SuperBowl 50 Thread

paulie21

http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2016/02/09/strange-facts-emerge-about-super-bowl-50-replay-assistant/?utm_network=facebook&utm_post=5109514&utm_source=FB%20-%20SNF%20on%20NBC&utm_tags=srm%5Bfootball%2Carticle%5D

More Goodell incompetence

Realt Dearg Sec

"Most are far more concerned about doing a good job..."

They have a sense of humour anyway.

Morrisseeee

It's starting to sink in



/If Carlserg did Sunday's then last Sunday was nearly it...........but unfortunately 'Peyton Budweiser ' did it and we just came up short, ie. Ireland/Utd drawing !

KrustyUCC

HigginsJ wrote: »

For me his post game reactions beats the hell out of the bland generic nonsense some spout. If I was a Panthes fan it would look to me like he was hurt by it and gave a ****. Too many get away with "We played hard & it was not our day but I know God will bring us back here next year" type responses that mean nothing.

Not for me

You act professional. Russell Wilson threw a pick to end the last SB and he faced the media afterwards fully

Not a hell of a lot between them in age

Fair enough he was hurt by the SB loss

All players are

He quotes Lombardi about being a bad loser

Here's another one that fits

"The difference between a successful person and others is not a lack of strength, not a lack of knowledge, but rather a lack of will."

If I was a Panther fan I would focus on the fumble near the end of the game

His excuse for not attempting to recover was it he might have got injured

It's the SB

Dan Marino only got there once. No guarantee you get back

You need to attempt to play the ball and help your team

Contrast that with your team mate who did all he could to play in the game



You tell me you can dive on the ball? How do you justify that to Thomas Davis?

Who knows you recover it or maybe knock it to a teammate, punt and get the ball with the game still at 6

The fumble didn't lose the game but it sure did help as basically it put the game out of reach