Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

M11/N11 - M50 (J4) to Coyne's Cross (J14) [options published]

Options
1246741

Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 7,322 ✭✭✭prunudo


    Reuben1210 wrote: »
    Does Phase 1 entailparallel access roads all the way from J6 to J8, or just segregated slip ways for teh garages and onto the bridge at J8?

    Afaik initially it will be only to segregate the businesses and garage from mainline traffic.
    Im still unsure though how they have the space without needing additional land. Even at present if a large truck is exiting it needs to swing into the lanes of traffic to make the turn.


  • Registered Users Posts: 7,322 ✭✭✭prunudo


    D.L.R. wrote: »
    Does this mean there'll be a 3 lane M11, a 3 lane M50 to Sandyford and a 2 lane M50 section in between? If so that's pretty idiotic.

    I wonder were there any conditions of the planning for the new cherrywood development to allow for upgrade of the remaining m50 to 3 lanes.


  • Registered Users Posts: 21,455 ✭✭✭✭Alun


    jvan wrote: »
    Afaik initially it will be only to segregate the businesses and garage from mainline traffic.
    Im still unsure though how they have the space without needing additional land. Even at present if a large truck is exiting it needs to swing into the lanes of traffic to make the turn.
    I agree, I can't see how they're going to squeeze it in either. I've been looking for some detailed drawings online but can't find anything.


  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 5,022 Mod ✭✭✭✭spacetweek


    I wonder how much of the N11 they will be able to redeclare as motorway when this is done. I reckon probably only J11 (Kilpeddar) to J14 (Coyne's Cross). North of that you have to make way too many compromises on alignment and slip lane length.


  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 5,022 Mod ✭✭✭✭spacetweek


    D.L.R. wrote: »
    Does this mean there'll be a 3 lane M11, a 3 lane M50 to Sandyford and a 2 lane M50 section in between? If so that's pretty idiotic.

    What 2 lane M50 section do you mean?


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 7,322 ✭✭✭prunudo


    spacetweek wrote: »
    I wonder how much of the N11 they will be able to redeclare as motorway when this is done. I reckon probably only J11 (Kilpeddar) to J14 (Coyne's Cross). North of that you have to make way too many compromises on alignment and slip lane length.

    Its a hard one to know, could be issues with the bus stops in Kilpedder and at Coynes cross too.

    Regarding the 2 lane m50, i presume they are talking about the section from Loughlinstown to Sandyford.


  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 5,022 Mod ✭✭✭✭spacetweek


    jvan wrote: »
    Its a hard one to know, could be issues with the bus stops in Kilpedder and at Coynes cross too.

    Regarding the 2 lane m50, i presume they are talking about the section from Loughlinstown to Sandyford.
    I reckon they move the bus stops and bus route onto the old road. More convenient for residents.
    I thought the M50 from Bray-Sandyford was getting widened along with the Bray bypass widening. That was the plan at one stage anyway. Maybe not anymore. That section isn't used anywhere near as much as the rest of the M50 except at rush hour.


  • Registered Users Posts: 7,322 ✭✭✭prunudo


    Problem is there is no old road or alternate route southbound for the 133 to go. If they make it motorway and close the stops its only encouraging more people to use private car and abandon the bus service.
    In an ideal world it be great to have it motorway but there also needs to be thought given to public transport solutions.


  • Moderators, Entertainment Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 14,391 Mod ✭✭✭✭marno21


    Reuben1210 wrote: »
    Does Phase 1 entailparallel access roads all the way from J6 to J8, or just segregated slip ways for teh garages and onto the bridge at J8?

    No, Phase 1 is just an upgrade at Kilmacanogue. The rest is in Phase 2 which will be more costly. Phase 2-4 are being appraised for potential inclusion in the National Development Plan.
    D.L.R. wrote: »
    Does this mean there'll be a 3 lane M11, a 3 lane M50 to Sandyford and a 2 lane M50 section in between? If so that's pretty idiotic.

    Yes. At the M50/M11 merge you basically have 4 lanes merging together as the 2 lane M11 merges with the 2 lane M50. This is more of an issue and the primary issue up for solution at the minute.

    The work being proposed is a result of the M11/N11 Needs Study which is effectively a policy document now. The M50 was outside the scope of this document.


  • Registered Users Posts: 567 ✭✭✭annfield1978


    Who has been appointed Marno do do Phase 1?

    marno21 wrote: »
    Upgrade of the N11/M11 is being implemented as per the N11/M11 Corridor Needs Study published in 2017:

    1. Construction of one way parallel access roads north of J8 Kilmacanogue. No land acquistion required and sorts out issue of direct access in the short term
    2. Widening the M11 between J4 and J6 using land in median, and upgrading J6 with increased roundabout capacity and realigned slip roads.
    3. Upgrade of the N11 from J6 to J8 to 3 lanes in either direction, service roads between J6 and J7, inclusive of the closure of J6a, a major upgrade of J7 and several link roads for increased network resilience.
    4. Upgrade of the N11 between J8 and J14 including dealing with direct accesses where possible.

    Phase 1 has been approved for implementation as a safety scheme in the short term. Phases 2-4 are being appraised as a large scheme for potential inclusion in the National Development Plan 2018-2027.


  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Entertainment Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 14,391 Mod ✭✭✭✭marno21


    Who has been appointed Marno do do Phase 1?
    Was a tender issued at all? Can't find one after looking there.

    Kildare RDO were to appoint consultants for the initial stages before Christmas but I haven't heard anything since.


  • Registered Users Posts: 7,322 ✭✭✭prunudo


    marno21 wrote: »
    Was a tender issued at all? Can't find one after looking there.

    Kildare RDO were to appoint consultants for the initial stages before Christmas but I haven't heard anything since.

    What is RDO? How come it would be Kildare and not Wicklow?


  • Registered Users Posts: 8,779 ✭✭✭Carawaystick


    Alun wrote: »
    I agree, I can't see how they're going to squeeze it in either. I've been looking for some detailed drawings online but can't find anything.

    I saw a drawing showing the exit from the petrol station being to the left of the shop building onto a new (CPO'ed) lane to here


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,341 ✭✭✭D Trent


    jvan wrote: »
    What is RDO? How come it would be Kildare and not Wicklow?

    Roads Design Office I would imagine ....


  • Registered Users Posts: 68,573 ✭✭✭✭L1011


    Only a subset of counties have an RDO. Kildare have designed schemes well outside county boundaries before and seem to specialise in motorways - the county has no single carriageway national primaries left which does give some justification there.


  • Moderators, Entertainment Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 14,391 Mod ✭✭✭✭marno21


    Kildare RDO (Roads Design Office - for national road designs) are also in charge of the big ticket N81 scheme so seem to be taking care of Wicklow's upgrades.


  • Registered Users Posts: 14,889 ✭✭✭✭loyatemu


    I saw a drawing showing the exit from the petrol station being to the left of the shop building onto a new (CPO'ed) lane to here

    it makes sense to send traffic back to the N11 via the J8 roundabout, but there's a lot of buildings, gardens etc in between.


  • Registered Users Posts: 7,322 ✭✭✭prunudo


    loyatemu wrote: »
    it makes sense to send traffic back to the N11 via the J8 roundabout, but there's a lot of buildings, gardens etc in between.

    Very true, as it is, if the traffic is heavy I'd often go up to roundabout and join the far side of bridge.


  • Registered Users Posts: 7,322 ✭✭✭prunudo




  • Registered Users Posts: 2,579 ✭✭✭Thud




  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 5,886 ✭✭✭Chris_5339762


    A significant factor in contributing to traffic jams on this route near the Bray North exit is the 'shock wave' affect of the sudden speed drop from 120kph to 60kph just after Bray South.

    There is so much wrong with that.

    a) its not true. What causes most of the problems is the capacity south of Bray north, the disimprovement of the alignment and the weaving section.
    b) It reduces from 100kph to 60kph just after Bray South.


  • Registered Users Posts: 21,455 ✭✭✭✭Alun


    It'll be interesting to see the detailed drawings when they're made public. Personally I can't see how they're going to squeeze an extra lane plus potentially a cycle track as well into the space available.


  • Registered Users Posts: 975 ✭✭✭decky1


    has anyone taken time to let those guy+girls that were up in the trees know about this, they may have to get back there on the double. there may be trees involved in this.


  • Registered Users Posts: 6,833 ✭✭✭Pete_Cavan


    I'm assuming that the new lane will be built east of the existing petrol stations and businesses, would this be correct?


  • Registered Users Posts: 7,322 ✭✭✭prunudo


    Pete_Cavan wrote: »
    I'm assuming that the new lane will be built east of the existing petrol stations and businesses, would this be correct?
    I don't think so, my understanding is that it will be similar set up to out bound on the n4 near Lucan.

    There were plans at one stage for a road running parallel to n11 joining the woodies roundabout to the copeswood aviary roundabout but it met opposition from locals.


  • Registered Users Posts: 28,403 ✭✭✭✭vicwatson


    There is so much wrong with that.

    a) its not true. What causes most of the problems is the capacity south of Bray north, the disimprovement of the alignment and the weaving section.
    b) It reduces from 100kph to 60kph just after Bray South.

    Also a problem is the merging, people on the M11 cake it when others force merge, break hard, next car has to, and so on, ultimately sometimes bringing traffic to a standstill further up the M50


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,579 ✭✭✭Thud


    Any update on this?


  • Moderators, Entertainment Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 14,391 Mod ✭✭✭✭marno21


    Consultants to be appointed for Phases 1-4 (feasibility, option selection, design and statutory process) with tender for that to be released shortly


  • Registered Users Posts: 375 ✭✭Reuben1210


    marno21 wrote: »
    Consultants to be appointed for Phases 1-4 (feasibility, option selection, design and statutory process) with tender for that to be released shortly

    At the end of phase 4, does that mean a route design would be released publicly, or that only happens later after detailed route selection/design? Is there a rough timeline for these phases?:)


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 5,886 ✭✭✭Chris_5339762


    I've heard rumours that this scheme will go all the way to Coynes Cross, ie: completely close the N11 gap. Is that true?


Advertisement