Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

"Naval Service" vs "Navy"

  • 15-02-2016 7:03pm
    #1
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,815 ✭✭✭


    Hi all,

    A question for those in the know. Why has the Naval Service got that name, as opposed to "Irish Navy". Can't find anything about it on the DF website.

    Thanks in advance!


Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,248 ✭✭✭✭BoJack Horseman


    'navy' sounds more aggressive.
    It also implies the ability to execute Naval combat, which our NS isn't really built for.


    (Apropo of naming convention...hilariously, Germany is building a class of warship... The F125. It is big enough to be classed as a destroyer, but the Germans didn't like the idea of having something that sounded aggressive, so it's the largest frigate in the world instead)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,357 ✭✭✭Negative_G


    Vorsprung wrote: »
    Hi all,

    A question for those in the know. Why has the Naval Service got that name, as opposed to "Irish Navy". Can't find anything about it on the DF website.

    Thanks in advance!

    Very simply the Navy is seen as a 'service' under the umbrella of the Defence Forces. Similarly the Air Corps is the aerial 'corps' of the army.

    That's my understanding at least.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,049 ✭✭✭discus


    It's my understanding that our Naval Service does not have a high enough rank within its structure to allow it to be called a Navy. I think our highest is rear admiral. This premise is similar to that of national armies. Under 100,000 isn't an army, it's a self defence force.


    This is all bollox knowledge, though. Wait for someone with actual facts to come through :P


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,867 ✭✭✭Alkers


    discus wrote: »
    It's my understanding that our Naval Service does not have a high enough rank within its structure to allow it to be called a Navy. I think our highest is rear admiral. This premise is similar to that of national armies. Under 100,000 isn't an army, it's a self defence force.


    This is all bollox knowledge, though. Wait for someone with actual facts to come through :P

    They have a vice admiral now that Mark Mellet is the Chief of Staff.

    IIRC the UK has a Naval Service which includes the Navy and the Royal Marines.

    I've known a lot of Navy people to refer to themselves as Navy rather than Naval service so I wouldn't worry about it.


  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 2,688 Mod ✭✭✭✭Morpheus


    Ive seen Irish Naval Service personnel wearing work related clothing with the word Navy embroidered or embossed on it.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 1,161 ✭✭✭Ren2k7


    There's no real distinction. It's just a name and they could easily be just called the Irish Navy if the govt wished it. Not so with the Air Corps though, they are actually closer to an army air corps than a air force in their own rights. They'd need a few fighter aircraft before they could be renamed.


  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 16,449 Mod ✭✭✭✭Manic Moran


    (Apropo of naming convention...hilariously, Germany is building a class of warship... The F125. It is big enough to be classed as a destroyer, but the Germans didn't like the idea of having something that sounded aggressive, so it's the largest frigate in the world instead)

    You are assuming that the Germans classify by size and not role. There have been bigger frigates in the past, such as this one. (7,000 tons for F125, over 10,000 for California)

    image025.jpg


    The California and Virgnia classes (in excess of 10,000 tons light), plus Bainbridge and Truxtun were originally commissioned as nuclear powered frigates under the US Navy's classification system of the time (which was based off the older concepts of size). The US changed its definitions in 1975, they were re-classified as cruisers.

    A quick scan of the specs for F125 indicates that 'Frigate' under the common usage of a single primary role is actually correct. She's a surface warfare combatant, with very limited capabilities at ASW and AAW.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 4,691 ✭✭✭4ensic15


    discus wrote: »
    I think our highest is rear admiral. This premise is similar to that of national armies. Under 100,000 isn't an army, it's a self defence force.


    This is all bollox knowledge, though. Wait for someone with actual facts to come through :P

    The highest operational rank in the naval service is commodore. that is the rank held by the flag officer commanding. The holders of any higher ranks naval have appointments at army headquarters which are general staff appointments and are not linked specifically to the naval service.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,049 ✭✭✭discus


    Fairsies. I won't argue with ya!


  • Registered Users Posts: 112 ✭✭a/tel


    4ensic15 wrote: »
    The highest operational rank in the naval service is commodore. that is the rank held by the flag officer commanding. The holders of any higher ranks naval have appointments at army headquarters which are general staff appointments and are not linked specifically to the naval service.



    I think you mean Defence Forces Headquarters.......:cool::)


  • Advertisement
  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 4,691 ✭✭✭4ensic15


    a/tel wrote: »
    I think you mean Defence Forces Headquarters.......:cool::)

    Always referred to as AHQ in my day.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,632 ✭✭✭Kat1170


    4ensic15 wrote: »
    Always referred to as AHQ in my day.

    Yup, still is.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,206 ✭✭✭ZeroThreat


    discus wrote: »
    It's my understanding that our Naval Service does not have a high enough rank within its structure to allow it to be called a Navy. I think our highest is rear admiral. This premise is similar to that of national armies. Under 100,000 isn't an army, it's a self defence force.


    This is all bollox knowledge, though. Wait for someone with actual facts to come through :P

    The Japanese army is known as the ground self-defence force yet it numbers 150,000.


  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 16,449 Mod ✭✭✭✭Manic Moran


    Kat1170 wrote: »
    Yup, still is.

    I have to say, I always figured that was why it was Naval Service and Air Corps. I always considered them as subsets of the Army structure. Much like the US Army Air Force of late WW2 (US Army Air Corps prior at the beginning of WW2. The US Air Force was only created in 1948.


  • Registered Users Posts: 112 ✭✭a/tel


    Kat1170 wrote: »
    Yup, still is.

    Military.ie state it is DFHQ

    Seeing as there is a Vice Admiral as COS i reckon he would think the same! :D


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,712 ✭✭✭roundymac


    It's an Irish thing :ie; to be different. For years we had a minister for external affairs, everyone else had a minister for foreign affairs.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 748 ✭✭✭Yawlboy


    When I served we were told it was The Naval Service because our Flag officer was only a Commodore and that in order to be a Navy you had to have at least 12 ships and an Admiral


  • Registered Users Posts: 112 ✭✭a/tel


    Yawlboy wrote: »
    When I served we were told it was The Naval Service because our Flag officer was only a Commodore and that in order to be a Navy you had to have at least 12 ships and an Admiral

    New Zealand have 11 ships and a Rear Admiral as Chief Of Navy.

    Pity the white paper didnt sort out the naming issue.

    Have a feeling that the government dont want a change as it prob sounds too warry.......


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,467 ✭✭✭Heraldoffreeent


    a/tel wrote: »
    New Zealand have 11 ships and a Rear Admiral as Chief Of Navy.

    Pity the white paper didnt sort out the naming issue.

    Have a feeling that the government dont want a change as it prob sounds too warry.......

    Yeah, also the Commodore rank is somewhat ethereal.

    In many European navies the equivalent is Konteradmiral/Flottillenadmiral, and in the early 80's the USN replaced Commodore with Rear Admiral (lower half) as a one star naval rank.


  • Advertisement
Advertisement