Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Cost of building a house

Options
  • 19-07-2016 5:23pm
    #1
    Registered Users Posts: 3,472 ✭✭✭


    Simon Coveney just on radio saying that it currently costs a private developer 300k to build a single house.

    Anyone know how that cost breaks down, and how much is down to government levies, taxes, etc, and how much would be profit?


Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 724 ✭✭✭Askthe EA


    Simon Coveney just on radio saying that it currently costs a private developer 300k to build a single house.

    Anyone know how that cost breaks down, and how much is down to government levies, taxes, etc, and how much would be profit?

    Its a little disingenuous that one. A one off self build might cost that but with economies of scale, i expect its less in larger developments.

    Did he say that was gross or net of land costs?


  • Registered Users Posts: 3,472 ✭✭✭Grolschevik


    Askthe EA wrote:
    Did he say that was gross or net of land costs?


    He didn't go into detail, just threw it out there, and the radio host (George Hook) repeated it a couple of times as fact.

    I'm asking because it seems to be quite inflated to my mind...


  • Registered Users Posts: 21,454 ✭✭✭✭Water John


    George is a bit of a mullet, takes any old bait.
    Heard some one say on radio today that, 40% of a house cost is actually taxes of various sorts, VAT, Income tax etc.

    300K including site would cover a decent house in rural areas.

    If that is his build figure, better off buying on the market, ready to move into, cheaper.


  • Registered Users Posts: 3,472 ✭✭✭Grolschevik


    To clarify, he implied 'per house' rather than saying 'single house'.

    An accurate paraphrasing would be: "It costs a developer 300,000 to build a house".


  • Registered Users Posts: 8,779 ✭✭✭Carawaystick


    I think coveney referred to a house in Dublin costing that much to build


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 402 ✭✭Lockedout2


    http://godfreygrant.ie/2015/04/the-cost-of-building-a-house-in-ireland/

    Here's one version

    Per Unit: Amount:
    Site Cost € 50,000
    Build Cost @ €100 psf, Size Average 1,100 €110,000
    Roads & Infrastructure € 15,000
    Utility Connections € 2,000
    Legal Fees on Acquisition and Disposal, Marketing, Estate Agency Fees. € 6,000
    Architects, Quantity Surveyors, Consultants, Homebond and Stamp Duty. € 2,500
    Part V Contributions € 5,000
    Council Levies € 10,000
    Cost of Finance € 7,500
    Total Costs €208,000
    Sale Price €236,080


  • Registered Users Posts: 724 ✭✭✭Askthe EA


    Lockedout2 wrote: »
    http://godfreygrant.ie/2015/04/the-cost-of-building-a-house-in-ireland/

    Here's one version

    Per Unit: Amount:
    Site Cost € 50,000
    Build Cost @ €100 psf, Size Average 1,100 €110,000
    Roads & Infrastructure € 15,000
    Utility Connections € 2,000
    Legal Fees on Acquisition and Disposal, Marketing, Estate Agency Fees. € 6,000
    Architects, Quantity Surveyors, Consultants, Homebond and Stamp Duty. € 2,500
    Part V Contributions € 5,000
    Council Levies € 10,000
    Cost of Finance € 7,500
    Total Costs €208,000
    Sale Price €236,080

    And that's a dirt cheap site


  • Registered Users Posts: 495 ✭✭bleary


    Surveyors in Ireland released a report in May on this
    https://www.scsi.ie/news/view?id=73
    They estimated 330,000 based on costs incurred in a number of sites in Dublin but that included a margin of 38,000


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 4,691 ✭✭✭4ensic15


    VAT has to be charged on the finished product. Take 13% from €300k and you are left with €251k. Doesn't take much to go off target and its a zero sum game. Get let down by a supplier, have and archeological dig, bad weather, security trouble, market shift as completion nears etc.


  • Registered Users Posts: 4,923 ✭✭✭enricoh


    I read somewhere recently that builders borrowing for say an estate would be lucky to get the dough at 10% p.a off the banks


  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 39,406 Mod ✭✭✭✭Gumbo


    enricoh wrote: »
    I read somewhere recently that builders borrowing for say an estate would be lucky to get the dough at 10% p.a off the banks

    That would be a bargain. The projects I am involved in are getting he funding at 14% for 12 months. If not in and out within the 12 months then they have to go back in and agree a figure going forward.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 4,691 ✭✭✭4ensic15


    Another change from previously is that architects, solicitors and builders providers no longer give as much credit as they used to. One time solicitors wouldn't charge for buying a site and would take a fee as each house was sold. Now money has to be paid upfront. This adds to the cashflow pressures and interest costs.


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,675 ✭✭✭exaisle


    4ensic15 wrote: »
    VAT has to be charged on the finished product. Take 13% from €300k and you are left with €251k. Doesn't take much to go off target and its a zero sum game. Get let down by a supplier, have and archeological dig, bad weather, security trouble, market shift as completion nears etc.

    Firstly, VAT is at 13.5% not 13% and if €300k includes VAT at 13.5%, then the VAT exclusive figure is €264,317......NOT €251k.....but that emphasises your point, I think! :-)


  • Registered Users Posts: 24,249 ✭✭✭✭Sleepy


    bleary wrote: »
    Surveyors in Ireland released a report in May on this
    https://www.scsi.ie/news/view?id=73
    They estimated 330,000 based on costs incurred in a number of sites in Dublin but that included a margin of 38,000
    There's an interesting figure in there of 8k Sales & Marketing costs. That seems rather excessive to me considering we're in a seller's market where housing is concerned.

    Call me a cynic but I'm guessing a lot of that 8k is finding it's way into the pockets of the developers' wives, sons and daughters...

    With the hard costs of construction coming to 150k, the government already possessing land banks (or able to acquire them cheaply through NAMA) and having much lower costs of finance (if it's required) it would seem like the Public Sector should be able to churn out large numbers of units much more easily than the private...


  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 39,406 Mod ✭✭✭✭Gumbo


    Sleepy wrote: »
    There's an interesting figure in there of 8k Sales & Marketing costs. That seems rather excessive to me considering we're in a seller's market where housing is concerned.

    Call me a cynic but I'm guessing a lot of that 8k is finding it's way into the pockets of the developers' wives, sons and daughters...

    With the hard costs of construction coming to 150k, the government already possessing land banks (or able to acquire them cheaply through NAMA) and having much lower costs of finance (if it's required) it would seem like the Public Sector should be able to churn out large numbers of units much more easily than the private...

    I think the reason the LA's are not building is to keep the money off the international balance sheet. I heard that by providing the funding to the housing agencies then the debt becomes internal and off the international sheets.

    I may be over simplifying but it's that understanding that we have been told internally.


  • Registered Users Posts: 724 ✭✭✭Askthe EA


    Sleepy wrote: »
    There's an interesting figure in there of 8k Sales & Marketing costs. That seems rather excessive to me considering we're in a seller's market where housing is concerned.

    Call me a cynic but I'm guessing a lot of that 8k is finding it's way into the pockets of the developers' wives, sons and daughters...

    ...

    You think?;

    A One page ad in a national paper costs thousands of euros.

    http://www.irishtimes.com/about-us/advertise/rate-card

    Signage is a couple of hundred

    Daft is a couple of hundred.


  • Registered Users Posts: 24,249 ✭✭✭✭Sleepy


    Yep. Taking out even a single one page ad for a property development would seem excessive to me and in the modern era, I'd question the value in print media advertising anyway. We're in a market where prospective house-buyers are hunting for properties. Signage at the site's entrance (or just down the road etc.) may cost a grand or so, a few hundred quid to keep the ads on Daft and MyHome until all units are sold. Even adding printing costs of brochures etc. and a salary for a sales person and I'd wager you could sell every unit in a 100 unit development for less than 80k.

    Even scaling back to a 50 unit development that would be €1600 per unit. Obviously, there are large economies of scale in that the only real cost difference in selling 10 units or 100 units are the numbers of brochures to be printed and the time in handling each individual sale (solicitors, sales reps etc).

    What I imagine is actually happening here is developers wives/kids are getting 6 figure salaries, or close to it, to act as sales reps in a market with huge under-supply and they're over-spending on advertising and "glamourous" launches etc. Either that or the developers have no real sense of cost control and are allowing estate agents to take percentages of sales prices for very little actual work. That's not a dig at you or your profession: a new build estate that's been built to any acceptable standard will sell itself in this market. It's like selling life rafts to drowning men.


  • Registered Users Posts: 8,184 ✭✭✭riclad


    Theres an article in the news 2 weeks ago,
    it says developer is selling new apartments ,houses for 140-199 k
    .
    The cost of a house depends on cost of site , vat, various taxes,council fees .
    those houses are designed as social housing ,
    he probably got the sites for zero cost.
    http://www.irishtimes.com/news/social-affairs/housing-co-op-offers-four-bed-homes-below-200-000-1.2675882
    say take away maybe 20 per cent off the sale price .
    to give the cost price.
    i reckon it costs around 100k per house ,if the site cost is zero.

    I think for a private builder it costs around 150k to build 1 apartment ,
    including site cost .
    maybe co ops, charitys have to pay less tax to build social housing .

    Wtf an income of 79k is considered ok, for social housing ?
    That covers most working people in ireland.


Advertisement