Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Being sacked for recovering illness

Options
  • 28-04-2016 12:24pm
    #1
    Registered Users Posts: 4


    I have an ongoing case of Unfair Dismissal against former employer. I had a temporary illness back in 2011 and he was approached by Employability Services to hire me so he could be entitled to the Wage Subsidy Scheme. I grew within my role and achieved outstanding results in marketing and business development. My part-time position soon became full-time covering marketing, PR, wholesale, stock control and operation management beside the original focus on e-commerce. After 2 years I successfully negotiated better terms of my employment; though my hours were reduced back to 3 days per week, I was offered a payrise + commission (!), duties reduced to e-commerce and marketing, and as requested to be re-located to the town their new shop opened and badly needed a boost in sales.
    A month later my employer finished a casual chat over the phone with "by the way, I terminated your contract backdated (to date I had my last day in full-time in the previous location of my work. I was re-located before without change of contract.). You'll get your new contract when you signed the Wage Subsidy Scheme Form for me".

    I understood he had to re-apply for wss because of my re-location but I never understood why he terminated my contract - ripping me off some employee's right I had gained with a 2 years continuous employment. I seeked legal advice and was advised to bring a claim for unfair dismissal. Later my solicitor figured out that I was sacked for my employer could not re-apply for Wage Subsidy Scheme if I was employed for more than a year!!! So he had to make me a new employee for his subsidy.

    Recently he also stated in court that he would not have employed me with new contract if he was not entitled to wage subsidy scheme, he could not afford me, he said...

    Though we are still waiting for verdict, we once had a decision by the Right's Commissioner who stated while it was, indeed, unfair dismissal, I significantly contributed to the dismissal. My solicitor could not find any other reason for this outcome but my statement that I would not have signed the wage subsidy form as I was not treated with illness anymore, and it would have been a lie (a fraud more like)

    And again, my former employer was not questioned why he believed he could sack me for not being sick.

    I have SERIOUS CONCERNS that there are thousand os people with mental disability out there employed under the wage susidy scheme - and being taken total advantage of by greed. They would not even understand what is going on... We had all the JobBridge and JobPlus scandals, and now it seems employers are hooked on by significant subsidy, to employ someone they would not need or could not afford otherwise.

    I am utterly shocked it is happening, and looking forward to hearing opinions.


Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 9,798 ✭✭✭Mr. Incognito


    Do you need to open multiple threads?

    This is seeking legal advice?

    or having a rant looking for what?


  • Registered Users Posts: 4 mamdmrmi


    Do you need to open multiple threads?

    This is seeking legal advice?

    or having a rant looking for what?

    I meant to edit the post and somewhat duplicated it. Sorry about it. Tried to contact a moderator but system did not allow me to send PM as I don't have enough posts yet.

    My only intent was to see others' opinion regarding this case. Whatever the outcome will be in my case, I plan to bring it in to spotlight to protect others from being exploited. I wanted to know beforehand though whether it is something people would have concerns about.


Advertisement