Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi all! We have been experiencing an issue on site where threads have been missing the latest postings. The platform host Vanilla are working on this issue. A workaround that has been used by some is to navigate back from 1 to 10+ pages to re-sync the thread and this will then show the latest posts. Thanks, Mike.
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Studs up!!

  • 05-12-2016 9:29pm
    #1
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,172 ✭✭✭


    Why is a perfectly executed two footed tackle deemed to be dangerous when, clean contact with the ball being made, the risk of injury to the player on the receiving end, so to speak, is minimal?
    Yet, on any given weekend of premiership action, I witness numerous blatant elbowing and knee-high kicking offences seemingly go completely unnoticed let alone penalised by officialdom.


Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 2,475 ✭✭✭KaiserGunner


    I thinks it's to do with the lack of control of your body, once you're in the air then there's no control there. Two footed challenges are reckless and there is no place for them in football.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 34,114 ✭✭✭✭listermint


    Anyone that thinks they are OK has never been on the receiving end of one or has just watched from a stool.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 32,024 ✭✭✭✭~Rebel~


    The tackler has to have the ability to pull out of the challenge to at least some extent. As said above, they simply lose a huge amount of control with a 2 footed challenge, potentially careening into a standing leg and causing career ending damage.

    Like you said, there are good ones where only the ball is taken, but thats kind of irrelevant. The only way to stop the ankle-snapping bad ones is to cut them out altogether. And they really are ****ing frightening to be on the receiving end of.

    Not even room for debate on this one imo.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,495 ✭✭✭✭bucketybuck


    chicorytip wrote: »
    Why is a perfectly executed two footed tackle

    Because they aren't and never will be always perfectly executed.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,172 ✭✭✭chicorytip


    Because they aren't and never will be always perfectly executed.
    No. Despite the lack of technical skills evident in many players such challenges still occur regularly in games. Most appear legitimate and not injury threatening yet are invariably penalised.A deliberate stamp on the leg of a prone
    opponent or the raking of studs down the shin or Achillies are offences which regularly go unpunished.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,495 ✭✭✭✭bucketybuck


    chicorytip wrote: »
    No. Despite the lack of technical skills evident in many players such challenges still occur regularly in games. Most appear legitimate and not injury threatening yet are invariably penalised.A deliberate stamp on the leg of a prone
    opponent or the raking of studs down the shin or Achillies are offences which regularly go unpunished.

    What is your point? That other offences go unpunished? Thats irrelevant. That some two footed tackles do no harm? That also doesn't matter, plenty of people jump red lights without causing harm either.

    Its very obvious why those types of tackles are considered reckless to be quite honest.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,060 ✭✭✭Sue Pa Key Pa


    It is reckless, can cause severe injury and is the last resort of a crap player without technical ability


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 14,748 ✭✭✭✭Lovely Bloke


    it's because in real time a referee can't tell the difference between a "genuine" tackle and a move like Aguero's at the weekend.

    I do believe that you can be in control of your legs and feet when in the air, I mean you don't become paralysed by simply becoming airborne, that's a stupid notion, and you ARE able to pull out if you need to.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,172 ✭✭✭chicorytip


    It is reckless, can cause severe injury and is the last resort of a crap player without technical ability


    No more reckless, surely, than the Aguero challenge, similar examples of which are prevalent in the game today.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25,775 ✭✭✭✭kfallon


    chicorytip wrote: »
    No more reckless, surely, than the Aguero challenge, similar examples of which are prevalent in the game today.

    And Aguero got a deserved straight red so your point is? :confused:


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 32,024 ✭✭✭✭~Rebel~


    it's because in real time a referee can't tell the difference between a "genuine" tackle and a move like Aguero's at the weekend.

    I do believe that you can be in control of your legs and feet when in the air, I mean you don't become paralysed by simply becoming airborne, that's a stupid notion, and you ARE able to pull out if you need to.

    Of course you can move your legs - but the point is that if you're in the air, heading for a standing leg, pulling back your legs doesn't help. Your whole body weight still crashes into that person. With a 1 footed challenge, the other, grounded foot, can actually stop your momentum. When you're flying through the air, there's nothing to stop you.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,593 ✭✭✭theteal


    Is this thread for serious????


Advertisement