What body types do women/guys find most/least attractive?

Musketeer4

jimgoose wrote: »

Nicely-upholstered. The sort of woman who's shoulders and arms I'd like. It's Yiddish for "juicy".

This shoulder fetish thing....briliant.

pumpkin4life

RWCNT wrote: »

Eight different male body types!? Is your name Mac and do you co-own a bar in Philadelphia by any chance?

Fat man! (AAAAWWWWWHAAAAAA) Fighter of the phag man!

Champion of the...gym!

You're a master of cake and deadlifts for everyone!

pilly

Colser wrote: »

Accountants stick around and have small feet ðŸ˜WTF

Now I think of it I do remember an old phrase my mother used to say "marry an ugly man and you'll never worry!". She never mentioned accountants or small feet though.

retro:electro

When guys say "curvy girls" what exactly are they taking about? I remember my male friend saying he loved curvy girls and then proceeded to say Emily Ratajowski fitted the profile of curvy. She's no more curvy than my little toe. To me curvy would be Holly Willoughby or Kardashian arse

DrPhilG

anna080 wrote: »

When guys say "curvy girls" what exactly are they taking about? I remember my male friend saying he loved curvy girls and then proceeded to say Emily Ratajowski fitted the profile of curvy. She's no more curvy than my little toe. To me curvy would be Holly Willoughby or Kardashian arse

Your friend really means big boobed. Emily certainly has that, but she is definitely not curvy as I would define it.

Holly Willoughbooby is the definition of curvy.

pilly

DrPhilG wrote: »

Your friend really means big boobed. Emily certainly has that, but she is definitely not curvy as I would define it.

Holly Willoughbooby is the definition of curvy.

Holly Willoughbooby is so gorgeous, as a female non-lesbian I could look at her all day.

jimgoose

pilly wrote: »

Holly Willoughbooby is so gorgeous, as a female non-lesbian I could look at her all day.

As a male non-lesbian, I heartily concur!

batistuta9

anna080 wrote: »

When guys say "curvy girls" what exactly are they taking about? I remember my male friend saying he loved curvy girls and then proceeded to say Emily Ratajowski fitted the profile of curvy. She's no more curvy than my little toe. To me curvy would be Holly Willoughby or Kardashian arse

it'd usually mean the type you think but i suppose it depends on the person.

i wouldn't call emily rata.. curvy either but i know what he means, big tits & a alright ass on her are curves

pilly

jimgoose wrote: »

As a male non-lesbian, I heartily concur!

Ah that gave me a hearty laugh for a Friday afternoon. And I'm getting off work in half an hour too. Very happy now. :D

armaghlad

anna080 wrote: »

When guys say "curvy girls" what exactly are they taking about? I remember my male friend saying he loved curvy girls and then proceeded to say Emily Ratajowski fitted the profile of curvy. She's no more curvy than my little toe. To me curvy would be Holly Willoughby or Kardashian arse

My definition of curvy is probably different to most people's. Curvy for me isn't big titeens and a big oul arse with a tiny waste.... it's more filled out, without being chubby, everything proportionate ie no big gut or bingo wings.

A girl I went on a date with last Friday, she's pure gorgeous in my eyes, she is not skinny but not in anyway fat or overweight, she has imo a great physic, what I'd describe as curvy (wish I could post a pic) and a nice bum! Also has the most gorgeous brown eyes and tanned skin! id take her any day over a Kardashian!

Mr. FoggPatches

armaghlad wrote: »

A girl I went on a date with last Friday, she's pure gorgeous in my eyes, she is not skinny but not in anyway fat or overweight, she has imo a great physic, what I'd describe as curvy (wish I could post a pic) and a nice bum! Also has the most gorgeous brown eyes and tanned skin! id take her any day over a Kardashian!

I wouldn't care how good looking she is if she's into that sh*te tbh.

Colser

Why don't men fancy Cameron Diaz..I think she'd be my type of I was male but men don't ever seem to mention her?

jimgoose

Colser wrote: »

Why don't men fancy Cameron Diaz..I think she'd be my type of I was male but men don't ever seem to mention her?

I think she's gorgeous. I would have thought that was a given! :pac:

wakka12

wakka12 wrote: »

http://img2.timeinc.net/people/i/2016/stylewatch/blog/160620/kim-kardashian-600x800.jpg

She is definitely at a healthy body fat level there. Look at her fairly slim waist and define jawline. She has extremely exaggerated bone structure and proportions, huge hips boobs shoulders and large frame overall which make her look quite chunky and curvy though

I think she has a fantastic body.

Musketeer4

Cameron Diaz is noce but she's too thin and gangley for my likeing. I like long hair too, I don't find cropped hair attractive, even though it can be nice at the same time if you get me - like, she's good looking and attractive but not in that kinda way for me.

Colser

jimgoose wrote:

I think she's gorgeous. I would have thought that was a given!

But she never gets mentioned anywhere...what about Jamie Lee Curtis?She's very attractive imo..too old?

jimgoose

Colser wrote: »

But she never gets mentioned anywhere...what about Jamie Lee Curtis?She's very attractive imo..too old?

Quite tasty fifteen years ago or so, but she seems to be completely grey these days and it doesn't suit her.

Ush1

Colser wrote: »

Why don't men fancy Cameron Diaz..I think she'd be my type of I was male but men don't ever seem to mention her?

Most men fancy women that look like Kim K/pornstars. Some don't admit it to women because it might seem creepy/sleazy.:)

Musketeer4

I actually find the typical pornstar look repulsive. Its really trampy looking. Big ballooned breasts and lips like they've been stung by a bee. Eww. Usually combined with ridiculously voluminous hair and stilettos.
Fúck. Right. Off.
I'd call it the sex-doll physique.

I'd feel the same about, say, Angelina Jolie. I wouldn't find her attractive really.

Colser

Musketeer4 wrote:

I'd feel the same about, say, Angelina Jolie. I wouldn't find her attractive really.

Same here and I'd take Marty Morrisey over Brad.ðŸ˜

retro:electro

What about all those Geordie Shore type girls with the big inflated titties and clown make up. Sure they do have fellas hanging off them.
I love the look of say, Sienna Miller, natural make up and freckles showing through. Can't stand that caked on crap.
On a man I like the physique of Jamie Dornan.

jimgoose

Musketeer4 wrote: »

...I'd feel the same about, say, Angelina Jolie. I wouldn't find her attractive really.

Technically she's beautiful-looking, but she's way too thin.

BabyE

Face matters so much, body is irrelevant as long as you are thin(for males)

Ush1

anna080 wrote: »

What about all those Geordie Shore type girls with the big inflated titties and clown make up. Sure they do have fellas hanging off them.
I love the look of say, Sienna Miller, natural make up and freckles showing through. Can't stand that caked on crap.
On a man I like the physique of Jamie Dornan.

That's what I mean when I'm on about Kim K/pornstar look. Whether people like to admit it or not a woman with big boobs, narrow waist and a big arse and makeup will get the most attention.

jimgoose

Ush1 wrote: »

That's what I mean when I'm on about Kim K/pornstar look. Whether people like to admit it or not a woman with big boobs, narrow waist and a big arse and makeup will get the most attention.

A lime-coloured Lamborghini Diablo with an orange interior will get plenty of attention too, but you wouldn't necessarily want to drive the thing for a week. :pac:

ohnonotgmail

Mr. FoggPatches wrote: »

I wouldn't care how good looking she is if she's into that sh*te tbh.

whats wrong with physics? It makes the world go round.

Ush1

jimgoose wrote: »

A lime-coloured Lamborghini Diablo with an orange interior will get plenty of attention too, but you wouldn't necessarily want to drive the thing for a week. :pac:

Oh I agree, but evolution wise were not setup to be driving things for a week, if ya get my drift!:P

jimgoose

Ush1 wrote: »

Oh I agree, but evolution wise were not setup to be driving things for a week, if ya get my drift!:P

I am attempting to suggest that putting up with this Essex Tart dawnce around me 'andbag annat innit crap for any length of time would be somewhat akin to trying to commute in the rain in a €300,000 supercar - a great idea on paper, especially if you're fifteen years old, but something very else to actually do. :pac:

Ush1

jimgoose wrote: »

I am attempting to suggest that putting up with this Essex Tart dawnce around me 'andbag annat innit crap for any length of time would be somewhat akin to trying to commute in the rain in a €300,000 supercar - a great idea on paper, especially if you're fifteen years old, but something very else to actually do. :pac:

I understand that, but this thread is about bodies! Not minds. There's a reason why that certain look is prevalent and testosterone increases when they see it!

Musketeer4

In a girl I like a pleasant, pretty face. Probably more favouring soft features, large eyes, a nice smile and slightly rounded appearance. Not into the long or angular faces, a prominent chin is a turn off.

Prefer long straight hair as opposed to curly or short.

Like a girl whos a little smaller than me but not so small that giving a kiss requires bending my neck. 5'6 to 5'8 would be ideal.

Body wise I'm not into skinny. I'm into a bit of "upholsterey" but not chubby or with folds. Just healthy level of bodyfat. A nice butt but not big or scrawny.

I think waist hip ratio is very important in female attractiveness across the board. I know a girl who is very healthy and is fit and has lovely features and a great personality but her waist hip ratio is out of whack. she has a ratio of 1.0, ie straight hips like a fella which just looks incorrect on a woman. Ideal for a woman is like 0.6 or something.

whoopsadoodles

Musketeer4 wrote: »

In a girl I like a pleasant, pretty face. Probably more favouring soft features, large eyes, a nice smile and slightly rounded appearance. Not into the long or angular faces, a prominent chin is a turn off.

Prefer long straight hair as opposed to curly or short.

Like a girl whos a little smaller than me but not so small that giving a kiss requires bending my neck. 5'6 to 5'8 would be ideal.

Body wise I'm not into skinny. I'm into a bit of "upholsterey" but not chubby or with folds. Just healthy level of bodyfat. A nice butt but not big or scrawny.

I think waist hip ratio is very important in female attractiveness across the board. I know a girl who is very healthy and is fit and has lovely features and a great personality but her waist hip ratio is out of whack. she has a ratio of 1.0, ie straight hips like a fella which just looks incorrect on a woman. Ideal for a woman is like 0.6 or something.

wow!

Musketeer4

wow!

Hah?

retro:electro

Musketeer4 wrote: »

In a girl I like a pleasant, pretty face. Probably more favouring soft features, large eyes, a nice smile and slightly rounded appearance. Not into the long or angular faces, a prominent chin is a turn off.

Prefer long straight hair as opposed to curly or short.

Like a girl whos a little smaller than me but not so small that giving a kiss requires bending my neck. 5'6 to 5'8 would be ideal.

Body wise I'm not into skinny. I'm into a bit of "upholsterey" but not chubby or with folds. Just healthy level of bodyfat. A nice butt but not big or scrawny.

I think waist hip ratio is very important in female attractiveness across the board. I know a girl who is very healthy and is fit and has lovely features and a great personality but her waist hip ratio is out of whack. she has a ratio of 1.0, ie straight hips like a fella which just looks incorrect on a woman. Ideal for a woman is like 0.6 or something.

Could ya be arsed being so logistical

Musketeer4

Musketeer4 wrote: »

q

I think waist hip ratio is very important in female attractiveness across the board. I know a girl who is very healthy and is fit and has lovely features and a great personality but her waist hip ratio is out of whack. she has a ratio of 1.0, ie straight hips like a fella which just looks incorrect on a woman. Ideal for a woman is like 0.6 or something.

Well at least you have your priorities right.

scopper

Musketeer4 wrote: »

I think waist hip ratio is very important in female attractiveness across the board. I know a girl who is very healthy and is fit and has lovely features and a great personality but her waist hip ratio is out of whack. she has a ratio of 1.0, ie straight hips like a fella which just looks incorrect on a woman. Ideal for a woman is like 0.6 or something.

Not sure if robot or slightly autistic.

Winterlong

Ush1 wrote: »

That's what I mean when I'm on about Kim K/pornstar look. Whether people like to admit it or not a woman with big boobs, narrow waist and a big arse and makeup will get the most attention.

The one thing about the porn star look is the rock solid boobs. Does not do it for me at all. Look silly and feel odd IMO.

Boobs ,proper boobs, need to have a good bit of wobble in them. And the ones that wobble when in a bra get bonus points from me.

beks101

LLMMLL wrote: »

I think many women profess to hate muscle but in reality muscular guys get A LOT of attention from women.

True, and so do the Geordie-Shore type with the surgically enhanced everything on show and drag queen makeup. We're curious creatures and we like to look at shiny things that stand out, a completely shredded, waxed 6-footer with arms the width of most people's thighs is a thing that stands out.

I'll look all day, but I'm not thinking "phwoarr, what I wouldn't do for a piece of that", I'll be thinking "jeez that's a strong look, must be hitting the roids hard. When's the last time he had a piece of cake? Mad looking yoke"

Colser

Winterlong wrote:

The one thing about the porn star look is the rock solid boobs. Does not do it for me at all. Look silly and feel odd IMO.

How do you know what they feel like Winterlong?

riffmongous

I fully agree on the hip-waist ratio thing, I have no interest physically in girls with straight hips. Course it can't get too exaggerated like Sissi or Kim Kardashian either, 0.7* looks best imo

*I only just learned that it's a mathematical thing

Winterlong

Colser wrote: »

How do you know what they feel like Winterlong?

From having played with them of course!

Ush1

Winterlong wrote: »

The one thing about the porn star look is the rock solid boobs. Does not do it for me at all. Look silly and feel odd IMO.

Boobs ,proper boobs, need to have a good bit of wobble in them. And the ones that wobble when in a bra get bonus points from me.

I hear ya. When I say pornstar look I don't really mean an actual pornstar, although plenty of them have natural boobs. I mean the "shape".

retro:electro

Now I'm a straight lady, but to me this woman is completely perfect. Her waist is the dream

Potential Underachiever

It's all about the ass for me, a nice juicy ass, yes please! This latest craze of women wearing leggings and sports gear is a god send to me, you can't beat a nice ass! After that the really just a regular shaped body is fine by me.

I dislike women who are caked in make up and would need a chisel to get it off, it's not a body type as such but still felt I'd add it, don't be shy ladies show warts and all don't think you're fooling people when you look like an oompa loompa!

Colser

Winterlong wrote:

From having played with them of course!

Of courseðŸ˜

Would anyone go out with the opposite to their ideal looking person if their personality was spot on?

Potential Underachiever

anna080 wrote: »

Now I'm a straight lady, but to me this woman is completely perfect. Her waist is the dream

Needs more ass!


I'll see your pic, and I'll raise you this....

http://img.allw.mn/content/wy/rx/opeqyfrn5590436ca6c53363426094.jpg

Musketeer4

scopper wrote: »

Not sure if robot or slightly autistic.

No the waist hip ratio is an actual thing. Google it. Studies have found that 0.6-0.7 is considered most attractive in females and it correlates with better health and fertility than women with WHRs that are greater.

I think 0.8-0.9 was considered most attractive in a man.

Someone said earlier attraction is not all about evolution and s selection and shít but it actually is nothing but.

Why would someone be most attracted to a certain WHR or biometry etc? Because that composition reflects good health, fertility and is the best option for a mate.

Why would someone be attracted to a kind, friendly but decisive and strong personality? Because they'll be a reliable and stable partner to have kids with.

And that's the way it is because throughout history people who were sexually attracted to body types reflective of suboptimal health and fertility, or mental nutters, or trees, or goats did not reproduce as effectively as the others.

Attraction is literally just bred into us. Simple as that.

DrPhilG

Not sure about calculating ratios, but I agree that proportion is important.

The whole (American but spreading) obsession with massive arses has me baffled.

Kim isn't too bad, but Khloe is comical looking with her huge bum.

For example, this nonsense on the right.
https://bossip.files.wordpress.com/2015/02/khloewhoa.jpg?w=700

I'd prefer a size 10 girl. But I'd rather have a size 14 girl with a size 14 ass than a size 10 girl with a size 14 ass.

carrieb

IMO most women are not into big muscly chiselled men. It's quite off putting. I'm in the gym a lot myself and I appreciate good legs or good arms on a man but six packs and bulging biceps do nothing for me. Most women I know like good arms and a good bum, apart from that there wouldn't be much talk about actual parts of a mans body. Tall men are popular! A nice body in general is always appreciated but I think mostly you want a man to look like he looks after himself. Fit, healthy, but not OTT.

Walter H Price

I'm not mad about muscular or super toned girls , i like a softer more feminine shape and the bigger the boobs and ass the better

scdublin

http://healthyceleb.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/Michelle-Keegan-hot-boobs.jpg

I don't think I've ever seen a more perfect figure than this....even if she had way smaller boobs her figure would still be perfect to me.