Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Flightradar24 Thread Part III

Options
1169170172174175319

Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 561 ✭✭✭space2ground1


    Interesting to see the pics going around of the monarch aircraft parked up in Shannon. Is it a common place for aircraft storage? What’s the likely destination for those planes in particular? Monarch must have had quite a few.


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,351 ✭✭✭Cloudio9


    Interesting to see the pics going around of the monarch aircraft parked up in Shannon. Is it a common place for aircraft storage? What’s the likely destination for those planes in particular? Monarch must have had quite a few.

    It’s because they’re leased from leasing companies based in ireland.

    When spanair and malev went bust there was loads of their planes parked up in Dublin. Probably not enough space in Dublin anymore.

    Won’t be long before they’re on their way to new homes.


  • Registered Users Posts: 705 ✭✭✭BZ


    Cloudio9 wrote: »
    It’s because they’re leased from leasing companies based in ireland.

    When spanair and malev went bust there was loads of their planes parked up in Dublin. Probably not enough space in Dublin anymore.

    Won’t be long before they’re on their way to new homes.

    The other big factor is the price of parking these birds is a lot cheaper in Shannon than Dublin.


  • Moderators, Entertainment Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 14,423 Mod ✭✭✭✭marno21


    EI-CBK returning to Dublin after operating the usual EI3408 evening DUB-CFN flight.

    Another issue?


  • Registered Users Posts: 18,184 ✭✭✭✭JCX BXC


    marno21 wrote: »
    EI-CBK returning to Dublin after operating the usual EI3408 evening DUB-CFN flight.

    Another issue?

    Seems to be a normal thing of a Saturday evening, Sundays schedule doesn't demand an aircraft to be in Donegal until 11:30. Doesn't seem particularly economical though.


  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Entertainment Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 14,423 Mod ✭✭✭✭marno21


    JCX BXC wrote: »
    Seems to be a normal thing of a Saturday evening, Sundays schedule doesn't demand an aircraft to be in Donegal until 11:30. Doesn't seem particularly economical though.
    10:30 - FlightRadar hasn't taken account of the time changing tonight yet.

    Seems surprising alright.


  • Registered Users Posts: 18,184 ✭✭✭✭JCX BXC


    marno21 wrote: »
    10:30 - FlightRadar hasn't taken account of the time changing tonight yet.

    Seems surprising alright.

    Ah 10:30, had forgotten about the change! It's strange rotating alright, seems that EI-EHH should be going there tomorrow, let's see if I'm right!


  • Registered Users Posts: 18,184 ✭✭✭✭JCX BXC


    BE653 (BEE8GW) BHX-NOC holding at NOC at 12,000ft and BE655 (BEE3VM) EDI-NOC about to enter the hold at 13,000ft at NOC due to fog.

    Current IRVR's are
    Threshold: 250m
    Midpoint: 225m
    Stopend: 250m

    They need either 300m or 550m of an IRVR at the threshold, depending on whether they're CAT II or CAT I.

    Update 13:47, EI911 (EIN91W) LGW-NOC joining the hold at 20,000ft. No improvement in IRVR's


  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 4,176 Mod ✭✭✭✭Locker10a


    JCX BXC wrote: »
    BE653 (BEE8GW) BHX-NOC holding at NOC at 12,000ft and BE655 (BEE3VM) EDI-NOC about to enter the hold at 13,000ft at NOC due to fog.

    Current IRVR's are
    Threshold: 250m
    Midpoint: 225m
    Stopend: 250m

    They need either 300m or 550m of an IRVR at the threshold, depending on whether they're CAT II or CAT I.

    Update 13:47, EI911 (EIN91W) LGW-NOC joining the hold at 20,000ft. No improvement in IRVR's

    The flybe has been holding for a long time! Hate to be pax on that flight. Any sight of improvement


  • Registered Users Posts: 18,184 ✭✭✭✭JCX BXC


    Locker10a wrote: »
    The flybe has been holding for a long time! Hate to be pax on that flight. Any sight of improvement

    No improvement, the first of the flybes from BHX had just requested a diversion from DUB.

    Second Flybe from EDI diverting to SNN.


  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Entertainment Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 14,423 Mod ✭✭✭✭marno21


    Seems to be a receiver out of action at Dublin Airport today - very poor ground coverage on FR24.


  • Moderators, Entertainment Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 14,423 Mod ✭✭✭✭marno21


    Delta's latest addition to its fleet, A359 N503DN over Cork at the minute


  • Registered Users Posts: 10,166 ✭✭✭✭Oscar Bravo


    EI-CBK currently in the hold at Carrickfinn due to Fog.


  • Registered Users Posts: 6,546 ✭✭✭kub


    Does anyone know about an incident at Cork airport earlier this afternoon, apparently an EI flight took off and had to return due to smoke in the cock pit?


  • Registered Users Posts: 29,567 ✭✭✭✭Wanderer78


    kub wrote: »
    Does anyone know about an incident at Cork airport earlier this afternoon, apparently an EI flight took off and had to return due to smoke in the cock pit?

    surprised it hasnt been mentioned on this forum yet

    https://www.rte.ie/news/munster/2017/1102/917034-cork-flight/


  • Registered Users Posts: 698 ✭✭✭Tazio


    yup saw that alright.... ?? wonder what was up? (Hopefully just a dodgy tablet/laptop battery)

    http://uk.flightaware.com/live/flight/EIN712/history/20171102/1150Z/EICK/EICK


    432244.jpg


  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Tazio wrote: »

    Crew had assessed the situation and said deboard via stairs, it appears some guests decided to leave via the overwing smoking section


  • Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators Posts: 11,676 Mod ✭✭✭✭devnull


    Crew had assessed the situation and said deboard via stairs, it appears some guests decided to leave via the overwing smoking section

    Friend of mine was on EI710 out of Cork which was due to leave Cork at 7:30am but did not take off until after 8:30 and was told it was due to operational reasons which was the same aircraft.


  • Registered Users Posts: 6,546 ✭✭✭kub


    Did one also on a flight from Amsterdam to Cork, a few weeks ago, had to land at Cardiff due to smoke or something like that?


  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    This was EI-GAL ex Aeroflot I believe


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 2,175 ✭✭✭PukkaStukka


    kub wrote: »
    Did one also on a flight from Amsterdam to Cork, a few weeks ago, had to land at Cardiff due to smoke or something like that?
    Different a/c on that occasion, EI-DEM


  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 4,176 Mod ✭✭✭✭Locker10a


    Major f@ck up with that EI flight with the slides blown.
    Either the Captain or Crew failed to give clear information to the passengers that the situation was under control and they would disembark normally or some of the overwing pax were either extremely ignorant or panicked and decided they know best and initiated an evacuation, which itself can cause serious injuries. Using those slides, while fun can be dangerous.


  • Registered Users Posts: 401 ✭✭NH2013


    Execptionally dangerous and reckless behaviour using the slides when not instructed to by crew if that was the case as it looks to be, there have been cases in the past of ground crew being killed by unintentionally inflated slides or passengers killed after being ingested into the engines by evacuating onto the wing before the crew instructed that it was safe to evacuate.


  • Registered Users Posts: 6,546 ✭✭✭kub


    Is there any chance that these prize idiots cam be prosecuted or fined for this?


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,175 ✭✭✭PukkaStukka


    Before passing judgment on why the over wing doors were popped and by whom, none of us know the circumstances prevailing inside the cabin up to and including the moment this happened. It was an emergency situation, the aircraft had returned and fire engines were alongside. There could have been smoke and distress inside and instructions may have been misunderstood.


  • Registered Users Posts: 8,448 ✭✭✭cml387


    Extensive studies after the Manchester air disaster found that passengers can either flee, or get stuck in a sort of trance. Needless to say those who flee survived.
    It's a bit premature to blame the pax, who may have heard the words "evacuate" and not the bit about the doors.
    Given that it was a scheduled flight with probably a large proportion of experienced passengers, and maybe smoke visible, some might behave proactively.
    I speak as someone who has been on board an emergency return, and everyone did stay calm, but the cabin was completely clear of any smoke and there was no apparent panic.


  • Registered Users Posts: 401 ✭✭NH2013


    cml387 wrote: »
    Given that it was a scheduled flight with probably a large proportion of experienced passengers, and maybe smoke visible, some might behave proactively.

    The problem lies with the fact that "Proactive" can often be exceptionally dangerous. Passengers are in a very poor position to asses the situation when compared to the crew and in particular the Flight Crew who will have the most information available, will have all the instuments and sensors in front of them and will likely be in conversation with fire services outside the aircraft, and be best placed to decide if it is safer to get off straight away and evacuate, or take a more conservative approach and disembark via steps. We'd all be reading a very different story tonight if one or more passengers was killed by ingestion into the engine or badly burned/killed by the exhaust from the engines.

    Take for example the Qantas flight QF32 which lost an engine and returned to land, only to be unable to shut down an engine as the control cables had been severed by the engine failure, had passengers evacuated onto the wing in that case, (instead of obeying crew instructions and remaining seated), they likely could have been severely injured or killed by the engine exhaust/intake.

    While absolutely in certain circumstances, an immediate evacuation may be the safest solution, doing so without instruction from the crew has and will get people killed or badly injured.


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,175 ✭✭✭PukkaStukka


    This photo is in the RTE website. The first officers window is wide open too, and I doubt it was from him (or her) hanging out of it roaring at pax to get off the wing and back inside the cabin....

    432260.jpeg

    Also the slides appear attached to the anchor points on the wing, so again - perhaps - this happened in foot of an instruction...


  • Registered Users Posts: 69,186 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    Would it not be extremely dangerous to criminalise somebody who panicked?

    Draconian and counterproductive IMO.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 2,175 ✭✭✭PukkaStukka




This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement