Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Playerunknown's : Battlegrounds
Options
Comments
-
-
-
-
How many updates on PC has the game had. It used to be updated every 2 weeks since launch 8 months ago. This is the games first build on console. People are far to hard on it and some expectations are retarded lol.I called this out on the xbox one x before launch and was basically told fps didn't matter and that 30fps was quite adequate for gaming by some noob
lol who's laughing now says me with my 120fps at 1440p on my pc
I have it one xbox one x as well and there are a lot of disappointed people on xbox with it.
I've had a great laugh playing it on Xbox over the last 2 days and that's coming from someone that also has a predator monitor with Gsync and running an i7 with a reference 1080. It's nice to put the feet up and play it on my 55inch 4K TV while using the controller. Yes, it took a while to get used to the inventory
The game is mostly stable from the ground. I got the impression that Digital Foundry have never played PUBG before. They start off by highlighting how poor the performance is at 20fps in the lobby. Anyone on PC knows the lobby is **** with crappy frame rates because of background processes like map and loot rendering as well as match making.0 -
-
Advertisement
-
-
-
-
-
-
Advertisement
-
-
This is to scale. I'd like to see how fortnite runs on a map this size. Not taking away from Fortnite. They are doing great but the map is tiny in comparison.Exactly. Fortnite actually runs well, and plays well too. BlueHole can't have a competent and experienced developer making a successful game in the same genre as them, taking a large portion of the market and locking it down. PUBG needs a console presence before Fortnite gets too big.
"It runs at 6fps in parts? Fúck it. Stick it on some Early Access program and it'll be grand! We'll fix it next year and spin the fixes as content updates. We have enough popular momentum on PC to see us through these turbulent times on console. They will lap that shít up. Now pass me the Bollinger Magnum, its been a hard morning counting up the amount of crate keys we have sold" - Some BlueHole Executive, probably.
0 -
-
FAILSAFE 00 wrote: »This is to scale. I'd like to see how fortnite runs on a map this size. Not taking away from Fortnite. They are doing great but the map is tiny in comparison.
but why should it have to run on a map that size? its running perfectly well and work perfectly well as is.
I think a big reason the PUBG map is a lot bigger is due to the fact vehicles have been added.
Can't really bring the map being small as a down side of it to be fair, they saw an opportunity, built a game that works and released it for free then backed it up with actually listening to the community and dropping hot fixes/patches regularly to address any issues that have come up.
To say I've been impressed with Epic Games over the last few weeks is an understatement they've really made a show of other companies in how they have listened to the community taken stuff on board and worked to make the game better for the people who play it, not try to milk as much money as possible from players.0 -
-
FAILSAFE 00 wrote: »This is to scale. I'd like to see how fortnite runs on a map this size. Not taking away from Fortnite. They are doing great but the map is tiny in comparison.
I'm not 100% on this, but what about ARMA 3, Just Cause 3, Grand Theft Auto V, etc? Those maps are just as big, if not bigger. Then you have MMO's with huge maps and other players. They all seem quite competent in handling massive distances. It's almost as if BlueHole are in over their head. Now, some might say that the UE4 engine isn't exactly designed for massive maps with 100 players, and they would probably be correct in that assertion, but that begs the question: why choose the UE4 engine? Because it was free.
If you can't make the game you want, then don't put out a poor attempt. If you have the money to make the game you want, then use it and make the game you want. BlueHole have access to more money than 100 indie developers combined. There is no excuse.0 -
-
-
-
-
Advertisement
-
Well then compare it to the PC version since public launch. Its has had an update almost every 2 weeks for 8-9 months. I can post plenty videos highlighting its issues on PC at public launch. It seems many PC players have developed amnesia and are now recalling that the PC version was a dream since launchchallengemaster wrote: »
First public release build on console. But based on what's already in place with PC and they've been working with Microsoft to optimise the game for months. It's in no way comparable to the first build on PC, entirely different stage of development and resources invested.
In relation to Xbox One X and Xbox, take a €500 PC and tell me how well PUBG plays on PC and then take a €250 PC and tell me how well PUBG performs on that.
Its the very first build on console. Its a work in progress. There seems to be a double standard online. People comparing a game that has been out 8-9 months on PC with regular updates to a game that has been out 2 days in Xbox's early access program.
Has Digital Foundry put it, "Its an amazing achievement that they got it running on console"
How about we give it 8-9 months on console and see how it performs then.0 -
FAILSAFE 00 wrote: »Well then compare it to the PC version since public launch. Its has had an update almost every 2 weeks for 8-9 months. I can post plenty videos highlighting its issues on PC at public launch. It seems many PC players have developed amnesia and are now recalling that the PC version was a dream since launch
In relation to Xbox One X and Xbox, take a €500 PC and tell me how well PUBG plays on PC and then take a €250 PC and tell me how well PUBG performs on that.
Its the very first build on console. Its a work in progress. There seems to be a double standard online. People comparing a game that has been out 8-9 months on PC with regular updates to a game that has been out 2 days in Xbox's early access program.
Has Digital Foundry put it, "Its an amazing achievement that they got it running on console"
How about we give it 8-9 months on console and see how it performs then.
Where do you draw the line in all of this? What is the point in releasing a game that doesn't run properly on console now? Why not wait?
Would you support Battlefield 5 releasing right now in a similar state to PUBG? Why not? People would buy it, and they will play whatever it is at the time of early-access release. It would be a very poor experience, but who cares, it will be finished (you hope) in 8-9 months time. Why not do this with every big game? Let the community and paying customers become the QA department and pay for that privilege.0 -
-
Where do you draw the line in all of this? What is the point in releasing a game that doesn't run properly on console now? Why not wait?
Would you support Battlefield 5 releasing right now in a similar state to PUBG? Why not? People would buy it, and they will play whatever it is at the time of early-access release. It would be a very poor experience, but who cares, it will be finished (you hope) in 8-9 months time. Why not do this with every big game? Let the community and paying customers become the QA department and pay for that privilege.
I am playing it on Xbox now with marginal issues.
My only issue is parachuting FPS and the odd consistent dip when driving. Other than that I am nearly always hoovering around 30 FPS. I have played PUBG on PC with many people on this thread for months at 1440p at 70-90FPS. Do you think if the game was unplayable I'd be still playing it on Xbox 0 -
FAILSAFE 00 wrote: »Well then compare it to the PC version since public launch. Its has had an update almost every 2 weeks for 8-9 months. I can post plenty videos highlighting its issues on PC at public launch. It seems many PC players have developed amnesia and are now recalling that the PC version was a dream since launch
In relation to Xbox One X and Xbox, take a €500 PC and tell me how well PUBG plays on PC and then take a €250 PC and tell me how well PUBG performs on that.
Its the very first build on console. Its a work in progress. There seems to be a double standard online. People comparing a game that has been out 8-9 months on PC with regular updates to a game that has been out 2 days in Xbox's early access program.
Has Digital Foundry put it, "Its an amazing achievement that they got it running on console"
How about we give it 8-9 months on console and see how it performs then.
I'm nitpicking but PC got 2 week updates for the first few months then nothing once console/miramar/vaulting was announced.0 -
FAILSAFE 00 wrote: »I am playing it on Xbox now with marginal issues.
My only issue is parachuting FPS and the odd consistent dip when driving. Other than that I am nearly always hoovering around 30 FPS. I have played PUBG on PC with many people on this thread for months at 1440p at 70-90FPS. Do you think if the game was unplayable I'd be still playing it on Xbox
Frankly I've no idea why you'd choose to play at 30fps with a controller :pac:0 -
-
-
-
Advertisement
-
![[Deleted User]](/applications/dashboard/design/images/defaulticon.png)
Advertisement