2016/17 Premier League Injuries & Suspensions

Iused2likebusts

Hogey007 wrote: »

Why didn't I hear about this yesterday??

Hopefully all ok but unlikely to use tc unless pep gives all clear.


@BenDinnery hi ben any issues with aguero??




in reply to @ossama_kk

Ben Dinnery‏ @BenDinnery
@ossama_kk A little bit of tightness in his hamstring. Pep will update

This could get interesting

km79

Hogey007 wrote: »

Why didn't I hear about this yesterday??

Hopefully all ok but unlikely to use tc unless pep gives all clear.


@BenDinnery hi ben any issues with aguero??



in reply to @ossama_kk

Ben Dinnery‏ @BenDinnery
@ossama_kk A little bit of tightness in his hamstring. Pep will update

I feel sick
NO WAY he plays both games now

Hogey007

Iused2likebusts wrote: »

This could get interesting

Your holding off for news today was certainly the clever move.
So annoyed I went a day early but there was a .3 swing with aguero & sterling rising & Costa dropping. Alli was close to a drop too but didn't effect my resale.
And I had just the exact amount to do sterling to firmino next week.

extra gravy

Waiting for Pep's presser like...

ScummyMan

Hogey007 wrote: »

Why didn't I hear about this yesterday??

Hopefully all ok but unlikely to use tc unless pep gives all clear.


@BenDinnery hi ben any issues with aguero??




in reply to @ossama_kk

Ben Dinnery‏ @BenDinnery
@ossama_kk A little bit of tightness in his hamstring. Pep will update

Hahahahahahakillmehahahahaha

Mike Ehrmantraut

Hogey007 wrote: »

Why didn't I hear about this yesterday??

Hopefully all ok but unlikely to use tc unless pep gives all clear.


@BenDinnery hi ben any issues with aguero??




in reply to @ossama_kk

Ben Dinnery‏ @BenDinnery
@ossama_kk A little bit of tightness in his hamstring. Pep will update

Not sure whether to laugh or cry

tailgunner

This changes nothing. It'll just make the inevitable points haul all the more beautiful.

Missing Links

Never again...until the next time.

CSF

Its not a big deal, just don't treble captain him.

threein99

Wish I'd waited until the press conferences now. I got caught in the moment

extra gravy

https://twitter.com/BenDinnery/status/837641828593774592

@ossama_kk I'm deleting the response as people seem to be reading too much into it. Fully expect Aguero to start

What people? :pac:

GLaDOS

Is there a quadruple captain option?

km79

#thfc Just been handed team news. Kane, Alderweireld & Vertonghen are "progressing well and will be assessed after final training session".

km79

Conte on Hazard: "A little problem for Eden but I think nothing serious. He got a kick in training. Who kicked him? I don’t remember!"

ScummyMan

https://twitter.com/ManCity/status/837666626979917824

km79

Wow thanks for nothing Pep

FHFC

km79 wrote: »

Wow thanks for nothing Pep

He didn't mention anything about an injury. That's good.

That whole thing stinks of Twitter trolling. The only place I saw a quote was on one of those pics stuck under an image of Pep tweets. Which usually equals a made up quote.

Ben Dinnery didn't know anything but gave it some oxygen and it turned into a mini panic.

Lucas Hood

Don't take notice of Dinnerys opinions just use him for finding news on players as hes good at tracking down quotes from managers.

The popularity he's achieved is mind boggling.

PARlance

km79 wrote: »

Conte on Hazard: "A little problem for Eden but I think nothing serious. He got a kick in training. Who kicked him? I don’t remember!"

I had a feeling Hazard was going to have a big GW and this only confirms it... a little worry only makes it sweeter

GLaDOS

Retrospective ban for Ibra likely

km79

GLaDOS wrote: »

Retrospective ban for Ibra likely

Can't be
Linesman seen it

GLaDOS

If they saw a deliberate elbow and didn't even give a yellow that's something else

km79

GLaDOS wrote: »

If they saw a deliberate elbow and didn't even give a yellow that's something else

I guess the fact that Ibra had his back to the linesman it could have looked like a flailing elbow
Which it was not !

Hogey007

Hard to know, ref had a long chat to him. What was he talking about if he didn't see it? As carragher said, looks like he just bottled it.
But may not be able to say he "never seen it"

Mings hasn't a leg to stand on. Much like alli in europa league I think for incidents like that a 10 match ban should be minimum. That's assault, not a bad tackle, to stamp down on someone's head! Despicable!

alchemist33

I think the ref will have to report he didn't see the elbow because seeing it and not calling it would make him out to be completely inept. They'll likely say they didnt have a clear view.

Hogey007

alchemist33 wrote: »

I think the ref will have to report he didn't see the elbow because seeing it and not calling it would make him out to be completely inept. They'll likely say they didnt have a clear view.

He'll have to explain what he spent a good 30 seconds talking to ibra about so.
Either way, I think he may be "relieved of" premier league duties for next round of matches.

Shedite27

Soccer Saturday reckon he'll have a few games ban

Hogey007

Shedite27 wrote: »

Soccer Saturday reckon he'll have a few games ban

I'll be stuck with aguero for a couple of games if that happens.

km79

Patrick van Aanholt could miss up-to three weeks after he was forced off with an injury: "He twisted it. Ankle ligaments." #CPFC

Defence is in rag order now with chambers injured for another month
And brunts fixtures turning soon

extra gravy

Kyle Naughton to be assessed after coming off with a hamstring problem.

CSF

Can't see Ibra surviving it. As has been said by others, the ref ain't gonna be able to say he saw him elbow the lad in the head but take no action. It's a loophole that only really benefits the offender when they get booked for what they did and the situation is seen to have been dealt with.

FHFC

CSF wrote: »

Can't see Ibra surviving it. As has been said by others, the ref ain't gonna be able to say he saw him elbow the lad in the head but take no action. It's a loophole that only really benefits the offender when they get booked for what they did and the situation is seen to have been dealt with.

Certain ban I'd say.

km79

CSF wrote: »

Can't see Ibra surviving it. As has been said by others, the ref ain't gonna be able to say he saw him elbow the lad in the head but take no action. It's a loophole that only really benefits the offender when they get booked for what they did and the situation is seen to have been dealt with.

The linesman saw it
But he saw it from behind so may not have looked as intentional
The linesman called the refs attention to it and the ref then gave ibra a talking to.

So if the officials say they didn't see it but talked to him about it then what ........

CSF

I'm fairly confident the referee's report isn't going to say the linesman informed him that Ibra elbowed him in the head. That would be an awkward conversation indeed.

km79

CSF wrote: »

I'm fairly confident the referee's report isn't going to say the linesman informed him that Ibra elbowed him in the head. That would be an awkward conversation indeed.

The ref pointed to his ear piece when calling ibra over

CSF

km79 wrote: »

CSF wrote: »

I'm fairly confident the referee's report isn't going to say the linesman informed him that Ibra elbowed him in the head. That would be an awkward conversation indeed.

The ref pointed to his ear piece when calling ibra over

That can in theory mean any of a number of things. He isn't going to put on his referee's report that the linesman told him Ibra elbowed your man in the head but he decided not to take any action, even if that is true.

ScummyMan

It looked to me like Ibra and the ref had a long chat, and Zlatan decided that he shouldn't be sent off :P

km79

CSF wrote: »

That can in theory mean any of a number of things. He isn't going to put on his referee's report that the linesman told him Ibra elbowed your man in the head but he decided not to take any action, even if that is true.

He could say that he saw the elbow to head but deemed it accidental
That's the way it works
Seen and dealt with
Even if incorrectly
We will know soon anyway and may sell him either way
He is getting annoying to own

Cartman78

ScummyMan wrote: »

It looked to me like Ibra and the ref had a long chat, and Zlatan decided that he shouldn't be sent off :P

I reckon if that conversation went on another 30 seconds or so, the ref would have ended up sending himself off.

Lucas Hood

Zlatan and Mings charged with violent conduct.

http://www.thefa.com/home/news/2017/mar/06/zlatan-ibrahimovic-tyrone-mings-charged-with-alleged-violent-conduct-060317

Shedite27

Lucas Hood wrote: »

Zlatan and Mings charged with violent conduct.

http://www.thefa.com/home/news/2017/mar/06/zlatan-ibrahimovic-tyrone-mings-charged-with-alleged-violent-conduct-060317

3 game ban to go along with that, though 1 will be the FA Cup this week

km79

No guarantees Butland will play this season: "If we feel there's an opportunity or think 'let's make sure he's right for pre-season' #SCFC


Whoever got grant early got the bargain of the season

km79

Junior Stanislas looks set to miss between “seven and 10 days” with the groin injury which ruled him out at OT on Saturday. #AFCB

Father Hernandez

Any word on Phillips?

Him starting would have me 7 this week.

Would rather not taking a -4

Benimar

Ibra accepts charge. 3 match ban, misses GW29 and 30

callaway92

Father Hernandez wrote: »

Any word on Phillips?

Him starting would have me 7 this week.

Would rather not taking a -4

Doubtful he'll be starting. May come on as a sub.

dr.kenneth noisewater

callaway92 wrote: »

Father Hernandez wrote: »

Any word on Phillips?

Him starting would have me 7 this week.

Would rather not taking a -4

Doubtful he'll be starting. May come on as a sub.

I think theres a good chance he will. Pulis was eager to have him back last GW and they were very poor so there will be changes this week. Think Brunt might be pushed back into defence though

ElTel

Bournemouth intend to challenge the suggestion of an increased suspension for Mings..

http://www.eveningecho.ie/sport/national-sport/zlatan-ibrahimovic-and-tyrone-mings-have-until-6pm-to-respond-to-fa-charges/2643818/

Personally I don't think he meant the stamp.
In a court of law he'd be given the benefit of the doubt.
So is the best Mings can hope for a three game ban?

Hogey007

ElTel wrote: »

Bournemouth intend to challenge the suggestion of an increased suspension for Mings..

http://www.eveningecho.ie/sport/national-sport/zlatan-ibrahimovic-and-tyrone-mings-have-until-6pm-to-respond-to-fa-charges/2643818/

Personally I don't think he meant the stamp.
In a court of law he'd be given the benefit of the doubt.
So is the best Mings can hope for a three game ban?

I have zero doubt he meant it and hope they throw the book at him.
He was well aware there was someone lying there, you can see him stamp rather than try to just land and the real tell tale sign he meant it was his facial expression didn't change. Meaning he knew impact was coming, if you'd "accidentily" stepped on a person's head (especially with football boots on) you'd immediately show concern/shock/surprise. He didn't and I'd love to see him get 8-10 games but suspect it'll be 5 or 6.

ElTel

Hogey007 wrote: »

I have zero doubt he meant it and hope they throw the book at him.
He was well aware there was someone lying there, you can see him stamp rather than try to just land and the real tell tale sign he meant it was his facial expression didn't change. Meaning he knew impact was coming, if you'd "accidentily" stepped on a person's head (especially with football boots on) you'd immediately show concern/shock/surprise. He didn't and I'd love to see him get 8-10 games but suspect it'll be 5 or 6.

Opinions will differ but proving it was intentional is another matter.
Is a deliberate premeditated (given it's revenge for a perceived stamp) elbow any less violent?