Waggle your 'Joystick' - Post your 3Dmark Scores here

EoinHef

wotzgoingon wrote: »

Here is my score with my new 6900 XT. I haven't figured out how to overclock using MPT yet, as it keeps crashing. I had it down to a T on my old 5700 XT and was in the top 10 in the world at one stage. This score is using stock settings but basic overclocking within spec. I have a refence model and had with my 5700 XT and replaced the thermal pad with paste on that. I'm pretty sure they are using a thermal pad on these too but it cost a lot and I'm not willing to open it up just to get better scores.

Overall Score: 17837

Graphics Score: 19722

CPU Score: 11571

https://www.3dmark.com/spy/19180203

Fair play,you have optimised the **** out of that:P


Very nice CPU score,especialy with a 3XXX ryzren,ive been tempted to push mine a bit more but the older i get the more i want to optimise for noise levels but once the GPU is in check temps are usually ok for CPU,i reckon 1.35v may be good for 5Ghz or even 5.1 for my 9700K.



I might trying going the other way with the 3080,seeing what voltage it takes to run 2000Mhz say,but ultimately ill run a much cooler profile 24/7 but maybe for a bench

wotzgoingon

EoinHef wrote: »

Fair play,you have optimised the **** out of that:P


Very nice CPU score,especialy with a 3XXX ryzren,ive been tempted to push mine a bit more but the older i get the more i want to optimise for noise levels but once the GPU is in check temps are usually ok for CPU,i reckon 1.35v may be good for 5Ghz or even 5.1 for my 9700K.



I might trying going the other way with the 3080,seeing what voltage it takes to run 2000Mhz say,but ultimately ill run a much cooler profile 24/7 but maybe for a bench

That CPU clock and score is just for benchmarks and wouldn't be stable enough to use day to day. The thermal pad on the GPU would be lowering my scores also and I do not know why AMD keep using them these days since the first Navi was launched as we all know paste is better but doesn't last as long as a thermal pad.

EoinHef

wotzgoingon wrote: »

That CPU clock and score is just for benchmarks and wouldn't be stable enough to use day to day. The thermal pad on the GPU would be lowering my scores also and I do not know why AMD keep using them these days since the first Navi was launched as we all know paste is better but doesn't last as long as a thermal pad.

Still,thats a nice score even for a bench for that cpu in my book.

Not massively impressed by the 3080 FE tbh,its good but what they were thinking with the stock profile i don't know. Just a tad undervolting and locking the max boost and it changes totally how the cards performs ie real quiet while performing even better,may be the silicon lottery and based on my chip but basically i can't see a down side and I've a lot of potential tuning to do

Maybe a few hundred extra in time spy,if I was to guess maybe an extra 500points max but who know.

Lockdown means I ain't got much else to do:P

Squidgy Black

https://www.3dmark.com/3dm/59836816

14 035 - Overall
17 515 - GPU Score - 3080 FE with a slight undervolt
6 602 - CPU Score - Ryzen 5 3600 running bone stock

CPU is killing me but I've been holding off on upgrading until the next gen, as there's not much point in upgrading to a 5800x or the likes with this lacklustre b450m-a board, as the VRM cooling is woeful, hence why I'm running stock speeds atm.

wotzgoingon

I got a new score earlier on in the evening.

Overall: 18692

GPU Score: 20950

CPU Score: 11605

https://www.3dmark.com/spy/19218747

Nonoperational

https://www.3dmark.com/spy/18843397

My PCS 3070 5800x prebuilt. Nice computer despite being prebuilt. Will do until the next cycle of CPU/GPU at least when I can build my own.

Overall 14145
GPU 14647
CPU 11848

MidlanderMan

do you guys pay for 3dMark?

Confused11811

MidlanderMan wrote: »

do you guys pay for 3dMark?

There is a demo version free on steam. The Timespy benchmark is all you can run on it.

wotzgoingon

MidlanderMan wrote: »

do you guys pay for 3dMark?

Yea I bought it years ago. Totally worth it.


edit: Just thinking more about this. I bought it on sale one time.

wotzgoingon

Confused11811 wrote: »

There is a demo version free on steam. The Timespy benchmark is all you can run on it.

And the worst part about that is you have to watch a demo before you run the benchmark heating up the GPU so you most likely will get a lower score.

Confused11811

wotzgoingon wrote: »

And the worst part about that is you have to watch a demo before you run the benchmark heating up the GPU so you most likely will get a lower score.

On the retail version can you choose to preform specific benchmarking ie. just testing the CPU or just the GPU ?

MidlanderMan

In DX11 Firestrike demo version:

Overall
35379

Graphics score
54 632

Physics score
23 816

Combined score
12 138


Max temo 91 junction on GPU, 67 on CPU

Max Freq 5997.1 mhz on cpu, 2958.53 on GPU.


The max freqs look way off though.

EoinHef

I got 3dmark for about €2.50 on one of the key sites.

MidlanderMan

DX 12 Time Spy

Overall
15 357

Graphics score
18 047

CPU score
8 326

CPU basically flatlined at 4.64hgz and the GPU maxed at 2500mhz and temps at 74c on the GPU and 60c on the CPU.

I'm running all stock because im lazy with 1 click OC on the GPU, SAM enabled, and PBO2 and auto OC Enabled.



5600x and 6900Xt for reference.

wotzgoingon

MidlanderMan wrote: »

DX 12 Time Spy

Overall
15 357

Graphics score
18 047

CPU score
8 326

CPU basically flatlined at 4.64hgz and the GPU maxed at 2500mhz and temps at 74c on the GPU and 60c on the CPU.

I'm running all stock because im lazy with 1 click OC on the GPU, SAM enabled, and PBO2 and auto OC Enabled.



5600x and 6900Xt for reference.

A link would be nice.

MidlanderMan

wotzgoingon wrote: »

A link would be nice.

Keep getting invalid score errors when I run. Maybe because it's the demo?

Nonoperational

MidlanderMan wrote: »

DX 12 Time Spy

Overall
15 357

Graphics score
18 047

CPU score
8 326

CPU basically flatlined at 4.64hgz and the GPU maxed at 2500mhz and temps at 74c on the GPU and 60c on the CPU.

I'm running all stock because im lazy with 1 click OC on the GPU, SAM enabled, and PBO2 and auto OC Enabled.



5600x and 6900Xt for reference.

I ended up getting better scores when I turned off all OC apart from PBO. Boost to 4.8-4.9 now. Auto OC actually disimproved things because it tried to do an allcore OC

K.O.Kiki

MidlanderMan wrote: »

Keep getting invalid score errors when I run. Maybe because it's the demo?

Either you're stopping the run by hitting ESC / Alt-tabbing, or it's crashing.

MidlanderMan

K.O.Kiki wrote: »

Either you're stopping the run by hitting ESC / Alt-tabbing, or it's crashing.

No, the run is completing. I'm just getting werid errors.

I've tried deleting future mark from windows and verifying local fieles on steam but it makes no difference.

Confused11811

So last night I ended up buying the retail version of 3D-Mark on a well know "Key" site for €3.59. Totally worth it :pac:

I think I've maxed out my 1080 TI and ryzen 3700X (with stock cooler) on my current setup using just windows software overclock.

https://www.3dmark.com/spy/19247899

MidlanderMan

Confused11811 wrote: »

So last night I ended up buying the retail version of 3D-Mark on a well know "Key" site for €3.59. Totally worth it :pac:

I think I've maxed out my 1080 TI and ryzen 3700X (with stock cooler) on my current setup using just windows software overclock.

https://www.3dmark.com/spy/19247899

DM me a link plz

MidlanderMan

My first valid score, apparently it was tessilation settings in AMD drivers causing the issue.

http://www.3dmark.com/spy/19263297

EoinHef

Negative LOD Bias is the setting in the nvidia control panel global settings. Set to allow or you will get invalid results. Just incase Nvidia owners have a similar issue.

wotzgoingon

wotzgoingon wrote: »

I got a new score earlier on in the evening.

Overall: 18692

GPU Score: 20950

CPU Score: 11605

https://www.3dmark.com/spy/19218747

In an around this score is all I will be able to get with this 6900 XT since I have a reference model. The two 8 pin connections are the limiting factor. Perfect for stock but to get the top of benchmarks you would need an aftermarket model with at least three 8 pin connections.

Giblet

Happy out with a 3080 FE with stock cooling. Any higher and I couldn't get a result.

https://www.3dmark.com/3dm/59967460

I'm re-doing the thermal pads soon, will see if there is much difference.

wotzgoingon

wotzgoingon wrote: »

In an around this score is all I will be able to get with this 6900 XT since I have a reference model. The two 8 pin connections are the limiting factor. Perfect for stock but to get the top of benchmarks you would need an aftermarket model with at least three 8 pin connections.

Managed to break the 21,000 graphics score barrier.

Overall: 18765

GPU Score: 21013

CPU Score: 11683

https://www.3dmark.com/spy/19291007

wotzgoingon

New Score but CPU score is down for some reason. Not sure why.

https://www.3dmark.com/spy/19313822


This score has a small bit higher graphics score but CPU was well down.

https://www.3dmark.com/spy/19312841

Giblet

CPU overclock sucks, blue screens above 42.5 multiplier even @ 30c.

Top 2% GPU score for a 3080FE on air, not bad!
https://www.3dmark.com/3dm/60429005

Luck100

Tweaked to the hairy edge of stability and all fans blazing...gets me to the top 13% of 3080Ti scores. Captain, I need more power! 350W is not enough!!!

http://www.3dmark.com/spy/21981899

Confused11811

I managed to upgrade both of my rigs to RX6800XT's, which surprisingly are running fine so far on 600 watt power supplies, one is gold rated the other bronze. I stress tested both rigs and they are stable but I'll probably upgrade the bronze PSU on the main rig as there is a coil whine coming from it (definitely from the PSU).

I run without any overclocks, with just 600 watts I won't try as I'm probably very close to the edge of the PSU abilities.

Main Rig Results

Here with new RX6800XT - AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT video card benchmark result - AMD Ryzen 7 3700X,ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. PRIME B450M-A II (3dmark.com)

With the old RX6800 - AMD Radeon RX 6800 video card benchmark result - AMD Ryzen 7 3700X,ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. PRIME B450M-A II (3dmark.com)

Secondary Rig

Here with new RX6800XT - AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT video card benchmark result - AMD Ryzen 5 3600,Gigabyte Technology Co., Ltd. B450 I AORUS PRO WIFI-CF (3dmark.com)

With the old RX6700XT - AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT video card benchmark result - AMD Ryzen 5 3600,Gigabyte Technology Co., Ltd. B450 I AORUS PRO WIFI-CF (3dmark.com)

The graphical score on the secondary rig is much better than the main rig 18248 v 17659. I'm not sure why and I'm not too concerned but any feedback would be welcome.