Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi all! We have been experiencing an issue on site where threads have been missing the latest postings. The platform host Vanilla are working on this issue. A workaround that has been used by some is to navigate back from 1 to 10+ pages to re-sync the thread and this will then show the latest posts. Thanks, Mike.
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

MLB 2017 Regular Season Thread

1910121415

Comments

  • Closed Accounts Posts: 13,687 ✭✭✭✭jack presley


    September call ups tomorrow. Anyone else not like this?

    Fair enough, you're giving young players a chance but bullpen management goes out the window and that's one of the most intriguing things about the game.


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,137 ✭✭✭TimRiggins


    September call ups tomorrow. Anyone else not like this?

    Fair enough, you're giving young players a chance but bullpen management goes out the window and that's one of the most intriguing things about the game.

    Can't wait for managers to change pitcher for every single batter too :rolleyes:


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 13,687 ✭✭✭✭jack presley


    TimRiggins wrote: »
    Can't wait for managers to change pitcher for every single batter too :rolleyes:

    Meaning 4+ hour games then.


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,137 ✭✭✭TimRiggins


    Meaning 4+ hour games then.

    5+ for the Yankees!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,941 ✭✭✭krustydoyle


    You beat me to it!!!! 


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,469 ✭✭✭ShyMets


    Tigers actively (again!) looking to offload Verlander too. Possibly to the Astros. Bit of a de-ju feeling about this rumour though.

    Verlander traded to the Astros for three prospects. Detroit will be covering a portion of his salary also


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 13,687 ✭✭✭✭jack presley


    ShyMets wrote: »
    Verlander traded to the Astros for three prospects. Detroit will be covering a portion of his salary also

    https://twitter.com/nypost_mets/status/903477022709579776


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,865 ✭✭✭✭Igotadose


    In other news, Pete Rose fired by Fox sports. Maybe he'll go away now from the spotlight once and for all:
    https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/early-lead/wp/2017/09/01/fox-sports-reportedly-has-fired-pete-rose-over-underage-sex-allegations/?tid=sm_tw&utm_term=.c717529e218e

    And, for some rea$$$on the Mets are playing in Houston today (Saturday). Double header too. The two 1962 expansion teams having it out. Maybe Houston finally wins a WS this year. They shouldn't have much trouble with the Mets, ghods that's hard to say.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 13,687 ✭✭✭✭jack presley


    Igotadose wrote: »

    And, for some rea$$$on the Mets are playing in Houston today (Saturday). Double header too. The two 1962 expansion teams having it out. Maybe Houston finally wins a WS this year. They shouldn't have much trouble with the Mets, ghods that's hard to say.

    Stupid fact of the day: First ever double header in Minute Maid Park!


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,469 ✭✭✭ShyMets


    Conforto having surgery this week. Four to six months recovery time


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 13,687 ✭✭✭✭jack presley


    ShyMets wrote: »
    Conforto having surgery this week. Four to six months recovery time

    Timeframes are like dog years when announced by Mets medical staff. So when they say 4-6 months, it really means at least 9 months and more than likely out for the whole year.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 13,687 ✭✭✭✭jack presley


    There's probably a insensitive and inappropriate joke in there somewhere but Harvey pitching in Houston today has been a disaster.

    first inning - 37 pitches, 4 hits, 1 hbp, 4 runs.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,469 ✭✭✭ShyMets


    There's probably a insensitive and inappropriate joke in there somewhere but Harvey pitching in Houston today has been a disaster.

    first inning - 37 pitches, 4 hits, 1 hbp, 4 runs.

    Harvey had a stinker. Flores got hit in the face with a ball and left the game a bloody mess. The only bright spot was Jacob Rhame pitched pretty well for his big league debut


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,865 ✭✭✭✭Igotadose


    ShyMets wrote: »
    Harvey had a stinker. Flores got hit in the face with a ball and left the game a bloody mess. The only bright spot was Jacob Rhame pitched pretty well for his big league debut

    But at least the Mets signed Nori Aoki. Perhaps some of the Blue Jay fans here can tell us whether he's got anything left. The Mets didn't go scout the latest phenom in Japan, though. Most of the rest of MLB did.

    I'm still holding to my 100 loss prediction. Flores likely done now, too, broken nose that sure looked nasty. Mets minor league boosters will get their fill of Gavin Cecchini. Harvey will be back serving BP in a few days. Rest of the month is vs. the division, Cincinnati and the Cubs. They could mess up the Cub's clinching the division with a good series mid-September. Maybe the games remaining vs. the Marlins will matter to the Marlins chasing the wild card.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,469 ✭✭✭ShyMets


    Igotadose wrote: »
    But at least the Mets signed Nori Aoki. Perhaps some of the Blue Jay fans here can tell us whether he's got anything left. The Mets didn't go scout the latest phenom in Japan, though. Most of the rest of MLB did.

    I'm still holding to my 100 loss prediction. Flores likely done now, too, broken nose that sure looked nasty. Mets minor league boosters will get their fill of Gavin Cecchini. Harvey will be back serving BP in a few days. Rest of the month is vs. the division, Cincinnati and the Cubs. They could mess up the Cub's clinching the division with a good series mid-September. Maybe the games remaining vs. the Marlins will matter to the Marlins chasing the wild card.

    Amazing how the season has gone. At the start of it I was confident of making the post season. Now we're talking 100 loss season. Thankfully it will soon be over.

    Haven't seen much of Cecchini but what I read about him doesn't fill me with with much optimism. Still might as well call him up and take a look. Nothing to lose now.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 13,687 ✭✭✭✭jack presley


    It's taken until late August/early September but at last, the Dodgers are in a bit of a slump, 1/7 in their last eight. They could just be winding down and at least it isn't happening in early October but it'll be interesting to see how long it lasts.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,865 ✭✭✭✭Igotadose


    It's taken until late August/early September but at last, the Dodgers are in a bit of a slump, 1/7 in their last eight. They could just be winding down and at least it isn't happening in early October but it'll be interesting to see how long it lasts.
    They just got Kershaw back. That'll help :P


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 13,687 ✭✭✭✭jack presley


    Igotadose wrote: »
    They just got Kershaw back. That'll help :P

    He pitched that one win!


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,469 ✭✭✭ShyMets


    He pitched that one win!

    Lost again last night. I suspect its more a case of taking the foot of the gas. They're through to the post season. No point going hell for leather in essentially meaningless games.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,469 ✭✭✭ShyMets


    Rosario left the game last night in the eight inning. No word yet as to why. So fingers crossed!!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,865 ✭✭✭✭Igotadose


    ShyMets wrote: »
    Rosario left the game last night in the eight inning. No word yet as to why. So fingers crossed!!

    Bruised right index finger. Will be out for a few games.

    Swept by Houston. Ahh well.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,469 ✭✭✭ShyMets


    Igotadose wrote: »
    Bruised right index finger. Will be out for a few games.

    Swept by Houston. Ahh well.

    Mets speak for half his hand is falling offðŸ˜


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 13,687 ✭✭✭✭jack presley




  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,469 ✭✭✭ShyMets




  • Closed Accounts Posts: 13,687 ✭✭✭✭jack presley


    ShyMets wrote: »
    Do I laugh. Do I cry. Do I hit the Redbreast 12

    All 3.

    But don't worry, only another few weeks and then we can move on with our lives (which in my case will be getting equally frustrated as a Washington Redskins supporter!).


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,865 ✭✭✭✭Igotadose


    All 3.

    But don't worry, only another few weeks and then we can move on with our lives (which in my case will be getting equally frustrated as a Washington Redskins supporter!).

    Some of us follow the Jets. Can you imagine. This team might challenge the all-time losingest Jets team at 1-15.

    Today's Mets injury report: The following Mets will have surgery in the next few days:
    David Wright - Rotator Cuff
    TJ Rivera - Tommy John (and he's an infielder ffs!)
    Michael Conforto - Shoulder
    Josh Edgin - Knee

    Maybe Wright's finally done and they can go sign a 3rd baseman this offseason.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 13,687 ✭✭✭✭jack presley


    Igotadose wrote: »

    Today's Mets injury report: The following Mets will have surgery in the next few days:
    David Wright - Rotator Cuff
    TJ Rivera - Tommy John (and he's an infielder ffs!)
    Michael Conforto - Shoulder
    Josh Edgin - Knee.

    Only 4?

    There's still 6 innings of today's game left though.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 13,687 ✭✭✭✭jack presley


    I know they're probably in cruise mode at the moment so they're probably not too worried about the 1-9 in the last 10 but the Dodgers have been beaten by Arizona the last 4 times they've played.

    And presuming the D'backs negotiate the wild card game, they'll be playing each other in the NLDS. Arizona certainly won't be afraid going into that series. Interesting couple of games coming up for these tonight and tomorrow.


  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Yip, the Dodgers have finally hit a very bad run. Suppose it's better to go through it now, but they need to start turning things around quick enough


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,054 ✭✭✭boccy23


    I know they're probably in cruise mode at the moment so they're probably not too worried about the 1-9 in the last 10 but the Dodgers have been beaten by Arizona the last 4 times they've played.

    And presuming the D'backs negotiate the wild card game, they'll be playing each other in the NLDS. Arizona certainly won't be afraid going into that series. Interesting couple of games coming up for these tonight and tomorrow.

    Only downside for the Dbacks is that Paul Goldschmidt has been sent for an MRI on his elbow.
    WOuld be a huge blow if he is out.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,941 ✭✭✭krustydoyle


    Here's JD's 4 Homers against the Dodgers last night

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Szf0TeB2PKY


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,469 ✭✭✭ShyMets


    I know they're probably in cruise mode at the moment so they're probably not too worried about the 1-9 in the last 10 but the Dodgers have been beaten by Arizona the last 4 times they've played.

    And presuming the D'backs negotiate the wild card game, they'll be playing each other in the NLDS. Arizona certainly won't be afraid going into that series. Interesting couple of games coming up for these tonight and tomorrow.

    They're in a bit of a slump. But based on their form to date I expect them to be a different animal come the Post Season.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,054 ✭✭✭boccy23


    ShyMets wrote: »
    They're in a bit of a slump. But based on their form to date I expect them to be a different animal come the Post Season.

    There are certainly precedents for teams with huge win totals in the regular season falling at the first hurdle in the postseason once the pressure is reapplied. The 1988 Mets with 100 wins and the 2001 Mariners with 116 wins are two that spring to mind.


  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    boccy23 wrote: »
    There are certainly precedents for teams with huge win totals in the regular season falling at the first hurdle in the postseason once the pressure is reapplied. The 1988 Mets with 100 wins and the 2001 Mariners with 116 wins are two that spring to mind.

    Definitely, I'd rather be a team in form, coming through the wild card, than win a division, but playing poorly in September.
    Need to iron out problems over the next few weeks, and hopr to be back in form for the last two weeks of the season. 1-9 over the last 10 games is very bad


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 13,687 ✭✭✭✭jack presley


    I'm basing this on my dodgy memory as opposed to facts so maybe I'm not right but weren't they winning a lot of one run games earlier in the season? That might skew their record a bit as under normal circumstances, you'd lose a chunk of those games but they weren't so I'm thinking their record is a lot better than they actually are.

    Now I'm not saying they should be a 70 win team but they were on pace for 110 wins at one stage weren't they?

    And as said before, every team has a slump at some stage in the season and it's surprising that it's taken this long for the Dodgers to hit theirs.

    And as others have said, you're better off coming into October hot as opposed to winning 95 games and being cold but the Dodgers still have a few weeks to sort themselves out.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,054 ✭✭✭boccy23


    I'm basing this on my dodgy memory as opposed to facts so maybe I'm not right but weren't they winning a lot of one run games earlier in the season? That might skew their record a bit as under normal circumstances, you'd lose a chunk of those games but they weren't so I'm thinking their record is a lot better than they actually are.

    Now I'm not saying they should be a 70 win team but they were on pace for 110 wins at one stage weren't they?

    And as said before, every team has a slump at some stage in the season and it's surprising that it's taken this long for the Dodgers to hit theirs.

    And as others have said, you're better off coming into October hot as opposed to winning 95 games and being cold but the Dodgers still have a few weeks to sort themselves out.

    They have a +189 run differential, first in baseball.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 13,687 ✭✭✭✭jack presley


    Ah right. Well there's my theory out the window.

    (And they are only 23-15 in one run games so nothing to see here. Carry on!)


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,469 ✭✭✭ShyMets


    boccy23 wrote: »
    They have a +189 run differential, first in baseball.

    I just feel that the Dodgers have too much quality and depth to loss to the Diamondbacks in the Post Season.

    In saying that their remaining schedule in the regular season is tricky. Plenty of scope to drop a few series.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,366 ✭✭✭✭8-10


    ShyMets wrote: »
    I just feel that the Dodgers have too much quality and depth to loss to the Diamondbacks in the Post Season.

    Except to Robbie Ray that is. Did anyone see his performance last night? 7 and 2/3's scoreless pitched, no walks, 14 strikeouts, perfect game to the 6th inning.

    What does Ray have to do to be considered an elite starting pitcher? He never seems to be mentioned in that bracket and yet he's had FOUR appearances v's the Dodgers this season with more than 10 strikeouts.....that's the best team in baseball he's nullifying.

    And plated a couple of runs while at bat....he's some man


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,589 ✭✭✭circular flexing


    boccy23 wrote: »
    There are certainly precedents for teams with huge win totals in the regular season falling at the first hurdle in the postseason once the pressure is reapplied. The 1988 Mets with 100 wins and the 2001 Mariners with 116 wins are two that spring to mind.

    Just to clarify the 2001 Mariners made it to the ALCS (beat the Indians in the ALDS).

    The problem with the post season is the sample size is so small, especially the Divisional Series, all it takes is a couple of pitchers to have a bad outing and you're in the hole.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,865 ✭✭✭✭Igotadose


    boccy23 wrote: »
    There are certainly precedents for teams with huge win totals in the regular season falling at the first hurdle in the postseason once the pressure is reapplied. The 1988 Mets with 100 wins and the 2001 Mariners with 116 wins are two that spring to mind.

    Agh. 1988. Where's the whiskey... Mickey Hatcher...Mike Scioscia... Who? Of course there was that Hershiser guy too.. And some dude with goo on his hat in the bullpen. Dave something.

    Always felt 1988 was karma for 1986.


    Mets were something like 11-1 vs. the Dodgers that regular season. Shows how much getting hot at the right time, matters. None of those Dodgers ever had as good a year as they had, that year.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,941 ✭✭✭krustydoyle


    So the Red Sox are in trouble for sign steeling using Apple Watches apparently


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 13,687 ✭✭✭✭jack presley


    So the Red Sox are in trouble for sign steeling using Apple Watches apparently

    So there is a use for the Apple Watch after all.

    EDIT - Nice counter claim by the Red Sox too.


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,137 ✭✭✭TimRiggins


    Verlander debuting for the Astros tonight.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,469 ✭✭✭ShyMets


    TimRiggins wrote: »
    Verlander debuting for the Astros tonight.

    He finished with 6 IP, 6 H, 1 R, 1 BB, 7 SO.

    Solid start Mr Velander


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,380 ✭✭✭The Reservoir Dubs Anchorman


    ShyMets wrote: »
    I just feel that the Dodgers have too much quality and depth to loss to the Diamondbacks in the Post Season.

    In saying that their remaining schedule in the regular season is tricky. Plenty of scope to drop a few series.

    I disagree with this. The Diamondbacks are good, very good, solid hitting and they have the rotation to beat the Dodgers. You only need 3 good starters in the post season and the Diamondbacks have that and a really solid bull pen.

    Also they will face the Dodgers in the first round as a Wild Card , given they are in the same division it will literally come down to who performs best on the day as they are built to play against each other.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 13,687 ✭✭✭✭jack presley


    Being on the DL must make you lose your mind and make you do strange things.

    https://twitter.com/cut4/status/905209918172651520


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,469 ✭✭✭ShyMets


    I disagree with this. The Diamondbacks are good, very good, solid hitting and they have the rotation to beat the Dodgers. You only need 3 good starters in the post season and the Diamondbacks have that and a really solid bull pen.

    Also they will face the Dodgers in the first round as a Wild Card , given they are in the same division it will literally come down to who performs best on the day as they are built to play against each other.

    I don't disagree with any of that. The Diamondbacks are a good team. Much better then anticipated at the start of the season. I just think the Dodgers will have too much for them in the Post Season.

    But time will tell


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,380 ✭✭✭The Reservoir Dubs Anchorman


    ShyMets wrote: »
    I don't disagree with any of that. The Diamondbacks are a good team. Much better then anticipated at the start of the season. I just think the Dodgers will have too much for them in the Post Season.

    But time will tell

    The Diamondbacks are on fire right now. Their rotation and bullpen is hot at the right time. And they have pressure hitters. The Dodgers line up is struggling big time. they need to snap out of it.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,589 ✭✭✭circular flexing


    ShyMets wrote: »
    I don't disagree with any of that. The Diamondbacks are a good team. Much better then anticipated at the start of the season. I just think the Dodgers will have too much for them in the Post Season.

    But time will tell

    The Dodgers have plenty of recent history of bottling it in the postseason.


Advertisement