spurious reason for ban

pj.dublin

It would appear i did not have the same view as the mod on said subject, therefore banned for spurious reason.
What is wrong about the post below, i fail to see what i posted that warrants a ban, please enlightening me.


You have been banned
Dear pj.dublin,

You have been permanently banned from Commuting & Transport for a breach of the forum charter.

Every forum on Boards.ie has a charter which lists any specific rules that forum may have and it is really important that you read this as it'll help you familiarise yourself with how that forum works. You should also understand that every forum is different and that charters are how you learn the differences.

Please see the Boards.ie FAQ for more details.

If you wish to appeal this ban you can see details on how to do so here.

monument

Moderator Note

Re-registering after a ban is not allow -- you risk all of your accounts getting a permanent ban.

Your post:
Quote:
Originally Posted by pj.dublin View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by murphaph View Post
LOLZ.
It's a matter of public record that Transdev have no shortage of applicants and as the minimum entry requirement seems to be a category B driving licence it is fair to assume most are suitable applicants that could be made into Luas drivers in 2 months (it takes years of experience to become a senior developer by the way).

In my company, if we developers all demanded 20% more pay, we'd probably get it, because "code" is the core product at our firm and if the developers left en masse, the firm would essentially cease to exist as the knowledge about the product in our heads is so valuable. You probably can't understand why we wouldn't all band together and demand 20% more pay but we know that our other non-developer colleagues would ultimately pay for it and we simply wouldn't shaft them like that.


PjDublin reply
Interesting post.
Why do you take what Transdev said as True, did they offer any proof?

So you software engineers stand up for lesser paid colleagues, and thats a good thing.
Did the LUAS driver not state that was a reason for rejecting the deal offered, new drivers would be on lesser pay and conditions, are they not to be admired for this stance?

dudara

Hi, have you attempted to contact the relevant mod via PM to discuss the action? (See flow chart above)

pj.dublin

dudara wrote: »

Hi, have you attempted to contact the relevant mod via PM to discuss the action? (See flow chart above)

Sure have, it would appear to me the ban is because i don't agree with the general view of posters on the LUAS discussion.
Are opposing views not welcome here? nothing about that in my quick read of the forum charter, i can't see what i did wrong.

dudara

Closing this thread as the OP is poster is a serial re-reg who has received multiple site bans in the past, and is once again banned.