Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Russian and alt-right Interference in democracies.
Options
Comments
-
-
-
Yourself isit wrote: »How would American involvement in the South China Sea and Korea cause russopobia?
Where was america mentioned in the post ,
Ask why russia would have an issue with south Korea deploying air defence missles in south Korea exactly
0 -
-
Yourself isit wrote: »Russia interfered in Syria and it was then that the real hatred of the Russians - virulent russopobia - began.
Again there is no Russophobia or Russophiles it's nonsense to give supports of russia to putin and band of gangsters an excuse to carry out their foreign policy in Ukraine ,the Baltics and further afield , it's a fairly common tactic used across several fora
0 -
Advertisement
-
-
It never been secret that it was Assange's personal vendetta against Obama. I don#t see any reason for him to release Podesta emails in time which would suit ClintonThis link points to the first major wikileak dump being two days before the first presidential debate, displaying the strategic nature of the dumps to inflict massive damage on Clinton and help Trump.
Do you remember any other candidate in US history who managed to get into White House with so low chances to win?Can you provide another example in US history where there was 5 investigations for collaboration with an enemy State into a US president?
https://twitter.com/huffingtonpost/status/795663593689808896?lang=en
Whole evidence about hacking is based on report from private company and DNC denied FBI access to hacked servers.Can you provide an example of how and why senate intelligence comittee investigatiosn get dropped? Are you saying there is no evidence?
Comey: DNC denied FBI's requests for access to hacked servers
Hardly report from private company and allegedly intercepted calls that Trump would be better choice for Russia can be considered as serious evidence.
BTW
CIA documents claim Russian soldiers were ‘turned to stone’ after shoot-out with ALIENS in Siberia
Are you saying that her private server is also Putin's fault?There is some truth in that. But the media campaign was dominated by the Clinton emails.
You know yourself that it was her lies about server, about her health and that nobody else had access to classified information put her down, not Putin
Say thanks to media bias against Trump, which forced people to believe to everything but ClintonThe use of Fake news and disinformation was massively used to benefit Trump as most of it was staged and amplified through Camridge Analytica or Russian architecture:
https://www.buzzfeed.com/craigsilverman/viral-fake-election-news-outperformed-real-news-on-facebook?utm_term=.ocOOnkRr9#.pad0a25KN
Effectively MSM committed suicide during their attempt to bring HRC into White House
Blatant bias against Trump may hasten the end of mainstream media
Why nobody taken seriously fake news from Slate and Clinton about secret Trump server?
https://twitter.com/HillaryClinton/status/793234169576947712
At least she had nearly all MSM on her side, who tried to downplay all negative information and turn all bias against TrumpI would actually gave Hillary Clinton break there. She suffered under a massive smear campaign.
Do you remember this famous CNN statement
Yep - every liberal loser now will blame Putin to distract attention from his own faults0 -
-
So according to your theory the unemployed(who are subset of poor and represent extreme case of powerty) are unemployed because they are stupid.Labarbapostiza wrote: »You mean poor conservatives....Most conservatives are poor. And this applies in Ireland too. And they are poor because they are stupid. Because conservatism has a culture of stupidity being a good thing. The poorest states in America are the most conservative, and they have the lowest performing school children. They're on the Down's Syndrome spectrum and proud of it.
lets make assumption that stupid people will always vote Democrats and check it with maps
Bingo - maps mostly match, factcheck that "stupid people will always vote liberals" is correct
Another discovery is that red states have lowest unemployment, which means that it was hard workers who voted Trump
PS - this post is not about unemployed, but against liberals, who think that only them can twist facts0 -
Count Dooku wrote: »So according to your theory the unemployed(who are subset of poor and represent extreme case of powerty) are unemployed because they are stupid.
lets make assumption that stupid people will always vote Democrats and check it with maps
Bingo - maps mostly match, factcheck that "stupid people will always vote liberals" is correct
Another discovery is that red states have lowest unemployment, which means that it was hard workers who voted Trump
PS - this post is not about unemployed, but against liberals, who think that only them can twist facts
Would you mind defining 'landslide' in the context of your post, please?0 -
Advertisement
-
Count Dooku wrote: »So according to your theory the unemployed(who are subset of poor and represent extreme case of powerty) are unemployed because they are stupid.
lets make assumption that stupid people will always vote Democrats and check it with maps
Bingo - maps mostly match, factcheck that "stupid people will always vote liberals" is correct
Another discovery is that red states have lowest unemployment, which means that it was hard workers who voted Trump
PS - this post is not about unemployed, but against liberals, who think that only them can twist facts
Cross referencing my map with your map kind of proves my point.
0 -
-
-
There is something wrong with your browser settings if you cannot see a full pictureProfessor Moriarty wrote: »Would you mind defining 'landslide' in the context of your post, please?
Not reallyLabarbapostiza wrote: »Cross referencing my map with your map kind of proves my point.
7 charts show who propelled Trump to victory
Majority of smartwealthy people voted Trump and majority of stupidpoor people voted Clinton0 -
-
First, small median income with low unemployment rate usually means smaller income inequality and if you will check with GINI index map, you will see that most of red states have low GINI coefficientLabarbapostiza wrote: »Now you're trying to twist the argument.
The geographic areas where there are the most conservatives, are the thickest and poorest parts.
Second, the blue states have higher unemployment, which liberals prefer to ignore in order to fill superior to conservatives
Third, if you will include living cost and especially rent/mortgage to equation, you can find that most people in red states would be much better on slightly lower salary
How it explains that most cases of extreme poverty such unemployment and ghettos exist mostly in blue states?Labarbapostiza wrote: »If the blue states did become infested with conservatism, the result would be poverty and ignorance.
Not really - the most insolvent states are blue statesLabarbapostiza wrote: »As it stands Liberals have to subsidise the loser states.
The only thing what liberals can do well is to live on borrowed money like it was during Obama, who doubled US debt in 8 years0 -
-
-
-
-
Advertisement
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Advertisement
-
Advertisement