Elderly man gets his shotgun back.

tac foley

If you're a soda-pop can you'd better look out........................

tac

biscuithead

Grizzly 45 wrote: »

Typical tho, revoke the license and confiscate the gun...And then come up with a load of Whatifery...[What if the neighbours or postman came up and was shot?:rolleyes: in court to try and deny it to him,....Absolute disgrace that this old gent even had to go to court to get his license. I wonder what the Supers excuse would have been if this ol guy had been attacked again while he confiscated his firearm to prevent mass carnage in county Limerick?? Best to shoot,shovel, and shut up it seems.

Isn't that more of your "whatifery"?

Grizzly 45

Proably more likely than him going on a rampage??
As our ethnic minority are known to extract revenge occasionally on those who deny them their rights to aquire items that aren't nailed down with railway spikes and gaurded by slavering Rottweilers.The super would also have to take into consideration of the old guys protection as although no police force is obligated to "protect and serve" any citizen,as it literally cannot do this and any police officer will tell you they are a reactive force not a proactive force.However as the saying goes,"when seconds count the police are minutes[or in our cases sometimes hours] away"

So where would our Super have stood IF the above had happened?Not obliged to protect this old guy,and proably not enough manpower or resources to do so either.Removed his sole "first response"equipment to such a threat? In Ireland.no doubt promoted and congratulated and a pay rise after a quick enquiry which finds no one to blame and no body's fault,move along..:rolleyes: Thussly doing more damage to whats left of AGS reputation of a force for the people.
Anywhere else,pillioried by the media,and a serious dragging over very hot coals of an enquiry as to why they left a eldely vunerable person in that situation.
But do tell ,what would your solution be??

123shooter

biscuithead wrote: »

Isn't that more of your "whatifery"?

Whatifery is used a lot by the lefties to justify what they want imposed on us all.

gunny123

Grizzly 45 wrote: »

Proably more likely than him going on a rampage??
As our ethnic minority are known to extract revenge occasionally on those who deny them their rights to aquire items that aren't nailed down with railway spikes and gaurded by slavering Rottweilers.The super would also have to take into consideration of the old guys protection as although no police force is obligated to "protect and serve" any citizen,as it literally cannot do this and any police officer will tell you they are a reactive force not a proactive force.However as the saying goes,"when seconds count the police are minutes[or in our cases sometimes hours] away"

So where would our Super have stood IF the above had happened?Not obliged to protect this old guy,and proably not enough manpower or resources to do so either.Removed his sole "first response"equipment to such a threat? In Ireland.no doubt promoted and congratulated and a pay rise after a quick enquiry which finds no one to blame and no body's fault,move along..:rolleyes: Thussly doing more damage to whats left of AGS reputation of a force for the people.
Anywhere else,pillioried by the media,and a serious dragging over very hot coals of an enquiry as to why they left a eldely vunerable person in that situation.
But do tell ,what would your solution be??

WACIST WACIST, WACIST. Standard answer from the caviar socalists.

Sparks

gunny123 wrote: »

WACIST WACIST, WACIST. Standard answer from the caviar socalists.

Standard answer from me too.
Knock that ****e on the head there please.
It's what leads to the D4 types standing in protest to prevent emergency resettling of families after six children burn to death in front of them.
And frankly, we have all been far more badly screwed over by bankers in suits than we ever have been by travellers. Unless someone has a story about how travellers stole somewhere around 70 billion euro from them?