Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi all! We have been experiencing an issue on site where threads have been missing the latest postings. The platform host Vanilla are working on this issue. A workaround that has been used by some is to navigate back a page or two to re-sync the thread and this will then show latest posts. Thanks, Mike.

Small Claims Court or not?

  • 29-07-2016 5:00pm
    #1
    Registered Users Posts: 684 ✭✭✭


    Anyone know if you can claim for damages through the SCC if a workman damages your property while carrying out work and won't fix it?

    It would be great to hear from anyone who's been through it? Even if they got nothing?


«1

Comments

  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 38 The Codemaster


    Never happened to me, but surely SCC makes sense. The worker should have had insurance. Are they ignoring your calls?


  • Registered Users Posts: 684 ✭✭✭Benedict


    Ignoring everything, yes.

    The thing is, if you go to a solicitor, you're into serious outlay straight away.

    The SCC sounds good - but it would be very interesting to hear from someone who's been through it.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 38 The Codemaster


    Benedict wrote: »
    Ignoring everything, yes.

    The thing is, if you go to a solicitor, you're into serious outlay straight away.

    The SCC sounds good - but it would be very interesting to hear from someone who's been through it.

    Don't bother with a solicitor - just fill in a SCC form & file it. No point messing around or threatening it to him - these guys will have heard it all before. Just cut to the chase & file the form.

    No need for experience having done it before - the process will draw to its own natural conclusion. Each case is different. He may cave immediately, or may see it through. Either way it's a small outlay for you. Keep good records - screenshots of unanswered & call logs. Photos of damage, etc.

    Good luck.


  • Registered Users Posts: 684 ✭✭✭Benedict


    Only thing is, it might be like "Judge Judy". If you lose, that's it. No appeal!


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 38 The Codemaster


    Benedict wrote: »
    Only thing is, it might be like "Judge Judy". If you lose, that's it. No appeal!

    You shouldn't lose if you have a proper case with photos of the damage. Any proof he caused it? Him ignoring you constantly could be construed as guilt but they may need something more.

    Anyway - just pay to fix it yourself if you lose. Not much choice. There aren't any other options available to you without large legal bills.

    What's the damage and estimated cost of repair?


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 684 ✭✭✭Benedict


    I'm just wondering is there any Blog-site specifically dedicated to upset customers in Ireland? Dublin particularly? I reckon that if I'd known in advance about the bunch I'm dealing with, I wouldn't have touched them with a barge-pole?

    I don't mean slandering anyone or anything malicious - but something like Trip-Advisor is for travellers?

    The crowd I dealt with in Dublin were all suits and smiles until the money was handed over - then things changed.

    I just think that consumers who have a genuine grievance (not malicious) should have a proper forum.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 13,420 ✭✭✭✭athtrasna


    Benedict wrote: »
    I'm just wondering is there any Blog-site specifically dedicated to upset customers in Ireland? Dublin particularly? I reckon that if I'd known in advance about the bunch I'm dealing with, I wouldn't have touched them with a barge-pole?

    I don't mean slandering anyone or anything malicious - but something like Trip-Advisor is for travellers?

    The crowd I dealt with in Dublin were all suits and smiles until the money was handed over - then things changed.

    I just think that consumers who have a genuine grievance (not malicious) should have a proper forum.

    No, would be a legal nightmare and bankrupt the site owner fairly quickly. Same reason you can't name companies on here.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 21,730 ✭✭✭✭Fred Swanson


    This post has been deleted.


  • Registered Users Posts: 684 ✭✭✭Benedict


    Fred is right about being able to appeal the SCC to higher court. But then you are into legal eagles and how much might that cost?

    Ordinary people are terrified of running up legal costs when there is no guarantee of winning and unscrupulous retailers know this. So they will say "Take me to court" knowing that even if you are in the right, you will not dare go near a court in case you lose.

    And how come sites like Tripadvisor can publish comments like "the food was terrible" or "the beds were uncomfortable"? Why can we not say "I had a terrible time with such-and-such a retailer?

    Once it is not malicious it should be allowed.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 6,926 ✭✭✭davo10


    Benedict wrote: »
    Fred is right about being able to appeal the SCC to higher court. But then you are into legal eagles and how much might that cost?

    Ordinary people are terrified of running up legal costs when there is no guarantee of winning and unscrupulous retailers know this. So they will say "Take me to court" knowing that even if you are in the right, you will not dare go near a court in case you lose.

    And how come sites like Tripadvisor can publish comments like "the food was terrible" or "the beds were uncomfortable"? Why can we not say "I had a terrible time with such-and-such a retailer?

    Once it is not malicious it should be allowed.

    Google "rate my solicitor" to see why rating websites are not allowed.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,224 ✭✭✭marklazarcovic


    I've been through the scc,won because he didn't have a leg to stand on... He challenged,hired a barrister,got his ass handed to him by the judge a 2 and time...

    Guess what,ive still not been paid. I have to chase him for it..

    He spent as much on a barrister as the award to me was to begin with.


  • Registered Users Posts: 684 ✭✭✭Benedict


    It would be fascinating, Marklazarcovic, if you could elaborate a bit on what actually happened in the court. Did the barrister give you a tough time? These guys are able to rattle a witness so he doesn't know his own name. They are playing at home and you are playing an away game. The odds are stacked against the person who is new to the court system.

    Was it like Judge Judy?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 32,688 ✭✭✭✭ytpe2r5bxkn0c1


    Benedict wrote: »
    It would be fascinating, Marklazarcovic, if you could elaborate a bit on what actually happened in the court. Did the barrister give you a tough time? These guys are able to rattle a witness so he doesn't know his own name. They are playing at home and you are playing an away game. The odds are stacked against the person who is new to the court system.

    Was it like Judge Judy?

    This is SCC not a chance of a barrister hassling you. And it's not like Judge Judy

    Many cases don't even see a court room.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,224 ✭✭✭marklazarcovic


    she challenged my version of events by claiming what her client had said was true,but the facts were blatantly obvious, yer man fcuked up and wasnt man enough to admit it and rectify his mistake. instead he tried to charge me for it. in the end he destroyed my property to dispose of the evidence,didnt work. bit of a farce as the only ones who get paid are the legal side.


  • Registered Users Posts: 684 ✭✭✭Benedict


    How long did the case take? Was there a big crowd watching? I believe it is open to the public.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 21,730 ✭✭✭✭Fred Swanson


    This post has been deleted.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,344 ✭✭✭NUTLEY BOY


    Here is a link to Citizens Information about the Small Claims Court. It is a good summary of what is involved.

    http://www.citizensinformation.ie/en/justice/courts_system/small_claims_court.html


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,224 ✭✭✭marklazarcovic


    yes ,open court,packed,took ten mins once started, was a few funny cases before mine,appeal was in closed court,took less then 10 mins


  • Registered Users Posts: 684 ✭✭✭Benedict


    What about being asked questions? Can loads of people get up and question you? Or is is just the judge and a solicitor for the opposite side?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 21,730 ✭✭✭✭Fred Swanson


    This post has been deleted.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 684 ✭✭✭Benedict


    Apparently you cannot claim more than 2k. And you have to pay E25 - so I imagine that the claims would be maybe from a few hundred Euro upward? It would hardly be worth going to the SCC for, say, less than 100 because after the 25, it would leave you with 75 and if you had to take a day off work to attend? Then you'd have parking, photo copies etc. So would it be worth it at all if you had a really small claim?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 21,730 ✭✭✭✭Fred Swanson


    This post has been deleted.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 32,688 ✭✭✭✭ytpe2r5bxkn0c1


    This post has been deleted.

    Not according to the guidelines.
    If your claim is accepted as suitable for the Small Claims Court the fee is not refunded, even if your claim is successful.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 21,730 ✭✭✭✭Fred Swanson


    This post has been deleted.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 32,688 ✭✭✭✭ytpe2r5bxkn0c1


    This post has been deleted.

    You can't because it isn't allowed and you have to show the costs involved in the claim.

    But the point is you cannot, as you maintained, claim the fee back if you win.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 21,730 ✭✭✭✭Fred Swanson


    This post has been deleted.


  • Registered Users Posts: 684 ✭✭✭Benedict


    Assuming it is damaged property you're claiming for, can you get it fixed and then look for the the money retrospectively? Obviously you would have to have a receipt for what you got done.

    And could the person you are suing argue "Ah, you only got one quote - I would have got that done cheaper if you'd told me".

    The website info is very vague - they don't say you've got to get different quotes. But they don't say you don't have to either.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 21,730 ✭✭✭✭Fred Swanson


    This post has been deleted.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,523 ✭✭✭the_pen_turner


    You can't because it isn't allowed and you have to show the costs involved in the claim.

    But the point is you cannot, as you maintained, claim the fee back if you win.

    if you did a job for a customer and they wouldn't pay. if you had it in your Ts and Cs that all time and expenses required to collect the money due would be added to the invoice

    say I did a job for 500 plus vat. customer is given invoice but hasn't paid. 14 days are up (in Ts andCs) , so I update invoice for the cost of time and registered post by 25 euro .
    now the invoice is 525 plus vat. payment in 7 days

    this goes on for a month until the invoice is now 600 plus vat.

    now I go scc and add 25 to the invoice for the scc plus 25 cost associated to the scc.
    the invoice is at least 650 plus vat


    this is the invoice amount I would be putting on the SCC claim.
    after that I would be expecting my time and costs to be paid for the lost time


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 32,688 ✭✭✭✭ytpe2r5bxkn0c1


    if you did a job for a customer and they wouldn't pay. if you had it in your Ts and Cs that all time and expenses required to collect the money due would be added to the invoice

    say I did a job for 500 plus vat. customer is given invoice but hasn't paid. 14 days are up (in Ts andCs) , so I update invoice for the cost of time and registered post by 25 euro .
    now the invoice is 525 plus vat. payment in 7 days

    this goes on for a month until the invoice is now 600 plus vat.

    now I go scc and add 25 to the invoice for the scc plus 25 cost associated to the scc.
    the invoice is at least 650 plus vat


    this is the invoice amount I would be putting on the SCC claim.
    after that I would be expecting my time and costs to be paid for the lost time

    SCC, for an Individual, does not allow for pricing your time. But look, if you have to ever go to SCC give it a try and tell us how it went. We can have 'what ifs' and 'say...' until the cows come home but why?


Advertisement