Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi all! We have been experiencing an issue on site where threads have been missing the latest postings. The platform host Vanilla are working on this issue. A workaround that has been used by some is to navigate back from 1 to 10+ pages to re-sync the thread and this will then show the latest posts. Thanks, Mike.
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Air to Water

13

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,830 ✭✭✭air


    Agreed, the point was that the other elements of the heating system still represent the majority of the cost though.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,808 ✭✭✭✭Water John


    Yeah Mad Lad, your right. But it doesn't cover the present regs on new house builds.
    If you want to go with cheap, head out to the bog and cut your own turf.


  • Registered Users Posts: 71 ✭✭Doorcase


    I am willing to do that if i got away with it


  • Posts: 21,179 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Water John wrote: »
    Yeah Mad Lad, your right. But it doesn't cover the present regs on new house builds.
    If you want to go with cheap, head out to the bog and cut your own turf.

    I'm not cheap and I want to remove myself from fossil fuels as much as possible if it's viable to do so.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,808 ✭✭✭✭Water John


    I want to get away from fossil fuels too. My house though is not very sealed and unless I put in something like wood gasification, HP with electrical source is out of the question for running cost.
    I could use your favoured wind turbine to heat a large insulated tank of water but that would be high capital cost. It is an idea I like if I could hands on a cheap turbine. I have plenty wind.


  • Posts: 21,179 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    You can make your own turbine, that's a project I would like to do and who cares if it's not ultra efficient it would be cheap and the energy free, I could power lights use old car batteries etc even dump it into a few electric heaters, immersion etc.

    A turbine in Ireland without grant and FIT is uneconomical.


  • Posts: 21,179 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    You could also get some kind of electric boiler and install it in line with an oil boiler ? run it off the turbine.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,808 ✭✭✭✭Water John


    In winter, heating the house would def be the best use of a wind turbine. The water storage would largely eliminate the intermittincy issue.
    A good insulated tank will only loose 1 C in the 24 hours.


  • Posts: 21,179 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Can you get electric boilers ? you could run the house heating then any time the wind blows, use the Oil, Gas, Wood pellets etc when there's no wind. Might actually be an idea for Solar PV also.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,830 ✭✭✭air


    Of course there are electrical boilers but an oil boiler would be more environmentally friendly.
    Forget about Solar PV for heating unless you are planning on a 50kW or bigger array.


  • Advertisement
  • Posts: 21,179 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    https://www.mrcentralheating.co.uk/gold-electric-boiler-4kw#.V_laSSgrKUk

    Available in 4, 6, 8, 11 Kw etc, Good cheap way of dumping excess energy and a lot cheaper than a heat pump.

    You can also connect two together and have two different sources of power. Connect them in line maybe with oil or gas.

    gold-electric_1_1.jpg


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,830 ✭✭✭air


    What excess energy is this you speak of Mad Lad that's available to dump during the heating season?
    My 4kW PV is producing all of 550W at the moment, wouldn't do much resistive heating with that.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,416 ✭✭✭randombar


    I dont know if I consider 15k a lot more than the standard, it is more but how much more really?

    Boiler, 1000 L drum, installation costs, 20 rads, controls etc.

    Does it count hot water?

    I wonder what the Geo Thermal equivalent cost is?

    What would people on this forum do in a new build? For me the UFH plus some kind of pump is kind of future proofing. Harder to upgrade a home with rads and oil boiler if the costs of oil go mad and/or better technologies come out.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,808 ✭✭✭✭Water John


    I would def use UFH, but have worked in the ind. Diff type of heat, even from floor to ceiling and no convections. In a well sealed new build also MHRV.
    Geo depends on subsoil type. That would be the first thing to look at. Shale rock, sligger unsuitable.
    With the world moving on to carbon neutral, electricity from fossil free sources will be the fuel of the future. House thus future proofed using HP.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,830 ✭✭✭air


    Have to agree with Walter John.
    With the level of current building regs it's not a massive stretch to go close to passive standards which means money saved on complicated heating systems.
    I'd definitely put in the UFH pipe when pouring the slab anyway, the pipe is cheap to put in and gives you the option of all kinds of low temperature heat sources down the line.


  • Posts: 21,179 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    What's all this efficient building regulations ? I still see houses going up with aero board like insulation in the walls.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,808 ✭✭✭✭Water John


    Any engineer will not sign off on a building that does not comply. They set very specific min spec insulation for all aspects of a house. Also insist on energyof fossil free source.That really means having solar panels or HP.


  • Posts: 21,179 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    A HP is a very very expensive way to meet regulations........

    So installing solar PV will meet regulations then ? what's the minimum Kwp ?


  • Registered Users Posts: 1 Foggy27


    Hey all,

    I plan to start construction on my own home after the new year, I have been looking at putting in underfloor with air to water system but I've been hearing mixed reviews on the monthly costs, so if people would mind letting me know roughly what it costs them a month I will know if its worth it or not,

    Thanks


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,856 ✭✭✭MicktheMan


    Area, orientation, size, design detail, design quality, build specification, build method, build quality, workmanship, personal preference etc etc all need to be answered before anyone could offer any form of a decent answer.
    The best heating system is no heating system i.e. build your house with minimal heat loss and you won't need an expensive (to install or run) heating system.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,808 ✭✭✭✭Water John


    Building a good sealed, well insulated house, really as Mick says do the insulation very well. Then your heating costs come down. Wheras my 25 yr old house costs 1500/2000 per year in heating oil. They well speced house now will come in at around if not less than €500 per year.
    Would do UFH and HP if I was at it now. If well sealed also put in Mechanical Heat Recovery Ventilation (MHRV), its not an optional extra for a well sealed house.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,031 ✭✭✭✭murphaph


    I've had the heat on for the first time in our new build and it's just quality. It's such an even temperature and no draughts. We've a low temp system, currently running at around 27 degrees so you can't really tell that the floor is the heat source. It doesn't feel warm to touch but the house got up to 23 degrees yesterday with 8 degrees outside temp so I flattened the heat curve slightly. It'll take some time to get it set up just right though.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,808 ✭✭✭✭Water John


    There are weather compensating thermostats. Some say they are tricky. I have no experience of them.


  • Posts: 21,179 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    If you got a well sealed , insulated house then why would you spend the guts of 15-20 K on a heat pump ? perhaps a wood pellet stove is the most cost effective solution ?

    Perhaps even night storage heaters with night rate electric is even more viable, if you have such a well insulated house it shouldn't cost a lot to heat on night rate electricity V the cost of a heat pump, it's ridiculous.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,031 ✭✭✭✭murphaph


    If you got a well sealed , insulated house then why would you spend the guts of 15-20 K on a heat pump ? perhaps a wood pellet stove is the most cost effective solution ?

    Perhaps even night storage heaters with night rate electric is even more viable, if you have such a well insulated house it shouldn't cost a lot to heat on night rate electricity V the cost of a heat pump, it's ridiculous.
    That's a valid point and I know plenty of people who subscribe to the "well insulated + gas boiler" model. In our case (being 150m from the road) the gas main would have been a few grand to lay and we'd have to install electricity regardless. We also want (at some future point when the sums really add up) to install PV on our roof (which intentionally faces SSW @ 45° and around 110m² of surface area to allow us to install a "decent" system that even in November/February can do something.

    So our HP is part of a speculative strategy really. Might not pay off if energy costs plateau.

    Edit: We have no night rate electric available here.


  • Advertisement
  • Posts: 21,179 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    murphaph wrote: »
    That's a valid point and I know plenty of people who subscribe to the "well insulated + gas boiler" model. In our case (being 150m from the road) the gas main would have been a few grand to lay and we'd have to install electricity regardless. We also want (at some future point when the sums really add up) to install PV on our roof (which intentionally faces SSW @ 45° and around 110m² of surface area to allow us to install a "decent" system that even in November/February can do something.

    So our HP is part of a speculative strategy really. Might not pay off if energy costs plateau.

    Edit: We have no night rate electric available here.

    My Partners Parents in baden wurttemberg have 14 Kwp of solar on the roof and this can generate up to 75 Kwh on a good sunny Summers day.

    All the excess goes to the grid in Summer and they buy it back at Night rate in Winter for the storage heaters. Their night rate is about 19 C/Kwh which is more than our Day rate, our Night rate is 8 C/Kwh.

    They get a generous Feed-In-Tariff for excess to the grid and got a grant for installation.

    To make the house air tight with crazy insulation and add a heat pump would have cost almost 50,000 Euro's. Not viable.

    They have a wood stove which they use also in the coldest of weather, there's no shortage of wood in Germany and they can get it cheap.

    Storage heaters are not as efficient as a heat pump but they are a hell of a lot cheaper than any heat pump and once paid off their energy is essentially free so efficiency isn's so important and once they continue to get a feed-in-tariff after the guaranteed 20 or so years then the Solar should work perfectly well.

    Once you get at least the night rate for energy you export then this is really all you need, the grid then becomes your gigantic free battery, only in Deutschland , the cost of Night rate electricity is a lot more than here and in your case there is no night rate..... so need to do your sums, you might get a good rate for exported electricity.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,808 ✭✭✭✭Water John


    If the Govn't sets a good feed in tarriff for PV is one problem. We have been waiting a long time.
    Secondly, you storage heaters will mean you have to include some other RE source in your build.
    The storage heaters will also play hell with your BER rating.

    I think 15K is a high price on the HP + UFH.
    The kit for UFH would cost 2.5/4K depending. One day for two people to install and one day to commission. Add HP and commission of same. What price, 5K?

    MHRV 5K


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,416 ✭✭✭randombar


    What about Vertical GSHP, any idea on pricing for that?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,138 ✭✭✭✭KCross


    If you got a well sealed , insulated house then why would you spend the guts of 15-20 K on a heat pump ? perhaps a wood pellet stove is the most cost effective solution ?

    Perhaps even night storage heaters with night rate electric is even more viable, if you have such a well insulated house it shouldn't cost a lot to heat on night rate electricity V the cost of a heat pump, it's ridiculous.

    I didnt like the idea of wood pellets myself. You are tying yourself to a few suppliers who can charge what they like. The system wont be that cheap to install either (what is!).

    You also have to keep "feeding" the thing and ordering more pellets and having a suitable place to store the pellets etc. It just didnt sit well with me. Maybe Im lazy!

    With a HP, once its installed thats it. It runs 100% automatically all year round. No ordering of anything and the long term goal is to get Solar PV and a FiT to further reduce its already low running costs.

    Also, for me, it wasnt just a capital costs decision, you also have to factor in convenience and comfort. I like the idea of underfloor heating as its a consistent heat throughout the house 24hrs a day, warm to walk on and fully automated.

    Using gas/oil/storage heaters etc in conjunction with standard rads doesnt give the above. Its more a traditional on/off type system. For instance, you come home early from work one day, the house is cold as you dont have it timed to come on and so you have to wait 30mins while the boiler kicks in. You dont have those kind of issues with HP's and UFH.... the house is ALWAYS at your desired temperature and the running costs for that comfort are quite low. I was willing to pay extra for that comfort. Each to their own of course.

    All the above is assuming a new build. Not sure its viable as a retrofit.
    murphaph wrote: »
    We also want (at some future point when the sums really add up) to install PV on our roof (which intentionally faces SSW @ 45° and around 110m² of surface area to allow us to install a "decent" system that even in November/February can do something.

    So our HP is part of a speculative strategy really. Might not pay off if energy costs plateau.

    Edit: We have no night rate electric available here.

    I'm with you on that. Similar strategy in my eyes too. My "grand plan" is to drive as much of my life on electric and then generate as much of it myself as possible cutting out as many middlemen and suppliers as possible. Electric heating, electric car, electric robot lawnmower.....

    Just need a decent FiT now to complete the plan!

    On the night rate electric comment... there is no such thing as "not available". Its available everywhere, you just tell your provider you want it.


  • Posts: 21,179 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    The problem with heat pumps is their shocking cost and if it brakes after warranty and if it dies after 10-15 years, you've paid a very high price to heat your home. At least storage heaters are relatively cheap by comparison to heat pump.

    Having to have a heat pump for regulations is a disgrace, they'd want to give a very good grant to compensate then we'd all have one.

    It's equally shocking that storage heaters might effect the BER of a home if it's mainly being powered by renewable energy or significantly so. Yes understand the BER calculated the Kwh cost per Sq meter or something like that but it should also take into account renewable energy.

    Yes you got to load a wood pellet stove but that can be once a day, the cost compared to HP is still far less.

    The Government are being very smart ordering the cost of all this onto the Home owner and giving no compensation.

    In would not like underfloor heating due to the constant changing of our climate, it could be 12 degrees one day in the middle of January and 3 degrees 24 hrs later etc, underfloor heating would drive me mental. I don't care if the house takes 30 mins to warm up because I can set the timer. It's never that cold anyway. 500 litres a year for oil is not a lot to spend on heating. Boy am I going to get a shock when we move in November !


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,031 ✭✭✭✭murphaph


    KCross wrote: »

    On the night rate electric comment... there is no such thing as "not available". Its available everywhere, you just tell your provider you want it.
    Where we are it's not available. Our regional network operator doesn't offer it.


  • Posts: 21,179 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    murphaph wrote: »
    Where we are it's not available. Our regional network operator doesn't offer it.

    German Electricity prices are mad, but I guess someone has to pay for the feed-in-tariff, still in my opinion , it's unacceptable to make poorer people pay such high prices.

    Not offering a night tariff is taking the P**s.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,138 ✭✭✭✭KCross


    murphaph wrote: »
    Where we are it's not available. Our regional network operator doesn't offer it.

    I didnt get you were not living in Ireland! Its available to everyone in Ireland.


  • Posts: 21,179 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    KCross wrote: »
    I didnt get you were not living in Ireland! Its available to everyone in Ireland.

    "Location : Berlin" wasn't a hint ? :D


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,138 ✭✭✭✭KCross


    In would not like underfloor heating due to the constant changing of our climate, it could be 12 degrees one day in the middle of January and 3 degrees 24 hrs later etc, underfloor heating would drive me mental. I don't care if the house takes 30 mins to warm up because I can set the timer. It's never that cold anyway. 500 litres a year for oil is not a lot to spend on heating. Boy am I going to get a shock when we move in November !

    Oil! Ooooil! I thought you wanted to rid yourself of that dirty stuff! :)

    Anyway, HP's have weather compensating controls so it doesnt pump the same heat in continuously. It adjusts based on the outside temperature. The idea is constant temperature in the house which is what you want.

    Its very comfortable!


  • Posts: 21,179 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Oh yes, I definitely want to rid myself of oil, going EV was a major step towards that considering driving 30,000 kms a year is by far the highest energy consumer for me, ridding myself of petrol and diesel is saving a tidy sum especially with work charging, yes I have to pay for the car but the savings go towards paying half the monthly payments.

    Anyway, I love the idea of heat pumps, as I said I know how effective it is in the car but at current costs it's a hard sell, then add the cost if it only lasts an average of 15 years provided there are no serious issues in that time.

    I can't remember if there was a grant for installation of a HP ?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,808 ✭✭✭✭Water John


    Like you Cross would like most aspects of my life to go electric.
    It will have to also to drive to a carbon neutral economy.

    The extra cost for Vertical GSHP is the borehole drilling mainly. There is a model that drills four holes at angles from one point. Don't know if anyone does it in this country.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,031 ✭✭✭✭murphaph


    German Electricity prices are mad, but I guess someone has to pay for the feed-in-tariff, still in my opinion , it's unacceptable to make poorer people pay such high prices.

    Not offering a night tariff is taking the P**s.
    I personally believe it's because wind energy requires baseload generation capacity (redundancy) and at the same time Germany has committed to decommissioning nuclear. So now we have very expensive electricity.

    Anyway...these prices mean PV (eventually with battery) will make financial sense here before most anywhere else I reckon.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,830 ✭✭✭air


    On the other end of the cost scale from 20k whole house systems is something like this:
    http://www.instarom.com/mitsubishi-air-conditioning-msz-hj25va-9000-btu-h-inverter-2956.html
    Under €500 including VAT excluding shipping from Romania
    Should be possible to have it supplied and installed for around €1000 I'd imagine.
    COP of 3.62 and uses 780W.
    If located centrally could be used as the main heat source for a well insulated home and could be significantly powered during the day by a big PV array even in winter


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,031 ✭✭✭✭murphaph


    A single point heat source, even in a a well insulated home is a total non-runner if you value any sort of comfort.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,903 ✭✭✭zulutango


    murphaph wrote: »
    A single point heat source, even in a a well insulated home is a total non-runner if you value any sort of comfort.

    They'd work well in these!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,830 ✭✭✭air


    Someone had better tell all the low energy home owners with nothing more than a single wood stove that they're doing it wrong then I guess.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,808 ✭✭✭✭Water John


    A passive house needs little if any heating. A small heat source would be fine.
    A house with a lower BER say A3 or B, don't know if a single point source would need to circulated some way?
    A bit more than those little fans on can get for on a stove, don't know?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,830 ✭✭✭air


    The majority of passive or near passive houses have some form of heating for exceptional conditions.
    On a less well insulated house nothing stopping you putting in 2 or 3 units, at 500 odd a pop they won't break the bank.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,031 ✭✭✭✭murphaph


    In my home I want 20 degrees in the living spaces, 24 degrees in bathrooms where I'll be wet and naked and 18 degrees in bedrooms so I can sleep better. How do I achieve this with a single heat source in my house?

    These are DIN values for these kinds of rooms for houses in Germany by the way, not my numbers.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,830 ✭✭✭air


    Suggest you stick to German forums then.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,808 ✭✭✭✭Water John


    Those would be the zoned temp for these rooms, in Ireland too. 21,23 & 18.
    Yeah would be difficult from one dry source.
    That's the purpose of rads or UFH.

    Sadly some people still putting in these systems and only one thermostat. Defeats the whole potential.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,830 ✭✭✭air


    Or as I suggested you could put a unit in each room.
    I posted the links to the system as I thought it might be useful for some people that might not have realised that heat pumps can be retrofitted relatively economically.
    One wouldn't need to use it as the exclusive heat source, but with a COP of 3 one could heat the house overnight for less than 3c / kWh in Ireland on night rate which is cheaper than any other fuel source.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,138 ✭✭✭✭KCross


    air wrote: »
    Suggest you stick to German forums then.

    That's a bit harsh. No one has a monopoly on the right way to do things.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,138 ✭✭✭✭KCross


    air wrote: »
    Or as I suggested you could put a unit in each room.
    I posted the links to the system as I thought it might be useful for some people that might not have realised that heat pumps can be retrofitted relatively economically.
    One wouldn't need to use it as the exclusive heat source, but with a COP of 3 one could heat the house overnight for less than 3c / kWh in Ireland on night rate which is cheaper than any other fuel source.

    Running them at night wouldn't really work though, would it?

    Heating the air is very different to heating a concrete slap with a HP. You don't want 23C going into the air during the night.

    So,realistically, wouldn't they be running at the day rate, not nightrate?


Advertisement