Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Flightradar24 Thread Part III

Options
1…151152154156157…319

Comments

  • Options
    #4592
    marno21
    Moderators, Entertainment Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 14,424 Mod ✭✭✭✭marno21


    34 in use now.


  • Options
    #4593
    Bussywussy
    Registered Users Posts: 921 ✭✭✭Bussywussy


    tricky D wrote: »
    Fluid spilled so clean up reqd.

    There was no spill or fluid loss...


  • Options
    #4594
    JCX BXC
    Registered Users Posts: 18,186 ✭✭✭✭JCX BXC


    Bussywussy wrote: »
    There was no spill or fluid loss...

    Vaguely reported on ATC that there was, or could have been.


  • Options
    #4595
    tricky D
    Closed Accounts Posts: 9,700 ✭✭✭tricky D


    Yep, it was mentioned in the ATC exchange. In hindsight it looks precautionary.


  • Options
    #4596
    monkey lover
    Closed Accounts Posts: 172 ✭✭monkey lover


    EI-DUZ coming straight back in to land on 28 after taking off. Did this happen yesterday to?


  • Advertisement
  • Options
    #4597
    IE 222
    Registered Users Posts: 1,670 ✭✭✭IE 222


    monkey lover wrote: »
    EI-DUZ coming straight back in to land on 28 after taking off. Did this happen yesterday to?

    EI990 DUB - ORK, My guess is a test flight before been put on Boston.


  • Options
    #4598
    nsa0bupkd3948x
    Closed Accounts Posts: 783 ✭✭✭nsa0bupkd3948x


    monkey lover wrote: »
    EI-DUZ coming straight back in to land on 28 after taking off. Did this happen yesterday to?

    Its a test flight based on the callsign EI990 but it is the aircraft operating EI109 yesterday that was cancelled.


  • Options
    #4599
    PukkaStukka
    Registered Users Posts: 2,175 ✭✭✭PukkaStukka


    monkey lover wrote: »
    EI-DUZ coming straight back in to land on 28 after taking off. Did this happen yesterday to?

    Maintenance flight after yesterday's dramas perhaps? It's not displaying its normal flight code of EI1XX


  • Options
    #4600
    JCX BXC
    Registered Users Posts: 18,186 ✭✭✭✭JCX BXC


    EI990 is normally a positioning callsign.


  • Options
    #4601
    nsa0bupkd3948x
    Closed Accounts Posts: 783 ✭✭✭nsa0bupkd3948x


    He's back on the ground in Dublin now


  • Advertisement
  • Options
    #4602
    PukkaStukka
    Registered Users Posts: 2,175 ✭✭✭PukkaStukka


    According to flight radar, EI356 appears to have taken off just after EI-990 (DUO flight) bound for Munich and came straigt back. Is this true or a glitch?


  • Options
    #4603
    nsa0bupkd3948x
    Closed Accounts Posts: 783 ✭✭✭nsa0bupkd3948x


    PukkaStukka wrote: »
    According to flight radar, EI356 appears to have taken off just after EI-990 (DUO flight) bound for Munich and came straigt back. Is this true or a glitch?

    Must be a glitch showing as halfway across the Irish sea for me.


  • Options
    #4604
    PukkaStukka
    Registered Users Posts: 2,175 ✭✭✭PukkaStukka


    Izaiah White Bearded wrote: »
    Must be a glitch showing as halfway across the Irish sea for me.

    Yeah refreshed the browser and its correct now! :o


  • Options
    #4605
    monkey lover
    Closed Accounts Posts: 172 ✭✭monkey lover


    JCX BXC wrote: »
    EI990 is normally a positioning callsign.

    Might have been the quickest way to get from hangar to gate?! ðŸ˜


  • Options
    #4606
    faoiarvok
    Registered Users Posts: 644 ✭✭✭faoiarvok


    JCX BXC wrote: »
    Switching ops to RWY16, EI109 DUB-JFK will be soon landing on RWY28 with an undercarriage problem and will block the runway for a time.

    Update: Landing gear failed to retract, also I see EI-FNG operating DUB-EWR EI101 diverted to KEF.

    "dramatic emergency landing WITHOUT landing gear" according to Dublin Live (caps theirs)

    https://facebook.com/DublinLiveOnline/#!/story.php?story_fbid=1566629510023971


  • Options
    #4607
    JCX BXC
    Registered Users Posts: 18,186 ✭✭✭✭JCX BXC


    faoiarvok wrote: »
    "dramatic emergency landing WITHOUT landing gear" according to Dublin Live (caps theirs)

    https://facebook.com/DublinLiveOnline/#!/story.php?story_fbid=1566629510023971

    Well....like... that's just a blatant lie!

    That is truly truly gutter journalism.


  • Options
    #4608
    JCX BXC
    Registered Users Posts: 18,186 ✭✭✭✭JCX BXC


    Fog at DUB now, no issues as of yet, rvr's 900m at threshold, 550m midpoint, 550m stopend, LVP's just in force now, clouds FEW001 and SCT003.

    Delays may build up now as LVP's beginning.

    EI579 doing a small loop in order to avail of CAT III.

    Update: Threshold now 400m, aircraft reporting very poor visibility on landing, that dropped very quickly!


  • Options
    #4609
    Cloudio9
    Registered Users Posts: 1,351 ✭✭✭Cloudio9


    Anyone know why there's a Speedbird 777 in DUB at the moment ?


  • Options
    #4610
    billie1b
    Registered Users Posts: 3,813 ✭✭✭billie1b


    Cloudio9 wrote: »
    Anyone know why there's a Speedbird 777 in DUB at the moment ?

    Was in for painting


  • Options
    #4611
    Locker10a
    Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 4,178 Mod ✭✭✭✭Locker10a


    According to Flightradar24 EI-FMJ has been on the ground at NOC for 6 days! Anyone know if this is accurate and if so why?


  • Advertisement
  • Options
    #4612
    JCX BXC
    Registered Users Posts: 18,186 ✭✭✭✭JCX BXC


    Possible breakup on RWY28, ops stopped for the minute.

    Update: Nothing found, ops restarting.


  • Options
    #4613
    Oscar Bravo
    Registered Users Posts: 10,167 ✭✭✭✭Oscar Bravo


    Locker10a wrote: »
    According to Flightradar24 EI-FMJ has been on the ground at NOC for 6 days! Anyone know if this is accurate and if so why?

    EI-FMJ was at Knock on August 29th doing some training.it returned to Dublin that evening around 7pm.


  • Options
    #4614
    Locker10a
    Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 4,178 Mod ✭✭✭✭Locker10a


    Oscar Bravo wrote: »
    Locker10a wrote: »
    According to Flightradar24 EI-FMJ has been on the ground at NOC for 6 days! Anyone know if this is accurate and if so why?

    EI-FMJ was at Knock on August 29th doing some training.it returned to Dublin that evening around 7pm.
    Thanks, I thought it seemed odd


  • Options
    #4615
    JCX BXC
    Registered Users Posts: 18,186 ✭✭✭✭JCX BXC


    Laser attacks again at DUB, ATC asking a BA Cityflier for info for gardai.


  • Options
    #4616
    Oscar Bravo
    Registered Users Posts: 10,167 ✭✭✭✭Oscar Bravo


    NOAA Lockheed WP-3D Orion N42RF just through the eye of Hurricane Irma now


  • Options
    #4617
    Mech1
    Registered Users Posts: 5,112 ✭✭✭Mech1


    Landings now on R34 thats unusual.


  • Options
    #4618
    JCX BXC
    Registered Users Posts: 18,186 ✭✭✭✭JCX BXC


    Mech1 wrote: »
    Landings now on R34 thats unusual.

    Do you know why?


  • Options
    #4619
    Fattes
    Registered Users Posts: 3,208 ✭✭✭Fattes


    JCX BXC wrote: »
    Do you know why?

    Runway inspection Scheduled


  • Options
    #4620
    CoisFharraige
    Registered Users Posts: 237 ✭✭CoisFharraige


    Fattes wrote: »
    JCX BXC wrote: »
    Do you know why?

    Runway inspection Scheduled

    Was expecting the usual - Heavy on 28 returning and blocking it.


  • Advertisement
  • Options
    #4621
    JCX BXC
    Registered Users Posts: 18,186 ✭✭✭✭JCX BXC


    CoisFharraige wrote: »
    Was expecting the usual - Heavy on 28 returning and blocking it.

    The usual?

    Other than EI-DUZ the other day and one a short while before that, I can't remember many events of this occuring.


This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement