Donald Trump

Galwayguy35 · 16-09-2016 7:11pm

Surprised he let Jimmy Fallon ruffle his hair.

Fathom · 16-09-2016 7:15pm

Galwayguy35 wrote: »

Surprised he let Jimmy Fallon ruffle his hair.

Looked staged. Got permission. In advance. Joke. Fell flat for me.

Pro Hoc Vice · 16-09-2016 8:20pm

Fathom wrote: »

Looked staged. Got permission. In advance. Joke. Fell flat for me.

I think Trump had said in the past he would let him touch his hair.

Sand · 16-09-2016 8:24pm

Trump is insecure about his hair and jibes that its a wig. He invited a woman up on stage to touch his hair a few months ago. I'd imagine he demanded Fallon ruffle it up to prove again that its not a wig. Its definitely a wig.

Pro Hoc Vice · 16-09-2016 8:26pm

Sand wrote: »

Trump is insecure about his hair and jibes that its a wig. He invited a woman up on stage to touch his hair a few months ago. I'd imagine he demanded Fallon ruffle it up to prove again that its not a wig. Its definitely a wig.

Defo not a wig it's a pretty bad combover.

osarusan · 16-09-2016 8:28pm

It's a Paul Costelloe Living Wig.

Penn · 16-09-2016 9:51pm

Not a wig but you can see when his hair was ruffled just how bald he's going on top. There was more scalp visible than on a bald man who's bad at making funny analogies. It's only because the hair at the sides and back and what little he has on top is long and combed over the top in all directions, and then back down so it doesn't look like a combover.

jooksavage · 16-09-2016 10:41pm

As Philomena Cunk put it, his hair "is a sort of fuzzy gas"

Sweetemotion · 16-09-2016 11:23pm

Ahh man, the left are livid.

All they have now is. Don't vote for this man, because he is bald.

Pro Hoc Vice · 16-09-2016 11:27pm

Sweetemotion wrote: »

Ahh man, the left are livid.

All they have now is. Don't vote for this man, because he is bald.

His hirsute issue is the least of anyone's problems. I suppose except his first wife she recommended a surgeon for that issue look up how that turned out for her. As a surporter of Trump says, just saying!

Sweetemotion · 16-09-2016 11:36pm

Pro Hoc Vice wrote: »

His hirsute issue is the least of anyone's problems. I suppose except his first wife she recommended a surgeon for that issue look up how that turned out for her. As a surporter of Trump says, just saying!

And thanks, for these sort off replies. Making people feel dumb "just because you know better" is why Trump is winning.

Pro Hoc Vice · 16-09-2016 11:43pm

Sweetemotion wrote: »

And thanks, for these sort off replies. Making people feel dumb "just because you know better" is why Trump is winning.

Where did I do that?

Funny thing many trump supporters mock what they say is generation snowflake yet they are the first to react like classic snowflake's.

BTW a person can't make you feel dumb that's all your own feelings own it.

InTheTrees · 16-09-2016 11:55pm

Sweetemotion wrote: »

Making people feel dumb "just because you know better" is why Trump is winning.

Trump isn't winning.

Sorry.

KingBrian2 · 17-09-2016 12:01am

InTheTrees wrote: »

Trump isn't winning.

Sorry.

He's won the popularity contest.

Pro Hoc Vice · 17-09-2016 12:07am

KingBrian2 wrote: »

He's won the popularity contest.

When was that held?

learn_more · 17-09-2016 12:10am

KingBrian2 wrote: »

He's won the popularity contest.

He actually has.

I'm just thinking if he's crowned, to look back on this thread, and to read peoples thoughts on the future PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES.

It's just bizarre.

If there were a vote TODAY ie 17/09/16, I'm convinced he would win.

Anyway, 2 months is a long time in politics.

If there was one job I would not like to have in politics right now, would be to part of Hillary s campaign team. They will never get a job in their lives ever again in their line of work, should trump win.

InTheTrees · 17-09-2016 12:19am

learn_more wrote: »

If there were a vote TODAY ie 17/09/16, I'm convinced he would win.
i

Well that's nice, enjoy the illusion.

However if the election were held today he would lose in a landslide.

He still isn't close to Romney's level of support from 2012.

AllGunsBlazing · 17-09-2016 2:58am

InTheTrees wrote: »

Well that's nice, enjoy the illusion.

However if the election were held today he would lose in a landslide.

He still isn't close to Romney's level of support from 2012.

This is the kind of lazy conceit that saw Britain stumble out of the EU. He is, sadly, very much in contention for the White House.

Realt Dearg Sec · 17-09-2016 3:18am

Trump's statement on the birther controversy is hilarious, I'm really glad he's decided to abandon his policy of careful engagement with issues that hurt Clinton in order to fabricate a new and ludicrous web of easily uncovered lies smothered in a totally transparent advertisement for one of his bloated, elitist hotels. Nice of him to remind us who he really is, a bumbling, self absorbed fool. I knew the smart strategy couldn't last. I don't think all his supporters are fools. But he forces them to sound like fools, having to defend every bit of shocking idiocy and incompetence that he manages to concoct. As self sabotaging and poorly run as Hillary's campaign is, I remain confident tonight that Donald will continue to **** the course.

InTheTrees · 17-09-2016 3:22am

AllGunsBlazing wrote: »

This is the kind of lazy conceit that saw Britain stumble out of the EU. He is, sadly, very much in contention for the White House.

No conceit here. Its vital that he doesn't win.

Of course he's in contention, he's one of two candidates.

Right now Hillary is at about 60% likely to win. The demographics of trumps support show he has an uphill struggle to even match romenys losing numbers.

Risteard · 17-09-2016 3:33am

Hon The Donald!

Parachutes · 17-09-2016 9:19am

InTheTrees wrote: »

Well that's nice, enjoy the illusion.

However if the election were held today he would lose in a landslide.

He still isn't close to Romney's level of support from 2012.

Not true. He's doing much better than Romney did with key demographics, 39% with Hispanics and about 18% with blacks according to some polls. That's pretty much unheard of for a republican.

He's ahead by many points in some battleground states. This race is much closer than you'd like to believe.

Bazzo · 17-09-2016 9:49am

Parachutes wrote: »

Not true. He's doing much better than Romney did with key demographics, 39% with Hispanics and about 18% with blacks according to some polls. That's pretty much unheard of for a republican.

He's ahead by many points in some battleground states. This race is much closer than you'd like to believe.

Could you link some sources for that? I find it very very hard to believe.

InTheTrees · 17-09-2016 12:07pm

Parachutes wrote: »

He's doing much better than Romney did with key demographics, 39% with Hispanics and about 18% with blacks according to some polls. That's pretty much unheard of for a republican.

39% with Hispanics? 18% with blacks?

Yes, unheard of for a republican so maybe adding a link would show that they're actually true.

Pro Hoc Vice · 17-09-2016 12:13pm

InTheTrees wrote: »

39% with Hispanics? 18% with blacks?

Yes, unheard of for a republican so maybe adding a link would show that they're actually true.

George W got 40% Hispanic in one of his elections even with African Americans at last election I think Romney got 13%

Harvey Normal · 17-09-2016 12:17pm

InTheTrees wrote: »

Well that's nice, enjoy the illusion.

However if the election were held today he would lose in a landslide.

He still isn't close to Romney's level of support from 2012.

He's close enough though and doing better in battleground states - so I'm told by online statisticians anyway. Certainly no landslide either way.

Harvey Normal · 17-09-2016 12:20pm

InTheTrees wrote: »

No conceit here. Its vital that he doesn't win.

Of course he's in contention, he's one of two candidates.

Right now Hillary is at about 60% likely to win. The demographics of trumps support show he has an uphill struggle to even match romenys losing numbers.

60% likely to win is a weak number. She was at 80% a few weeks ago (it's not the voting percentage. If you knew that she was definitely getting 55% and he would definitely get 45% and there were no state distortions then she would have a 100% chance).

Harvey Normal · 17-09-2016 12:21pm

Parachutes wrote: »

Not true. He's doing much better than Romney did with key demographics, 39% with Hispanics and about 18% with blacks according to some polls. That's pretty much unheard of for a republican.

He's ahead by many points in some battleground states. This race is much closer than you'd like to believe.

That's not true at all. He's getting what used to be a democratic vote - working class whites - though.

InTheTrees · 17-09-2016 12:35pm

Harvey Normal wrote: »

60% likely to win is a weak number. She was at 80% a few weeks ago (it's not the voting percentage. If you knew that she was definitely getting 55% and he would definitely get 45% and there were no state distortions then she would have a 100% chance).

A weak number? Well yeah. but those numbers will change. I was responding to someone who said if the election were held today she would lose.

She's obviously not losing is she?

http://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/2016-election-forecast

Capt'n Midnight · 17-09-2016 12:53pm

seamus wrote: »

Trump still believes that Obama wasn't born in America;
...
Hilary is a devious and intelligent liar. Trump is a bare-faced, stupid and compulsive liar.

America has to pick one. I know which one I would rather have in charge.

The definition of an honest politician is once bought they stay bought.

Too many U turns aren't good.

What are the stats on longevity in the US ? For mere mortals women live longer than men. Is this also true for the top 1% who can avail of the sort of medical care denied to the vast majority without bankrupting them ? Trump is older and has a few more heart attack risk factors.

Donald Trump

Comments