Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Contract issue

Options
  • 09-03-2016 11:01pm
    #1
    Registered Users Posts: 6


    To start my contract is 20years old I have worked the same mon to fri full time loyal and very good employee. We now have a girl who is going on maternity leave who works a weekend shift which she says she won't be able to do when she returns to work as previous staff have been allowed to do after maternity leave. So the boss is looking at changing the contracts to accommodate her. She has been working with us for about 6 years but I am not willing to change at this stage in life to include weekends. I don't have a family and will never have one so I am wondering if he is changing my contract because of this issue as it will mean less hassle when it comes to people coming back from maternity.. My question is can he legally discriminate against me and change a contract to suit him.


Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 23,536 ✭✭✭✭ted1


    Harriet123 wrote: »
    To start my contract is 20years old I have worked the same mon to fri full time loyal and very good employee. We now have a girl who is going on maternity leave who works a weekend shift which she says she won't be able to do when she returns to work as previous staff have been allowed to do after maternity leave. So the boss is looking at changing the contracts to accommodate her. She has been working with us for about 6 years but I am not willing to change at this stage in life to include weekends. I don't have a family and will never have one so I am wondering if he is changing my contract because of this issue as it will mean less hassle when it comes to people coming back from maternity.. My question is can he legally discriminate against me and change a contract to suit him.

    If he did and you quit, there's a string case for constructive dismissal as he fundamentally changed your working conditions


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 577 ✭✭✭simdan


    Why does your contract have to change? Surely he could rewrite the girls contract as long as she accepts of course. There are many different contracts for employees at the same level in my company.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 160 ✭✭kenmccarthy


    Basically the answer is NO....a contract cannot be changed unilaterally without the consent of both employer AND employee. After 20 years precencence any attempt to alter/modify your employment contract to your detriment wouldn't be permitted....only IF it was with your agreement


  • Registered Users Posts: 6 Harriet123


    Because he wants to include me in weekend rota.. We are a small company so there I isn't many people to fill the position. This girl was hired to work weekends I was not. If the other girls who work weekends starts to get pregnant and not want to work I am worried I will be landed with more if he changes contract now..


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 577 ✭✭✭simdan


    Harriet123 wrote:
    Because he wants to include me in weekend rota.. We are a small company so there I isn't many people to fill the position. This girl was hired to work weekends I was not. If the other girls who work weekends starts to get pregnant and not want to work I am worried I will be landed with more if he changes contract now..

    Please read above. He cannot change your contract without your agreement.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 25,969 ✭✭✭✭Mrs OBumble


    simdan wrote: »
    Please read above. He cannot change your contract without your agreement.

    But if you do not agree, he could choose to make you redundant. Probably won't 'cos it would cost him a bit. But could.

    And to return to your original question, this is not discrimination. It's simply re-organising the way the business operates. Which an employer is entitled to do.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 18,268 ✭✭✭✭uck51js9zml2yt


    But if you do not agree, he could choose to make you redundant. Probably won't 'cos it would cost him a bit. But could.

    And to return to your original question, this is not discrimination. It's simply re-organising the way the business operates. Which an employer is entitled to do.

    His job would have to no longer exist to be made redundant. This would not be the case.

    An employer can't unilaterally change an employee contract.


  • Registered Users Posts: 6 Harriet123


    Thank you all this has been helpful
    At least he can't fire me when I decline I hope😁


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,001 ✭✭✭mitresize5


    Don't wait for this to be presented to you as a fait accompli

    Get in now and tell him you are not interested in working weekends. Be polite about it but firm if needs be.

    TBH this drives me mad at times. The fact that working parents decide to have kids should never adversely affect other employees.

    It leads to resentment and bad blood by those affected and rightly so. This ladies role should not change as a result of her having a child if it effects other employees.

    This is her and her partners and your bosses problem - not yours

    BTW - We are a young family who regularly have all the madness associated with that and I would never expect a colleague life to suffer as a result


  • Registered Users Posts: 25,969 ✭✭✭✭Mrs OBumble


    His job would have to no longer exist to be made redundant. This would not be the case.

    An employer can't unilaterally change an employee contract.

    But his job (weekdays-only widget-woggler) does not still exist.

    The jobs of all employees are being changed so that they all take turns as providing weekend cover, instead of allowing some to be week-days only and some weekends only.

    An employer cannot unilaterally change a contract, agreed. But if there are changes to be made, and employer can make them and will have to pay off those employees who don't agree.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 6 Harriet123


    My boss is well aware of my objections... I have no interest in joining a weekend rota to suit mothers to be and already people who are mothers so they can have an easier work life at my expense. I feel I am being targeted due to the fact I can't have children so I can't ask to reduce my working hours due to kids at home.. Ps my job is still the same this will be extra work on top of everything I already do.. Also I am these girls manager which will also not change.


  • Registered Users Posts: 6 Harriet123


    By he way I am female.


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,457 ✭✭✭livedadream


    Harriet123 wrote: »
    My boss is well aware of my objections... I have no interest in joining a weekend rota to suit mothers to be and already people who are mothers so they can have an easier work life at my expense. I feel I am being targeted due to the fact I can't have children so I can't ask to reduce my working hours due to kids at home.. Ps my job is still the same this will be extra work on top of everything I already do.. Also I am these girls manager which will also not change.

    others have said it but ill add to it,

    you are not being discriminated against.

    you contact cant be changed without your permission HOWEVER your contact may say something like flexible hours or not guaranteed the same hours, its all depends (im guessing if it was written 20 years ago it wont)

    Be reasonable with your boss, tell them you do not wish to work weekends.
    If he says well t e business needs have changed then you don't have a leg to stand on.

    Thats life if you work for a business thats open on weekends you must be prepared to work available hours. (this goes for the very 'active' women you seem to work with also)


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,001 ✭✭✭mitresize5


    I disagree.

    This has constructive dismissal written all over it for an employees of this long standing.

    The needs of the business haven't changed, the needs of some employees have. There is a huge difference.

    If I were you I'd be fighting this all the way.

    Having said all that id be taking proper legal advice on this


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,001 ✭✭✭mitresize5


    I disagree.

    This has constructive dismissal written all over it for an employees of this long standing.

    The needs of the business haven't changed, the needs of some employees have. There is a huge difference.

    If I were you I'd be fighting this all the way.

    Having said all that id be taking proper legal advice on this


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 160 ✭✭kenmccarthy


    An employer cannot change/alter the terms of an employment contract at 'will' ...... this isn't north korea......if an employer could change a contact sure what would be the point of drawing up & signing a contract in the first place.

    National employment rights organisation ( NERO ) have a good websiye7


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,457 ✭✭✭livedadream


    mitresize5 wrote: »
    I disagree.

    This has constructive dismissal written all over it for an employees of this long standing.

    The needs of the business haven't changed, the needs of some employees have. There is a huge difference.

    If I were you I'd be fighting this all the way.

    Having said all that id be taking proper legal advice on this

    different strokes, if shes been there 20 years in general 20 years ago contracts didnt exist and if they did they were one pagers.

    there are two sides, she is also being inflexible, there is no reason for her to not work weekends other than she doesnt want to.

    I agree that the contract cant be changed without her consent but ive also seen it happen that the boss can turn around and say the business needs have changed, it all depends on what job she does.

    Changing it to suit girls getting preggers isnt fair but that doenst make it illegal or a breach of unfair dismissals or she constructively dismiss's herself.


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,001 ✭✭✭mitresize5


    No employer in there right mind would go to a tribunal to defend changing 20 year old work practices because other employees family situation changed.

    Whether the OP wants to go down that route is another question. I certainly would.


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,457 ✭✭✭livedadream


    mitresize5 wrote: »
    No employer in there right mind would go to a tribunal to defend changing 20 year old work practices because other employees family situation changed.

    Whether the OP wants to go down that route is another question. I certainly would.

    i agree, but it doesnt mean it doesnt happen.

    cart before the house though, she might go to her employer say i dont agree to my contract being changed, historical contract etc and be fine.


  • Registered Users Posts: 25,969 ✭✭✭✭Mrs OBumble


    Harriet123 wrote: »
    Also I am these girls manager which will also not change.

    So you manage staff, but are not willing to be there during some of the hours that they are there. And you are being dismissive towards your staff, referring to women who have had babies as mere "girls".

    If I was your manager, you would be be getting a swift kick in the rear end, metaphorically speaking of course.

    I'll stand by my earlier opinion: the manager can choose to change your contract, but if you don't agree to do the new job, he has to pay you off. But I now feel a good deal less sympathetic towards you.


    If it bothers you that you cannot have children but your staff are doing so, then I'd suggest some counselling: you will find it difficult to manage effectively if you have a chip on your shoulder.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 1,001 ✭✭✭mitresize5




    If it bothers you that you cannot have children but your staff are doing so, then I'd suggest some counselling: you will find it difficult to manage effectively if you have a chip on your shoulder.

    Thats an outrageous comment.

    At no point in this thread has that lady insinuated anything of the sort. She doesnt want to work weekends because she hasnt had to in 20 years

    You have no idea of that persons life or background and jumping to those conclusions is way out of order and I assume extremely hurtful


  • Registered Users Posts: 4,310 ✭✭✭Pkiernan


    So you manage staff, but are not willing to be there during some of the hours that they are there. And you are being dismissive towards your staff, referring to women who have had babies as mere "girls".

    If I was your manager, you would be be getting a swift kick in the rear end, metaphorically speaking of course.

    I'll stand by my earlier opinion: the manager can choose to change your contract, but if you don't agree to do the new job, he has to pay you off. But I now feel a good deal less sympathetic towards you.


    If it bothers you that you cannot have children but your staff are doing so, then I'd suggest some counselling: you will find it difficult to manage effectively if you have a chip on your shoulder.


    WTF? ????

    Cop yourself on.


  • Registered Users Posts: 7,515 ✭✭✭the_pen_turner


    I think these hours are on top of the weeks work.

    tell your boss that you need personal time away from work to keep your work life balance

    tell the boss that you would be caught for extra tax and that the extra hours would not result in any extra money in your pocket.

    tell your boss that you will be taking those days in lieu of money along with your increase in holidays



    you should donate some of your days off to charities or sick kids etc. its very hard to argue that you want someone to come in on their day of instead of feeding homeless or helping sick kids.
    only joking really but it would show the boss to be a monster


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 338 ✭✭Fluffy Cat 88


    So you manage staff, but are not willing to be there during some of the hours that they are there. And you are being dismissive towards your staff, referring to women who have had babies as mere "girls".

    If I was your manager, you would be be getting a swift kick in the rear end, metaphorically speaking of course.

    I'll stand by my earlier opinion: the manager can choose to change your contract, but if you don't agree to do the new job, he has to pay you off. But I now feel a good deal less sympathetic towards you.


    If it bothers you that you cannot have children but your staff are doing so, then I'd suggest some counselling: you will find it difficult to manage effectively if you have a chip on your shoulder.

    For the sake of fcuk!!!

    Us child free beings are not all bitter and twisted, many of us choose to live our lives sans-sprog!

    Op, explain to your boss you will not be available for weekend work.

    Hope it all works out for you.


  • Registered Users Posts: 91 ✭✭Dilly.




    If it bothers you that you cannot have children but your staff are doing so, then I'd suggest some counselling: you will find it difficult to manage effectively if you have a chip on your shoulder.

    how dare you!

    Not everyone who doesn't have children has an issue or problem with it, for many it is a life choice. Your comment is extremely judgemental and damn right rude!

    This isn't the first time you've advised someone they need counselling based on nothing but your own presumptions, it's very strange and reflects more on you than it does on them.


  • Registered Users Posts: 91 ✭✭Dilly.


    And you are being dismissive towards your staff, referring to women who have had babies as mere "girls".

    And also the hypocrisy!! You're referring to women who don't have children as being in need of counselling.


  • Moderators, Business & Finance Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 51,688 Mod ✭✭✭✭Stheno


    Mod: No more discussion on peoples decisions/choices on having children.

    Warnings have been given out already.


  • Registered Users Posts: 25,969 ✭✭✭✭Mrs OBumble


    This is absolutely nothing to do with choices, the OP has already told us that:
    Harriet123 wrote: »
    I feel I am being targeted due to the fact I can't have children

    And I would agree that she likely is being targeted for this reason: it is quite normal for employers to expect child-free people (for whatever reason) to work more than their fair share of unsociable hours, to take holidays during non-holiday periods, to stay late to cover problems etc. I've certainly experienced this (being childless). And many people would think that's it's actually the right thing for an employer to do.

    If the OP was not the manager of the women concerned, then I would feel total sympathy for her position.

    But she's told us that she is middle management. In pretty much every other business on the planet, being middle management means that, at least sometimes, you work the same hours that your staff do. I'm actually quite surprised that the employer has allowed this situation to go on for so long already.


Advertisement