Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi all! We have been experiencing an issue on site where threads have been missing the latest postings. The platform host Vanilla are working on this issue. A workaround that has been used by some is to navigate back from 1 to 10+ pages to re-sync the thread and this will then show the latest posts. Thanks, Mike.
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Reach 'Advantage'

  • 07-11-2016 1:55pm
    #1
    Registered Users Posts: 73 ✭✭


    You hear it being mentioned at nearly every Tale of the Tape:
    'Joe Bloggs has a X inch reach advantage'
    Does anyone else think it could be objectively called longer reach rather than straight out the gate being referred to as an 'advantage?'

    I realise when it comes to the boxing aspect of the game it is certainly advantageous to be able to hit your opponent when they can't hit you.

    However, if you talk about the grappling aspect of MMA I think there can be a case made that longer reach can be in certain situations, a disadvantage.

    For example, I find it a lot easier locking on armbars and kimuras from guard on someone with longer arms than a stockier opponent.
    With standup wrestling I find it far more difficult to get and underhook and particularly a 2-on-1 Russian Tie on a stockier opponent than a rangier one.


Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,326 ✭✭✭MartyMcFly84


    Long limbs can also be an advantage for submissions.

    I know some long limbed guys who can hit things like darce choke or triangles from everywhere is it much easier for them to lock them up.

    In general for two guys the same weight having long reach is an advantage, perhaps not in wrestling specifically but in a lot of martial arts having longer limbs would be an advantage.

    Especially arts that involve striking and start standing. Jon Jones for example is an long limbs fighter who uses it to his advantage in every range.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 6,924 ✭✭✭wonderfullife


    Jack Slack of Fightland does great work and i encourage everybody to check out his articles and podcasts. He's extremely knowledgeable on the technical aspects of the fight game.

    What he reminds people, constantly, is a reach advantage is never just the numbers on the screen.

    For example:

    Conor has a 74" reach, Eddie 69" reach. But when you see them standing face-to-face it's easy to argue Conor is an inch, if not 2 inches, taller than Eddie. Conor claimed Eddie stood on his tippy-toes during the face-off.

    It's more than a 5" reach in practice. What Jack Slack always emphasises is the true metric is height x reach.

    If you stand parallel to a wall and put your arm out at shoulder height to touch the wall, shoulder height is the straightest line to the wall and where your reach is at its optimum.

    If you move your arm up higher on the wall without moving your feet, your fingers are no longer touching the wall. You need to step closer to the wall. Whereas if you move your arm lower on the wall, it is still touching the wall.

    In practice for Eddie to hit Conor in the head he has to punch upwards and raise his hands above his shoulder. Conor is punching downwards to hit Eddie in the head.

    Slack also points out that the longest weapon at a fighters disposal is often their leg. Again, your leg reach is at its optimum when standing up straight.

    Where height and reach can be a disadvantage, against a wrestler, is that the smaller man is closer to the legs of his opponent for a level-change.

    On paper, Conor has a 5" reach. In practice, it's bigger. It's a huge advantage on the feet, especially if a fighter has excellent control of range and distance. Eddie must close the distance to hit Conor and leaves himself vulnerable to eating clean punches and kicks in doing so. Range will be a huge factor in the fight.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 39,615 ✭✭✭✭Mellor


    For example, I find it a lot easier locking on armbars and kimuras from guard on someone with longer arms than a stockier opponent.
    That's probably true for me too. The longer arms means they re further past your hips. With their hand in the same spot, their elbow is more open.

    But this is cancelled out by the fact that can hit darces, triangles, etc easier. And have more scope to control range in an open guard.
    With standup wrestling I find it far more difficult to get and underhook and particularly a 2-on-1 Russian Tie on a stockier opponent than a rangier one.

    Maybe. But its easier to get a double leg as you can get closer to them before you shoot. And so on. Pros and cons in different areas. Overall I'd say it's an advantage in jiu jisu but not as outright an advantage as in striking


  • Registered Users Posts: 73 ✭✭VulcanRaving


    Mellor wrote: »
    That's probably true for me too. The longer arms means they re further past your hips. With their hand in the same spot, their elbow is more open.

    But this is cancelled out by the fact that can hit darces, triangles, etc easier. And have more scope to control range in an open guard.



    Maybe. But its easier to get a double leg as you can get closer to them before you shoot. And so on. Pros and cons in different areas. Overall I'd say it's an advantage in jiu jisu but not as outright an advantage as in striking

    Actually I'm a 6 footer myself with a long reach.
    I agree with the D'Arce choke, I've had more success trying to lock that up from a sprawl than a guillotine. The Team Alpha male guys (Mendes, Faber) seem to be guillotine advocates, maybe their bodytype suits it.
    Triangles would be true as well but we are now getting into leg length where I'm zoning in on Mike Goldberg announcing arm reach as an advantage in the tale of the tape.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,326 ✭✭✭MartyMcFly84


    Because it is an advantage.

    In MMA the fight starts standing, so whoever can hit and not get hit will have an advantage. Straight away the person with shorter arms will need to have a strategy to cancel that reach. Be it head movement, setting up takedowns, rushing etc.

    But the onus will be on the shorter armed fighter to work the beat the reach advantage or he/she will just get picked off on the outside.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 39,615 ✭✭✭✭Mellor


    Actually I'm a 6 footer myself with a long reach.
    I think you're looking at it the wrong way. You are comparing "you vrs long" and "you vrs short". In both cases you're the long guy. You are comparing two different fights.

    But you should be looking at a single fight. Sure it can be tricky to lock a Russian tie on a short guy, but he prob has a much harder time locking one on you. That's the reach advantage.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 24,878 ✭✭✭✭arybvtcw0eolkf


    I've a long reach, and whether its MMA, Judo, BJJ or Wrestling I'll take the advantage a long reach gives me any day [over a shorter reach].

    If you're being caught out because of your long reach, then I often tell a newbie 'T-Rex arms' and stop giving straight, long arms.. I'd tell someone the same irregardless what style they're training.

    I'm primarily a Judoka, so I've dying for you to give me long arms.. They're like the golden ticket for me, and this works for MMA training, BJJ, Wrestling or Judo and it works the same on the ground.. You've got long arms, think 'T-Rex arms and pull those elbows in.

    My two cent.


Advertisement