Chelsea v Manchester United 23/10/16 k/o 16.00 SS1

YouTookMyName

£90m for some haircuts, shít dancing, and one performance every 8 games. Bargain.

mansize

Christ that Top 5 is tighter than Wenger's wallet!

superfurry1

United really bent over and accepted that with a smile that was a very shameful performance.

BMMachine

M!Ck^ wrote: »

Continue this courageous fight for justice

Meh, your old reliable aren't getting it right no matter how much they spend. It's funny watching the glory hunting Irish Man Utd fan section panicking and performing mental gymnastics as they don't know what to do with all that spite they normally unleash on other clubs.

Oh but maybe if you buy 4 more players for 150 million it might work.

superfurry1

Wenger has no wallet fanny pack

fyfe79

mansize wrote: »

Christ that Top 5 is tighter than Wenger's wallet!

Only 2 goals between the top 5.

Crackle

Fantastic performance from Chelsea. The new formation and setup is working very well so far. There's a proper balance to the side now and it's refreshing to see an actual left footed player on the left side and no Ivanovic on the right. It'll be interesting to see how it works long term as other sides adapt and attempt to counter it.

As good as Chelsea were, United were equally bad. Some of the defending and individual performances were bordering on being disgraceful.

GreNoLi

I have no idea what I'm doing.png

BorneTobyWilde

I think Jose said something about '' foul on my players'' I think .
Could be the Luis tackle he's on about .

TitianGerm

M!Ck^ wrote: »

Not sure why what I posted is so hard to understand, I have explained multiple times. Please read back

I did read it. The OP said he had one good game and you said he had two?

I'm just saying if the fee was lower people would probably be fine with his performances so far. When people know he was 90m they expect more.

Lukker-

Muahahaha wrote: »

Heaviest away defeat for ManU in 17 years, anyone know what team held that record?

Think it was vs Chelsea in 99. 5-0

BMMachine

BMMachine wrote: »

Meh, your old reliable aren't getting it right no matter how much they spend. It's funny watching the glory hunting Irish Man Utd fan section panicking and performing mental gymnastics as they don't know what to do with all that spite they normally unleash on other clubs.

Oh but maybe if you buy 4 more players for 150 million it might work.

Cool story bro
Please continue

ERG89

RoboKlopp wrote: »

I wonder what excuses will be rolled out by Mourinho.

Beaten by a better team fair and square

United had more possession today. Moral victory goes to Jose.

Muahahaha wrote: »

Heaviest away defeat for ManU in 17 years, anyone know what team held that record?

Newcastle? Oh 17 years....dunno

emmetkenny

emmetkenny wrote: »

I did read it. The OP said he had one good game and you said he had two?

I'm just saying if the fee was lower people would probably be fine with his performances so far. When people know he was 90m they expect more.

I'm not debating any of what you are saying. Not sure why you continue to try to justify the point you are making

justshane

BorneTobyWilde wrote: »

I think Jose said something about '' foul on my players'' I think .
Could be the Luis tackle he's on about .

Jose will always always find someone/something to deflect the blame. In saying that Luiz's tackle was nasty, I think he more mistimed it but still was lucky.

BMMachine

M!Ck^ wrote: »

Cool story bro
Please continue

Yeah if you ignore what I'm saying and talk sarcastically it means I'm wrong. jeez, wasn't there another man utd fan acting the exact same way with me recently? Wonder what the correlation is. Cos there is no way I'm just right.

Vincent Vega

BorneTobyWilde wrote: »

I think Jose said something about '' foul on my players'' I think .
Could be the Luis tackle he's on about .

I could make out 'uno a zero....quattro a zero'.
I'd say it was something undermining the result like 'you'd won the match at 1-0 nevermind 4-0' or could have been suggesting the result was as good as 1-0 to Conte seeing as they have to play again.

Donnielighto

BMMachine wrote: »

Meh, your old reliable aren't getting it right no matter how much they spend. It's funny watching the glory hunting Irish Man Utd fan section panicking and performing mental gymnastics as they don't know what to do with all that spite they normally unleash on other clubs.

Oh but maybe if you buy 4 more players for 150 million it might work.

Ah here who's the spiteful one. Utd fans are being realistic in the main.

BMMachine

BMMachine wrote: »

Yeah if you ignore what I'm saying and talk sarcastically it means I'm wrong. jeez, wasn't there another man utd fan acting the exact same way with me recently? Wonder what the correlation is. Cos there is no way I'm just right.

Is this even about football for you now? Please continue as this is amusing

murpho999

All talk of Utd but credit must also go to Chelsea. They played great today.

Ulysses Gaze

Vincent Vega wrote: »

I could make out 'uno a zero....quattro a zero'.
I'd say it was something undermining the result like 'you'd won the match at 1-0 nevermind 4-0' or could have been suggesting the result was as good as 1-0 to Conte seeing as they have to play again.

Well if Mourinho was such a tactical genius, he could have turned his team around from 1-0 down to win the game.

martingriff

Muahahaha wrote: »

Heaviest away defeat for ManU in 17 years, anyone know what team held that record?

Wasn't it southhampton 6-2 or something during there grey shirt days

Andersonisgod

The irony here was that these Chelsea players got to go out and play the kind of expansive football that Mourinho always prohibited. To do it so effectively and with such style against Mourinho's team must be sweet for a lot of those players.

amber69

Think he said ye started before we were ready. The bus wasn't even in gear.

BMMachine

M!Ck^ wrote: »

Is this even about football for you now? Please continue as this is amusing

theres that classic spite.

martingriff

emmetkenny wrote: »

I did read it. The OP said he had one good game and you said he had two?

I'm just saying if the fee was lower people would probably be fine with his performances so far. When people know he was 90m they expect more.

I think he was arguing I said 1 when its 2 I should get my facts straight

murpho999

murpho999 wrote: »

All talk of Utd but credit must also go to Chelsea. They played great today.

I have given Chelsea credit multiple times tbf
Other have said the same also. You have to wade through all the ****e posts to find the decent ones!

BMMachine

BMMachine wrote: »

theres that classic spite.

OK mighty stuff

martyos121

I'm just waiting for Mourinho's bitter excuse-laden rant post-match interview now.

Andersonisgod

Andersonisgod wrote: »

The irony here was that these Chelsea players got to go out and play the kind of expansive football that Mourinho always prohibited. To do it so effectively and with such style against Mourinho's team must be sweet for a lot of those players.

I'd say it was sweet for a lot of them today considering his carry on last season

The Talking Bread

Muahahaha wrote: »

Heaviest away defeat for ManU in 17 years, anyone know what team held that record?

Chelsea in 2000. 5 0. Taibi era!

martyos121

martyos121 wrote: »

I'm just waiting for Mourinho's bitter excuse-laden rant post-match interview now.

Let me know how it goes. Too painful to watch sky at the moment
Don't fap too much!! :P

GavRedKing

Theres a good lash of those chelsea players who wanted to put it up to Utd and their performanced today showed that. Hazard and Matic being two stand out players in that regard.

A lot of sh*te went on last year regarding the players being terrible and jose maoning about them but it must have been a sweet victory for those players, whether it was 1 or 4-0 its only 3 points but its the confidence it brings from the manner of the win is whats good for chelsea fans and players a like.

I love contes passion but i wonder is that what got up Joses backside when they were shaking hands at the end.

The top 5 is seperated by 1 point. Nobody will walk the league this year it looks like, its going to be a hard fight and Utd are far from out of it. Theyre only 6 points behind is it, Utd will lick the wounds and come back, chelsea fans can cheer this victory, abu's too but its a long season.

The 6/7 days rest really helped us too. Utd had 2 games in the same time we had 6 days rest, that helps and showed too.

Donnielighto

Andersonisgod wrote: »

The irony here was that these Chelsea players got to go out and play the kind of expansive football that Mourinho always prohibited. To do it so effectively and with such style against Mourinho's team must be sweet for a lot of those players.

Didn't you used to wax lyrical about him and his pragmatic approach.

http://m.imgur.com/a/gjIcp

Rayne Wooney

Even the Chelsea twitter account is taking the píss

Know you've hit bottom then

Andersonisgod

Donnielighto wrote: »

Didn't you used to wax lyrical about him and his pragmatic approach.

http://m.imgur.com/a/gjIcp

Twitter? What's that all about?

D0NNELLY

M!Ck^ wrote: »

Let me know how it goes. Too painful to watch sky at the moment
Don't fap too much!! :P

All spent

TitianGerm

M!Ck^ wrote: »

I'm not debating any of what you are saying. Not sure why you continue to try to justify the point you are making

I'm not trying to justify anything. I was agreeing with you against the other poster but giving my opinion why I can see the point the other poster mentioned.

martingriff

Muahahaha wrote: »

Heaviest away defeat for ManU in 17 years, anyone know what team held that record?

Not acording to skysports it was 5-0 5 years ago

ricero

Jose showing signs of cracking

Donnielighto

Andersonisgod wrote: »

Twitter? What's that all about?

For people to infer what they want.
What about the question?

Sgt Pepper 64

first time jose has lost by 4 clear goals

justshane

Jose keeps referencing the third and fourth goals as counter attacking goals, they weren't.

Donnielighto

Donnielighto wrote: »

Didn't you used to wax lyrical about him and his pragmatic approach.

http://m.imgur.com/a/gjIcp

?

What's with the Twitter stuff. Who's that?

Tom.D.BJJ

ricero wrote: »

Jose showing signs of cracking

Nonsense. Sensible interview so far. We move on and we need to win some games.

Donnielighto

Mature enough interview there, protective but not petulant.

Andersonisgod

Really stressing that counter attack stuff isn't he.

PhlegmyMoses

RoboKlopp wrote: »

?

What's with the Twitter stuff. Who's that?

Pretty sure it's AIG. Was posted before.

Rayne Wooney

glad he didn't dwell on the Luiz question, we were never coming back when it went 2-0

justshane

Andersonisgod wrote: »

Really stressing that counter attack stuff isn't he.

Except no goal came from Chelsea counter attacking.