the casino scene was jarring and could be snipped. I'd think similar of the whole side story TBH. Felt like we have to get the Finn dude screen time and spark up a love story angle and deal with the (sadly)loose end that was Phasma(such a bloody waste of a character IMHO and not just in TLJ).

    The starship chase seemed even dafter a plot idea second time around(ditto for the opening bombing run). The hyperspace suicide run was fantastic though. Standout image sequence for me. Great cinema. Mind you Dern's character I could easily have done without. Though she is the only woman character that wasn't shown as "perfect" and "invincible", so there's that. Though they weren't to know of poor Carrie's end, it would have been the ideal scene for her to go out on. Princess Leia says fcuk you empire! :)

    Luke on the Skelligs? Hamill and Ridley played it well, but again as a standalone scene not quite in the SW universe but wearing all the familiar clothes of it. Which would be my overarching feeling on this and TFA, especially this. Yoda was inexplicable in his performance and actions. Playing the fool for laughs. Which he only did once before in his very first appearance and for good reasons. He was serious business after that. More of the "burn the past" while pushing nostalgia for the sake of it. Luke with the breastfeeding and fishing wasn't as bad for me as some seem to feel. Initially I thought, hang on, maybe he's doing a first appearance Yoda to Rey's Luke. Playing the cranky old fool to gauge her reaction and worthiness as an apprentice. That would have made more sense and the story could have still had him gone by the end, but nope. Luke had to be the non hero with feet of clay to make way for the new. Burn the past Luke Skywalker.

    The Leia superwoman bit was beyond embarrassing.

    The removal of Snoke was daft from a story basis. Oh sure it pushed the easily pushed buttons when he got offed, but another utterly wasted pointless character like Phasma. No backstory, no reasons given for who he is, what he came from, how he ended up creating a new empire, or how he's about the most powerful force user we've seen so far, or how he influenced Kylo. Nope, let's throwaway all of that for a button pushing exercise for the popcorn rows. It's really bloody awful storytelling. More like a level in a video game to be won and onto the next.

    TL;DR? For me it was a badly written, simplistic, button pushing retcon of the SW universe going forward.

    It looked bloody brilliant though. Hats off to the FX and cinematographer guys and gals on that score. The soundtrack was better too.


    I don’t really agree about kylo. He’s definitely not out of the box villain.
    He’s conflicted and switching mor to the light as he gets to know rey more throughout the film. She can sense that too. He’s talking to her the whole time as Ben Solo. Not kylo ren. And that’s the part she’s managing to bring out of him.

    He doesn’t fully make the switch until after the battle. She says to him we have to save the fleet and he pauses for a beat and he could go either way in that moment right there and then he goes full bad and demands she let go and join him. Into pleading with her to join him. So maybe even then he’s not totally there.
    He’s far more complex and interesting than any villain we’ve had in Star Wars. This is how we should have gotten Anakin in the ugly rot of turning to Vader.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,501 ✭✭✭✭Slydice


    Right, one week down. Box Office Mojo have helpfully put it into a "showdown" with four other films.
    http://www.boxofficemojo.com/showdowns/chart/?view=daily&id=openingweekendshowdown.htm

    I had been adding Bats v Sups into the mix to check but it looks like they've avoided that scenario so far (hint: that would be bad)

    Anyway, looks like it's tracking the daily performance of Jurassic World after having a start like The Force Awakens.

    So, if it goes the Jurassic World route, it might get to 1.6bn.... BUT... Force Awakens didn't perform well in China (around 50mn compared to JW 200mn) so that might not pan out. Although.. Rogue One might have awakened the audience there cos Rogue One was awesome and brought in 69mn.

    Overall, I'd say it'll land roughly somewhere between 1.4 and 1.7bn.


    So, back of the envelope...
    2bn Force Awakens
    1bn Rogue One
    1.5bn Last Jedi
    ===============
    4.5bn total

    That's break even on the purchase price of LucasFilm for 4bn.

    There's been dvd/bluray/streaming sales, ad deals, theme park rides and merch etc on top of that. So....

    I'd say it's all profit from here out.

    Could see them let loose with creativity and development now for the universe.


  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Slydice wrote: »
    Right, one week down. Box Office Mojo have helpfully put it into a "showdown" with four other films.
    http://www.boxofficemojo.com/showdowns/chart/?view=daily&id=openingweekendshowdown.htm

    I had been adding Bats v Sups into the mix to check but it looks like they've avoided that scenario so far (hint: that would be bad)

    Anyway, looks like it's tracking the daily performance of Jurassic World after having a start like The Force Awakens.

    So, if it goes the Jurassic World route, it might get to 1.6bn.... BUT... Force Awakens didn't perform well in China (around 50mn compared to JW 200mn) so that might not pan out. Although.. Rogue One might have awakened the audience there cos Rogue One was awesome and brought in 69mn.

    Overall, I'd say it'll land roughly somewhere between 1.4 and 1.7bn.


    So, back of the envelope...
    2bn Force Awakens
    1bn Rogue One
    1.5bn Last Jedi
    ===============
    4.5bn total

    That's break even on the purchase price of LucasFilm for 4bn.

    There's been dvd/bluray/streaming sales, ad deals, theme park rides and merch etc on top of that. So....

    I'd say it's all profit from here out.

    Could see them let loose with creativity and development now for the universe.

    Or make another 4 billion


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 7,611 ✭✭✭david75


    Slydice wrote: »
    Right, one week down. Box Office Mojo have helpfully put it into a "showdown" with four other films.
    http://www.boxofficemojo.com/showdowns/chart/?view=daily&id=openingweekendshowdown.htm

    I had been adding Bats v Sups into the mix to check but it looks like they've avoided that scenario so far (hint: that would be bad)

    Anyway, looks like it's tracking the daily performance of Jurassic World after having a start like The Force Awakens.

    So, if it goes the Jurassic World route, it might get to 1.6bn.... BUT... Force Awakens didn't perform well in China (around 50mn compared to JW 200mn) so that might not pan out. Although.. Rogue One might have awakened the audience there cos Rogue One was awesome and brought in 69mn.

    Overall, I'd say it'll land roughly somewhere between 1.4 and 1.7bn.


    So, back of the envelope...
    2bn Force Awakens
    1bn Rogue One
    1.5bn Last Jedi
    ===============
    4.5bn total

    That's break even on the purchase price of LucasFilm for 4bn.

    There's been dvd/bluray/streaming sales, ad deals, theme park rides and merch etc on top of that. So....

    I'd say it's all profit from here out.

    Could see them let loose with creativity and development now for the universe.


    I don’t think they’re as worried about TLJ box office as they are about Solo.
    That one will be a real gauge on whether or not the standalones work and are viable. Solo is going up against some serious competition upon release too.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,501 ✭✭✭✭Slydice


    Now that it's all profit, I'd say they are less worried about many box office issues.

    The focus would probably be on making money. KK probably has to demonstrate the type of successful decision making that Feige has over in the MCU ... which so far she has... maybe even more so (all primary films > 1bn, all secondary @ 1bn).

    Solo would probably be important internally to demonstrate she can consistently deliver. I can't imagine there not being folks who'd love a chance to step up on the inside... though I know very little of the inside hierarchy over there for SW. Just that it's BI -> KK -> (probably more people) -> Directors

    I'm looking forward to Rebels return anyway (ssshhh "Ahsoka lives" pass-it-on :))


  • Advertisement
  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 7,611 ✭✭✭david75


    Slydice wrote: »
    Now that it's all profit, I'd say they are less worried about many box office issues.

    The focus would probably be on making money. KK probably has to demonstrate the type of successful decision making that Feige has over in the MCU ... which so far she has... maybe even more so (all primary films > 1bn, all secondary @ 1bn).

    Solo would probably be important internally to demonstrate she can consistently deliver. I can't imagine there not being folks who'd love a chance to step up on the inside... though I know very little of the inside hierarchy over there for SW. Just that it's BI -> KK -> (probably more people) -> Directors

    I'm looking forward to Rebels return anyway (ssshhh "Ahsoka lives" pass-it-on :))

    Ahsoka has to make an appearance before the end of the season right?
    Really hope the new animated series is about her but it’s a reach.


Advertisement