Ticket Trout

sbsquarepants

I see you're back answering the question you want rather than the question asked - you'd make a good politician.

degsie

sbsquarepants wrote: »

I see you're back answering the question you want rather than the question asked - you'd make a good politician.

A step up from a troll surely?

sbsquarepants

People who call you out on the nonsense you post but can't support with any trace of logic, aren't necessarily trolls. It's possible they just see your argument for what it is.

degsie

sbsquarepants wrote: »

People who call you out on the nonsense you post but can't support with any trace of logic, aren't necessarily trolls. It's possible they just see your argument for what it is.

Defending the indefensible would be considered trolling by some.

sbsquarepants

I guess we must just have very different understandings of the word indefensible.

degsie

sbsquarepants wrote: »

I guess we must just have very different understandings of the word indefensible.

This is the meaning I'm referring to...

Definition of indefensible:
a : incapable of being maintained as right or valid : untenable
b : incapable of being justified or excused

https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/indefensible

sbsquarepants

Oh, you do know what it means.
I guess you must just spout your not very well thought out bolloxology for some other reason so.

degsie

sbsquarepants wrote: »

Oh, you do know what it means.
I guess you must just spout your not very well thought out bolloxology for some other reason so.

Showing your true colours now?

Fred Swanson

This post has been deleted.

Boom_Bap